Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Sci Rep ; 14(1): 9695, 2024 04 27.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38678107

ABSTRACT

High-dose methotrexate (HD-MTX) is a widely used chemotherapy regimen for hematologic malignancies such as lymphomas and acute lymphoblastic leukemia, but its use can lead to adverse effects, including acute kidney injury (AKI), impaired liver function, and mucositis, causing extended hospital stays and delayed subsequent chemotherapy. Our study aimed to investigate the predictive factors for renal toxicities associated with HD-MTX in Thai patients undergoing treatment for hematologic malignancies. We enrolled 80 patients who underwent MTX-containing regimens, analyzing 132 chemotherapy cycles. The most common disease was primary central nervous system lymphoma (33%). Genetic polymorphisms were examined using the MassARRAY® system, identifying 42 polymorphisms in 25 genes. Serum creatinine and MTX levels were measured 24 and 48 h after MTX administration. For the primary outcome, we found that the allele A of MTRR rs1801394 was significantly related to renal toxicity (odds ratio 2.084 (1.001-4.301), p-value 0.047). Patients who exceeded the MTX threshold levels at 24 h after the dose had a significantly higher risk of renal toxicity (OR (95%CI) = 6.818 (2.350-19.782), p < 0.001). Multivariate logistic regression analysis with a generalized estimated equation revealed hypertension and age as independent predictors of increased MTX levels at 24 h after the given dose.


Subject(s)
Hematologic Neoplasms , Methotrexate , Humans , Male , Methotrexate/adverse effects , Methotrexate/administration & dosage , Female , Middle Aged , Thailand/epidemiology , Aged , Adult , Hematologic Neoplasms/drug therapy , Hematologic Neoplasms/genetics , Acute Kidney Injury/chemically induced , Acute Kidney Injury/genetics , Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic/adverse effects , Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic/administration & dosage , Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide , Young Adult , Southeast Asian People
2.
Blood Cancer J ; 12(12): 173, 2022 12 23.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36550105

ABSTRACT

Patients with hematologic malignancies (HM) have demonstrated impaired immune responses following SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. Factors associated with poor immunogenicity remain largely undetermined. A literature search was conducted using PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane, and medRxiv databases to identify studies that reported humoral or cellular immune responses (CIR) following complete SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. The primary aim was to estimate the seroconversion rate (SR) following complete SARS-CoV-2 vaccination across various subtypes of HM diseases and treatments. The secondary aims were to determine the rates of development of neutralizing antibodies (NAb) and CIR following complete vaccination and SR following booster doses. A total of 170 studies were included for qualitative and quantitative analysis of primary and secondary outcomes. A meta-analysis of 150 studies including 20,922 HM patients revealed a pooled SR following SARS-CoV-2 vaccination of 67.7% (95% confidence interval [CI], 64.8-70.4%; I2 = 94%). Meta-regression analysis showed that patients with lymphoid malignancies, but not myeloid malignancies, had lower seroconversion rates than those with solid cancers (R2 = 0.52, P < 0.0001). Patients receiving chimeric antigen receptor T-cells (CART), B-cell targeted therapies or JAK inhibitors were associated with poor seroconversion (R2 = 0.39, P < 0.0001). The pooled NAb and CIR rates were 52.8% (95% CI; 45.8-59.7%, I2 = 87%) and 66.6% (95% CI, 57.1-74.9%; I2 = 86%), respectively. Approximately 20.9% (95% CI, 11.4-35.1%, I2 = 90%) of HM patients failed to elicit humoral and cellular immunity. Among non-seroconverted patients after primary vaccination, only 40.5% (95% CI, 33.0-48.4%; I2 = 87%) mounted seroconversion after the booster. In conclusion, HM patients, especially those with lymphoid malignancies and/or receiving CART, B-cell targeted therapies, or JAK inhibitors, showed poor SR after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. A minority of patients attained seroconversion after booster vaccination. Strategies to improve immune response in these severely immunosuppressed patients are needed.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Hematologic Neoplasms , Janus Kinase Inhibitors , Humans , COVID-19 Vaccines , SARS-CoV-2 , COVID-19/prevention & control , Hematologic Neoplasms/complications , Hematologic Neoplasms/therapy , Antibodies, Neutralizing
3.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 101(36): e30538, 2022 Sep 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36086710

ABSTRACT

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) surveillance rates are suboptimal. We aimed to identify HCC surveillance barriers from both physician's and patient's perspectives and assess the effectiveness of physician education using social networks. A nationwide survey with 513 physicians and another single-center survey with 315 HCC-risk patients were conducted. Barriers to suboptimal surveillance were identified using univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis. We educated 143 physicians by sending brief notes on HCC surveillance guidelines via social networks and re-evaluated their knowledge after 60 days using t test. Surveys showed 458 (86.3%), 254 (47.8%), and 225 (42.4%) physicians recommended surveillance in patients with cirrhosis, at-risk hepatitis B virus, and hepatitis C virus infection, respectively. Only 228 (42.9%) and 241 (38.0%) respondents adhered to recommended surveillance tools and interval, respectively. The main surveillance barriers among physicians were the lack of knowledge and resource limitations. The lack of a doctor's prescription was identified as a major barrier by patient' perspectives (odds ratio 1.4, 95% CI: 1.1-1.8, P = .024). Education via social networks enhanced physicians' knowledge, with pre- and post-education scores for guideline awareness of 63.0% versus 84.3% (P < .001) and for surveillance indication and tools of 40.0% versus 63.0% (P = .001), and 42.0% versus 59.3% (P = .015), respectively. Physicians' knowledge gap is a primary barrier for adherence to HCC surveillance protocols. Brief education via social networks shows effectiveness at increasing physicians' knowledge of HCC surveillance.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Hepatocellular , Liver Neoplasms , Physicians , Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/diagnosis , Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/epidemiology , Humans , Liver Neoplasms/diagnosis , Liver Neoplasms/epidemiology , Patient Reported Outcome Measures , Surveys and Questionnaires
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...