Oral anticancer medicine interventions: A cross-sectional study in French community pharmacies.

INTRODUCTION: The increasing number of oral anticancer medicines (OAMs) dispensed in community pharmacies and the associated challenges (misuse, management of side effects) give the community pharmacist (CP) a major role in the pharmacotherapeutic management of cancer patients. In France, as a response to these challenges, cancer outpatients can schedule a meeting with their CP to ensure the safe and effective use of OAMs. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the perspectives of these interventions regarding their implementation and the opinion of French CPs. METHODS: A declarative survey and semi-structured interviews were conducted with CPs that dispensed at least one OAM between January 2021 and March 2022. The study was conducted between April and August 2022. RESULTS: Eighty-five CPs completed the survey. Of these pharmacists, 21% (n = 18) had already performed OAM interventions and 91% (n = 61) wanted to implement them. Lack of time, knowledge and training were the main barriers to implementation. No correlations were identified between the characteristics of community pharmacies and the likelihood of implementing OAM interventions. CONCLUSIONS: Considering that CPs seem willing to implement them and the favourable context in France, this observational study highlights the potential of OAM interventions to improve the management of cancer patients. Though further studies are required to better evaluate the implementation and the potential effects of these interventions, OAM interventions could be relevant strategies in other healthcare systems to secure the management of cancer patients through the involvement of the CP.

[Patients treated with anticancer drugs: Practices and expectations of community pharmacists]. / Patients sous anticancéreux : pratiques et attentes des pharmaciens officinaux.

INTRODUCTION: The evolution of pharmacotherapeutic management of cancer patients makes essential the role of the community pharmacist through its management conducted in community pharmacy as well as its relationships with the hospital and primary care professionals. The objective of this work is to study this pharmacotherapeutic management, for all routes of administration considered. METHODS: This observational study is based on a questionnaire and semi-structured interviews conducted with community pharmacists in contact with the Unité médicale ambulatoire de cancérologie (UMAC) of the University Hospital of Dijon. RESULTS: The main objective of community pharmacists is to ensure that patients understand and comply with their treatment. Twenty-one percent of them have already implemented oral anticancer drug interviews. Sixty-five percent have partial information about the injectable treatments administered to their patients while only 3 % have complete knowledge. Sixty-nine percent of community pharmacists are satisfied with the documents sent by the UMAC (summary of drug treatments, pharmaceutical report, individualized pharmaceutical plan). However, the lack of information from hospital structures generally represents one of the main difficulties in the management of cancer patients by community pharmacists and coordination with other professionals. DISCUSSION: The information and training of community pharmacists represent possible improvements for a better care and coordination between healthcare professionals. Some emerging practices, such as the implementation of oral anticancer drug interviews in community pharmacies and the participation of community pharmacists in primary care coordination organizations, also represent opportunities to strengthen their role in the management of cancer patients.

Impact of a Tripartite Collaboration between Oncologist, Pharmacist and Diabetologist in the Management of Patients with Diabetes Starting Chemotherapy: The ONCODIAB Trial.

BACKGROUND: Diabetes negatively impacts cancer prognosis. The objective of this work was to evaluate a tripartite oncologist-pharmacist-diabetologist collaboration in the management of patients with diabetes starting chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The prospective ONCODIAB study (NCT04315857) included 102 adults with diabetes starting chemotherapy by whom a continuous glucose monitoring device was worn for fourteen days from the first day of the first and second chemotherapy cycles. The primary outcome was to assess pharmacist and diabetologist interventions. The secondary outcome was to evaluate the impact of the ONCODIAB follow-up on individualized patient glycemic targets at 6 months. RESULTS: A total of 191 (2 per patient) were made either by clinical pharmacists (n = 95) or diabetologists (n = 96) during the first two chemotherapy cycles. The anatomic therapeutic chemical drug classes most frequently involved in pharmacist interventions were cardiovascular system (23%), alimentary tract and metabolism (22%), and anti-infectives for systemic use (14%). Diabetologists modified the antidiabetic treatment in 58 (62%) of patients: dose reduction (34%), drug discontinuation (28%), drug addition (24%), and dose increase (15%). Glycated hemoglobin decreased from 7.6 ± 1.7% at baseline to 7.1 ± 1.1% at 6 months (p = 0.02). Compared to individualized targets, HbA1c was higher, in the interval, or lower in 29%, 44%, and 27% of patients at baseline vs. in 8%, 70%, and 22% of patients at 6 months, respectively (p < 10-3). CONCLUSIONS: In our study, a close collaboration between oncologists, pharmacists, and diabetologists helped by continuous glucose monitoring led to overall medication optimization and better glycemic control in patients with diabetes starting chemotherapy.

Glycemic control in people with diabetes treated with cancer chemotherapy: contribution of continuous glucose monitoring.

AIMS: The aim of our study was to assess, with Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM), exhaustive information on the glucose profile in people with diabetes starting chemotherapy. We also evaluated the adaptation of glucose-lowering drugs following analysis of CGM recordings. METHODS: Eighty-five people with diabetes starting chemotherapy were included in the ONCODIAB study. A CGM was worn for up to fourteen days in blinded mode before and after the diabetologist's intervention to evaluate the impact of modifying the glucose-lowering drugs. RESULTS: Time spent in range was 67.2 ± 24.2%. Time below the target glucose range (TBR) (< 70 mg/dl) was 8.9% in all the study population. TBR was significantly higher in patients treated with at least one drug due to the risk of hypoglycemia compared to the others (11.5% vs. 4.4%, p = 0.009). Sixty-five patients had available sensor data for the two recordings. Forty-one patients (51.9%) saw a decrease in their antidiabetic treatment after the diabetologist's intervention guided by the first CGM recording. We observed a significant reduction in the time spent below the target glucose range (70-55 mg/dl) between the two CGM recordings (10.3 ± 14.6% vs. 6.3 ± 9.4%, p = 0.016 and 3.8 ± 8.4% vs. 1.2 ± 2.9%, p = 0.012, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: CGM use in blinded mode could be an interesting tool to reduce the risk of hypoglycemia in people with diabetes starting chemotherapy. Our findings fully support the recommendation that assessing hypoglycemia risk should be mandatory in patients with diabetes before starting chemotherapy.

Clinical and Economic Impact of a Multidisciplinary Follow-Up Program in Lymphoma Patients.

Objectives: The UMACOACH Lymphoma is a multidisciplinary monitoring program for patients initiating a first highly haematotoxic treatment for Hodgkin or non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Patient follow-up is based on consultation with a pharmacist and planed phone calls by nurses supervised by a clinical haematologist. Our objective was to assess effectiveness and cost of the UMACOACH Lymphoma Program (ULP) and to investigate patient satisfaction and quality of life (QoL). Methods: This French monocentric case-control study included all patients enrolled in the ULP over a one-year period (cases) matched with retrospective patients receiving usual care (controls). Numbers of adverse events (AEs), re-hospitalisations, average relative dose intensity (ARDI), treatment response and survival were compared between the two groups. Among cases, patient satisfaction and QoL using the EORTC-QLQC30 questionnaire before and after treatment were evaluated. Results: Seventy-eight cases were matched to 78 controls. Twenty-six percent grade 3−4 AEs were observed in cases versus 38% in controls (p = 0.001). There were 76 and 88 re-hospitalisations in the case and control groups, respectively (p = 0.217). ARDI > 85% was observed in 92% and 82% of cases and controls, respectively (p = 0.138). No differences were observed in terms of treatment responses and survival. Estimated cost savings were of EUR 81,782 in favour of the case group. An improvement of 5.1 points was observed in the total QoL score before and after treatment in cases. Conclusions: A nurse−pharmacist−haematologist collaboration seems to be promising to reduce grade 3−4 AEs in HL and NHL patients receiving highly haematotoxic chemotherapy regimens. Cost savings from hospitalisation being avoided were also shown.

Safety of ninety-minute daratumumab infusion.

PURPOSE: Daratumumab is the first anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody of the class approved for recurrent and refractory multiple myeloma. Grade 3 and 4 Infusion-Related Reactions (IRRs) are frequent during the first and second infusions. Due to the risks associated with severe IRRs, daratumumab is systematically administered over a period of 3.5 hours.The main objective of this study was to evaluate the safety of a 90-minute daratumumab infusion from the third infusion. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All patients who had received two or more doses of daratumumab in monotherapy or in combination with standard infusion rates were included. We excluded patients enrolled in clinical trials. For the rapid infusion protocol, 20% of the dose was administered over 30 minutes and the remaining 80% over 60 minutes. RESULTS: From April 1 to May 31, 2019, 25 patients received 53 90-minute infusions of daratumumab. Premedication included corticosteroids, antipyretics, antihistamines, and if necessary a leukotriene receptor antagonist. No grade 3 or grade 4 IRRs were observed. CONCLUSION: From the third infusion, we found that a rapid administration of daratumumab (90 vs 210 minutes) was well tolerated and safe. It would be interesting to test this regimen from the second infusion.

Clinical and economic impact of pharmacist interventions in an ambulatory hematology-oncology department.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate clinical and financial impact of pharmacist interventions in an ambulatory adult hematology-oncology department. METHODS: All cancer patients receiving a first injectable immuno- and/or chemotherapy regimen were included in this prospective study over a one-year period. The clinical impact of pharmacist interventions made by two clinical pharmacists was rated using the Clinical Economic and Organizational tool. Financial impact was calculated through cost savings and cost avoidance. Main results: Five hundred and fifty-eight patients were included. A total of 1970 pharmacist interventions were performed corresponding to a mean number of 3.5 pharmacist interventions/patient. The clinical impact of pharmacist interventions was classified as negative, null, minor, moderate, major and lethal in 0, 84 (4%), 1353 (68%), 385 (20%), 148 (8%) and 0 cases, respectively. The overall cost savings were €175,563. One hundred and nine (6%) of all pharmacist interventions concerned immuno- or chemotherapy regimen for cost savings of €148,032 (84% of the total amount of cost savings). The cost avoidance was €390,480. Cost avoidance results were robust to sensitivity analyses with cost of preventable adverse drug event as main driver of the model. When the cost of employing a pharmacist was subtracted from the average yearly cost savings plus cost avoidance per pharmacist, this yielded a net benefit of €223,021. The cost-benefit ratio of the clinical pharmacist was €3.7 for every €1 invested. Principal conclusions: To have two full-time clinical pharmacists in a 55-bed ambulatory adult hematology-oncology department is both clinically and financially beneficial.

Intra-arterial idarubicin_lipiodol without embolization can provide prolonged complete response in hepatocellular carcinoma: A case report.

Hepatocellular carcinoma is the fourth leading cause of cancer death. For unresectable intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma, the standard treatment is transarterial chemoembolization. To date, the overall survival at three years remains low, and there is currently no consensus about the best anticancer agent and optimal treatment regimen. We report the case of a hepatocellular carcinoma patient with a vascular contraindication to embolization who achieved a complete response after four intra-arterial infusions of idarubicin emulsified with lipiodol. The patient maintained his response over a three-year period without any hepatocellular carcinoma treatment, demonstrating the major role of the anticancer agent in the efficacy of transarterial therapies for intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma.