A retrospective observational study examining interhospital transfers from six New Zealand rural hospitals in 2019.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to identify the percentage of patients that were transferred from rural hospitals and who received an investigation or intervention at an urban hospital that was not readily available at the rural hospital. METHODS: A retrospective observational study. DESIGN: Patients were randomly selected and clinical records were reviewed. Patient demographic and clinical information was collected, including any interventions or investigations occurring at the urban referral hospital. These were compared against the resources available at the rural hospitals. SETTING: Six New Zealand (NZ) rural hospitals were included. PARTICIPANTS: Patients that were transferred from a rural hospital to an urban hospital between 1 Jan 2019 and 31 December 2019 were included. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome measure was the percentage of patients who received an investigation or intervention that was not available at the rural hospital. RESULTS: There were 584 patients included. Overall 73% of patients received an intervention or investigation that was not available at the rural hospital. Of the six rural hospitals, there was one outlier, where only 37% of patients transferred from that hospital received an investigation or intervention that was not available rurally. Patients were most commonly referred to general medicine (23%) and general surgery (18%). Of the investigations or interventions performed, 43% received a CT scan and 25% underwent surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Most patients that are transferred to urban hospitals receive an intervention or investigation that was not available at the rural hospital.

New Zealand's vocational Rural Hospital Medicine Training Programme: the first ten years.

AIMS: The Rural Hospital Medicine Training Programme (RHMTP) was established in 2008 to develop New Zealand's rural hospital medical workforce. This study evaluates the RHMTP's first 10-year outcomes. METHODS: A mixed-methods descriptive study. Database interrogation of: the Royal New Zealand College of General Practitioners records; University of Otago's e-Vision; the Medical Council of New Zealand's register of doctors. A survey of trainees who had graduated or withdrew from the programme. Survey questions included: current scope and place of employment; undergraduate rural experience; and trainee experiences. RESULTS: From 2009-2018, 98 doctors entered the RHMTP: 29 graduated, 20 withdrew and 49 are active registrars. Of the graduates, more than half (17/29) also completed GP training. Overall survey response rate: 80% (39/49). Graduate response rate: 97% (28/29). 92% (24/26) of currently practising graduates are working in rural New Zealand, mostly (22/24) in rural hospitals. Trainees value the RHMTP's flexibility and breadth of clinical exposure. The main challenges relate to a lack of alignment of training requirements and funding. CONCLUSIONS: In its first decade, the RHMTP has been successful in generating a rural hospital workforce and the programme is steadily growing. Attention to existing barriers is needed to ensure the RHMTP can reach its potential to benefit all of New Zealand's rural communities.