Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
1.
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging ; 11(4): 561-572, 2018 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28780194

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to analyze whether scar characterization could improve the risk stratification for life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias and sudden cardiac death (SCD). BACKGROUND: Among patients with a cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) indication, appropriate defibrillator (CRT-D) therapy rates are low. METHODS: Primary prevention patients with a class I indication for CRT were prospectively enrolled and assigned to CRT-D or CRT pacemaker according to physician's criteria. Pre-procedure contrast-enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance was obtained and analyzed to identify scar presence or absence, quantify the amount of core and border zone (BZ), and depict BZ distribution. The presence, mass, and characteristics of BZ channels in the scar were recorded. The primary endpoint was appropriate defibrillator therapy or SCD. RESULTS: 217 patients (39.6% ischemic) were included. During a median follow-up of 35.5 months (12 to 62 months), the primary endpoint occurred in 25 patients (11.5%) and did not occur in patients without myocardial scar. Among patients with scar (n = 125, 57.6%), those with implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapies or SCD exhibited greater scar mass (38.7 ± 34.2 g vs. 17.9 ± 17.2 g; p < 0.001), scar heterogeneity (BZ mass/scar mass ratio) (49.5 ± 13.0 vs. 40.1 ± 21.7; p = 0.044), and BZ channel mass (3.6 ± 3.0 g vs. 1.8 ± 3.4 g; p = 0.018). BZ mass (hazard ratio: 1.06 [95% confidence interval: 1.04 to 1.08]; p < 0.001) and BZ channel mass (hazard ratio: 1.21 [95% confidence interval: 1.10 to 1.32]; p < 0.001) were the strongest predictors of the primary endpoint. An algorithm based on scar mass and the absence of BZ channels identified 148 patients (68.2%) without ICD therapy/SCD during follow-up with a 100% negative predictive value. CONCLUSIONS: The presence, extension, heterogeneity, and qualitative distribution of BZ tissue of myocardial scar independently predict appropriate ICD therapies and SCD in CRT patients.


Subject(s)
Arrhythmias, Cardiac/prevention & control , Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy , Cardiomyopathies/diagnostic imaging , Cicatrix/diagnostic imaging , Death, Sudden, Cardiac/prevention & control , Heart Failure/therapy , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Myocardium/pathology , Primary Prevention/methods , Aged , Arrhythmias, Cardiac/diagnosis , Arrhythmias, Cardiac/etiology , Arrhythmias, Cardiac/mortality , Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy/adverse effects , Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy/mortality , Cardiomyopathies/complications , Cardiomyopathies/mortality , Cicatrix/complications , Cicatrix/mortality , Death, Sudden, Cardiac/etiology , Female , Heart Failure/diagnosis , Heart Failure/etiology , Heart Failure/mortality , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Predictive Value of Tests , Prospective Studies , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Spain , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
2.
Neuroinformatics ; 11(1): 77-89, 2013 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22903439

ABSTRACT

Subtraction of Ictal SPECT Co-registered to MRI (SISCOM) is an imaging technique used to localize the epileptogenic focus in patients with intractable partial epilepsy. The aim of this study was to determine the accuracy of registration algorithms involved in SISCOM analysis using FocusDET, a new user-friendly application. To this end, Monte Carlo simulation was employed to generate realistic SPECT studies. Simulated sinograms were reconstructed by using the Filtered BackProjection (FBP) algorithm and an Ordered Subsets Expectation Maximization (OSEM) reconstruction method that included compensation for all degradations. Registration errors in SPECT-SPECT and SPECT-MRI registration were evaluated by comparing the theoretical and actual transforms. Patient studies with well-localized epilepsy were also included in the registration assessment. Global registration errors including SPECT-SPECT and SPECT-MRI registration errors were less than 1.2 mm on average, exceeding the voxel size (3.32 mm) of SPECT studies in no case. Although images reconstructed using OSEM led to lower registration errors than images reconstructed with FBP, differences after using OSEM or FBP in reconstruction were less than 0.2 mm on average. This indicates that correction for degradations does not play a major role in the SISCOM process, thereby facilitating the application of the methodology in centers where OSEM is not implemented with correction of all degradations. These findings together with those obtained by clinicians from patients via MRI, interictal and ictal SPECT and video-EEG, show that FocusDET is a robust application for performing SISCOM analysis in clinical practice.


Subject(s)
Brain/diagnostic imaging , Diagnostic Errors/statistics & numerical data , Epilepsies, Partial/diagnostic imaging , Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted , Image Processing, Computer-Assisted/statistics & numerical data , Algorithms , Electroencephalography , Humans , Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted/methods , Image Processing, Computer-Assisted/methods , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Monte Carlo Method , Subtraction Technique , Tomography, Emission-Computed, Single-Photon
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...