Comparison between thrombelastography and thromboelastometry in hyperfibrinolysis detection during adult liver transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Hyperfibrinolysis is one of the main causes of non-surgical bleeding during liver transplantation (LT). Viscoelastic haemostatic assays, including thromboelastometry (ROTEM(®)) and thrombelastography (TEG(®)), can detect hyperfibrinolysis at the bedside. No study has yet demonstrated which device or assay is more suitable for detecting hyperfibrinolysis. METHODS: This prospective observational study compared ROTEM(®) and TEG(®) in isolated adult LT. ROTEM(®) (EXTEM(®) [tissue factor activation], FIBTEM(®) [tissue factor activation with platelet inhibition], and APTEM(®) [tissue factor activation with tranexamic acid/aprotinin]) and TEG(®) (kaolin-TEG(®)) were simultaneously performed using arterial blood samples at eight time-points during LT: induction of general anaesthesia, 60 min after skin incision, 10 and 45 min after portal vein clamp, 15 min before graft reperfusion, and five, 30, and 90 min after graft reperfusion. Hyperfibrinolysis was identified per the manufacturers' definitions (maximum lysis >15% in ROTEM(®) or Lysis30>8% in TEG(®)) and confirmed with APTEM(®); incidence was compared between assays McNemar's test. RESULTS: Among 296 possible measurement points from 376 consecutive LT recipients, 250 underwent final analysis: 46 measurement points were excluded because of missing assays or flat line. Hyperfibrinolysis was confirmed at 89 (36%) of 250 measurement points: FIBTEM(®), EXTEM(®), and kaolin-TEG(®) detected 84 (94%), 41 (46%), and 21 (24%) hyperfibrinolysis, respectively. These hyperfibrinolysis detection rates significantly differed from each other (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Tissue factor-triggered ROTEM(®) tests were more sensitive than contact-activated k-TEG(®) in identifying hyperfibrinolysis in LT patients. Inhibition of platelet-fibrin interaction in FIBTEM(®) enhanced sensitivity to hyperfibrinolysis detection compared with EXTEM(®).

Acute kidney injury following orthotopic liver transplantation: incidence, risk factors, and effects on patient and graft outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Liver transplant recipients frequently develop acute kidney injury (AKI), but the predisposing factors and long-term consequences of AKI are not well understood. The aims of this study were to identify predisposing factors for early post-transplant AKI and the impact of AKI on patient and graft survival and to construct a model to predict AKI using clinical variables. METHODS: In this 5-year retrospective study, we analysed clinical and laboratory data from 424 liver transplant recipients from our centre. RESULTS: By 72 h post-transplant, 221 patients (52%) had developed AKI [according to the Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) criteria]. Predisposing factors for development of AKI were female sex, weight (>100 kg), severity of liver disease (Child-Pugh score), pre-existing diabetes mellitus, number of units of blood or fresh frozen plasma transfused during surgery, and non-alcoholic steatohepatitis as the aetiology of end-stage liver disease (P≤0.05). Notably, preoperative serum creatinine (SCr) was not a significant predisposing factor. After fitting a forward stepwise regression model, female sex, weight >100 kg, high Child-Pugh score, and diabetes remained significantly associated with the development of AKI within 72 h (P≤0.05). The area under the receiver operator characteristic curve for the final model was 0.71. The incidence of new chronic kidney disease and requirement for dialysis at 3 months and 1 yr post-transplant were significantly higher among patients who developed AKI. CONCLUSIONS: Development of AKI within the first 72 h after transplant impacted short-term and long-term graft survival.

Liver transplantation outcome in patients with angiographically proven coronary artery disease: a multi-institutional study.

Over the last decade the age of liver transplant (LT) recipients and the likelihood of coronary artery disease (CAD) in this population have increased. There are no multicenter studies that have examined the impact of CAD on LT outcomes. In this historical cohort study, we identified adult LT recipients who underwent angiography prior to transplantation at seven institutions over a 12-year period. For each patient we recorded demographic data, recipient and donor risk factors, duration of follow-up, the presence of angiographically proven obstructive CAD (≥50% stenosis) and post-LT survival. Obstructive CAD was present in 151 of 630 patients, the CAD(+) group. Nonobstructive CAD was found in 479 patients, the CAD(-) group. Patient survival was similar for the CAD(+) group (adjusted HR 1.13, CI = [0.79, 1.62], p = 0.493) compared to the CAD(-) group. The CAD(+) patients were further stratified into severe (CADsev, >70% stenosis, n = 96), and moderate CAD (CADmod, 50-70% stenosis, n = 55) groups. Survival for the CADsev (adjusted HR = 1.26, CI = [0.83, 1.91], p = 0.277) and CADmod (adjusted HR = 0.93, CI = [0.52, 1.66], p = 0.797) groups were similar to the CAD(-) group. We conclude that when current CAD treatment strategies are employed prior to transplant, post-LT survival is not significantly different between patients with and without obstructive CAD.

Central venous thrombosis and perioperative vascular access in adult intestinal transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Venous access is crucial in intestinal transplantation, but a thrombosed venous system may prevent the use of central veins of the upper body. The incidence of venous thrombosis and the necessity to perform alternative vascular access (AVA) in intestinal transplant recipients have not been fully investigated. METHODS: Records of adult patients who underwent intestinal transplantation between January 1, 2001, and December 31, 2009, were reviewed. Contrast venography was performed as pre-transplantation screening. Vascular accesses at the transplantation were categorized as I (percutaneous line via the upper body veins), II (percutaneous line via the lower body veins), and III (vascular accesses secured surgically, with interventional radiology, or using non-venous sites). Categories II and III were defined as AVA. Risk factors for central venous thrombosis and those for requiring AVA were analysed, respectively. RESULTS: Among 173 patients, central venous obstruction or stenosis (<50% of normal diameter) was found in 82% (141 patients). AVA was required in 4.6% (eight patients: four in each category II and III). Large-bore infusion lines were placed via the femoral arteries in all category III patients without complications. Existing inferior vena cava filter and hypercoagulable states were identified as the risk factors for the use of AVA, but not for central venous thrombosis. Outcomes of patients who underwent AVA were similar to those of patients without AVA. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of adult patients undergoing intestinal transplantation had at least one central venous stenosis or obstruction. The recipient outcomes were comparable when either standard vascular access or AVA was used for transplantation.

Pulmonary thromboembolism during adult liver transplantation: incidence, clinical presentation, outcome, risk factors, and diagnostic predictors.

BACKGROUND: Intraoperative pulmonary thromboembolism (PTE) is an often overlooked cause of mortality during adult liver transplantation (LT) with diagnostic challenge. The goals of this study were to investigate the incidence, clinical presentation, and outcome of PTE and to identify risk factors or diagnostic predictors for PTE. METHODS: Four hundred and ninety-five consecutive, isolated, deceased donor LTs performed in an institution for a 3 yr period (2004-6) were analysed. The standard technique was a piggyback method with veno-venous bypass without prophylactic anti-fibrinolytics. The clinical diagnosis of PTE was made with (i) acute cor pulmonale, and (ii) identification of blood clots in the pulmonary artery or observation of acute right heart pressure overload with or without intracardiac clots with transoesophageal echocardiography. RESULTS: The incidence of PTE was 4.0% (20 cases); cardiac arrest preceded the diagnosis of PTE [75% (15)] and PTE occurred during the neo-hepatic phase [85% (17)], especially within 30 min after graft reperfusion [70% (14)]. Operative and 60 day mortalities of patients with PTE were higher (P<0.001) than those without PTE (30% vs 0.8% and 45% vs 6.5%). Comparison of perioperative data between the PTE group (n=20) and the non-PTE group (n=475) revealed cardiac arrest and flat-line thromboelastography in three channels (natural, amicar, and protamine) at 5 min after graft reperfusion as the most significant risk factors or diagnostic predictors for PTE with an odds ratio of 154.32 [95% confidence interval (CI): 44.82-531.4] and 49.44 (CI: 15.6-156.57), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: These findings confirmed clinical significance of PTE during adult LT and suggested the possibility of predicting this devastating complication.