The effect of passive clear aligners on masticatory muscle activity in adults with different levels of oral parafunction.

BACKGROUND: There is limited knowledge of the possible side-effects of clear aligners on jaw function. OBJECTIVES: To determine the short-term effect of passive clear aligners (PCAs) on masticatory muscle activity (MMA), occlusal discomfort (OD) and temporomandibular disorder (TMD) symptoms in adults with different levels of self-reported oral parafunction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Participants were screened for oral parafunctional behaviours using the oral behavioural checklist. Respondents in ≥85th and ≤15th percentiles were invited to participate and allocated to a high (HPF: N = 15) or low (lower parafunction [LPF]: N = 16) parafunction group. Participants underwent a TMD clinical examination; somatisation and somatosensory amplification were assessed by questionnaires; OD and stress were assessed by visual analogue scales. While wearing PCAs, awake-time MMA was assessed three times over 9 days using a wearable electromyography device, along with OD, stress and TMD symptoms. RESULTS: The wearing of PCAs was associated with a significant decrease in mean contraction episode amplitude in both groups (p = 0.003). OD levels increased and remained raised in all participants after insertion of the PCAs (p < 0.001), more so in the HPF group (p = 0.048). The HPF group had higher somatisation scores (p = 0.006) and reported more TMD symptoms at all time points (p ≤ 0.004). No significant changes in stress or TMD symptoms were found in either group during the study period. CONCLUSIONS: PCAs were associated with a decrease in MMA in all participants. HPF individuals had greater somatisation and reported greater discomfort when wearing PCAs than LPF individuals.

Investigation of dental materials as skin simulants for forensic skin/skull/brain model impact testing.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to measure the tear strength and hardness of four different dental silicones in comparison to that of porcine skin. METHODS: Specimens were prepared (n = 20/group) according to ASTM D624-00, using three hydrophilic vinyl polysiloxane impression materials, one duplication silicone, and fresh porcine skin. A universal testing machine was used to strain each test specimen until complete rupture and calculate its tear strength (kNm(-1)). Failure analysis was then conducted using a stereoscopic zoom light microscope, as well as a scanning electron microscope (SEM). A shore A-type durometer was used to measure the hardness of all specimens. RESULTS: The tear strength for the silicones ranged from 1.75 to 9.58 kNm(-1) and the pigskin from 3.65 to 56.40 kNm(-1). The mean shore hardness for the silicones ranged from 16.275 to 62.65DU and the pigskin had a mean shore hardness of 22.65DU, with p values <0.0125 (0.05/4). Failure analysis of the silicone materials showed the origin of failure being in the tension side of the specimens and typical failure patterns were observed. Examining the materials under a SEM revealed that materials with higher viscosity presented with a larger amount of filler particle content than silicones with low viscosity, with the duplication silicone having no filler content. CONCLUSION: Dental silicones are a good alternative for skin in studies that require a skin simulant.