Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Clin Anesth ; 4(6): 444-7, 1992.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-1360803

ABSTRACT

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To define the ability of esmolol and alfentanil to control the hemodynamic changes associated with extubation and emergence. DESIGN: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. SETTING: General surgery operating rooms at a university hospital. PATIENTS: Forty-two ASA physical status I and II patients without history of cardiac or pulmonary disease undergoing surgery not involving the cranium or thorax. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were given either a bolus dose of normal saline followed by an infusion of normal saline, a bolus dose of alfentanil 5 micrograms/kg followed by an infusion of normal saline, or a bolus dose of esmolol 500 micrograms/kg followed by an infusion of esmolol 300 micrograms/kg/min. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Emergency and extubation resulted in significant increases in heart rate (HR) and blood pressure (BP) in the placebo group. Alfentanil controlled the responses to emergence but prolonged the time to extubation (p < 0.05). Esmolol significantly controlled the responses to emergence and extubation (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Emergence and extubation after inhalation general anesthesia result in significant increases in BP and HR in healthy patients. An esmolol bolus dose and subsequent infusion significantly attenuated these responses. A small bolus dose of alfentanil minimized the responses to emergence but prolonged the time to extubation and was no longer protective at that point.


Subject(s)
Adrenergic beta-Antagonists/therapeutic use , Alfentanil/therapeutic use , Anesthesia Recovery Period , Hemodynamics/drug effects , Propanolamines/therapeutic use , Adult , Double-Blind Method , Female , Hemodynamics/physiology , Humans , Male , Surgical Procedures, Operative
2.
Anaesthesia ; 47(11): 959-61, 1992 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-1466436

ABSTRACT

The collateral circulation to the hand was evaluated on 70 hands of healthy volunteers. Comparisons were made between the results of the modified Allen's test alone and the Allen's test combined with either plethysmography or digital blood pressure. The modified Allen's test requires patient cooperation and the results can be subjective. Plethysmography does not require patient cooperation and produces a signal that varies directly with flow; however, this is not a quantifiable signal. Digital blood pressure (measured by the 2300 Finapres noninvasive blood pressure monitor, Ohmeda, Englewood, CO, USA) also requires no patient cooperation. The values produced are of clinical value and reproducible. Both the plethysmograph and digital blood pressure monitors were able to demonstrate the dominant arterial vessel of the hand. The digital blood pressure monitor produces an objective recordable numerical value, an accepted clinical parameter, and it does not require patient cooperation. The use of a digital blood pressure monitor may prove to be an acceptable alternative to the traditional Allen's test.


Subject(s)
Blood Pressure/physiology , Collateral Circulation/physiology , Hand/blood supply , Blood Pressure Determination/instrumentation , Constriction , Fingers/blood supply , Hand/physiology , Humans , Plethysmography , Radial Artery/physiology , Ulnar Artery/physiology
3.
J Clin Monit ; 8(1): 28-32, 1992 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-1538249

ABSTRACT

In 1929, Edgar V. Allen described a noninvasive evaluation of the patency of the arterial supply to the hand of patients with thromboangitis obliterans (Am J Med Sci 1929; 178:237). In the early 1950s, Allen's test was modified (Wright I. Vascular diseases in clinical practice. Chicago: Year Book Medical Publishers, 1952) for use as a test of collateral circulation prior to arterial cannulation. This test involves the examiner occluding the patient's ulnar and radial arteries while the patient makes a fist, causing the hand to blanch. The patient is then asked to extend the fingers. After the hand is open, the examiner releases the ulnar artery while continuing to maintain pressure on the radial artery. Adequate collateral circulation is felt to be indicated by return of normal color to the hand. The patient is instructed not to hyperextend the fingers when opening the hand. Hyperextension may cause a decrease in perfusion to the arch, possibly resulting in a false interpretation of the Allen test (Anesthesiology 1972;37:356). The modified Allen's test can be performed quickly and easily, but it is susceptible to error. (With Allen's original test, both hands were tested simultaneously. The patient clenched both fists tightly for 1 minute while the examiner compressed one artery of each hand. This method helps diagnose complete occlusion, just as Allen intended. The test was later modified, however, to evaluate the adequacy of collateral circulation. To perform the modified Allen's test, the examiner compresses both arteries while the patient's fist are clenched.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)


Subject(s)
Collateral Circulation/physiology , Hand/blood supply , Adult , Brachial Artery/physiology , Constriction , Humans , Middle Aged , Monitoring, Physiologic/methods , Oximetry , Plethysmography , Radius/blood supply , Regional Blood Flow/physiology , Sensitivity and Specificity , Ulna/blood supply
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...