Validity of the 6-Minute Walk Test and YMCA Submaximal Cycle Test During Midpregnancy.

ABSTRACT: Tinius, RA, Blankenship, M, Maples, JM, Pitts, BC, Furgal, K, Norris, ES, Hoover, DL, Olenick, A, Lambert, J, and Cade, WT. Validity of the 6-minute walk test and Young Men's Christian Association (YMCA) submaximal cycle test during midpregnancy. J Strength Cond Res 35(11): 3236-3242, 2021-Submaximal exercise testing can be a feasible alternative to maximal testing within special populations to safely predict fitness levels; however, submaximal exercise testing has not been well-validated for use during pregnancy. The purpose of this study was to determine the concurrent validity of the 6-minute walk test (6MWT) and the YMCA submaximal cycle test (YMCAT) to predict V̇o2max in physically active women during midpregnancy. Thirty-seven (n = 37) pregnant women (22.1 ± 1.4 weeks' gestation) and 10 (n = 10) nonpregnant women participated in the study. Subjects completed a graded maximal treadmill test at 1 visit to measure maximal oxygen consumption (V̇o2max), and then subjects completed the 6MWT and YMCAT in randomized order during a separate visit. The predicted V̇o2max from each submaximal test were compared with the measured V̇o2max from the treadmill test to assess the validity of these tests during pregnancy. Among pregnant women, predicted V̇o2max from the YMCAT was not correlated to the measured V̇o2max (r = 0.14, p = 0.42), and the predicted V̇o2max from the 6MWT was only moderately correlated (r = 0.40, p = 0.016) to the measured V̇o2max. Among nonpregnant women, the predicted V̇o2max values from both the YMCAT and the 6MWT had strong correlations with the measured V̇o2max values (YMCAT: r = 0.71, p = 0.02; 6MWT: r = 0.80, p = 0.006). Neither test demonstrated concurrent validity among the pregnant sample. The main finding is that the YMCAT is not a valid method to estimate V̇o2max during midpregnancy (likely due to physiological changes in heart rate [HR] during pregnancy). The 6MWT has potential to be used clinically for estimating fitness as actual and predicted values did positively correlate, and it is not dependent on HR responses to exercise. However, if a precise measure of fitness is needed, then neither test appears to have strong validity for use during midpregnancy.

Assessment of endpoint criteria and perceived barriers during maximal cardiorespiratory fitness testing among pregnant women.

BACKGROUND: A plateau in volume of oxygen consumption (VO2) is the primary indicator for determining if an individual has reached their maximal aerobic capacity. However, secondary criteria can also be used to identify maximal effort (i.e. lactate level, rating of perceived exertion [RPE], percent of age-predicted maximal heart rate [HR] and respiratory exchange ratio [RER]). Age and gender-specific secondary criteria have been developed for the general population, but no secondary criteria have been established for pregnant women. The primary purpose of this study was to analyze secondary endpoint criteria during VO2max testing among pregnant women. A secondary purpose was to identify emotional and physical barriers pregnant women have that may prevent them from reaching maximal effort. METHODS: Twenty-five pregnant women (age= 30.0±3.6 years; gestation age= 22.1±1.4 weeks, pre-pregnancy BMI= 23.68±4.04 kg/m2) participated. Each participant completed a Bruce protocol treadmill test and maximal HR, RER, lactate, and RPE were assessed and compared to standards. Barriers were assessed immediately postexercise via open-ended questions. RESULTS: The mean VO2max was 32.9±8.8 mL/kg/min. Mean RPEmax was 17.6±1.8 versus the standard of RPE≥17 (P=0.12). Percent of age-predicted HRmax was 88.0±6.8% versus the standard of ≥95% (P<0.001). Immediate postexercise lactate was 6.8±2.4mM versus the standard of ≥8 mM (P=0.03). Maximal RER was 1.2±0.2 versus the standard of RERmax ≥1.1 (P=0.08). CONCLUSIONS: Our data provide preliminary evidence that secondary criteria may need to be adjusted for pregnant women. Additionally, physical and emotional barriers may be enhanced by pregnancy (e.g. pain, discomfort, anxiety, health concerns), and may limit the performance of pregnant women during maximal exercise.