Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Publication year range
1.
Rev Med Liege ; 79(S1): 62-65, 2024 May.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38778652

ABSTRACT

Spirituality (in addition to laughter) is inherent to humans. When their health deteriorates, especially in the field of oncology, people often seek help through it. Prayer is the most commonly used tool and is sometimes entrusted to a particular person believed to possess certain powers referred to as a «fire cutter¼. It is then used in a targeted manner against specific symptoms such as burns. No biophysical effects are known. This intercession brings secondary benefits (positive effects on anxiety, stress, placebo effect) that can improve the patients' health. It is not the healthcare provider's mission to prescribe these spiritual practices, but they should be able to recognize them and openly discuss with patient who choose to use them, knowing that a benefit is likely to be reached.


La spiritualité (en plus du rire) est le propre de l'homme. Quand son état de santé se dégrade, en particulier en cancérologie, il y cherche souvent une aide. La prière est l'outil le plus souvent utilisé. Elle est parfois confiée à une personne particulière dotée de certains pouvoirs appelée «coupeur de feu¼. La prière est alors utilisée de manière ciblée contre une symptomatologie spécifique type brûlure. Aucun effet biophysique n'est connu. Cette intercession amène des bénéfices secondaires (effet sur l'anxiété, le stress, effet placebo) à même d'améliorer l'état de santé des patients. Le soignant n'a pas pour mission de prescrire ces accompagnements qui relèvent du spirituel, mais doit savoir les reconnaître et en discuter de manière ouverte avec le patient y ayant recours, sachant qu'un bénéfice sera vraisemblablement au rendez-vous.


Subject(s)
Spirituality , Humans , Neoplasms
2.
Rev Med Liege ; 79(S1): 113-116, 2024 May.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38778658

ABSTRACT

Inform, prevent, educate and encourage are the key words must be the keywords of all stakeholders who take care of a patient with ENT cancer in order to potentiate the effectiveness of the different treatments but also to improve the quality of life of patients.


Les cancers ORL sont favorisés par le tabagisme. Beaucoup de nos patients ne connaissent pas les conséquences qui découlent de leur assuétude. Informer, prévenir, éduquer et encourager doivent être les mots clé de tous les intervenants qui prennent en charge un patient atteint d'un cancer ORL afin de potentialiser l'efficacité des différents traitements mais aussi d'améliorer la qualité de vie des patients.


Subject(s)
Smoking Cessation , Humans , Smoking Cessation/methods , Head and Neck Neoplasms/therapy , Head and Neck Neoplasms/psychology , Quality of Life
3.
J BUON ; 21(4): 979-988, 2016.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27685923

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Although commonly used for the treatment of locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) concomitant radio-chemotherapy (RT-CT) with weekly cisplatin has not been definitely studied. We conducted a single centre retrospective study with the aim to evaluate efficacy and acute toxicity of definitive concomitant RT-CT with 40 mg/m2 weekly cisplatin in patients with locally advanced HNSCC with a particular emphasis on RT modality (conventional or accelerated) and dose of cisplatin delivered. METHODS: One hundred and twelve consecutive patients were included. They were given cisplatin 40 mg/m2)week concomitantly with conventionally fractionated (CFRT) (N=33) or accelerated (ART) (N=79) RT. RESULTS: RT was delivered according to the treatment plan in 104 patients and full dose was given to 107 patients. A median cumulative cisplatin dose of 240 mg/m2 was administered to patients treated with CFRT and of 200 mg/m2 to those treated with ART. Overall complete response rate was 81.3%. With a median follow up of 38.4 months, median overall survival (OS) was 75 months, not influenced by RT type or cisplatin dose received. The most clinically significant grade 3 or 4 acute toxicities were stomatitis (35.7%), neutropenia (25%), anemia (12.5%) and acute kidney injury (5.4%). CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows that a median cumulative dose of 200 mg/m2 cisplatin can be safely administered using a weekly regimen to patients treated with concomitant RT (CFRT or ART). Efficacy results and toxicity compare favorably with those described with triweekly cisplatin RT-CT, suggesting that a randomized comparison should be undertaken.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/drug therapy , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/radiotherapy , Cisplatin/administration & dosage , Head and Neck Neoplasms/drug therapy , Head and Neck Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Adult , Aged , Combined Modality Therapy/methods , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Radiotherapy Dosage
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...