Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 7 de 7
Filter
1.
Int J Clin Pract ; 58(10): 928-31, 2004 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15587771

ABSTRACT

Surgical stress may cause neural, endocrine, metabolic and humoral responses depending on the severity of the procedure. In this study, we aimed to study the effect of the preoperatively given ascorbic acid (AA), which is an antioxidant, and its role in the biosynthesis of neuropituitary hormones on the surgical stress response. Twenty-two American Society of Anaesthesiologists I and II patients ageing between 18 and 40, who have no endocrine and metabolic disease, and undergoing abdominal operation for non-malignant diseases were allocated to the study. These non-premedicated patients were divided into two groups in random: Group I, etomidate group; and Group II, AA plus etomidate group. AA was given to patients in Group II 20min before etomidate injection. After monitoring the patient, anaesthetic induction was applied by giving 0.3 mg/kg of etomidate, 2 microg/kg of fentanyl and 0.1 mg/kg of vecuronium. Anaesthesia was continued with 1-0.7% isoflurane and N2O/O2 (67 and 37%, respectively). Tramadol was given for the management of post-operative analgesia. Blood samples were obtained from all patients before the operation and at second, sixth, twelfth and twenty-forth hours after the beginning of operation for cortisol, adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH), osteocalcin, insulin and blood glucose level analyses. There was no statistically significant difference in cortisol, osteocalcin, insulin and glucose levels in both groups, when compared to the control levels. Whereas, patients in Group II had higher levels of cortisol than the control group at sixth hour, which were in normal limits, and there was no decrease in osteocalcin concentration. ACTH level was increased at the second and sixth hours, which was statistically significant, but at twelfth and twenty-forth hours, they were close to control group levels. As a result, we conclude that AA given before anaesthesia achieved by etomidate is not sufficient for the prevention of surgical stress response and that AA induction before anaesthesia should be preferred, particularly for the prevention of decrease in osteocalcin levels.


Subject(s)
Anesthetics, Intravenous/administration & dosage , Antioxidants/administration & dosage , Ascorbic Acid/administration & dosage , Etomidate/administration & dosage , Hysterectomy/psychology , Stress, Physiological/prevention & control , Adolescent , Adrenocorticotropic Hormone/blood , Adult , Blood Glucose/analysis , Drug Therapy, Combination , Female , Humans , Hydrocortisone/blood , Insulin/blood , Osteocalcin/blood , Stress, Physiological/blood , Treatment Outcome
2.
Agri ; 16(1): 64-8, 2004 Jan.
Article in Turkish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15152590

ABSTRACT

Epidural analgesia (EA) is one of the most commonly used techniques in obstetric analgesia. Our objective was to evaluate patients who experienced EA during labour as well as to find out their knowledge, attitude and behaviour in this matter, prospectively. Between 1997 and 2002, a questionnaire, "patient evaluation form for EA", was delivered to 190 obstetric patients. The patients were divided into two groups. In Group I there were 100 patients who were evaluated between 1997 and 1999, and Group II was comprised of 90 patients who were evaluated between 2000 and 2002. Demographic data of the patients were similar in both groups. The question "How have you been informed about EA?" was replied as "TV or newspaper" by 50% of the patients in Group I while the answer was "from someone who experienced it before" by 60% of the patients in Group II (p < 0.01). With these information about EA, 30% and 40% of the patients in Group I were found out to be worried about neural paralysis and some possible disorders related to their babies, respectively. However, 40% of the patients in Grup II worried about back pain and headache (p < 0.01). As a result, considering the mother candidates' high information rate from someone who experienced EA before (60%), interest to the labour analgesia will increase as the mothers are satisfied with the results of EA.


Subject(s)
Analgesia, Epidural , Analgesia, Obstetrical , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Labor, Obstetric , Pain/prevention & control , Adult , Analgesia, Epidural/psychology , Analgesia, Obstetrical/psychology , Female , Humans , Labor, Obstetric/psychology , Pain/psychology , Patient Education as Topic , Patient Satisfaction , Pregnancy , Prospective Studies , Surveys and Questionnaires , Turkey
3.
Int J Clin Pract ; 57(7): 585-7, 2003 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14529058

ABSTRACT

We prospectively investigated the outcome of a combination therapy of oral amitriptyline and sympathetic ganglion blockade on 10 patients suffering from reflex sympathetic dystrophy of the upper extremity for at least three months. The efficacy of the treatment was evaluated by clinical examination, pain ratings on the visual analogue scale (VAS) and grip strength measurements using the Jamar dynamometer. The results were statistically analysed with Wilcoxon signed-ranks test for comparison of the before and after treatment grip strength measurements and with paired t-test for comparison of the mean of initial and consecutive pain ratings on the VAS. Values of p < 0.01 were considered to be statistically significant. Combination therapy proved beneficial in this particular patient population, which, as far as previously documented studies are concerned, would otherwise respond less favourably to a treatment consisting solely of sympathetic blockade.


Subject(s)
Amitriptyline/therapeutic use , Analgesics, Non-Narcotic/therapeutic use , Anesthetics, Local/therapeutic use , Bupivacaine/therapeutic use , Reflex Sympathetic Dystrophy/drug therapy , Sympatholytics/therapeutic use , Adult , Drug Therapy, Combination , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Treatment Outcome
4.
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol ; 24(2): 181-4, 2003.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12701975

ABSTRACT

Ketoprofen is a NSAIDs of the 2-aryl propionic acid class commonly used in the treatment of inflammatory rheumatic disease, acute pain and fever. Clinically, ketoprofen seems to reduce morphine requirements by 33 to 40% with ketoprofen's supposed central mechanism of analgesia. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of intravenous (IV) ketoprofen as an adjuvant to IV PCA (patient controlled analgesia) with tramadol after major gynecological cancer surgery for postoperative analgesia. Fifty patients were enrolled in this double-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled study. Patients were allocated randomly to two groups: group I (25 patients) served as a control group, with patients receiving saline; group II (25 patients) received ketoprofen. Patients received an intravenous bolus of saline or 100 mg ketoprofen at the end of surgery. Then, PCA was given as a 20 mg tramadol bolus and 10 min lockout time. Pain relief was regularly assessed using a visual analog scale. Tramadol consumption, side-effects, and patient satisfaction were noted during the 24 hours after the surgery. No significant difference was observed in pain score, side-effects and patient satisfaction between the groups (p > 0.05). The cumulative PCA-tramadol consumption was lower in the ketoprofen-treated patients than placebo-treated patients (p < 0.05). Our results demonstrate that a single dose of 100 mg ketoprofen reduced tramadol consumption for treatment of postoperative pain after major gynecological cancer surgery.


Subject(s)
Analgesia, Patient-Controlled , Analgesics, Opioid/therapeutic use , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/therapeutic use , Gynecologic Surgical Procedures , Ketoprofen/therapeutic use , Pain, Postoperative/drug therapy , Tramadol/therapeutic use , Abdomen/surgery , Adult , Aged , Double-Blind Method , Drug Therapy, Combination , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Ovarian Neoplasms/surgery , Pain Measurement , Treatment Outcome , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/surgery
5.
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol ; 23(4): 366-8, 2002.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12214748

ABSTRACT

Infection is a potentially serious complication of long-term epidural (EP) catheterization in cancer patients. Although the use of epidural opioid analgesia is an effective and safe means for pain relief in terminally ill patients, these patients are in need of monitorization for possible infection. This is the first report in which EP catheter cultivation has been assessed in an immunocompromised and febrile neutropenic endometrial cancer patient.


Subject(s)
Anesthesia, Epidural/adverse effects , Bone Neoplasms/complications , Carcinoma/complications , Catheterization/adverse effects , Endometrial Neoplasms/complications , Fever/etiology , Analgesics, Opioid/administration & dosage , Bone Neoplasms/secondary , Carcinoma/pathology , Endometrial Neoplasms/pathology , Female , Humans , Immunocompromised Host , Middle Aged , Morphine/administration & dosage , Neutropenia/complications , Rectovaginal Fistula/complications
6.
Eur J Anaesthesiol ; 19(4): 271-5, 2002 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12074416

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Epidural analgesia is the most effective method for pain relief during labour. The aim was to elucidate the efficacy of ropivacaine 0.05% and bupivacaine 0.05%, which were both combined with fentanyl 0.00015% to provide analgesia in labour. METHODS: Forty nulliparous females were enrolled into the study. After insertion of an epidural catheter, patients were randomly assigned into two groups. Once the os uteri had dilated to 4-5 cm, a bolus of bupivacaine 0.125% 10mL + fentanyl 50 microg (1 mL) in Group 1 patients, and ropivacaine 0.125% 10mL + fentanyl 50 microg (1 mL) in Group 2 patients was administered via the epidural catheter. Then, patient-controlled epidural analgesia was started with a basal infusion of bupivacaine 0.05% 10 mLh(-1) + fentanyl 0.00015% 1.5 pgmL(-1) in Group 1, and ropivacaine 0.05% + fentanyl 1.5 microgmL(-1) in Group 2. When needed, a 10 mL bolus infusion could be given and the lockout time was 20 min. Maternal and fetal haemodynamic variables were monitored before induction and subsequently at 5 min intervals. Using a visual analogue scale assessed the degree of pain. RESULTS: Maternal haemodynamic variables and Apgar scores were not different between the two groups. The second stage of the labour was shorter in Group 2 (P < 0.01). There were no significant differences in patients' assessment of motor block or mode of delivery between groups. CONCLUSIONS: An epidural infusion (10 mLh(-1)) of bupivacaine 0.05% or ropivacaine 0.05% together with fentanyl 1.5 microg mL(-1) provided good and safe analgesia during labour.


Subject(s)
Amides/administration & dosage , Analgesia, Epidural , Analgesia, Obstetrical , Analgesia, Patient-Controlled , Analgesics, Opioid/administration & dosage , Anesthetics, Local/administration & dosage , Bupivacaine/administration & dosage , Fentanyl/administration & dosage , Adult , Double-Blind Method , Drug Combinations , Female , Humans , Ropivacaine
7.
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol ; 23(6): 527-32, 2002.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12556097

ABSTRACT

In this study the pathophysiology and characteristics of cancer pain together with cancer pain syndromes and guidelines of management are reviewed. Tumour-associated pain may be nociceptive (somatic or visceral) if the sustaining mechanisms are related to ongoing tissue pathology, or neuropathic when pain is associated with injury to neural tissues. The mechanism by which tumours produce pain include obstruction of lymphatic and vascular channels, distension of a hollow viscous, oedema and tissue inflammation or necrosis. Injury to tissues results in the local release of numerous chemicals that mediate transmission of pain stimulus. Cancer pain syndromes result from one or more of three fundamental causes; direct tumour involvement of tissues, cancer-directed therapy, and mechanisms unrelated to cancer or its treatment. Cancer pain syndromes are also classified as acute or chronic. Cancer pain characteristics provide some of the data essential for syndrome identification. These characteristics include intensity, quality, distribution and temporal relationships. The principles of tumour-directed pain control include modifying the source of pain by treating the cancer and the inflammatory response to cancer, altering the central perception of pain and interfering with nociceptive transmission within the central nervous system.


Subject(s)
Neoplasms , Pain, Intractable/prevention & control , Pain, Intractable/physiopathology , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Humans , Pain Measurement , Syndrome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...