Monitoring of fluid absorption with nitrous oxide during transurethral resection of the prostate.

BACKGROUND: The fluid absorption that occurs during transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) can be indicated and quantified by the ethanol method. Recently, nitrous oxide (N(2)O) was tested in animals and volunteers and seemed to be more accurate and safe. The present study compared these two methods in surgical patients. METHODS: Eighty-six TURPs were performed at two hospitals using an irrigating fluid that contained 3% mannitol, 1% ethanol and 0.004% N(2)O (40 ml/l). The ethanol concentration was measured by end-expiratory tests every 10 min. The N(2)O concentration was measured by a flared nasal cannula every second. Fluid absorption was calculated based on a regression equation (ethanol method) from the area under the curve based on the samples where CO(2) >median (N(2)O method). RESULTS: Thirteen patients (15%) absorbed >300 ml of fluid as indicated by the ethanol method. The median volume was 707 ml (range 367-1422). Ethanol yielded higher figures for fluid absorption up to 700-800 ml, whereafter the N(2)O method indicated that the absorption was larger. Over the entire range, the mean difference between the two methods at the end of any 10-min period of TURP was only +45 ml, although the 95% limits of agreement were quite separated (-479 to +569 ml). CONCLUSIONS: The N(2)O method does not require forced breath sampling and was successfully apply clinically. However, there was a dose-dependent difference in result between the ethanol and N(2)O methods, which markedly separated the limits of agreement for a wider range of fluid absorption events.

Nitrous oxide for monitoring fluid absorption in volunteers.

BACKGROUND: We studied whether nitrous oxide (N(2)O) added to a fluid allows the infused volume to be quantified by measuring N(2)O in the expired air during normal breathing. If so, N(2)O might serve as a tracer of fluid absorption during endoscopic surgery. METHODS: Twelve male volunteers received continuous and intermittent i.v. infusions (5-45 min) of fluid containing 40 ml litre(-1) of N(2)O. Breath N(2)O and CO(2) concentrations were measured every second via a flared nasal cannula, a standard nasal cannula, or a Hudson mask. RESULTS: An expression for the amount of infused fluid was obtained by calculating the area under the N(2)O concentration-time curve for samples representative for exhalation (CO(2)>median) and then dividing this area by the median CO(2) for the remaining samples. The N(2)O method then estimated fluid volumes of between 50 and 1400 ml within a 95% prediction interval of +/-200 ml. There were differences of up to 14% in results between the airway devices tested, but the volunteers preferred the flared nasal cannula. N(2)O showed a distinctly higher 3 min variability during intermittent infusion, which could indicate whether fluid absorption is directly intravascular or extravascular. No adverse effects were seen. CONCLUSIONS: N(2)O method does not require forced end-expiratory breath sampling but still predicts an administered fluid volume with high precision. N(2)O variability can probably be used to distinguish immediately between intravascular and perivesical fluid absorption during surgery.

High-dose intravenous infusion of irrigating fluids containing glycine and mannitol in the pig.

BACKGROUND: Large-scale absorption of electrolyte-free irrigating fluid during endoscopic surgery may result in a "transurethral resection syndrome." The severity of the syndrome can probably be modified by using mannitol 5% instead of the most widely used glycine 1.5%. METHODS: Seventeen pigs with a mean body weight of 22 (range 19-26) kg received an intravenous infusion of 100 mL kg(-1) h(-1) of either glycine 1.5% or mannitol 5% over 90 min. Central hemodynamics, whole-body and brain oxygen consumption, intracranial pressure, blood hemoglobin, and the sodium concentrations in serum and urine were monitored for 120 min. Selected measurements were made on 6 other pigs given mannitol 3% and in 2 controls not given any fluid. Morphological examinations of the hearts were conducted. RESULTS: Both glycine 1.5% and mannitol 5% transiently increased cardiac output, the aortic blood flow rate, and arterial pressures, but all of these parameters fell to below baseline after the infusions were ended. The intracranial pressure was lower (P < 0.05) and the oxygen consumption in the brain decreased (P < 0.001) during the infusion of mannitol 5%. Glycine 1.5% expanded the intracellular volume more than mannitol did (P < 0.002). Signs of myocardial damage were graded glycine 1.5% > mannitol 5% > mannitol 3%. CONCLUSIONS: Massive infusion of glycine 1.5% and mannitol 5% left the pigs in a hypokinetic hypotensive state. Glycine 1.5% increased the intracranial pressure and injured the myocardium more than mannitol 5%, which then seems to be a more appropriate irrigating fluid to use during endoscopic surgery.