Intramuscular Administration of Tranexamic Acid in a Large Swine Model of Hemorrhage with Hyperfibrinolysis.

BACKGROUND: Traumatic injury with subsequent hemorrhage is one of the leading causes of mortality among military personnel and civilians alike. Post traumatic hemorrhage accounts for 40-50% of deaths in severe trauma patients occurring secondary to direct vessel injury or the development of trauma induced coagulopathy (TIC). Hyperfibrinolysis plays a major role in TIC and its presence increases a patient's risk of mortality. Early therapeutic intervention with intravenous (IV) tranexamic acid (TXA) prevents development of hyperfibrinolysis and subsequent TIC leading to decreased mortality. However, obtaining IV access in an austere environment can be challenging. In this study, we evaluated the efficacy of intramuscular (IM) versus IV TXA at preventing hyperfibrinolysis in a hemorrhaged swine. METHODS: Yorkshire cross swine were randomized on the day of study to receive IM or IV TXA or no treatment. Swine were sedated, intubated, and determined to be hemodynamically stable prior to experimentation. Controlled hemorrhaged was induced by the removal of 30% total blood volume. After hemorrhage, swine were treated with 1000 mg of IM or IV TXA. Control animals received no treatment. Thirty minutes post TXA treatment, fibrinolysis was induced with a 50 mg bolus of tissue plasminogen activator (tPA). Blood samples were collected to evaluate blood TXA concentrations, blood gases, blood chemistry, and fibrinolysis. RESULTS: Blood TXA concentrations were significantly different between administration routes at the early timepoints, but were equivalent by 20 minutes after injection, remaining consistently elevated for up to three hours post administration. Induction of fibrinolysis resulted in 87.18 ± 4.63% lysis in control animals, compared to swine treated with IM TXA 1.96 ± 2.66 % and 1.5 ± 0.42% lysis in the IV TXA group. CONCLUSION: In the large swine model of hemorrhage with hyperfibrinolysis, IM TXA is bioequivalent and equally efficacious in preventing hyperfibrinolysis as IV TXA administration.

An evidence-based approach to nonoperative management of traumatic hemorrhagic shock in the emergency department.

The management of traumatic hemorrhagic shock has evolved, with increasing emphasis on damage control resuscitation principles. Despite these advances, hemorrhage is still the leading preventable cause of death in trauma. This issue provides evidence-based recommendations for the assessment and treatment of traumatic hemorrhagic shock. Hemostatic techniques as well as correction of hemorrhagic hypovolemia and traumatic coagulopathy are presented. The safety and efficacy of practices such as resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA), viscoelastic clot testing, and whole blood resuscitation are also reviewed.

A Comparison of Headache Treatment in the Emergency Department: Prochlorperazine Versus Ketamine.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Intravenous subdissociative-dose ketamine has been shown to be effective for pain management, but has not been specifically studied for headaches in the emergency department (ED). For this reason, we designed a study to compare standard treatment (prochlorperazine) with ketamine in patients with benign headaches in the ED. METHODS: This study was a multicenter, double-blind, randomized, controlled trial with a convenience sample of patients presenting to the ED with benign headaches. Patients were randomized to receive either prochlorperazine and diphenhydramine or ketamine and ondansetron. Patients' headache severity was measured on a 100-mm visual analog scale (VAS) at 0, 15, 30, 45, and 60 minutes. Nausea, vomiting, anxiety, and the need for rescue medications were also tracked. Patients were contacted at 24 to 48 hours posttreatment to rate their satisfaction and to determine whether they were still experiencing a headache. RESULTS: There were a total of 54 subjects enrolled. Two patients in the ketamine group and one in the prochlorperazine group withdrew because of adverse effects of the medications. In regard to the primary outcome, at 60 minutes, the prochlorperazine group had a mean improvement in VAS pain scores of 63.5 mm compared with 43.5 mm in the ketamine group, corresponding to a between-groups difference of 20.0 mm (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.8 to 37.2 mm) and a P value of .026. At 45 minutes, the prochlorperazine group had a mean improvement in pain scores of 56.1 mm compared with 38.0 mm in the ketamine group, a difference of 18.1 mm (95% CI 1.0 to 35.2 mm). At 24- to 48-hour follow-up, the mean satisfaction score was 8.3 of 10 for prochlorperazine and 4.9 of 10 for ketamine, a difference of 3.4 (95% CI 1.2 to 5.6). There was not a statistically significant difference in the percentage of patients who had a headache at follow-up or in other secondary outcomes. CONCLUSION: Prochlorperazine appears to be superior to ketamine for the treatment of benign headaches in the ED.