Sex-based differences in inguinal hernia factors.

BACKGROUND: Much of our knowledge about inguinal hernias is based on males. Meanwhile, it is established that women have worse outcomes after inguinal hernia repair, with more chronic pain and higher recurrences. Pediatric literature shows inguinal hernias in females are more likely to be bilateral, incarcerated, and carry a stronger genetic predisposition than males. We aimed to evaluate sex-based differences in inguinal hernia factors in adults, to help supplement the paucity of literature in the adult population. METHODS: An institutional database of patients undergoing repair of primary inguinal hernias was queried with focus on preoperative risk factors and operative characteristics. Multivariate analysis was performed looking for independent variables associated with a greater number of hernia defects found intraoperatively. RESULTS: Among 494 patients, 202 (40.9%) were female. Number of risk factors among females was significantly higher than males (1.53 vs 1.2, p = 0.003). Females had significantly more constipation, GERD, and asthma and lower BMI than males. Family history of hernias was similar between both sexes. As expected, females had significantly less direct hernias (12.9% vs 32.9%, p < 0.001) and more femoral hernias (38.5% vs 12.2%, p < 0.001) than males. Bilaterality was similar. Females undergoing inguinal hernia repair averaged 1.23 prior deliveries. Regression analysis showed age, sex, BMI, and number of deliveries were not correlated with the number of defects. CONCLUSIONS: Females undergoing primary inguinal hernia repair had more preoperative risk factors for inguinal hernia than males. In our population, there was no higher incidence of bilaterality or significant genetic predisposition in females as noted by family history of hernias. Age, sex, BMI and number of deliveries did not correlate with the number of hernia defects found. Our study promotes awareness of inguinal hernias in females and presents new data to quantify sex-based differences and predispositions to inguinal hernias.

One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass for Revisional Bariatric Surgery: Assessment of Short-Term Safety.

PURPOSE: With the continued increase in bariatric procedures being performed in the USA, a growing percentage are revisions for weight regain after sleeve gastrectomy (SG) and gastric banding (LAGB). Standard practice in the USA involves conversion to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB). Internationally, one anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) has become a popular and effective alternative. Without the jejuno-jejunal anastomosis, OAGB has reduced potential related long-term complications. The purpose of this study is to compare the short-term safety of revision to OAGB versus RYGB. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients who underwent conversion to OAGB from LAGB or SG for weight regain from January 2019 to October 2021 were compared to BMI, sex, and age-matched patients who underwent conversion to RYGB. RESULTS: In our study, 82 patients were included, 41 in each cohort (41 OAGB vs. 41 RYGB). The majority in both groups underwent conversion from SG (71% vs. 78%). Operative time, estimated blood loss, and length of stay were comparable. There was no difference in 30-day complications (9.8% vs. 12.2%, p = .99) or reoperation (4.9% vs. 4.9%, p = .99). Mean weight loss at 1 month was also comparable (7.91 lbs vs 6.36 lbs). CONCLUSIONS: Patients undergoing conversion to OAGB for weight regain had similar operative times, post-operative complication rates, and 1-month weight loss compared to those who underwent RYGB. While more research is needed, this early data suggests that OAGB and RYGB provide comparable outcomes when used as conversion procedures for to failed weight loss. Therefore, OAGB may present a safe alternative to RYGB.

Re-do Laparoscopic Gastrojejunostomy for Gastrojejunal Anastomosis Stricture After Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass.

Stricture of the gastrojejunostomy is a possible complication after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. We present the case of a patient with stricture refractory to endoscopic dilation. The patient underwent laparoscopic revision of the gastrojejunostomy with a hand-sewn anastomosis.

Association between time interval from bariatric surgery to pregnancy and maternal weight outcomes.

BACKGROUND: The majority of patients having bariatric surgery are reproductive-age women who are advised to delay pregnancy for at least 12 months after surgery. Many women become pregnant sooner and the association between gestational weight gain (GWG) and maternal long-term weight is unknown. OBJECTIVES: The primary objective of this study was to compare weight outcomes in pregnancies occurring < 12 months versus ≥ 12 months after bariatric surgery. The secondary objectives were to determine the association between time interval from bariatric surgery to pregnancy and maternal nutritional status and maternal and neonatal outcomes. STUDY DESIGN: This is a retrospective cohort study of women with singleton livebirths after bariatric surgery who received care at a single tertiary care center between 2009 and 2017. GWG was the difference in weight between the first prenatal visit and delivery. GWG adequacy was determined by the IOM 2009 guidelines according to prepregnancy BMI (inadequate, adequate, excessive). Postpartum weight retention was calculated as the difference between weight at first prenatal visit and measured postpartum weight. Weight outcomes along with maternal nutritional status and maternal and neonatal outcomes were compared between < 12 months versus ≥ 12 months after bariatric surgery with t-tests, Mann-Whitney U and chi-square tests, as appropriate. RESULTS: Of the 76 pregnancies that met inclusion criteria, 36.8% occurred < 12 months (median 7.2 months) and 63.2% occurred ≥ 12 months after surgery (median 26.9 months). Of those with pregnancies < 12 months from surgery, 34% had a restrictive procedure (adjustable gastric band or sleeve gastrectomy) while 66% had a combined restrictive-malabsorptive procedure (Roux-en-Y gastric bypass). In the ≥ 12 months group, 42.3% had a restrictive procedure while 57.7% had a combined restrictive-malabsorptive procedure. There were no significant differences in maternal age, ethnicity or nulliparity between groups, but there were more women with obesity in the < 12 months group (75 vs. 52%, p = .03). The mean prepregnancy BMI in the < 12 months group was 34.3 vs. 31.2 kg/m2 in the ≥ 12 months group. The < 12 months group had lower mean GWG (4.9 vs. 10.9 kg, p = .01) and higher frequency of weight loss during pregnancy (28.6 vs. 4.2%, p < .01) compared to the ≥ 12 months group. The < 12 months group had significantly less postpartum weight retention at 6 months compared to the ≥ 12 months group (-1.3 vs. 8.3 kg, p = .02). The < 12 months group had a higher prevalence of vitamin B12 deficiency (23.1 versus 4.9%, p = .05). There were no differences in hyperemesis, hypertensive disorders, gestational diabetes or delivery mode between groups (p > .05). There were no differences in gestational age at delivery, birth weight and small for gestational age infants between groups (p > .05). CONCLUSION: Pregnancy < 12 months after bariatric surgery is associated with significantly lower mean GWG and a higher frequency of weight loss during pregnancy as well as less postpartum weight retention at 6 months. Although there were no differences birthweight, weight loss during pregnancy and its accompanying metabolic changes are concerning for a developing fetus. Further study is needed to determine the optimal timing of pregnancy after bariatric surgery with respect to both maternal and infant short and long-term outcomes.

Interpretation of androgen and anti-Mullerian hormone profiles in a Hispanic cohort of 5- to 8-year-old girls with premature adrenarche.

PURPOSE: Premature adrenarche (PA) often leads to polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). Higher anti-mullerian hormone (AMH) levels are reported in PCOS. We studied the androgen profile and AMH profiles in Hispanic girls with PA (aged 5-8 years) and age and body mass index (BMI) matched controls. METHODS: Retrospective review of electronic medical records of girls who met the inclusion criteria for premature adrenarche were done. RESULTS: PA girls (n=76) were matched to control girls (n=12) for age (mean±standard deviation) (6.7±1 years vs. 6.2±1.3 years) and BMI (20±10 kg/m2 vs. 17.8±2.7 kg/m2). Dehydroepiandrostenedione sulfate (63.3±51.3 µg/dL vs. 29.8±17.3 µg/dL, P<0.001) and testosterone levels (11.4±4.8 ng/dL vs. 8.2±2.9 ng/dL, P=0.001) were significantly higher in the PA group than controls. AMH values (<14 years: reference range, 0.49-3.15 ng/mL) were 3.2±2.2 ng/mL vs. 4.6± 3.2 ng/mL respectively in the PA and control groups and were not different (P=0.4). AMH did not show a correlation with bone age (P=0.1), and testosterone (P=0.9) in the PA group. 17-hydroxyprogesterone levels (17-OHP ng/dL) were 39.5±30.5 ng/dL vs. 36.8±19.8 ng/dL in PA versus control girls. The concentration of 17-OHP was not statistically different between the control and PA groups. CONCLUSION: Higher AMH was not observed in PA girls and no correlation with BA and androgen levels was observed.

Uterocervical angle: a novel ultrasound screening tool to predict spontaneous preterm birth.

BACKGROUND: Mechanical alteration of the cervical angle has been proposed to reduce spontaneous preterm birth. Performance of the uterocervical angle as measured by ultrasound for predicting spontaneous preterm birth is poorly understood. OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine whether a novel ultrasonographic marker, uterocervical angle, correlates with risk of spontaneous preterm birth in a general population. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a retrospective cohort study from May 2014 through May 2015 of singleton gestations between 16 0/7-23 6/7 weeks undergoing transvaginal ultrasound for cervical length screening. Images were remeasured for uterocervical angle between the lower uterine segment and the cervical canal. Primary outcome was prediction of spontaneous preterm birth <34 weeks and <37 weeks by uterocervical angle and secondary outcome evaluated cervical length and spontaneous preterm birth. RESULTS: A total of 972 women were studied. The rate of spontaneous preterm birth in this cohort was 9.6% for delivery <37 weeks and 4.5% for <34 weeks. Uterocervical angle of ≥95 degrees was significantly associated with spontaneous preterm birth <37 weeks with sensitivity of 80% (P < .001; confidence interval, 0.70-0.81; negative predictive value, 95%). Uterocervical angle of ≥105 degrees predicted spontaneous preterm birth <34 weeks with sensitivity of 81% (P < .001; confidence interval, 0.72-0.86; negative predictive value, 99%). Cervical length ≤25 mm significantly predicted spontaneous preterm birth <37 weeks (P < .001; sensitivity, 62%; negative predictive value, 95%) and <34 weeks (P < .001; sensitivity, 63%; negative predictive value, 97%). Regression analysis revealed a significant association of maternal age, nulliparity, race, and obesity at conception with spontaneous preterm birth and uterocervical angle. There was no correlation identified between history of dilation and curettage, abnormal Pap smear results, excisional cervical procedures, smoking, or obesity at delivery on spontaneous preterm birth and uterocervical angle. CONCLUSION: A wide uterocervical angle ≥95 and ≥105 degrees detected during the second trimester was associated with an increased risk for spontaneous preterm birth <37 and <34 weeks, respectively. Uterocervical angle performed better than cervical length in this cohort. Our data indicate that uterocervical angle is a useful, novel transvaginal ultrasonographic marker that may be used as a screening tool for spontaneous preterm birth.

Breast Cancer Profile among Patients with a History of Chemoprevention.

Purpose. This study identifies women with breast cancer who utilized chemoprevention agents prior to diagnosis and describes their patterns of disease. Methods. Our database was queried retrospectively for patients with breast cancer who reported prior use of chemoprevention. Patients were divided into primary (no history of breast cancer) and secondary (previous history of breast cancer) groups and compared to patients who never took chemoprevention. Results. 135 (6%) of 2430 women used chemoprevention. In the primary chemoprevention group (n = 18, 1%), 39% had completed >5 years of treatment, and fully 50% were on treatment at time of diagnosis. These patients were overwhelmingly diagnosed with ER/PR positive cancers (88%/65%) and were diagnosed with equal percentages (44%) of IDC and DCIS. 117 (87%) used secondary chemoprevention. Patients in this group were diagnosed with earlier stage disease and had lower rates of ER/PR-positivity (73%/65%) than the nonchemoprevention group (84%/72%). In the secondary group, 24% were on chemoprevention at time of diagnosis; 73% had completed >5 years of treatment. Conclusions. The majority of patients who used primary chemoprevention had not completed treatment prior to diagnosis, suggesting that the timing of initiation and compliance to prevention strategies are important in defining the pattern of disease in these patients.