Programmatic variation in home hemodialysis in Canada: results from a nationwide survey of practice patterns.

BACKGROUND: Over 40% of patients with end stage renal disease in the United States were treated with home hemodialysis (HHD) in the early 1970's. However, this number declined rapidly over the ensuing decades so that the overwhelming majority of patients were treated in-centre 3 times per week on a 3-4 hour schedule. Poor outcomes for patients treated in this fashion led to a renewed interest in home hemodialysis, with more intensive dialysis schedules including short daily (SDHD) and nocturnal (NHD). The relative infancy of these treatment schedules means that there is a paucity of data on 'how to do it'. OBJECTIVE: We undertook a systematic survey of home hemodialysis programs in Canada to describe current practice patterns. DESIGN: Development and deployment of a qualitative survey instrument. SETTING: Community and academic HHD programs in Canada. PARTICIPANTS: Physicians, nurses and technologists. MEASUREMENTS: Programmatic approaches to patient selection, delivery of dialysis, human resources available, and follow up. METHODS: We developed the survey instrument in three phases. A focus group of Canadian nephrologists with expertise in NHD or SDHD discussed the scope the study and wrote questions on 11 domains. Three nephrologists familiar with all aspects of HHD delivery reviewed this for content validity, followed by further feedback from the whole group. Multidisciplinary teams at three sites pretested the survey and further suggestions were incorporated. In July 2010 we distributed the survey electronically to all renal programs known to offer HHD according to the Canadian Organ Replacement Registry. We compiled the survey results using qualitative and quantitative methods, as appropriate. RESULTS: Of the academic and community programs that were invited to participate, 80% and 63%, respectively, completed the survey. We observed wide variation in programmatic approaches to patient recruitment, human resources, equipment, water, vascular access, patient training, dialysis prescription, home requirements, patient follow up, medications, and the approach to non-adherent patients. LIMITATIONS: Cross-sectional survey, unable to link variation to outcomes. Competition for patients between HHD and home peritoneal dialysis means that case mix for HHD may also vary between centres. CONCLUSIONS: There is wide variation between programs in all domains of HHD delivery in Canada. We plan further study of the extent to which differences in approach are related to outcomes.

PROBLÉMATIQUE: Au début des années 70, plus de 40% des patients en insuffisance rénale terminale aux États-Unis étaient traités par hémodialyse à domicile (HDD). Cette proportion a décliné rapidement au cours des décennies suivantes, de sorte que le mode de suppléance pour la majorité des patients est maintenant l'hémodialyse 3 fois par semaine à raison de 3 à 4 heures par séance. Les mauvais résultats obtenus avec cette méthode ont renouvelé l'intérêt pour l'HDD, notamment pour les dialyses intensives incluant la dialyse quotidienne courte (DQC) et l'hémodialyse nocturne (HDN). Étant donné leur nouveauté, il y a peu de données sur les façons de faire avec ces modes de suppléance. OBJECTIF: Afin de décrire les pratiques actuelles, nous avons réalisé un questionnaire systématique auprès des programmes d'HDD au Canada. DESIGN: Développement et déploiement d'un outil qualitatif. CADRE: Programmes d'HDD académiques et communautaires au Canada. PARTICIPANTS: Médecins, infirmières et technologues. VARIABLES MESURÉES: Approches pour la sélection des patients, le mode de suppléance, les ressources humaines disponibles et le mode de suivi pour chaque programme. MÉTHODOLOGIE: Nous avons développé un outil en trois phases. Un groupe de discussion composé de néphrologues canadiens ayant une expertise en DQC ou HDN ont échangé sur le contenu de l'étude et ont rédigé des questions sur 11 domaines. Trois néphrologues familiers avec tous les aspects de l'HDD ont révisé la validité des questions, puis ont demandé un nouvel avis à tout le groupe de discussion. Des équipes multidisciplinaires provenant de trois sites ont ensuite évalué le questionnaire et ont apporté des suggestions. En juillet 2010, le questionnaire a été distribué électroniquement à tous les programmes qui offrent l'HDD d'après le Registre canadien des insuffisances et des transplantations d'organes. Les résultats ont été compilés au moyen de méthodes qualitatives ou quantitatives, le cas échéant. RÉSULTATS: 80% des centres académiques et 63% des centres communautaires invités ont répondu au questionnaire. Nous avons observé des variations importantes entre les programmes quant au recrutement des patients, aux ressources humaines, à l'équipement, à l'eau, aux accès vasculaires, à l'entraînement des patients, à la prescription de dialyse, aux exigences du domicile, au suivi des patients, à la médication et à l'approche face aux patients non-adhérents. LIMITATIONS: Étude transversale, incapacité d'associer les variations aux issues cliniques. La compétition entre l'HDD et la dialyse péritonéale pour le recrutement des patients entraîne peut-être une variabilité entre les centres dans la composition des groupes de patients en HDD. CONCLUSIONS: Il y a de grandes variations entre les programmes dans tous les domaines concernant l'HDD au Canada. Nous planifions d'étudier dans le futur jusqu'à quel point ces différences sont reliées aux issues cliniques.

[Anaphylactoid reactions with the use of ST-AN69 dialysers in patients taking ACE inhibitors]. / Une série de réactions indésirables associées à l'utilisation concomitante d'une membrane AN69-ST et d'un IECA.

Anaphylactoid reactions from blood contact with AN69 hemodialysis membrane in patients taking ACE inhibitors are well-known. Modified AN69 dialyzers (ST-AN69) were invented to create a membrane combining low thrombogenic properties with safety with ACE inhibitors. We report four patients taking ACE inhibitors that presented anaphylactoid reactions with ST-AN69.

Outcome of ANCA-associated renal vasculitis: a 5-year retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Renal involvement is frequently present in antineutrophil cytoplasmic autoantibody (ANCA)-associated systemic vasculitis and is an important cause of end-stage renal failure (ESRF). METHODS: This retrospective, multicenter, sequential cohort study reports presenting features and outcome of 246 new patients diagnosed in London, UK, between 1995 and 2000. RESULTS: Diagnostic subgroups were microscopic polyangiitis, 120 patients (49%); Wegener's granulomatosis (WG), 82 patients (33%); renal-limited vasculitis, 33 patients (13.5%); and Churg-Strauss angiitis, 11 patients (4.5%). Median age was 66 years, 57% were men, and median creatinine level at presentation was 3.87 mg/dL (342 micromol/L). ANCA was present in 92%. Cumulative patient survival at 1 and 5 years was 82% and 76%, respectively. Mortality was associated with age older than 60 years (P < 0.001), development of ESRF (P < 0.001), initial creatinine level greater than 2.26 mg/dL (200 micromol/L; P = 0.01), and sepsis (P < 0.048). ESRF occurred in 68 patients (28%), of whom 47% died. Fifty-six patients who presented with a creatinine level greater than 5.65 mg/dL (500 micromol/L) survived, and 31 patients (55%) achieved dialysis independence. Relapse occurred in 34% after a median of 13 months and was more common in patients with WG (P = 0.048) and proteinase 3-ANCA (P = 0.034). Leukopenia occurred in 41% and was associated with sepsis (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Mortality and morbidity of ANCA-associated systemic vasculitis are improving compared with previous series, but remain high. Renal vasculitis often affects older patients, who have a particularly poor outcome. Early diagnosis improves outcome. Leukopenia, caused by immunosuppressive therapy, should be avoided because of the close association with sepsis and death.

Spontaneous and protracted partial remission of microscopic polyangiitis.

Microscopic polyangiitis (MPA), or microscopic polyarteritis, is an idiopathic small vessel vasculitis that frequently causes glomerular damage and renal failure and skin and lung damage in many cases. The renal lesions include focal necrotizing glomerulonephritis, extracapillary proliferative (crescentic) glomerulonephritis, and tubulointerstitial infiltration with polymorphonuclear leukocytes and lymphocytes. MPA often is associated with the presence of antineutrophil cytoplasmic autoantibody (ANCA) (myeloperoxidase positive) as a diagnostic marker. MPA commonly is regarded as a serious condition that places the survival of the kidneys and the patient at risk. Typically, there is a prodrome of some weeks to months, with rapid decline in renal function and dialysis as a potential outcome if intensive immunosuppressive treatment is not given or is delayed. We describe an otherwise typical case of MPA occurring in a 52-year-old woman presenting with multisystem disease, antimyeloperoxidase ANCA antibodies, renal impairment, and necrotizing crescentic glomerulonephritis in whom this usual sequence of events was not followed because the patient refused steadfastly to have any treatment for nearly a decade. Renal function remained stable for nearly 10 years, although there were persistent proteinuria, microscopic hematuria, and antimyeloperoxidase ANCA antibodies. A late renal-pulmonary relapse occurred, and immunosuppression was permitted only briefly. Prolonged renal and patient survival in the absence of immunosuppressive treatment has been reported rarely in this context.