Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 25
Filter
1.
ESMO Open ; 8(6): 102192, 2023 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38052104

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The Patient Reported Outcome for Fighting FInancial Toxicity (PROFFIT) questionnaire was developed to measure financial toxicity (FT) and identify its determinants. The aim of the present study was to confirm its validity in a prospective cohort of patients receiving anticancer treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From March 2021 to July 2022, 221 patients were enrolled at 10 Italian centres. Selected items of the EORTC-QLQ-C30 questionnaire represented the anchors, specifically, question 28 (Q-28) on financial difficulties, and questions 29-30 measuring global health status/quality of life (HR-QOL). The study had 80% power to detect a 0.20 correlation coefficient (r) between anchors and PROFFIT-score (items 1-7, range 0-100, 100 indicating maximum FT) with bilateral alpha 0.05 and 80% power. Confirmatory factor analysis was conducted. FT determinants (items 8-16) were described. RESULTS: Median age of patients was 65 years, 116 (52.5%) were females, 96 (43.4%) had low education level. Confirmatory factor analysis confirmed goodness of fit of the PROFFIT-score. Significant partial correlation of PROFFIT-score was found with Q-28 (r = 0.51) and HR-QOL (r = -0.23). Mean (SD) PROFFIT-score at baseline was 36.5 (24.9); it was statistically significantly higher for patients living in South Italy, those with lower education level, those who were freelancer/unemployed at diagnosis and those who reported significant economic impact from the COVID-19 pandemic. Mean (SD) scores of determinants ranged from 17.6 (27.1) for item 14 (support from medical staff) to 49.0 (36.3) for item 10 (expenses for medicines or supplements). PROFFIT-score significantly increased with worsening response to determinants. CONCLUSIONS: External validation of PROFFIT-score in an independent sample of patients was successful. The instrument is now being used in clinical studies.


Subject(s)
Neoplasms , Quality of Life , Female , Humans , Aged , Male , Prospective Studies , Financial Stress , Pandemics , Neoplasms/therapy , Surveys and Questionnaires , Patient Reported Outcome Measures
2.
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci ; 26(22): 8481-8501, 2022 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36459030

ABSTRACT

In recent years, the advanced knowledge of clinical, biological and molecular features of prostate cancer have led to the introduction of new drugs and have allowed the relocation of old drugs in different settings. In this way, the new concepts of systemic disease arise: high risk or high volume vs. low risk and low volume disease castration sensitive prostate cancer (CSPC), diversifying the use of previously approved drugs (CRPC) and opening new scenarios for sequence therapy. The aim of this review is to integrate new developments into the medical management of systemic prostate cancer.


Subject(s)
Prostatic Neoplasms , Male , Humans , Prostatic Neoplasms/drug therapy , Prostatic Neoplasms/surgery , Immunotherapy , Algorithms , Knowledge , Castration
3.
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci ; 25(18): 5871-5875, 2021 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34604980

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV2 infection (PASC) are a novel terminology used to describe post-COVID persistent symptoms, mimicking somehow the previously described chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS). In this manuscript, we evaluated a therapeutical approach to address PASC-derived fatigue in a cohort of past-COVID-19 positive patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A number of 100 patients, previously diagnosed as COVID-19 positive subjects and meeting our eligibility criteria, was diagnosed having PASC-related fatigue. They were recruited in the study and treated with oxygen-ozone autohemotherapy (O2-O3-AHT), according to the SIOOT protocol. Patients' response to O2-O3-AHT and changes in fatigue were measured with the 7-scoring Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS), according to previously published protocols. RESULTS: Statistics assessed that the effects of O2-O3-AHT on fatigue reduced PASC symptoms by 67%, as a mean, in all the investigated cohort of patients (H = 148.4786 p < 0.0001) (Figure 1). Patients following O2-O3-AHT therapy, quite completely recovered for PASC-associated fatigue, a quote amounting to about two fifths (around 40%) of the whole cohort undergoing ozone treatment and despite most of patients were female subjects, the effect was not influenced by sex distribution (H = 0.7353, p = 0.39117). CONCLUSIONS: Ozone therapy is able to recover normal functionality and to relief pain and discomfort in the form of PASC-associated fatigue in at least 67% of patients suffering from post-COVID sequelae, aside from sex and age distribution.


Subject(s)
Blood Transfusion/methods , COVID-19/complications , Fatigue Syndrome, Chronic/etiology , Fatigue Syndrome, Chronic/therapy , Oxygen/administration & dosage , Ozone/administration & dosage , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , COVID-19/therapy , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Severity of Illness Index , Surveys and Questionnaires , Post-Acute COVID-19 Syndrome
4.
Hered Cancer Clin Pract ; 19(1): 45, 2021 Oct 27.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34706754

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND AIM: The BRCA 1 and BRCA 2 genes are associated with an inherited susceptibility to breast cancer with a cumulative risk of 60% in BRCA 1 mutation carriers and of 30% in BRCA 2 mutation carriers. Several lifestyle factors could play a role in determining an individual's risk of breast cancer. Obesity, changes in body size or unhealthy lifestyle habits such as smoking, alcohol consumption and physical inactivity have been evaluated as possible determinants of breast cancer risk. The aim of this study was to explore the current understanding of the role of harmful lifestyle and obesity or weight change in the development of breast cancer in female carriers of BRCA 1/2 mutations. METHODS: Articles were identified from MEDLINE in October 2020 utilizing related keywords; they were then read and notes, study participants, measures, data analysis and results were used to write this review. RESULTS: Studies with very large case series have been carried out but only few of them have shown consistent results. Additional research would be beneficial to better determine the actual role and impact of such factors.

5.
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci ; 24(23): 12093-12108, 2020 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33336727

ABSTRACT

Penile cancer (PC) is a typical tumor of non-industrialized countries. The incidence is 20-30 times higher in Africa and South America, considering the elevated prevalence of sexually transmitted diseases. Histologically, PC includes squamous cell carcinoma (SCPC), the most frequent, and nonsquamous carcinoma (NSCPC). Early diagnosis is the goal, whereas later diagnosis relates to poor functional outcomes and worse prognosis. The 5-year survival rate is 85% for patients with histologically regional negative lymph nodes, compared to 29%-40% for those with histologically regional positive lymph nodes. To date no new drugs are approved, and there are few new data about molecular mechanisms underlying tumorigenesis. The SCPC remains a rare tumor and the current therapeutic algorithm is based principally on retrospective analysis and less on prospective trials. In this review article, biomarkers of prognosis and efficacy of current treatments are summarized with a focus on those that have the potential to affect treatment decision-making in SCPC.


Subject(s)
Biomarkers, Tumor/analysis , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/diagnosis , Clinical Decision-Making , Penile Neoplasms/diagnosis , Humans , Male , Prognosis
6.
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci ; 23(9): 3885-3891, 2019 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31115016

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Testicular cancer is a relatively rare neoplasia, with an incidence of about 1,5% among male malignancies, usually in the third and fourth decade of life. Although several histological variants are known, with some histotypes affecting older patients (e.g., spermatocytic seminoma), there is a clear predominance (90-95%) of germ cell tumors among young adults patients1. Testicular Germ Cell Tumor (TGCT), undoubtedly the seminoma histological variant more than non-seminoma one, is definitely a highly curable disease, with a distinctive sensitivity to cisplatin-based therapy (and for seminomas to radiotherapy) and an outstanding cure rate of nearly 80% even for patients with advanced disease. So far, clinical and pathohistological features supported our efforts to choose the best treatment option for patients suffering from this malignancy, but we don't clearly enough know molecular and pathological features underlying different clinical behaviors, mostly in early-stage disease: by improving this knowledge, we should better "shape" therapeutic or surveillance programs for each patient, also in order to avoid unnecessary, if not harmful, treatments.


Subject(s)
Testicular Neoplasms/pathology , Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Cisplatin/therapeutic use , Humans , Male , Neoplasm Staging , Neoplasms, Germ Cell and Embryonal/drug therapy , Neoplasms, Germ Cell and Embryonal/metabolism , Neoplasms, Germ Cell and Embryonal/pathology , Prognosis , Seminoma/metabolism , Seminoma/pathology , Seminoma/radiotherapy , Testicular Neoplasms/drug therapy , Testicular Neoplasms/metabolism
7.
Onco Targets Ther ; 12: 1583-1591, 2019.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30881013

ABSTRACT

Nasopharyngeal carcinoma is a rare disease in Western countries. Nevertheless, its incidence in China, Singapore, and other Eastern countries reaches 20 cases per 100,000 people. Being an extremely chemo- and radiosensitive disease, upfront treatment often consists in the association of intensity-modulated radiation therapy and concurrent cisplatin. Unfortunately, about 20% of the patients suffer from a radioresistant disease which recurs after upfront therapy. For these patients, mainly available therapeutic options consist in systemic therapy, in particular poly-chemotherapy. In those showing a single locoregional recurrence, chemotherapy is not considered to be the preferred approach and other different strategies may be employed. Re-irradiation and surgery are strategies that are always used more often, albeit related to high risk of morbidity. Immunotherapy and targeted therapy, such as heavy ions-based re-irradiations, are experimental but very intriguing options.

8.
Anticancer Agents Med Chem ; 18(9): 1220-1227, 2018.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29637868

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck (SCCHN) are neoplasms arising from the epithelium of the first aero-digestive tract. They are very heterogeneous both clinically and biologically. Classic and well acknowledged risk factors are alcohol and tobacco consumption and other forms of smokeless tobacco assumption, although lately the incidence of Human Papilloma Virus (HPV)-related SCCHN is rapidly increasing. HPV-related tumors are very different from their alcohol and tobacco-associated counterpart, as they show strong chemo and radio sensitivity and thus can often be treated with conservative treatment strategies. Moreover, peculiar biologic features characterize HPV-related tumors, such as wild type TP53, low expression of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR), wild type CCND1 and high expression of P16. In contrast, alcohol and tobacco related SCCHN show opposite features, together with higher number of chromosomal and genetic abnormalities, conferring them chemo and radio resistance. METHODS: We have performed a narrative review of the PubMed database with the aim to study the mutational landscape of SCCHN. RESULTS: Several lines of evidence support the existence of at least two genetically different types of SCCHN, one virus-related and the other alcohol and/or tobacco-related, characterized by both clinical and biological opposite features. Virus related SCCHN are very chemo and radiosensitive, so suitable for organ preserving strategy, which in the near future may be induction chemotherapy followed by association of chemotherapy and underpowered radiotherapy. Alcohol and tobacco related SCCHN are themselves strongly heterogeneous and can be divided in different entities on the basis of the "Driver" genetic aberration, responsible for carcinogenesis. The most frequently mutated genes in alcohol and tobacco-related SCCHN are TP53, NOTCH1, CCND1, CDKN2A, EGFR and PI3KCA. CONCLUSIONS: Virus-related SCCHN can be managed with chemo-radiotherapy. Alcohol and tobacco-related tumors should be further characterized on the basis of their "Driver Mutations" in order to select effective targeted therapies.


Subject(s)
Head and Neck Neoplasms/etiology , Head and Neck Neoplasms/therapy , Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck/etiology , Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck/therapy , Alcohol Drinking/adverse effects , Animals , Disease Management , Head and Neck Neoplasms/genetics , Head and Neck Neoplasms/virology , Humans , Mutation , Papillomaviridae/isolation & purification , Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck/genetics , Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck/virology , Tobacco Smoking/adverse effects , Translational Research, Biomedical
12.
Ann Oncol ; 29(1): 112-118, 2018 01 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28950295

ABSTRACT

Background: Liquid biopsy is an alternative to tissue for RAS testing in metastatic colorectal carcinoma (mCRC) patients. Little information is available on the predictive role of liquid biopsy RAS testing in patients treated with first-line anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody-based therapy. Patients and methods: In the CAPRI-GOIM trial, 340 KRAS exon-2 wild-type mCRC patients received first-line cetuximab plus FOLFIRI. Tumor samples were retrospectively assessed by next generation sequencing (NGS). Baseline plasma samples were analyzed for KRAS and NRAS mutations using beads, emulsion, amplification, and magnetics digital PCR (BEAMing). Discordant cases were solved by droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) or deep-sequencing. Results: A subgroup of 92 patients with available both NGS data on tumor samples and baseline plasma samples were included in this study. Both NGS analysis of tumor tissue and plasma testing with BEAMing identified RAS mutations in 33/92 patients (35.9%). However, 10 cases were RAS tissue mutant and plasma wild-type, and additional 10 cases were tissue wild-type and plasma mutant, resulting in a concordance rate of 78.3%. Analysis of plasma samples with ddPCR detected RAS mutations in 2/10 tissue mutant, plasma wild-type patients. In contrast, in all tissue wild-type and plasma mutant cases, ddPCR or deep-sequencing analysis of tumor tissue confirmed the presence of RAS mutations at allelic frequencies ranging between 0.15% and 1.15%. The median progression-free survival of RAS mutant and wild-type patients according to tissue (7.9 versus 12.6 months; P = 0.004) and liquid biopsy testing (7.8 versus 13.8 moths; P < 0.001) were comparable. Similar findings were observed for the median overall survival of RAS mutant and wild-type patients based on tissue (22.1 versus 35.8 months; P = 0.016) and plasma (19.9 versus 35.8 months; P = 0.013) analysis. Conclusion: This study indicates that RAS testing of liquid biopsy results in a similar outcome when compared with tissue testing in mCRC patients receiving first-line anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Colorectal Neoplasms/drug therapy , Colorectal Neoplasms/genetics , Liquid Biopsy/methods , Proto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)/genetics , Alleles , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/administration & dosage , Camptothecin/administration & dosage , Camptothecin/analogs & derivatives , Cetuximab/administration & dosage , Colorectal Neoplasms/blood , Colorectal Neoplasms/pathology , Fluorouracil/administration & dosage , Humans , Leucovorin/administration & dosage , Mutation , Neoplasm Metastasis , Progression-Free Survival , Treatment Outcome
13.
Support Care Cancer ; 26(6): 1841-1849, 2018 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29270827

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) still represents a common side-effect of chemotherapy, and often, its perception differs between patients and healthcare professionals. The aim of this study was to evaluate the agreement on the perception of CINV and other items among clinicians, patients, and nurses. METHODS: This observational prospective study was part of an evaluation program promoted by the Women Against Lung Cancer in Europe (WALCE) Onlus. From August 2015 to February 2016, a survey was administered in 11 oncologic institutions to 188 stage IV lung cancer patients and to their oncologists and nurses during first-line chemotherapy. Our survey investigated 11 aspects: anxiety, mood, weakness, appetite, nausea, vomiting, pain, drowsiness, breath, general condition, and trust in treatments. These items were assessed through Numerical Rating Scale at four consecutive evaluations: at T0 (immediately prior to the first cycle), at T1 (immediately prior to the second cycle), at T2 (immediately prior to the third cycle), and at T3 (immediately prior to the fourth cycle). Clinician versus patient (CvP), nurse versus patient (NvP), and clinician versus nurse (CvN) agreements were estimated applying Weighted Cohen's kappa. A multivariate logistic model and generalized equation estimates were applied to evaluate factors possibly influencing CINV development. RESULTS: The incidence of patients reporting CINV varied from 40% at T0 to 71% at T3. Both CvP and NvP agreement on the investigated items were mainly moderate, slightly increasing over time, and becoming substantial for some items, in particular for NvP. Pre-chemotherapy anxiety in its mild, moderate, and severe manifestations, as well as mild, moderate, and severe anxiety experienced after chemotherapy start, exposed patients to a higher risk of anticipatory and acute/delayed CINV, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Despite clinical staff awareness of patients' status and perceptions, CINV still represents a clinical problem. This study confirms that particular attention should be paid to anxiety due to its key role in CINV development.


Subject(s)
Antiemetics/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Agents/adverse effects , Lung Neoplasms/complications , Nausea/chemically induced , Vomiting/chemically induced , Adult , Aged , Antiemetics/pharmacology , Female , Humans , Lung Neoplasms/drug therapy , Lung Neoplasms/pathology , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Surveys and Questionnaires
14.
Crit Rev Oncol Hematol ; 111: 166-172, 2017 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28259291

ABSTRACT

Epigenetic changes are defined as inherited modifications that are not present in DNA sequence. Gene expression is regulated at various levels and not only in response to DNA modifications. Examples of epigenetic control are DNA methylation, histone deacetylation and mi-RNA expression. Methylation of several tumor suppressor gene promoters is responsible for their silencing and thus potentially sustain cancerogenesis. Similarly, histone deacetylation can lead to oncogene activation. mi-RNA are small (18-20 nucleotides) non-coding RNA fragments capable of inhibiting other m-RNA, ultimately altering the balance in oncogene and tumor suppressor gene expression. It has been shown that growth of several tumor types can be stimulated by epigenetic changes in various phases of cancerogenesis, and drugs able to interfere with these mechanisms can have a positive impact on tumor progression. As matter of fact, epigenetic changes are dynamic and can be reversed by epigenetic inhibitors. Recently, methyltransferase and histone deacetylase inhibitors have attracted the attention of researchers and clinicians as they potentially provide alternative therapeutic options in some cancers. Drugs that inhibit DNA methylation or histone deacetylation have been studied for the reactivation of tumor suppressor genes and repression of cancer cell growth. Epigenetic inhibitors work alone or in combination with other therapeutic agents. To date, a number of epigenetic inhibitors have been approved for cancer treatment. The main challenge in the field of epigenetic inhibitors is their lack of specificity. In this review article we describe their mechanisms of action and potential in cancer treatment.


Subject(s)
Neoplasms/drug therapy , Neoplasms/genetics , Carcinogenesis/genetics , DNA Methylation , Epigenesis, Genetic , Gene Expression , Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Humans , Promoter Regions, Genetic
15.
Ann Oncol ; 27(6): 1055-1061, 2016 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27002107

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Cetuximab plus chemotherapy is a first-line treatment option in metastatic KRAS and NRAS wild-type colorectal cancer (CRC) patients. No data are currently available on continuing anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) therapy beyond progression. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We did this open-label, 1:1 randomized phase II trial at 25 hospitals in Italy to evaluate the efficacy of cetuximab plus 5-fluorouracil, folinic acid and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) as second-line treatment of KRAS exon 2 wild-type metastatic CRC patients treated in first line with 5-fluorouracil, folinic acid and irinotecan (FOLFIRI) plus cetuximab. Patients received FOLFOX plus cetuximab (arm A) or FOLFOX (arm B). Primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). Tumour tissues were assessed by next-generation sequencing (NGS). This report is the final analysis. RESULTS: Between 1 February 2010 and 28 September 2014, 153 patients were randomized (74 in arm A and 79 in arm B). Median PFS was 6.4 [95% confidence interval (CI) 4.7-8.0] versus 4.5 months (95% CI 3.3-5.7); [hazard ratio (HR), 0.81; 95% CI 0.58-1.12; P = 0.19], respectively. NGS was performed in 117/153 (76.5%) cases; 66/117 patients (34 in arm A and 32 in arm B) had KRAS, NRAS, BRAF and PIK3CA wild-type tumours. For these patients, PFS was longer in the FOLFOX plus cetuximab arm [median 6.9 (95% CI 5.5-8.2) versus 5.3 months (95% CI 3.7-6.9); HR, 0.56 (95% CI 0.33-0.94); P = 0.025]. There was a trend in better overall survival: median 23.7 [(95% CI 19.4-28.0) versus 19.8 months (95% CI 14.9-24.7); HR, 0.57 (95% CI 0.32-1.02); P = 0.056]. CONCLUSIONS: Continuing cetuximab treatment in combination with chemotherapy is of potential therapeutic efficacy in molecularly selected patients and should be validated in randomized phase III trials.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/administration & dosage , Cetuximab/administration & dosage , Colorectal Neoplasms/drug therapy , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects , Cetuximab/adverse effects , Class I Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinases/genetics , Colorectal Neoplasms/genetics , Colorectal Neoplasms/pathology , Disease-Free Survival , Female , Fluorouracil/administration & dosage , Fluorouracil/adverse effects , Humans , Italy , Leucovorin/administration & dosage , Leucovorin/adverse effects , Male , Neoplasm Metastasis , Organoplatinum Compounds/administration & dosage , Organoplatinum Compounds/adverse effects , Proportional Hazards Models , Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf/genetics , Proto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)/genetics , Treatment Outcome
16.
ESMO Open ; 1(6): e000086, 2016.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28848656

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In the cetuximab after progression in KRAS wild-type colorectal cancer patients (CAPRI) trial patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) received 5-fluorouracil, folinic acid and irinotecan (FOLFIRI) and cetuximab in first line followed by 5-Fluorouracil, folinic acid, oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) with or without cetuximab until progression. Limited data are available on the efficacy and safety of anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (anti-EGFR) agents on elderly patients with mCRC. In the current study we evaluated the efficacy and safety of FOLFIRI plus cetuximab in age-defined subgroups. METHODS: A post-hoc analysis was performed in CAPRI trial patients; outcomes (progression-free survival (PFS), overall response rate (ORR), safety) were analysed by age-groups and stratified according to molecular characterisation. 3 age cut-offs were used to define the elderly population (≥65; ≥70 and ≥75 years). RESULTS: 340 patients with mCRC were treated in first line with FOLFIRI plus cetuximab. Among those, 154 patients were >65 years, 86 >70 years and 35 >75 years. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) was performed in 182 patients. Among them, 87 patients were >65 years, 46 >70 and 17 >75. 104 of 182 patients were wild type (WT) for KRAS, NRAS, BRAF, PIK3CA genes. In the quadruple WT group, 51 patients were ≥65 years; 29 were ≥70; 9 were ≥75. Median PFS was similar within the age-subgroups in the intention-to-treat population, NGS cohort and quadruple WT patients, respectively. Likewise, ORR was not significantly different among age-subgroups in the 3 populations. Safety profile was acceptable and similarly reported among all age-groups, with the exception of grade ≥3 diarrhoea (55% vs 25%, p=0.04) and neutropaenia (75% vs 37%, p=0.03) in patients ≥75 years and grade ≥3 fatigue (31% vs 20%, p=0.01) in patients <75 years. CONCLUSIONS: Tolerability of cetuximab plus FOLFIRI was acceptable in elderly patients. Similar ORR and PFS were observed according to age-groups. No differences in adverse events were reported among the defined subgroups with the exception of higher incidence of grade ≥3 diarrhoea and neutropaenia in patients ≥75 years and grade ≥3 fatigue in patients <75 years. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: 2009-014041-81.

17.
Int J Oncol ; 45(5): 2137-42, 2014 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25176223

ABSTRACT

We conducted a phase III multicenter randomized trial to compare the efficacy of the combination of liposome encapsulated doxorubicin (Myocet(©)) plus either cyclophosphamide (MC) or vinorelbine (MV). Since July 2006, 233 patients affected with metastatic breast cancer were randomized to receive the combination of Myocet (M) 60 mg/m(2) i.v. plus cyclophosphamide (C) 600 mg/m2 on Day 1 of a 21­day cycle (Arm A) or Myocet (M) at 50 mg/m2 plus vinorelbine (V) 25 mg/m2 i.v. on Day 1 and V 60 mg/m2 orally on Day 8 on a 21­day cycle (Arm B). The primary endpoints of the study was time to progression (TTP); secondary endpoints were RR, toxicity and OS. Response was observed in 53/116 (45.7%) evaluable patients of Arm A vs. 51/112 (45.5%) of Arm B, respectively (P=NS). Median TTP was 41 weeks (95% CI, 32­51) and 34 weeks (95% CI, 26­39), for M/C and M/V, respectively (P=0.0234). The difference in median OS was not statistically significant (131 vs. 122 weeks; P=0.107). With regard to toxicity, patients treated with MV showed a slight increase of neutropenia and constipation, as compared to those treated with MC. No clinical signs of cardiotoxicity were observed. The MC combination remains as an unbeaten 'standard' in first line treatment of MBC.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy , Cyclophosphamide/administration & dosage , Doxorubicin/analogs & derivatives , Vinblastine/analogs & derivatives , Adult , Aged , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Doxorubicin/administration & dosage , Doxorubicin/adverse effects , Drug Carriers , Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions/pathology , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Polyethylene Glycols/administration & dosage , Polyethylene Glycols/adverse effects , Survival Analysis , Vinblastine/administration & dosage , Vinblastine/adverse effects , Vinorelbine
18.
Ann Oncol ; 25(9): 1756-1761, 2014 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24942275

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Treatment with antiepidermal growth factor receptor (anti-EGFR) monoclonal antibodies has been restricted to metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients with RAS wild-type tumors. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) allows the assessment in a single analysis of a large number of gene alterations and might provide important predictive and prognostic information. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In the CAPRI-GOIM trial, 340 KRAS exon 2 wild-type mCRC patients received first-line FOLFIRI plus cetuximab. Tumor samples (182/340, 53.5%) were assessed by NGS to search for mutations in 22 genes involved in colon cancer. RESULTS: Objective responses in the NGS cohort were observed in 104/182 patients [overall response rate (ORR) 57.1%; 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 52% to 66.4%] with a median progression-free survival (mPFS) of 9.8 (95% CI 8.7-11.5) months. NGS analysis was successfully completed in all 182 samples. One or more gene mutations (up to five) were detected in 124/182 (68.1%) tumors within 14/22 genes for a total of 206 mutations. KRAS exon 2 mutations were identified in 29/182 (15.9%) samples, defined as wild type by local laboratory assessment. Frequently mutated genes were: TP53 (39.6%), KRAS exons 3/4 (8.8%), NRAS exons 2/3 (7.1%), PIK3CA exons 9/20 (13.2%), BRAF (8.2%). FOLFIRI plus cetuximab treatment determined ORR of 62.0% (95% CI 55.5% to 74.6%) with mPFS of 11.1 (95% CI 9.2-12.8) months in patients with KRAS and NRAS wild-type tumors. Conversely, ORR was 46.6% (95% CI 39.9-57.5%) with mPFS of 8.9 (95% CI 7.4-9.6) months in patients with KRAS or NRAS mutations. Similarly, the subgroup of patients carrying KRAS, NRAS, BRAF, or PIK3CA mutations showed a worse outcome, although this might be due to a prognostic effect. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that NGS analysis in mCRC is feasible, reveals high level of intra and intertumor heterogeneity, and identifies patients that might benefit of FOLFIRI plus cetuximab treatment.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Camptothecin/analogs & derivatives , Colorectal Neoplasms/drug therapy , Colorectal Neoplasms/genetics , Mutation , Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Base Sequence , Camptothecin/therapeutic use , Cetuximab , Class I Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinases , Disease-Free Survival , ErbB Receptors/antagonists & inhibitors , ErbB Receptors/immunology , Fluorouracil/therapeutic use , GTP Phosphohydrolases/genetics , High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing , Humans , Leucovorin/therapeutic use , Membrane Proteins/genetics , Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinases/genetics , Proto-Oncogene Proteins/genetics , Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf/genetics , Proto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras) , Retrospective Studies , Sequence Analysis, DNA , Tumor Suppressor Protein p53/genetics , ras Proteins/genetics
19.
Cancer Treat Rev ; 36 Suppl 3: S30-3, 2010 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21129607

ABSTRACT

Lung cancer is the most common cancer worldwide with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), including squamous carcinoma, adenocarcinoma and large cell carcinoma, accounting for about 85% of all lung cancer types with most of the patients presenting with advanced disease at the time of diagnosis. In this setting first-line platinum-based chemotherapy for no more than 4-6 cycles are recommended. After these cycles of treatment, non-progressing patients enter in the so called "watch and wait" period in which no further therapy is administered until there is disease progression. In order to improve the advanced NSCLC outcomes, the efficacy of further treatment in the "watch and wait" period was investigated. This is the "maintenance therapy". Recently, the results coming from randomized phase III trials investigating two new agents, pemetrexed and erlotinib, in this setting led to their registration for maintenance therapy. Here, we report and discuss these results.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/drug therapy , ErbB Receptors/antagonists & inhibitors , Glutamates/administration & dosage , Guanine/analogs & derivatives , Lung Neoplasms/drug therapy , Molecular Targeted Therapy , Quinazolines/administration & dosage , Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A/antagonists & inhibitors , Administration, Oral , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/pathology , Disease Progression , Disease-Free Survival , Drug Administration Schedule , Erlotinib Hydrochloride , Female , Guanine/administration & dosage , Humans , Lung Neoplasms/pathology , Male , Pemetrexed , Prognosis
20.
Cancer Treat Rev ; 36 Suppl 3: S42-5, 2010 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21129609

ABSTRACT

In the last decade dramatic improvements have been obtained in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer. Thanks to the introduction in the clinical practice of new drugs such as Irinotecan and Oxaliplatin, and modern biological drugs such as Bevacizumab and Cetuximab, the response rate, progression-free and overall survival are about 50-60%, 9-11 and 20-24 months respectively. Despite this progress, many questions remain unsolved especially those related to the optimal duration of treatment and the role of maintenance therapy. To treat until progression (or unacceptable toxicity) is the classical way but in the common clinical practice is frequent to perform an induction therapy (until the maximum response is obtained) followed by a complete stop and restart on progression, or by a maintenance without the drug/s responsible of the major cumulative toxicities. The following report focus on the role of different strategies respect to the classic "treatment until progression".


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Colonic Neoplasms/drug therapy , Antibodies, Monoclonal/administration & dosage , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized , Bevacizumab , Camptothecin/administration & dosage , Camptothecin/analogs & derivatives , Cetuximab , Colonic Neoplasms/mortality , Disease Progression , Disease-Free Survival , Humans , Irinotecan , Organoplatinum Compounds/administration & dosage , Oxaliplatin , Survival Rate
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...