Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
PLoS One ; 15(6): e0235428, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32579591

ABSTRACT

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0232943.].

2.
PLoS One ; 15(5): e0232943, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32428036

ABSTRACT

Over the past few decades many corporate organisations have moved to open-plan office designs, mostly due to financial and logistical benefits. However, recent studies have found significant drawbacks to open plan offices and it is unclear how office designs can facilitate the best work output and company culture. Current design practice aims to optimise efficiency of space, but no previous research has tested the effect of office design experimentally in a working office. This paper describes an experiment comparing four different office designs (Open-plan, Zoned open-plan, Activity based, and Team offices) against a suite of wellbeing and productivity metrics in a real world technology company. Results suggest that two very different designs (Zoned open-plan and Team offices) perform well compared to Open-plan office designs. Zoned open-plan and Team office designs improved employee satisfaction, enjoyment, flow, and productivity, while Activity based and Open-plan designs performed poorly by comparison. The Open-plan office design was rated more poorly by employees, had higher levels of unsafe noise, and once employees no longer had to be in the Open-plan office design of the experiment, they spent more time at their desks.


Subject(s)
Environment Design/trends , Interior Design and Furnishings/methods , Workplace/psychology , Adult , Efficiency , Female , Humans , Job Satisfaction , Male , Middle Aged , Netherlands , Pilot Projects , Surveys and Questionnaires , Technology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...