ABSTRACT
Anesthesiology training programs are tasked with equipping trainees with the skills to become medically and ethically competent in the practice of anesthesia and to be prepared to obtain board certification, yet there is currently no standardized ethics curriculum within anesthesia training programs in the United States. To bridge this gap, and to provide a validated ethics curriculum to meet the aforementioned needs, in July 2021, a survey was sent to anesthesia scholars in the field of biomedical ethics to identify key areas that should be included in such an ethics curriculum. The responses were rated on a Likert scale and ranked. This paper identifies the top ten topics identified as high priority for inclusion in an anesthesiology training program and consequently deemed most relevant to meet the educational needs of graduates of an anesthesiology residency: (1) capacity to consent; (2) capacity to refuse elective versus lifesaving treatment; (3) application of surrogate decisionmaking; (4) approach to do not resuscitate (DNR) status in the operating room; (5) patient autonomy and advance directives; (6) navigating patient beliefs that may impair care; (7) "futility" in end-of-life care: when to withdraw life support; (8) disclosure of medical errors; (9) clinical criteria for "brain death" and consequences of this definition; and (10) the impaired anesthesiologist.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Catheter associated urinary tract infections (CAUTIs) have become a focus for reducing healthcare costs. Reimbursement may be reduced to hospitals with higher rates. The implementation of bundles or other efforts to reduce infection numbers may not be as robust at hospitals caring for more diverse patient populations. This may lead to a disparity in hospital-associated infections rates that may lead to lower reimbursement and a downward spiral of quality of care and racial disparities. METHODS: We analyzed patients in the National Trauma Data Bank from 2016 to 2017. The final analysis included patients 65 years or older with one or more day of mechanical ventilation. This was the population had the highest rate of CAUTI. We compared white patients to non-whites using students t test, Mann Whitney U test, or chi-square as appropriate. Logistic regression with odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) was computed to identify risk factors for of CAUTI. RESULTS: Risk factors for developing a CAUTI were race (OR 1.44, 95% confidence interval (95%CI) 1.23-1.71), injury severity score (OR 1.10 per increase of one, 95% CI 1.01-1.02), care at a teaching hospital (OR 1.17, 95%CI 1.02-1.35), private insurance (OR 1.28, 95%CI 1.09-1.51), hypertension (OR 1.18, 95%CI 1.02-1.37), female gender (OR 1.54, 95%CI 1.33-1.77). Non-white patients received care at teaching hospitals more often and had a higher rate of government insurance or no insurance. DISCUSSION: The Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) has put in place a reimbursement modification 87 plan based on the rates of hospital-associated infections including CAUTIs. We have demonstrated non-white 88 patients have higher odds for developing a CAUTI. CONCLUSION: CMS may potentially worsen the racial disparity by further cutting reimbursement to hospitals who care for higher proportions of non-whites.
