Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 50
Filter
1.
J Biomech ; 102: 109550, 2020 03 26.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31932024

ABSTRACT

Workplace safety assessment, personalized treatment design and back pain prevention programs require accurate subject-specific estimation of spinal loads. Since no noninvasive method can directly estimate spinal loads, easy-to-use regression equations that are constructed based on the results of complex musculoskeletal models appear as viable alternatives. Thus, we aim to develop subject-specific regression equations of L4-L5 and L5-S1 shear and compression forces during various symmetric/asymmetric tasks using a nonlinear personalized finite element musculoskeletal trunk model. Kinematics and electromyography (EMG) activities of 19 young healthy subjects were collected during 64 different symmetric/asymmetric tasks. To investigate the reliability and accuracy of the musculoskeletal model and regression equations, we compared estimated trunk muscle activities and L4-L5 intradiscal pressures (IDPs) respectively with our own electromyography data (EMGs) and reported in vivo pressure measurements. Although in general, six independent rotation components (three trunk T11 rotations and three pelvic S1 rotations) are required to determine kinematics along the spine, only two surrogate variables (trunk flexion and its asymmetric angles) satisfactorily predicted all six rotation components (R2 > 0.94). Regression equations, developed based on subject-specific inputs, predicted spinal loads in satisfactory agreement with IDP measurements (R2 = 0.85). Predicted muscle activities in the personalized musculoskeletal models were in moderate to weak agreements with our measured EMGs in 19 participants. Based on dominance analysis, trunk flexion and its asymmetry angle, hand-load weight, hand-load lever arm, and body weight were the most important variables while the effects of body height and sex on spinal loads remained small.


Subject(s)
Lifting , Lumbar Vertebrae/physiology , Patient-Specific Modeling , Adult , Biomechanical Phenomena , Body Height , Body Weight , Humans , Male , Muscle, Skeletal/physiology , Nonlinear Dynamics , Pressure , Regression Analysis , Reproducibility of Results , Weight-Bearing , Young Adult
2.
Appl Ergon ; 82: 102935, 2020 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31479837

ABSTRACT

This paper evaluates a method for motion-based prediction of external forces and moments on manual material handling (MMH) tasks. From a set of hypothesized contact points between the subject and the environment (ground and load), external forces were calculated as the minimal forces at each contact point while ensuring the dynamics equilibrium. Ground reaction forces and moments (GRF&M) and load contact forces and moments (LCF&M) were computed from motion data alone. With an inverse dynamics method, the predicted data were then used to compute kinetic variables such as back loading. On a cohort of 65 subjects performing MMH tasks, the mean correlation coefficients between predicted and experimentally measured GRF for the vertical, antero-posterior and medio-lateral components were 0.91 (0.08), 0.95 (0.03) and 0.94 (0.08), respectively. The associated RMSE were 0.51 N/kg, 0.22 N/kg and 0.19 N/kg. The correlation coefficient between L5/S1 joint moments computed from predicted and measured data was 0.95 with a RMSE of 14 Nm for the flexion/extension component. In conclusion, this method allows the assessment of MMH tasks without force platforms, which increases the ecological aspect of the tasks studied and enables performance of dynamic analyses in real settings outside the laboratory.


Subject(s)
Ergonomics/methods , Forecasting/methods , Stress, Mechanical , Task Performance and Analysis , Weight-Bearing/physiology , Adult , Biomechanical Phenomena , Female , Humans , Lifting , Lumbar Vertebrae/physiology , Male , Motion , Movement , Sacrum/physiology
3.
J Biomech ; 99: 109520, 2020 01 23.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31787261

ABSTRACT

While some low-cost inertial motion capture (IMC) systems are now commercially available, generally, they have not been evaluated against gold standard optical motion capture (OMC). The objective was to validate the low-cost Neuron IMC system with OMC. Whole-body kinematics were recorded on five healthy subjects during manual handling of boxes for about 32 min while wearing 17 magnetic and inertial measurement units with Optotrak clusters serving as a reference. The kinematical model was calibrated anatomically for OMC and with poses for IMC. Local coordinate systems were aligned with angular velocities to dissociate differences due to technology or kinematical model. Descriptive statistics including the root mean square error (RMSE), coefficient of multiple correlation (CMC) and limits of agreement (LoA) were applied to the joint angle curves. The average technological error yielded 5.8° and 4.9° for RMSE, 0.87 and 0.96 for CMC and 0.4 ± 8.6° and -0.3 ± 6.0° for LoA about the frontal and transverse axes respectively, whereas the longitudinal axis yielded 10.5° for RMSE, 0.78 for CMC and 3.3 ± 13.1° for LoA. Differences due to technology and to the model contributed similarly to the total difference between IMC and OMC. For many joints and axes, RMSE stayed under 5°, CMC over 0.9 and LoA under 10°, especially for the transverse axis and lower limb. The Neuron low-cost IMC system showed potential for tracking complex human movements of long duration in a normal laboratory environment with a certain error level that may be suitable for many applications involving large IMC distribution.


Subject(s)
Costs and Cost Analysis , Mechanical Phenomena , Movement , Adult , Biomechanical Phenomena , Calibration , Female , Humans , Young Adult
4.
J Biomech ; 97: 109410, 2019 Dec 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31648789

ABSTRACT

Foot placement strategy is an essential aspect in the study of movement involving full body displacement. To get beyond a qualitative analysis, this paper provides a foot placement classification and analysis method that can be used in sports, rehabilitation or ergonomics. The method is based on machine learning using a weighted k-nearest neighbors algorithm. The learning phase is performed by an observer who classifies a set of trials. The algorithm then automatically reproduces this classification on subsequent sets. The method also provides detailed analysis of foot placement strategy, such as estimating the average foot placements for each class or visualizing the variability of strategies. An example of applying the method to a manual material handling task demonstrates its usefulness. During the lifting phase, the foot placements were classified into four groups: front, contralateral foot behind, ipsilateral foot behind, and parallel. The accuracy of the classification, assessed with a holdout method, is about 97%. In this example, the classification method makes it possible to observe and analyze the handler's foot placement strategies with regards to the performed task.


Subject(s)
Foot/physiology , Machine Learning , Movement/physiology , Adult , Humans , Male , Research Design , Task Performance and Analysis , Young Adult
5.
J Biomech ; 70: 124-133, 2018 03 21.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29198368

ABSTRACT

Maximum voluntary exertion (MVE) tasks quantify trunk strength and maximal muscle electromyography (EMG) activities with both clinical and biomechanical implications. The aims here are to evaluate the performance of an existing trunk musculoskeletal model, estimate maximum muscle stresses and spinal forces, and explore likely differences between males and females in maximum voluntary exertions. We, therefore, measured trunk strength and EMG activities of 19 healthy right-handed subjects (9 females and 10 males) in flexion, extension, lateral and axial directions. MVEs for all subjects were then simulated in a subject-specific trunk musculoskeletal model, and estimated muscle activities were compared with EMGs. Analysis of variance was used to compare measured moments and estimated spinal loads at the L5-S1 level between females and males. MVE moments in both sexes were greatest in extension (means of 236 Nm in males and 190 Nm in females) and least in left axial torque (97 Nm in males and 64 Nm in females). Being much greater in lateral and axial MVEs, coupled moments reached ∼50% of primary moments in average. Females exerted less moments in all directions reaching significance except in flexion. Muscle activity estimations were strongly correlated with measurements in flexion and extension (Pearson's r = 0.69 and 0.76), but the correlations were very weak in lateral and axial MVEs (Pearson's r = 0.27 and 0.13). Maximum muscle stress was in average 0.80 ±â€¯0.42 MPa but varied among muscles from 0.40 ±â€¯0.22  MPa in rectus abdominis to 0.99 ±â€¯0.29 MPa in external oblique. To estimate maximum muscle stresses and evaluate validity of a musculoskeletal model, MVEs in all directions with all coupled moments should be considered.


Subject(s)
Models, Biological , Muscle, Skeletal/physiology , Physical Exertion/physiology , Torso/physiology , Adult , Electromyography , Female , Humans , Male , Sex Characteristics , Torque , Young Adult
6.
J Biomech ; 70: 166-174, 2018 03 21.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29089111

ABSTRACT

To reduce lifting and associated low back injuries, manual material handling operations often involve pulling-pushing of carts at different weights, orientations, and heights. The loads on spine and risk of injury however need to be investigated. The aim of this study was to evaluate muscle forces, spinal loads and trunk stability in pull-push tasks in sagittal-symmetric, static upright standing posture. Three hand-held load magnitudes (80, 120 and 160 N) at four elevations (0, 20, 40 and 60 cm to the L5-S1) and 24 force directions covering all pull/push orientations were considered. For this purpose, a musculoskeletal finite element model with kinematics measured earlier were used. Results demonstrated that peak spinal forces occur under inclined pull (lift) at upper elevations but inclined push at the lowermost one. Minimal spinal loads, on the other hand, occurred at and around vertical pull directions. Overall, spinal forces closely followed variations in the net external moment of pull-push forces at the L5-S1. Local lumbar muscles were most active in pulls while global extensor muscles in lifts. The trunk stability margin decreased with load elevation except at and around horizontal push; it peaked under pulls and reached minimum at vertical lifts. It also increased with antagonist activity in muscles and intra-abdominal pressure. Results provide insight into the marked effects of variation in the load orientation and elevation on muscle forces, spinal loads and trunk stability and hence offer help in rehabilitation, performance enhancement training and design of safer workplaces.


Subject(s)
Muscle, Skeletal/physiology , Spine/physiology , Standing Position , Torso/physiology , Biomechanical Phenomena/physiology , Finite Element Analysis , Humans , Models, Biological , Postural Balance/physiology , Weight-Bearing/physiology
7.
J Biomech ; 70: 149-156, 2018 03 21.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28797595

ABSTRACT

Musculoskeletal models represent spinal motion segments by spherical joints/beams with linear/nonlinear properties placed at various locations. We investigated the fidelity of these simplified models (i.e., spherical joints with/without rotational springs and beams considering nonlinear/linear properties) in predicting kinematics of the ligamentous spine in comparison with a detailed finite element (FE) model while considering various anterior-posterior joint placements. Using the simplified models with different joint offsets in a subject-specific musculoskeletal model, we computed local spinal forces during forward flexion and compared results with intradiscal pressure measurements. In comparison to the detailed FE model, linearized beam and spherical joint models failed to reproduce kinematics whereas the nonlinear beam model with joint offsets at -2 to +4mm range (+: posterior) showed satisfactory performance. In the musculoskeletal models without a hand-load, removing rotational springs, linearizing passive properties and offsetting the joints posteriorly (by 4mm) increased compression (∼32%, 17% and 11%) and shear (∼63%, 26% and 15%) forces. Posterior shift in beam and spherical joints increased extensor muscle active forces but dropped their passive force components resulting in delayed flexion relaxation and lower antagonistic activity in abdominal muscles. Overall and in sagittally symmetric tasks, shear deformable beams with nonlinear properties performed best followed by the spherical joints with nonlinear rotational springs. Using linear rotational springs or beams is valid only in small flexion angles (<30°) and under small external loads. Joints should be placed at the mid-disc height within -2 to +4mm anterior-posterior range of the disc geometric center and passive properties (joint stiffnesses) should not be overlooked.


Subject(s)
Joints/physiology , Muscle, Skeletal/physiology , Patient-Specific Modeling , Spine/physiology , Torso/physiology , Adult , Biomechanical Phenomena , Finite Element Analysis , Hand , Humans , Male , Pressure , Rotation , Weight-Bearing
8.
Appl Ergon ; 65: 112-122, 2017 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28802429

ABSTRACT

For paramedics, loading a stretcher into an ambulance is an activity with a high risk of back injury and accidents. The objective of this study was to document strategies paramedics use at work while loading a powered stretcher into an ambulance. A total of 249 stretcher loading operations performed by 58 paramedics, and 51 semistructured post-intervention interviews were analyzed. Almost three quarters of loading operations required additional actions (e.g., raising the shoulders and additional lifting) to insert the stretcher into the cot fastener system in the ambulance. Some strategies that were necessary to complete the stretcher loading operation seemed to have negative impacts on the workers' health, such as repositioning the stretcher. This action wastes time and requires significant physical efforts, as it is usually done alone. This study suggests some potential solutions, related to equipment, training, workers and work organization, to reduce the risk of injury while loading stretchers.


Subject(s)
Emergency Medical Services , Moving and Lifting Patients/methods , Stretchers , Adult , Ambulances , Biomechanical Phenomena , Emergency Medical Technicians , Female , Humans , Interviews as Topic , Male , Middle Aged , Moving and Lifting Patients/adverse effects , Occupational Health , Occupational Injuries/prevention & control , Physical Exertion , Risk Factors , Time and Motion Studies , Video Recording , Young Adult
9.
Appl Ergon ; 60: 93-102, 2017 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28166904

ABSTRACT

A few biomechanical studies have contrasted the work techniques of female and male workers during manual material handling (MMH). A recent study showed that female workers differed from males mostly in the strategy they used to lift 15-kg boxes from the ground, especially regarding task duration, knee and back postures and interjoint coordination. However, the lifting technique difference observed in females compared to males was perhaps due to a strength differences. The objective of this study was to test whether female workers would repeat the same lifting technique with a load adjusted to their overall strength (females: 10 kg; males: 15 kg), which can be considered a "relative load" since the overall back strength of females is 2/3 that of males. The task for the participants consisted in transferring boxes from one pallet to another. A dynamic 3D linked segment model was used to estimate the net moments at L5/S1, and different kinematic variables were considered. The results showed that the biomechanics of the lifting techniques used by males and females were similar in terms of task duration and cumulative loading, but different in terms of interjoint coordination pattern. The sequential interjoint coordination pattern previously seen in females with an absolute load (15 kg) was still present with the relative load, suggesting the influence of factors more intrinsically linked to sex. Considering that the female coordination pattern likely stretched posterior passive tissues when lifting boxes from the ground, potentially leading to higher risk of injury, the reason for this sex effect must be identified so that preventive interventions can be proposed.


Subject(s)
Hip Joint/physiology , Knee Joint/physiology , Lifting , Lumbosacral Region/physiology , Sex Factors , Biomechanical Phenomena , Female , Humans , Male , Muscle Fatigue , Time Factors , Weight-Bearing
10.
Genes Brain Behav ; 16(2): 285-295, 2017 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27620964

ABSTRACT

Animal and human studies suggest that initial expression of maternal behaviour depends on oxytocin and dopamine systems. However, the mechanism by which these systems affect parenting behaviours and the timing of these effects are not well understood. This article explores the role of mothers' executive function in mediating the relation between oxytocin and dopamine gene variants and maternal responsiveness at 48 months post-partum. Participants (n = 157) were mothers recruited in the Maternal Adversity, Vulnerability and Neurodevelopment Study, which assesses longitudinally two cohorts of mothers and children in Canada. We examined single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) related to the dopamine and oxytocin systems (DRD1 rs686, DRD1 rs265976, OXTR rs237885 and OXTR rs2254298), assessed mothers' decision-making at 48 months using the Cambridge Neurological Automated Testing Battery (CANTAB) and evaluated maternal responsiveness from videotaped interactions during the Etch-A-Sketch co-operation task. Mediation analyses showed that OXTR rs2254298 A-carriers had an indirect effect on positive parenting which was mediated by mothers' performance on decision-making task (estimate = 0.115, P < 0.005), while OXTR rs2254298 A-carriers had both direct and indirect effects on physically controlling parenting, also mediated through enhanced performance on decision-making (estimate = -0.059, P < 0.005). Dopamine SNPs were not associated with any measure of executive function or parenting (all P > 0.05). While oxytocin has previously been associated with only the early onset of maternal behaviour, we show that an OXTR polymorphism is involved in maternal behaviour at 48 months post-partum through mothers' executive function. This research highlights the importance of the oxytocin system to maternal parenting beyond infancy.


Subject(s)
Dopamine/genetics , Executive Function/physiology , Maternal Behavior/physiology , Oxytocin/genetics , Adult , Child , Cohort Studies , Dopamine/metabolism , Female , Humans , Longitudinal Studies , Male , Mother-Child Relations , Mothers , Oxytocin/metabolism , Parenting/psychology , Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide , Pregnancy , Receptors, Oxytocin/genetics
11.
J Biomech ; 49(14): 3492-3501, 2016 10 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27712883

ABSTRACT

Subject-specific parameters influence spinal loads and the risk of back disorders but their relative effects are not well understood. The objective of this study is to investigate the effects of changes in age (35-60 years), sex (male, female), body height (BH: 150-190cm) and body weight (BW: 50-120kg) on spinal loads in a full-factorial simulation using a personalized (spine kinematics, geometry, musculature and passive properties) kinematics driven musculoskeletal trunk finite element model. Segmental weight distribution (magnitude and location along the trunk) was estimated by a novel technique to accurately represent obesity. Five symmetric sagittal loading conditions were considered, and main effect plots and analyses of variance were employed to identify influential parameters. In all 5 tasks simulated, BW (98.9% in compression and 96.1% in shear) had the greatest effect on spinal loads at the L4-L5 and L5-S1 levels followed by sex (0.7% in compression and 2.1% in shear), BH (0.4% in compression and 1.5% in shear) and finally age (<5.4%). At identical BH and BW, spinal loads in females were slightly greater than those in males by ~4.7% in compression and ~8.7% in shear. In tasks with no loads in hands, BW-normalized spinal loads further increased with BW highlighting the exponential increase in spinal loads with BW that indicates the greater risk of back disorders especially in obese individuals. Uneven distribution of weight in obese subjects, with more BW placed at the lower trunk, further (though slightly <7.5%) increased spinal loads.


Subject(s)
Abdominal Muscles/physiopathology , Lumbar Vertebrae/physiopathology , Adult , Aging , Biomechanical Phenomena , Body Height , Body Weight , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Models, Biological , Models, Theoretical , Obesity/physiopathology , Posture , Sensitivity and Specificity , Sex Characteristics , Weight-Bearing
12.
Biomech Model Mechanobiol ; 15(6): 1699-1712, 2016 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27169402

ABSTRACT

Development of a subject-specific computational musculoskeletal trunk model (accounting for age, sex, body weight and body height), estimation of muscle forces and internal loads as well as subsequent validation by comparison with measured intradiscal pressure in various lifting tasks are novel, important and challenging. The objective of the present study is twofold. First, it aims to update and personalize the passive and active structures in an existing musculoskeletal kinematics-driven finite element model. The scaling scheme used an existing imaging database and biomechanical principles to adjust muscle geometries/cross-sectional-areas and passive joint geometry/properties in accordance with subjects' sex, age, body weight and body height. Second, using predictions of a detailed passive finite element model of the ligamentous lumbar spine, a novel nonlinear regression equation was proposed that relates the intradiscal pressure (IDP) at the L4-L5 disc to its compression force and intersegmental flexion rotation. Predicted IDPs and muscle activities of the personalized models under various tasks are found in good-to-excellent agreement with reported measurements. Results indicate the importance of personal parameters when computing muscle forces and spinal loads especially at larger trunk flexion angles as minor changes in individual parameters yielded up to 30 % differences in spinal forces. For more accurate subject-specific estimation of spinal loads and muscle activities, such a comprehensive trunk model should be used that accounts for subject's personalized features on active musculature and passive spinal structure.


Subject(s)
Lumbar Vertebrae/physiology , Musculoskeletal Physiological Phenomena , Pressure , Torso/physiology , Biomechanical Phenomena , Computer Simulation , Finite Element Analysis , Humans , Nonlinear Dynamics , Posture , Regression Analysis , Reproducibility of Results , Rotation , Weight-Bearing/physiology
13.
J Biomech ; 49(6): 946-952, 2016 Apr 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26475220

ABSTRACT

Nowadays in various daily, occupational and training activities, there are many occasions with forces supported in hands acting at various magnitudes, elevations, and orientations with substantial horizontal components. In this work, we aim to compute trunk muscle forces, stability, and spinal loads under pulling external forces applied at 3 elevations and 13 orientations. Under an identical upright standing posture and upper body weight, the trunk active-passive response is computed using a validated iterative finite element kinematics-driven model. Pulling forces of 80, 120, and 160N are resisted symmetrically in both hands held at 20, 40, and 60 cm elevations above the L5-S1 and oriented each in upward (-90°), inclined upward (-75°, -60°, -45°, -30°, and -15°), horizontal (0°), inclined downward (15°, 30°, 45°, 60°, and 75°) and finally downward in gravity direction (90°). In addition, in all analyses, an antagonist moment of 10Nm is applied in order to generate rather small antagonist coactivity and intra-abdominal pressures of 8-12 kPa are considered when abdominal muscles are active under upward pulling forces. Results demonstrated substantial differences in muscular response, spinal loads, and stability margin as the pulling force elevation, orientation, and magnitude altered. Compression and shear forces at lower lumbar levels peaked under forces at higher elevations acting with downward inclinations. Minimum spinal forces were computed at all elevations under pulling forces in the upward direction. Trunk stability was also maximum under these latter forces pulling upward. These findings have important consequences in rehabilitation, training, and design of safer occupational activities.


Subject(s)
Abdominal Muscles/physiology , Lumbosacral Region/physiology , Weight-Bearing/physiology , Biomechanical Phenomena , Finite Element Analysis , Humans , Lumbar Vertebrae/physiology , Models, Biological , Postural Balance , Posture/physiology , Torso/physiology
14.
Ergonomics ; 58(5): 748-61, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25403553

ABSTRACT

Few musculoskeletal models are available to assess shoulder deeper muscle demand during overhead lifting tasks. Our objective was to implement a musculoskeletal model to assess the effect of lifting height and load on shoulder muscle work. A musculoskeletal model scaled from 15 male subjects was used to calculate shoulder muscle work during six lifting tasks. Boxes containing three different loads (6, 12 and 18 kg) were lifted by the subjects from the waist to shoulder or eye level. After optimisation of the maximal isometric force of the model's muscles, the bio-fidelity of the model was improved by 19%. The latter was able to reproduce the subjects' lifting movements. Mechanical work of the rotator cuff muscles, upper trapezius and anterior deltoid was increased with lifting load and height augmentation. In conclusion, the use of a musculoskeletal model validated by electromyography enabled to evaluate the muscle demand of deep muscles during lifting tasks.


Subject(s)
Body Height , Lifting , Rotator Cuff/physiology , Shoulder/physiology , Weight-Bearing , Adult , Biomechanical Phenomena , Electromyography , Humans , Male , Muscle, Skeletal/physiology
15.
J Electromyogr Kinesiol ; 25(2): 355-62, 2015 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25483204

ABSTRACT

This study aimed to assess the level of co-activation of the superficial shoulder muscles during lifting movement. Boxes containing three different loads (6, 12, and 18 kg) were lifted by fourteen subjects from the waist to shoulder or eye level. The 3D kinematics and electromyograms of the three deltoids, latissimus dorsi and pectoralis major were recorded. A musculoskeletal model was used to determine direction of the moment arm of these muscles. Finally an index of muscle co-activation named the muscle focus was used to evaluate the effects of lifting height, weight lifted and phase (pulling, lifting and dropping phases) on superficial shoulder muscle coactivation. The muscle focus was lower (more co-contraction) during the dropping phase compared to the two other phases (-13%, p<0.001). This was explained by greater muscle activations and by a change in the direction of the muscle moment arm as a function of glenohumeral joint position. Consequently, the function of the shoulder superficial muscles varied with respect to the glenohumeral joint position. To increase the superficial muscle coactivation during the dropping phase may be a solution to increase glenohumeral joint stiffness.


Subject(s)
Lifting , Muscle Contraction/physiology , Muscle, Skeletal/physiology , Shoulder/physiology , Weight-Bearing/physiology , Adult , Electromyography/methods , Humans , Male , Movement/physiology , Shoulder Joint/physiology
16.
J Int Neuropsychol Soc ; 20(9): 909-19, 2014 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25171131

ABSTRACT

The effect of low birth weight on children's development has been documented for a range of neurocognitive outcomes. However, few previous studies have examined the effect of birth weight variability within the normal range on children's neuropsychological development. The current study examined birth weight variation amongst children weighing ≥2500 g in relation to their language, executive functioning (EF), and theory of mind (ToM), and specified a developmental pathway in which birth weight was hypothesized to be associated with children's EF and ToM through their intermediary language skills. The current study used a prospective community birth cohort of 468 children. Families were recruited when children were newborns and followed up every 18 months until children were age 4.5. Language was assessed at age 3 using a standardized measure of receptive vocabulary (PPVT), and EF and ToM were measured at age 4.5 using previously validated and developmentally appropriate tasks. After controlling for potential confounding variables (family income, parent education, gestational age), birth weight within the normal range was associated with language ability at age 3 (ß=.17; p=.012); and the effect of birth weight on both EF (z=2.09; p=.03) and ToM (z=2.07; p=.03) at age 4.5 operated indirectly through their language ability at age 3. Our findings indicate that the effects of birth weight on child neurocognition extend into the normal range of birth weight, and specific developmental mechanisms may link these skills over time.


Subject(s)
Birth Weight/physiology , Child Development/physiology , Executive Function/physiology , Language , Theory of Mind/physiology , Age Factors , Child, Preschool , Female , Gestational Age , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Longitudinal Studies , Male , Neuropsychological Tests
17.
J Biomech ; 47(12): 3035-42, 2014 Sep 22.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25065729

ABSTRACT

A wide range of loading conditions involving external forces with varying magnitudes, orientations and locations are encountered in daily activities. Here we computed the effect on trunk biomechanics of changes in force location (two levels) and orientation (5 values) in 4 subjects in upright standing while maintaining identical external moment of 15 Nm, 30 Nm or 45 Nm at the L5-S1. Driven by measured kinematics and gravity/external loads, the finite element models yielded substantially different trunk neuromuscular response with moderate alterations (up to 24% under 45 Nm moment) in spinal loads as the load orientation varied. Under identical moments, compression and shear forces at the L5-S1 as well as forces in extensor thoracic muscles progressively decreased as orientation of external forces varied from downward gravity (90°) all the way to upward (-25°) orientation. In contrast, forces in local lumbar muscles followed reverse trends. Under larger horizontal forces at a lower elevation, lumbar muscles were much more active whereas extensor thoracic muscle forces were greater under smaller forces at a higher elevation. Despite such differences in activity pattern, the spinal forces remained nearly identical (<6% under 45 Nm moment). The published recorded surface EMG data of extensor muscles trend-wise agreed with computed local muscle forces as horizontal load elevation varied but were overall different from results in both local and global muscles when load orientation altered. Predictions demonstrate the marked effect of external force orientation and elevation on the trunk neuromuscular response and spinal forces and questions attempts to estimate spinal loads based only on consideration of moments at a spinal level.


Subject(s)
Muscle, Skeletal/physiology , Spine/physiology , Torso/physiology , Weight-Bearing/physiology , Adult , Biomechanical Phenomena , Electromyography , Humans , Male , Posture/physiology , Young Adult
18.
Appl Ergon ; 45(6): 1558-69, 2014 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24931477

ABSTRACT

Forty-five manual material handlers (15 females, 15 expert males and 15 novice males) performed series of box transfers under conditions similar to those of large distribution centers. The objective of the study was to verify whether sex differences in joint motions and in back loading variables (L5/S1 moments) exist during multiple box transfers. The task consisted in transferring 24 15-kg boxes from one pallet to another (4 layers of boxes; 6 boxes/layer: 3 in the front row, 3 in the back) at a self-determined pace and then at an imposed pace of 9 lifts/min. Full-body 3D kinematic data were collected as well as external foot forces. A dynamic 3D linked segment model was used to estimate the net moments at L5/S1. The results show that the peak L5/S1 moment during lifting for females was significantly lower than for males, but once normalized to body size the difference disappeared. In general, the female workers were very close to the posture adopted by the novice males at the instant of the peak resultant moment. However, females were closer to the box than the male workers. One major sex difference was seen when lifting from the ground, with the use of interjoint coordination analyses. Female workers showed a sequential motion initiated by the knees, followed by the hip and the back, while expert males showed a more synchronized motion. The lifting strategy of females likely stretches lumbar spine passive tissues, which in turn put them at greater risk of back injuries. As observed in our previous studies, these differences between expert males, novice males and females are especially notable when the box is lifted from the ground.


Subject(s)
Lifting , Task Performance and Analysis , Adult , Anthropometry , Biomechanical Phenomena , Electromyography , Female , Humans , Male , Muscle Fatigue/physiology , Occupational Diseases/etiology , Occupational Diseases/prevention & control , Posture/physiology , Sex Factors
19.
J Electromyogr Kinesiol ; 24(3): 387-93, 2014 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24650795

ABSTRACT

Forces at different heights and orientations are often carried by hands while performing occupational tasks. Trunk muscle activity and spinal loads are likely dependent on not only moments but also the orientation and height of these forces. Here, we measured trunk kinematics and select superficial muscle activity of 12 asymptomatic subjects while supporting forces in hands in upright standing. Magnitude of forces in 5 orientations (-25°, 0°, 25°, 50° and 90°) and 2 heights (20cm and 40cm) were adjusted to generate flexion moments of 15, 30 and 45Nm at the L5-S1 disc centre. External forces were of much greater magnitude when applied at lower elevation or oriented upward at 25°. Spinal kinematics remained nearly unchanged in various tasks. Changes in orientation and elevation of external forces substantially influenced the recorded EMG, despite similar trunk posture and identical moments at the L5-S1. Greater EMG activity was overall recorded under larger forces albeit constant moment. Increases in the external moment at the L5-S1 substantially increased EMG in extensor muscles (p<0.001) but had little effect on abdominals; e.g., mean longissimus EMG for all orientations increased by 38% and 75% as the moment level altered from 15Nm to 30Nm and to 45Nm while that in the rectus abdominus increased only by 2% and 4%, respectively. Under 45Nm moment and as the load orientation altered from 90° to 50°, 25°, 0° and -25°, mean EMG dropped by 3%, 12%, 12% and 1% in back muscles and by 17%, 17%, 19% and 13% in abdominals, respectively. As the load elevation increased from 20cm to 40cm, mean EMG under maximum moment decreased by 21% in back muscles and by 17% in abdominals. Due to the lack of EMG recording of deep lumbar muscles, changes in relative shear/compression components and different net moments at cranial discs despite identical moments at the caudal L5-S1 disc, complementary model studies are essential for a better comprehension of neuromuscular strategies in response to alterations in load height and orientation.


Subject(s)
Muscle, Skeletal/physiology , Posture/physiology , Task Performance and Analysis , Torso/physiology , Weight-Bearing/physiology , Adult , Analysis of Variance , Biomechanical Phenomena , Electromyography , Healthy Volunteers , Humans , Male , Muscle Strength Dynamometer
20.
Appl Ergon ; 45(3): 471-81, 2014 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23891462

ABSTRACT

Thirty manual material handlers (15 experts and 15 novices) were invited to perform series of box transfers under conditions similar to those of large distribution centers. The objective of the present study was to verify whether multiple box transfers leading to fatigue would also lead to differences between expert and novice workers in joint motions and in back loading variables (L5/S1 moments). The task consisted in transferring 24 15-kg boxes from one pallet to another (4 layers of boxes; 6 boxes/layer: 3 in the front row, 3 in the back) at a self-determined pace and then at an imposed pace of 9 lifts/min for a total of 240 lifts. The underlying idea was to set a challenging task that would force the experts to use their skills. Full-body 3D kinematic data were collected as well as external foot forces. A dynamic 3D linked segment model was used to estimate the net moments at L5/S1. The results clearly show that the experts bent their lumbar spine less (10° less) and were closer (4 cm) to the box than novice workers. Knee flexions were similar in both groups except when the box was lifted from ground level (expert ≈ 71°, novice ≈ 48°). The peak resultant moment was not statistically different (expert = 168 Nm, novice = 184 Nm) although experts had lower values on average than novices when lifting heights (and deposit heights) of the boxes increased. Therefore, experts differed from novice workers mostly in the posture-related variables. These differences are especially important to consider when the box is located on the ground, as the back posture and back loading are then at their greatest magnitude and could have a major impact on the distribution of internal forces on the spine.


Subject(s)
Lifting , Adult , Cumulative Trauma Disorders/etiology , Cumulative Trauma Disorders/prevention & control , Ergonomics , Fatigue/etiology , Fatigue/prevention & control , Humans , Inservice Training , Lifting/adverse effects , Male , Movement , Occupational Diseases/etiology , Occupational Diseases/prevention & control , Professional Competence
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...