HCV-HIV coinfected pregnant women: data from a multicentre study in Italy.

PURPOSE: To provide information about main pregnancy outcomes in HIV-HCV coinfected women and about the possible interactions between HIV and HCV in this particular population. METHODS: Data from a multicenter observational study of pregnant women with HIV, conducted in Italian University and Hospital Clinics between 2001 and 2015, were used. Eligibility criteria for analysis were HCV coinfection and at least one detectable plasma HCV-RNA viral load measured during pregnancy. Qualitative variables were compared using the Chi-square or the Fisher test and quantitative variables using the Mann-Whitney U test. The Spearman's coefficient was used to evaluate correlations between quantitative variables. RESULTS: Among 105 women with positive HCV-RNA, median HCV viral load was substantially identical at the three trimesters (5.68, 5.45, and 5.86 log IU/ml, respectively), and 85.7 % of the women had at least one HCV-RNA value >5 log IU/ml. Rate of preterm delivery was 28.6 % with HCV-RNA <5 log IU/ml and 43.2 % with HCV-RNA >5log (p = 0.309). Compared to women with term delivery, women with preterm delivery had higher median HCV-RNA levels (third trimester: 6.00 vs. 5.62 log IU/ml, p = 0.037). Third trimester HIV-RNA levels were below 50 copies/ml in 47.7 % of the cases. No cases of vertical HIV transmission occurred. Rate of HCV transmission was 9.0 % and occurred only with HCV-RNA levels >5 log IU/ml. CONCLUSIONS: Coinfection with HIV and HCV has relevant consequences in pregnancy: HIV coinfection is associated with high HCV-RNA levels that might favour HCV transmission, and HCV infection might further increase the risk of preterm delivery in women with HIV. HCV/HIV coinfected women should be considered a population at high risk of adverse outcomes.

Hepatitis B virus mother-to-child transmission among HIV-infected women receiving lamivudine-containing antiretroviral regimens during pregnancy and breastfeeding.

The study included 309 HIV-infected pregnant women receiving a lamivudine-containing antiretroviral regimen from week 25 of gestational age until 6 months postpartum, during breastfeeding. Twenty-seven of them (8.7%) were hepatitis B virus surface antigen (HBsAg) positive; at baseline, hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA levels >3 log(10) IU/mL (with a median level of 6.2 log(10) IU/mL) were found in 10 women, who at one, three and six months postpartum had median levels of 5.2 log(10) IU/mL, 4.5 log(10) IU/mL and 2.8 log(10) IU/mL, respectively. Twenty-four of the 30 breast milk samples evaluated had undetectable HBV DNA and the other six had values between 15 and 155 IU/mL. Median lamivudine concentrations were 1070 ng/mL in serum and 684 ng/mL in breast milk. Among the 24 HBV-exposed children with available samples, 16 always tested negative, four had a transient infection, one had an undetermined status and three (12.5%) first tested positive at Month 12 or Month 24. Among the children born to the HBV-uninfected mothers of the same cohort, the rate of HBsAg positivity at 12-24 months was 2% (4/196). Our finding of the absence of significative levels of HBV DNA in the breast milk of co-infected mothers supports the present recommendations for breastfeeding in HBV-infected women. Horizontal transmission can be hypothesized for the infections detected in children at 12-24 months. Children born to HBV-positive mothers remained at higher risk of postnatal HBV acquisition compared to those born to HBV-negative women.

A Simplified HAART Regimen with Raltegravir and Lamivudine, and Pharmacokinetic Interactions with a Combined Immunosuppressive Therapy with Tacrolimus and Everolimus in an HIV/HCV/HBV/HDV Patient after Liver Transplantation.

In this case report, we examine the impact of a simplified two-drug highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) regimen of raltegravir and lamivudine in a patient co-infected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and hepatitis C, D and B viruses (HCV/HDV/HBV) under immunosuppressive therapy after liver transplantation. Pharmacokinetic interactions between integrase inhibitors and immunosuppressant drugs are described. Raltegravir, the first integrase inhibitor, associated with lamivudine, was introduced because its metabolism does not interfere with immunosuppressant therapy. During post-orthotopic liver transplantation follow-up, the patient's transaminases level increased and his antiretroviral therapy (HAART) of tenofovir/emtricitabine and fosamprenavir was changed, due to suspected drug toxicity. After seven months of follow-up, the patient showed good tolerance, good viro-immunological control with undetectable HIV viraemia and stable concentrations of immunosuppressive drugs. This case indicates that the combination of raltegravir and lamivudine is an optimal and effective strategy because it resulted in an important reduction of hepatic transaminases in a patient with very critical clinical conditions.

HIV-1 coreceptor switch during 2 years of structured treatment interruptions.

The purpose of this investigation was to determine the impact on human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) tropism of uncontrolled virus exposure during 2 years of intermittent highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART). The Istituto Superiore di Sanità-Pulsed Antiretroviral Therapy (ISS-PART) randomized study compared the outcome of 2 years of structured treatment interruptions (STIs) versus standard continuous treatment in first-line HAART responder subjects. The STI schedule consisted of five STIs of 1, 1, 2, 2, and 3 months, respectively, separated by four periods of 3-month therapy. In the present study, coreceptor tropism was assessed in 12 patients of the STI arm at different time points over a period of 2 years. Tropism was determined on DNA and RNA by V3 loop region sequencing. The Geno2pheno algorithm (false-positive rate, FPR: 20%) was used for data interpretation. At baseline, 9/12 subjects (75.0%) had CCR5-tropic viruses in their HIV. Three had a CXCR4-tropic virus. Ten patients maintained the same coreceptor in DNA after 2 years, whereas in two patients, a shift occurred (one R5-X4, one X4-R5). In a patient with an R5 virus at baseline, a transient change to X4 tropism was seen in the rebounding virus during STI. Changes in tropism were not associated with the amplitude and duration of virus exposure during STIs, residual viremia at baseline, or the development of resistance mutations in the RT region. Our preliminary results suggest that viral replication, observed after short periods of treatment interruption, is not enough to drive the evolution of HIV tropism.

Virological failure at one year in triple-class experienced patients switching to raltegravir-based regimens is not predicted by baseline factors.

We evaluated rates and determinants of virological failure in triple-class experienced patients receiving raltegravir-based regimens from a national observational study over 48 weeks, defined by any one of the following: (1) no HIV-RNA suppression to undetectable levels (<50 copies/mL) during follow-up; (2) detectable viral load after obtaining undetectable levels; and (3) leaving the study before 48 weeks. Among 101 eligible patients, 26 (25.7%; 95% CI 17.2-34.2) had virological failure. No significant differences between patients with and without virological failure were observed for gender, age, route of transmission, baseline CD4/HIV-RNA, CDC group, hepatitis B or C co-infections, resistance (based on the last genotype available), type and number of concomitant drug classes, concomitant use of darunavir, atazanavir, etravirine, enfuvirtide or maraviroc, and health-related quality-of-life measures. A high rate of treatment response was observed. The analyses did not identify any baseline factor associated with failure, including resistance status. Even if we cannot exclude the presence of pre-existing minority resistant variants not captured by genotypic tests, the lack of baseline predictors of failure suggests the need to monitor patients closely during follow up for other factors, such as potential drug interactions and reduced levels of adherence, which may favour virological failure.

The mutational archive in proviral DNA does not change during 24 months of continuous or intermittent highly active antiretroviral therapy.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to determine the modifications of the mutational archive in proviral HIV-1 DNA occurring during 24 months of intermittent or continuous highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART). METHODS: The study population included subjects enrolled in the Istituto Superiore di Sanità Pulsed Antiretroviral Therapy (ISS PART) clinical trial. All of these patients were on first-line HAART and had plasma HIV-1 RNA below 50 HIV-1 RNA copies/mL. A genotypic resistance test was performed on HIV-1 DNA extracted from peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) at baseline and after 24 months of follow-up. Resistance-associated mutations (RAMs) were defined according to the International AIDS Society (IAS) USA classification. RESULTS: Sixty-nine subjects were included in the study [36 enrolled in arm A of the ISS PART (continuous HAART) and 33 enrolled in arm B (intermittent HAART)]. No major modifications of the mutational archive were found in either group after 24 months of follow-up, in terms of both the proportion of subjects with mutations and the total number of mutations. CONCLUSIONS: In this patient population, the mutational archive in HIV-1 DNA extracted from PBMC was stable for 24 months, irrespective of HAART modality, whether continuous or intermittent.

Pharmacokinetics of nelfinavir in HIV-1-infected pregnant and nonpregnant women.

AIMS: To compare steady-state nelfinavir (NFV) pharmacokinetics in pregnant and nonpregnant HIV-infected women. METHODS: Twenty-five pregnant HIV-infected women were selected from an ongoing observational study evaluating the pharmacokinetics of antiretroviral agents during pregnancy. Twenty of them were in the third and five in the second trimester. Data for the control group of 21 HIV-infected nonpregnant women were taken from a previous multicentre pharmacokinetic trial. All the participating women achieved steady-state plasma concentrations while on a highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) regimen including NFV (1250 mg bid) and two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs). Blood samples for NFV measurement were collected predose (C(trough)) and at 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8 and 12 h post dose. RESULTS: During the third trimester of pregnancy NFV AUC(0-12 h) median (range) values were 25.76 (12.61-42.74) microg h(-1) ml(-1), and were 32.49 (19.16-63.81) microg h(-1) ml(-1) in the control group [mean difference - 9.30 microg h(-1) ml(-1); 95% confidence interval (CI) -15.76, -2.83; P < 0.05). Median oral clearance (CL/F) was significantly higher in pregnant women than in the control group (48.5 l h(-1), range 29.3-99.1 l h(-1) vs. 38.5 l h(-1), range 19.6-65.2 l h(-1); mean difference 12.6 l h(-1); 95% CI 3.3, 21.9) but the difference disappeared when CL/F was adjusted for body weight. C(trough) was significantly (P < 0.01) lower in pregnant compared with nonpregnant women (median 0.8 microg ml(-1), range 0-2.6 microg ml(-1) vs. 1.5 microg ml(-1), range 0.5-4.9 microg ml(-1); mean difference -1.0 microg ml(-1); 95% CI -1.7, -0.31). The median elimination half-life of NFV observed during pregnancy was 3.7 h (range 1.4-6.6 h), compared with 5.2 (range 3.1-10.1 h) in the control group (mean difference -1.7; 95% CI -2.8, -0.51). CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that women in the later stages of pregnancy may be exposed to subtherapeutic concentrations of NFV. Thus, adjustments in drug dosage or frequency of administration may be required.

Risk factors and occurrence of rash in HIV-positive patients not receiving nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor: data from a randomized study evaluating use of protease inhibitors in nucleoside-experienced patients with very low CD4 levels (<50 cells/microL).

BACKGROUND: Most of the studies evaluating rash in HIV-positive patients have focused on nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTI), particularly nevirapine, and little is known about the occurrence of rash and the risk factors for its development in patients receiving regimens not based on NNRTI. METHODS: We evaluated all cases of rash observed during a 48-week randomized multicentre trial in 1251 nucleoside-experienced patients who started treatment with protease inhibitors (ritonavir or indinavir) at CD4 counts below 50 cells/microL. Incidence rates for rash were calculated according to gender, clinical status, age, use of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART), Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia (PCP) prophylaxis and use of individual antiretroviral drugs at enrollment. Differences between groups defined according to the above characteristics were tested for statistical significance using the log-rank test in a Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. All factors that gave results in the univariate analyses below the significance level of 0.05 were included in a multivariate analysis using a Cox regression model. RESULTS: During a follow-up period of 9690 person-months, 66 patients (5.3%) developed rash (0.68 events/100 person-months). In the univariate analyses, risk of rash did not differ with trial treatment (indinavir or ritonavir), clinical status, PCP prophylaxis, or age. During follow-up, rash was observed in 7.5% of enrolled women and in 4.5% of enrolled men (P=0.03). Serious rash occurred in 4.5% of enrolled women and in 1.6% of enrolled men (P=0.003). Use of HAART (P<0.001) and inclusion of zidovudine and of zalcitabine in the prescribed regimen (P=0.02) appeared to be associated with a lower risk of rash. In the multivariate analysis, the variables that remained significantly predictive of rash were gender (risk for women compared to men: 1.65, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.00-2.72, P=0.048) and use of a non-HAART regimen (risk for non-HAART patients compared to HAART: 2.73, 95% CI: 1.49-5.02, P=0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In our study, about 5% of HIV-positive patients who started treatment with protease inhibitors at very low CD4 counts developed rash, generally in the first few weeks after treatment. Risk was significantly higher in women and in patients who did not receive a HAART regimen. Our data indicate that women have a higher risk of rash than men, also with regimens that do not include NNRTI.

HIV-related morbidity and mortality in patients starting protease inhibitors in very advanced HIV disease (CD4 count of < 50 cells/microL): an analysis of 338 clinical events from a randomized clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: AIDS defining events occur infrequently in the presence of CD4 counts above 200 cells/microL. It is, however, uncertain for most of the AIDS defining conditions whether this threshold can be considered equally safe in patients with a previously very low CD4 nadir. METHODS: We evaluated in detail all the AIDS defining events observed during a 48-week clinical trial in 1251 nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor-experienced patients who started protease inhibitors (PIs) at CD4 counts below 50 cells/microL. The type of event, immunological status at the moment of event and time between start of PI treatment and event occurrence were analysed cumulatively and by event type; event rates were calculated. RESULTS: Concomitant data on CD4 counts were available for 338 AIDS defining events (81% of total events). Median time between start of treatment with PI and event was 94.5 days and median absolute CD4 value at the occurrence of event was 20 per microL. Only 14 events (in 12 patients) were observed above the threshold of 200 CD4 cells/microL. An analysis of the 67 deaths with concomitantly available CD4 counts (57%) showed a median CD4 count of 10 cells/microL, with only four deaths occurring in the presence of a CD4 count above 100 cells/microL. CONCLUSIONS: Very few clinical AIDS defining conditions were observed in patients who start PIs at very low CD4 counts and with treatment restore absolute values in CD4 counts above 200 cells/microL. This threshold can therefore be considered a clinically effective goal of treatment with respect to occurrence of all AIDS defining conditions in patients starting PIs in very advanced HIV disease.

A randomized trial comparing the introduction of ritonavir or indinavir in 1251 nucleoside-experienced patients with advanced HIV infection.

ISS-IP1, a multicenter, randomized, 48-week open trial, was designed to compare the introduction of ritonavir or indinavir in patients with previous nucleoside experience and CD4+ cell counts below 50/mm3. Concomitant antiretroviral treatment with nucleoside analogs was allowed. Primary efficacy measures were survival and time to a new AIDS-defining event or death, analyzed through the whole period of observation by the intention-to-treat approach. Primary toxicity measures were time to treatment discontinuation and adverse events, grade at least 3/serious, analyzed by an on-treatment approach. Evaluation-of efficacy also included CD4+ cell and RNA response. The trial enrolled 1251 patients in 5 months. At baseline, mean CD4+ cell count was about 20 cells/mm3 and mean HIV RNA copy number was 4.9 log10/ml in both groups. Overall, 402 patients in the ritonavir group and 250 patients in the indinavir group permanently discontinued the assigned treatment (relative risk, 1.96; 95% CI, 1.68-2.30; p = 0.0001), with most of this difference dependent on a higher number of discontinuation for adverse events in the ritonavir group. After a mean follow-up of 307 days (ritonavir, 304; indinavir, 309), 124 deaths (ritonavir, 61; indinavir, 63; relative risk, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.67-1.36; p = 0.80) and 330 new AIDS-defining events (ritonavir, 170; indinavir, 160; relative risk, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.85-1.31; p = 0.60) were observed. CD4+ cell counts increased in both groups in patients still receiving treatment, with about 100 cells gained by week 24 and 150 cells gained by week 48. Body weight also increased over time in both groups. Analysis of RNA response showed a decrease of 1.5 log10 or higher in both treatment groups. Overall, 400 patients in the ritonavir group and 338 patients in the indinavir group developed at least one grade 3/serious new adverse event during follow-up (relative risk, 1.48; 95% CI, 1.28-1.72; p = 0.0001). Favorable CD4+ cell and RNA responses at 24 and 48 weeks were observed in both groups of patients remaining on treatment. Indinavir showed slightly better effects in sustaining RNA, CD4+ cell, and body weight responses. Ritonavir and indinavir results were comparable in terms of clinical outcome (survival and AIDS-defining events).

Evaluation of a second-generation nucleic acid sequence-based amplification assay for quantification of HIV type 1 RNA and the use of ultrasensitive protocol adaptations.

Accurate assessment of plasma HIV RNA levels at low concentrations is clinically important. We evaluated a second-generation quantitative HIV RNA assay (NucliSens HIV-1 QT), and three simple adaptations of the NucliSens standard protocol to lower the lower cutoff level. The assays were evaluated in constructed panels with known HIV RNA concentrations and in clinical samples. Results were compared with those obtained with the first generation (NASBA HIV-1 QT) and with two other commercially available assays: the Amplicor HIV Monitor test and the Quantiplex assay. In a constructed panel, results obtained by NASBA QT were on average 0.13 log(10) copies/ml (SD 0.15) higher than those of NucliSens. The NucliSens assay could quantify HIV RNA in at least 50% of the samples down to 518 (2.71 log(10)) copies/ml and NASBA QT to 5.80 x 10(3) (3.76 log(10)) copies/ml). Both assays correlated well with the known input (R NucliSens = 0.99; R NASBA QT = 0.996), but results were more variable at lower input levels. With the three different ultrasensitive NucliSens adaptations, HIV RNA could be quantified in at least 50% of the samples down to 100 (2.00 log(10)), 46 (1.66 log(10)), and 10 (1.00 log(10)) copies/ml, respectively. In patient samples, Amplicor results were on average 0.11 (SD 0.20) log(10) copies/ml above, NucliSens 0.02 (SD 0.29) copies/ml above, and Quantiplex 0.13 (SD 0.19) copies/ml below the mean of the three assay results per sample. The variation remained the same over the range of RNA levels with all three assays. The NucliSens assay can quantify HIV RNA at lower levels than the NASBA QT and is comparable to other commercially available assays. The lower cutoff of the NucliSens can be lowered down to 10 copies/ml.

Plasma HIV-1 copy number and in vitro infectivity of plasma prior to and during combination antiretroviral treatment.

Some studies on untreated patients have shown a general correlation between plasma HIV copy number and plasma infectivity in in vitro models. Recent observations also indicate that HIV-RNA level is an important predictor of perinatal transmission and may also have a role in heterosexual transmission. To further analyse the correlation between HIV viral load and plasma infectivity, we studied the relationship between HIV-1 plasma copy number and plasma infectivity prior to and during treatment with antiretroviral combination regimens in HIV-1 infected adults. Plasma infectivity was assessed in vitro by coculture of plasma from HIV-positive patients with PHA-stimulated fresh PBMC from uninfected donors. A positive plasma isolation, in almost all cases (43/45) and irrespective of treatment status, was associated with an HIV viral load higher than 100000 copies per ml, with higher plasma HIV-1 RNA values in isolation-positive samples compared with isolation-negative samples (median values, 710000 vs. 37500 copies per ml, respectively). SI and NSI strains had similarly high viral load values (470000 vs. 790000 copies per ml), but CD4 counts were lower in the SI phenotype group. Our data indicate that low levels of viral load are only exceptionally associated with isolation from plasma in the in vitro model we used. This observation confirms indirectly the presence of an association between viral load and infectivity. The requisite of a high plasma viral load in order to obtain infectivity (i.e. positivity of HIV isolation from plasma) also seems maintained under antiretroviral treatment, adding confidence in the conclusion that reductions in viral load translate into reduction of plasma infectivity. Due to the extreme complexity of factors determining transmission, a very prudent interpretation of the results is essential when information from experimental studies has to be transferred to clinical situations requiring assessment of risks or clinical decisions.

Prevalence and characteristics of multinucleoside-resistant human immunodeficiency virus type 1 among European patients receiving combinations of nucleoside analogues.

The prevalence and the genotypic and phenotypic characteristics of multinucleoside-resistant (MNR) human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) variants in Europe were investigated in a multicenter study that involved centers in nine European countries. Study samples (n = 363) collected between 1991 and 1997 from patients exposed to two or more nucleoside analogue reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) and 274 control samples from patients exposed to no or one NRTI were screened for two marker mutations of multinucleoside resistance (the Q151M mutation and a mutation with a 2-amino-acid insertion at codon 69, T69S-XX). Q151M was identified in six of the study samples (1. 6%), and T69S-XX was identified in two of the study samples (0.5%; both of them T69S-SS), but both patterns were absent among control samples. Non-NRTI (NNRTI)-related changes were observed in viral strains from two patients, which displayed the Q151M resistance pattern, although the patients were NNRTI naive. The patients whose isolates displayed multinucleoside resistance had received treatment with zidovudine and either didanosine, zalcitabine, or stavudine. Both resistance patterns conferred broad cross-resistance to NRTIs in vitro and a poor response to treatment in vivo. MNR HIV-1 is found only among multinucleoside-experienced patients. Its prevalence is low in Europe, but it should be closely monitored since it seriously limits treatment options.

Early immune reconstitution after potent antiretroviral therapy in HIV-infected children correlates with the increase in thymus volume.

DESIGN: Despite significant rises in total CD4 T cells, the process of immune reconstitution in adults with HIV infection treated with potent antiretroviral treatment results in a rather slow increase in phenotypically naive lymphocytes. In children more than in adults, thymic function may be at least partly restored when disease-induced immunosuppression is attenuated by pharmacological means. METHODS: Twenty-five vertically infected and antiretroviral-experienced [zidovudine (ZDV)/ZDV plus didanosine (ddl)] children were prospectively followed during 12 months of treatment with lamivudine (3TC), stavudine (d4T) and indinavir (IDV). The plasma HIV viral load and phenotypic and functional cellular immunity-defining parameters were examined. The relationship between the degree of immune reconstitution and thymus volume assessed by nuclear magnetic resonance was also examined. RESULTS: An early and steep increase in CD45RA+62L+ T cells was observed in parallel with a sustained decrease in plasma HIV RNA levels and a significant rise in total CD4 T cells. This increase was significantly greater than that observed in CD4+CD45RO+ T cells. Analysis of the CD4 T cell receptor (TCR) beta repertoire and T helper function showed the ability to reconstitute families almost completely absent at baseline, and a substantial improvement of antigen-specific responses by peripheral blood lymphocytes. The rise in CD4 cells and in CD4+CD45RA+62L+ T cells was statistically associated with changes in thymus size observed over time. CONCLUSION: These data suggest a relevant contribution of the thymus to reconstitution of the peripheral pool of T cells in vertically HIV-infected children treated with potent antiretroviral regimens.

Quality of life outcomes of combination zidovudine- didanosine-nevirapine and zidovudine-didanosine for antiretroviral-naive advanced HIV-infected patients.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the quality of life outcomes in antiretroviral-naive patients randomized to zidovudine plus didanosine versus zidovudine plus didanosine plus nevirapine for treatment of advanced HIV disease (the Istituto Superiore di Sanità 047 trial). DESIGN: A 48-week randomized, double-blind trial. METHODS: Sixty patients were enrolled and evaluated over 24 weeks. Quality of life was assessed using a modified version of the Medical Outcomes Study-HIV Health Survey. For analysis, we calculated two summary scores reflecting the physical (PHS) and the mental (MHS) components of health. RESULTS: Although the three-drug combination was superior at inducing immunologic and virologic responses, the two-drug regimen was superior for both PHS and MHS, especially at week 8 where differences were both statistically and clinically significant (5.8 and 9.2 points, respectively, P< 0.02 for both). Quality of life changes paralleled trends in body weight and Karnofsky performance status score. CONCLUSION: Although a three-drug antiretroviral therapy regimen was superior in terms of short term virologic/immunologic response, the two-drug regimen was better in terms of quality of life. In general, triple therapy remains the most effective treatment option. However, quality of life assessments can yield results that may be discordant with and complementary to those obtained using conventional endpoints. Comparative trials should collect a comprehensive range of outcome measures, including patient-reported quality of life, in order to provide clinicians and patients with additional information that may influence treatment decisions.

Hospitalizations and costs of treatment for protease inhibitor-based regimens in patients with very advanced HIV-infection (CD4 < 50/mm(3)).

PURPOSE: To describe the cost of hospitalization and treatment in patients with very advanced disease who tart different regimens based on a protease inhibitor (PI). METHOD: An observational retrospective analysis was performed on data from a 48-week randomized, multicenter study. Analysis was based on a subgroup of centers that were geographically defined. Costs of ordinary hospital admissions and of antiretroviral treatment were considered. Incidence of hospitalization and number of days free from hospitalization during the period of observation were calculated. Cost and hospitalization measures were compared among patients receiving three different therapeutic regimens: only PI, PI plus one nucleoside, or PI plus two nucleosides. A multivariate analysis was used to assess cost differences, controlling for variables potentially able to influence outcome. RESULTS: Overall, among 166 patients starting PI (PI plus two nucleosides, 71;PI plus one nucleoside, 65; only PI, 30), 162 ordinary hospital admissions were observed during about 1 year of follow-up. Monthly rates of admission per person and incidence of first hospitalization on 100 person-months showed a clear inverse relationship with the number of drugs comprising the baseline treatment regimen, with the lower rates for the triple therapy group (0.06 and 3.9, respectively), intermediate values for the dual therapy group (0.10 and 8.1, respectively), and higher rates for the PI monotherapy group (0.15 and 13.7, respectively). The average number of days free from hospitalization per month was 29.5 in the triple therapy group, 28.6 in the dual therapy group, and 27.9 in the monotherapy group. The results of cost analysis showed, despite higher cost of antiretroviral treatment, that global costs were progressively lower using regimens of increasing potency: Compared to PI monotherapy, global cost (costs of antiretroviral treatment and of hospitalizations combined) per month per patient was 31.9% lower for the triple therapy group and 19.3% lower for the dual therapy. Global cost for the triple therapy was 15.7% lower compared to global cost for dual therapy. After adjustment for CD4 count, AIDS status, and Karnofsky score, both hospitalization costs and global costs were significantly lower for triple therapy compared to monotherapy (p =.002 and.039, respectively). CONCLUSION: In advanced and nucleoside-experienced patients, PI-containing regimens have a differential impact according to the overall strength of the regimen, with the best effects on both hospitalizations and treatment costs obtained using PI within potent combination regimens.