ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: eHealth data analytics is widely used in health care research. However, there is limited knowledge on the role of eHealth data analysis to inform continuing professional development (CPD). The aim of this study was to collate available research evidence on the use of eHealth data for the development of CPD programs and plans for medical practitioners. METHODS: A scoping review was conducted using the six-stage Arksey and O'Malley Framework. A consultation exercise (stage 6) was performed with 15 international experts in the fields of learning and practice analytics to deepen the insights. RESULTS: Scoping review. The literature searches identified 9876 articles published from January 2010 to May 2022. After screening and full-text review, a total of nine articles were deemed relevant for inclusion. The results provide varied-and at times partial or diverging-answers to the scoping review research questions. Consultation exercise. Research rigor, field of investigation, and developing the field were the three themes emerged from analysis. Participants validated the scoping review methodology and confirmed its results. Moreover, they provided a meta-analysis of the literature, a description of the current CPD ecosystem, and clear indications of what is and should be next for the field. DISCUSSION: This study shows that there is no formal or well-established correlation between eHealth data and CPD planning and programming. Overall findings fill a gap in the literature and provide a basis for further investigation. More foundational work, multidisciplinary collaborations, and stakeholders' engagement are necessary to advance the use of eHealth data analysis for CPD purposes.
Subject(s)
Telemedicine , Humans , Health Personnel , Knowledge , LearningABSTRACT
Digital health tools such as apps are being increasingly used by women to access pregnancy-related information. Conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic, this study investigated: (i) pregnant women's current usage of digital health tools to self-monitor and (ii) their interest in theoretical pregnancy app features (a direct patient-to-healthcare-professional communication tool and a body measurement tool). Using a mixed methods approach, 108 pregnant women were surveyed and 15 currently or recently pregnant women were interviewed online. We found that pregnant women used digital health tools to mainly access pregnancy related information and less so to self-monitor. Most participants were interested and enthusiastic about a patient-to-healthcare-professional communication tool. About half of the survey participants (49%) felt comfortable using a body measurement tool to monitor their body parts and 80% of interview participants were interested in using the body measurement to track leg/ankle swelling. Participants also shared additional pregnancy app features that they thought would be beneficial such as a "Digital Wallet" and a desire for a holistic pregnancy app that allowed for more continuous and personalised care. This study highlights the gaps and needs of pregnant women and should inform all stakeholders designing pregnancy digital healthcare. This study offers a unique insight into the needs of pregnant women during a very particular and unique period in human history.
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Medical regulatory bodies in Australasia are encouraging greater use of continuing professional development activities, such as multisource feedback (MSF), which are practice-based, include facilitated feedback, and improve performance. The aim of this study was to explore the feasibility, effectiveness, and sustainability of an MSF process that includes a telephone/videoconference debrief, to better design future MSF implementation. METHOD: Thirty-seven Australasian physician participants sought feedback from patients and colleagues and debriefed their feedback report with a trained facilitator. The impact was evaluated using quantitative and qualitative measures including surveys and semistructured interviews. RESULTS: The feasibility of the MSF process was impacted by the level of support for the participant to complete the MSF, the nature and location of participants' work, and the use of telephone/videoconference to deliver the debrief. Regarding effectiveness, the MSF stimulated reflection on practice and action on areas identified for improvement. In addition, the quality of rater feedback and the inclusion of a debrief impacted participant and facilitator reports of effectiveness. The absence of a culture of feedback, the formative nature of the MSF, and the confidentiality of the results were factors impacting sustainability. DISCUSSION: Optimizing MSF is important to encourage broad uptake in the wider medical community in Australasia. Although several factors were identified as having an impact, it is clear that inclusion of a quality debrief will increase the perceived value and the effectiveness of MSF. Delivering that debrief through telephone/videoconference can be effective and will increase the overall feasibility and sustainability.
