Monitoring safety and use of old and new treatment options for type 2 diabetic patients: a two-year (2013-2016) analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To compare patients' and physicians' perceptions regarding effectiveness and tolerability of non-insulin hypoglycemic drugs in a cohort of type 2 diabetic patients; to verify whether a possible tridimensional link between effectiveness, tolerability, and adherence affects long-term therapeutic outcomes. METHODS: A two-year observational study was performed in 1389 Type 2 diabetic patients by involving general practitioner clinics and Diabetes Centers. A decimal scale and the Morisky questionnaire were used, respectively, to assess effectiveness and tolerability perceptions, and medication adherence. RESULTS: Physicians perceived therapy as more efficacious compared to their patients: perceived effectiveness was steady for physicians during the study whereas patients' perception not significantly decreased (mean score from >8 to 7.84 ± 1.69). Physicians assigned higher tolerability scores compared to patients but only at the beginning of the study; interestingly, physicians' tolerability perception was poorer than patients' perception at last follow-up (mean score = 7.57 ± 1.40 vs. 7.88 ± 1.84). Favorable (score >7) patients' perceptions about treatment effectiveness and tolerability were associated with higher adherence. Patients showed medium adherence across the study. CONCLUSIONS: A mutual relationship between clinical effectiveness, adverse drug reactions, and adherence has been established, significantly impacting the clinical management of diabetic patients. A careful monitoring of this link by clinicians appears therefore necessary.

Type 2 diabetes mellitus impairs the maturation of endothelial progenitor cells and increases the number of circulating endothelial cells in peripheral blood.

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is associated with endothelial dysfunction, which leads to vascular complications. Endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) are thought to be a subset of cells derived from the bone marrow that play a crucial role in the neovascularization of ischemic tissue and in the maintenance of endothelial cell integrity. In contrast, circulating endothelial cells (CECs) are of endothelial origin and become detached from the intima of blood vessels in response to pathological stimuli. The study investigated the effects of T2DM on subpopulations of EPCs and CECs in peripheral blood, as compared with the effects on unacylated (UAG) and acylated (AG) ghrelin levels, which have been shown recently to play an important role in endothelial dysfunction associated with diabetes. Using the high-performance flow cytometer FACSCanto, and UAG/AG ghrelin enzyme immunoassay kits, we analyzed whole peripheral blood samples from: (i) diabetic patients with a history of disease of less than 1 year and no clinical evidence of angiopathy, (ii) diabetic patients with long-standing disease with vascular complications, and (iii) healthy donors. We found that T2DM did not affect bone-marrow mobilization, but it altered the UAG/AG profile and decreased the number of highly differentiated EPCs (late EPCs) greatly. In addition, T2DM increased the number of CECs, together with the number of activated CECs. Our results suggest that: (i) the endothelial damage could be due mainly to altered maturation/commitment of EPCs, rather than a simple decrease in their production in the bone marrow; and (ii) EPC subpopulations and ghrelin levels could be useful markers to assess endothelial damage in diabetes.