Evaluating Clinical Safety and Analytical Impact of Subvisible Silicone Oil Particles in Biopharmaceutical Products.

Silicone oil is a commonly used lubricant in pre-filled syringes (PFSs) and can migrate over time into solution in the form of silicone oil particles (SiOPs). The presence of these SiOPs can result in elevated subvisible particle counts in PFS drug products compared to other drug presentations such as vials or cartridges. Their presence in products presents analytical challenges as they complicate quantitation and characterization of other types of subvisible particles in solution. Previous studies have suggested that they can potentially act as adjuvant resulting in potential safety risks for patients. In this paper we present several analytical case studies describing the impact of the presence of SiOPs in biotherapeutics on the analysis of the drug as well as clinical case studies examining the effect of SiOPs on patient safety. The analytical case studies demonstrate that orthogonal techniques, especially flow imaging, can help differentiate SiOPs from other types of particulate matter. The clinical case studies showed no difference in the observed patient safety profile across multiple drugs, patient populations, and routes of administration, indicating that the presence of SiOPs does not impact patient safety.

Subcutaneous Injection Site Pain of Formulation Matrices.

PURPOSE: The objective of this work was to systematically evaluate the effects of formulation composition on subcutaneous injection site pain (ISP) using matrices comprising of common pharmaceutical excipients. METHODS: Two randomized, blinded, crossover studies in healthy subjects were conducted at a single site, where subjects received 1 mL SC injections of the buffer matrices. ISP intensity was measured using a 100 mm visual analogue scale (VAS), which was then analyzed via heatmap, categorical grouping, subgroup analysis, and paired delta analysis. RESULTS: Buffer type, buffer concentration and tonicity agent showed a substantial impact on ISP. Citrate buffer demonstrated a higher ISP than acetate buffer or saline). The 20 mM citrate buffer was more painful than 10 or 5 mM citrate buffers. NaCl and propylene glycol were significantly more painful than sugar alcohols (mannitol, sucrose, trehalose or glycerol). Histidine buffers exhibited ISP in the descending order of 150 mM > 75 mM > 25 mM > 0 mM NaCl, while histidine buffers containing Arginine-HCl at 0, 50, or 150 mM all showed very low ISP. Histidine buffer at pH 6.5 showed a lower ISP than pH 5.7. CONCLUSIONS: This systematic study via orthogonal analyses demonstrated that subcutaneous ISP is significantly influenced by solution composition.

Infliximab Biosimilars in the Age of Personalized Medicine.

Structural and functional differences between REMICADE and its two FDA-approved biosimilars appear to have clinical implications. We suggest a personalized biosimilar substitution approach based on prescribed indication, biosimilar afucosylation level, and a patient's FCGR3A polymorphism. We also advocate for establishing glycosylation variation limits for biosimilar approvals.

Biosimilarity under stress: A forced degradation study of Remicade® and Remsima™.

Remsima™ (infliximab) is the first biosimilar monoclonal antibody (mAb) approved by the European Medical Agency and the US Food and Drug Administration. Remsima™ is highly similar to its reference product, Remicade®, with identical formulation components. The 2 products, however, are not identical; Remsima™ has higher levels of soluble aggregates, C-terminal lysine truncation, and fucosylated glycans. To understand if these attribute differences could be amplified during forced degradation, solutions and lyophilized powders of the 2 products were subjected to stress at elevated temperature (40-60°C) and humidity (dry-97% relative humidity). Stress-induced aggregation and degradation profiles were similar for the 2 products and resulted in loss of infliximab binding to tumor necrosis factor and FcγRIIIa. Appearances of protein aggregates and hydrolysis products were time- and humidity-dependent, with similar degradation rates observed for the reference and biosimilar products. Protein powder incubations at 40°C/97% relative humidity resulted in partial mAb unfolding and increased asparagine deamidation. Minor differences in heat capacity, fluorescence, levels of subvisible particulates, deamidation and protein fragments were observed in the 2 stressed products, but these differences were not statistically significant. The protein solution instability at 60°C, although quite significant, was also similar for both products. Despite the small initial analytical differences, Remicade® and Remsima™ displayed similar degradation mechanisms and kinetics. Thus, our results show that the 2 products are highly similar and infliximab's primary sequence largely defines their protein instabilities compared with the limited influence of small initial purity and glycosylation differences in the 2 products.

A Multidimensional Analytical Comparison of Remicade and the Biosimilar Remsima.

In April 2016, the Food and Drug Administration approved the first biosimilar monoclonal antibody (mAb), Inflectra/Remsima (Celltrion), based off the original product Remicade (infliximab, Janssen). Biosimilars promise significant cost savings for patients, but the unavoidable differences between innovator and copycat biologics raise questions regarding product interchangeability. In this study, Remicade and Remsima were examined by native mass spectrometry, ion mobility, and quantitative peptide mapping. The levels of oxidation, deamidation, and mutation of individual amino acids were remarkably similar. We found different levels of C-terminal truncation, soluble protein aggregates, and glycation that all likely have a limited clinical impact. Importantly, we identified more than 25 glycoforms for each product and observed glycoform population differences, with afucosylated glycans accounting for 19.7% of Remicade and 13.2% of Remsima glycoforms, which translated into a 2-fold reduction in the level of FcγIIIa receptor binding for Remsima. While this difference was acknowledged in Remsima regulatory filings, our glycoform analysis and receptor binding results appear to be somewhat different from the published values, likely because of methodological differences between laboratories and improved glycoform identification by our laboratory using a peptide map-based method. Our mass spectrometry-based analysis provides rapid and robust analytical information vital for biosimilar development. We have demonstrated the utility of our multiple-attribute monitoring workflow using the model mAbs Remicade and Remsima and have provided a template for analysis of future mAb biosimilars.