Perineal bowel evisceration after extralevator abdominoperineal excision and vertical rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap closure.

INTRODUCTION: Perineal bowel evisceration is a rare complication after extralevator abdominoperineal excision (ELAPE). This surgical technique is used to resect low rectal and anal cancer, with a lower likelihood of positive surgical margins, but resulting in a larger perineal defect. A vertical rectus abdominis myocutaneous (VRAM) flap allows filling of the empty pelvic space and closure of the defect in the pelvic floor. CASE PRESENTATION: A 77-year-old woman, with a hysterectomy in her medical history, underwent an ELAPE followed by reconstruction of the perineal defect with a VRAM flap after neoadjuvant radiotherapy for a moderately differentiated invasive adenocarcinoma of the distal rectum. The postoperative course was complicated with a herniation of the perineal wound and evisceration of a bowel loop. CONCLUSION: Closure of the perineal defect after ELAPE remains a challenge, especially in cases where several risk factors for delayed wound healing, flap failure and perineal herniation are present.

Martius flap reconstruction for rectovaginal fistula after stapled hemorrhoidopexy (Longo operation): a case report.

PURPOSE: A rectovaginal fistula (RVF) is a rare disease. It's an epithelium-lined abnormal communication between rectum and vagina. It represents approximately 5% of all anorectal fistulas. RVF may have different causes. METHODS: We present a case of a 58-year-old woman with a rectovaginal fistula after stapled hemorrhoidopexy (Longo operation). RESULTS: A 58-year-old woman presented herself in our department with vaginal fecal discharge and vaginitis almost one month after a stapled hemorrhoidopexy was performed in another hospital. On vaginal examination, a large dorsal defect was palpated at four cm. On rectal examination, the stapler line was palpable at four cm and just distal to this stapler line, a large defect could be palpated. A lower gastrointestinal tract radiography was performed and identified a RVF. The patient was put on antibiotics and two operations were planned. First, a temporary ileostomy was created. After healing of the vaginitis, reconstructive surgery with anatomic fistula repair in combination with the interposition of healthy, vascularised tissue was performed. In this case, we chose the Martius flap. The operation as well as the postoperative course was uneventful. CONCLUSIONS: Cases of postoperative RVF have been increasingly reported since the introduction of stapled hemorrhoidopexy. Patients with RVF can have a varying degree of symptoms. Diagnosis is primarily based on the patient's medical history together with a clinical examination. There are many surgical approaches for RVF. Anatomic fistula repair alone is associated with lower success rates compared with combined procedures with the adjunctive interposition of healthy, vascularised tissue.