Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 17 de 17
Filter
1.
Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992) ; 69(suppl 1): e2023S115, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37556634

ABSTRACT

Women and men can have the same illnesses, but with different prevalence and reactions to symptoms. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to emphasize that distinct traits between men and women require a different approach for each of them. METHODS: PubMed and Google Scholar were searched using the following terms: Disability Evaluations, Women's health, Osteoporosis, Osteoarthritis, and Lymphedema, Pregnancy. RESULTS/CONCLUSION: Disease management can go beyond the symptoms, assessing the long-term consequences and possibly the disabilities they can generate, compromising the quality of life of the person, his/her family members, and eventually caregivers.


Subject(s)
Disabled Persons , Quality of Life , Humans , Pregnancy , Female , Male , Women's Health , Caregivers
2.
Rev. Assoc. Med. Bras. (1992, Impr.) ; 69(supl.1): e2023S115, 2023.
Article in English | LILACS-Express | LILACS | ID: biblio-1449119

ABSTRACT

SUMMARY Women and men can have the same illnesses, but with different prevalence and reactions to symptoms. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to emphasize that distinct traits between men and women require a different approach for each of them. METHODS: PubMed and Google Scholar were searched using the following terms: Disability Evaluations, Women's health, Osteoporosis, Osteoarthritis, and Lymphedema, Pregnancy. RESULTS/CONCLUSION: Disease management can go beyond the symptoms, assessing the long-term consequences and possibly the disabilities they can generate, compromising the quality of life of the person, his/her family members, and eventually caregivers.

5.
Clinics (Sao Paulo) ; 74: e722, 2019 05 13.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31090795

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to provide evidence for understanding how to treat osteoarthritis (OA) in our country. Therefore, it was necessary to match information and investigations related to the treatment of the disease from the three main types of specialists involved: physiatrists, orthopedists and rheumatologists. METHODS: The authors acted as a scientific advisory committee. From the initial discussions, a structured questionnaire was developed for use with a group of specialists on OA using the Delphi technique. The questionnaire was sent to 21 experts appointed by the authors, and the results obtained were critically analyzed and validated. RESULTS: The prevalence of OA was 33% in Brazil, corresponding to one-third of the individuals in the reference population, which included individuals over 25 years of age. Another significant finding was that most patients did not receive any form of treatment in the early stages of OA. CONCLUSION: The committee pointed to the need for early intervention and that the available medicinal resources can fulfil this important role, as is the case with SYSADOA treatments. Glucosamine-based medicinal products with or without chondroitin could also fulfill this need for early treatment. The other generated evidence and included investigations were then grouped together and are the subject of this publication.


Subject(s)
Clinical Competence/standards , Delphi Technique , Evidence-Based Medicine/standards , Osteoarthritis/therapy , Adult , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/administration & dosage , Brazil , Chondroitin Sulfates/therapeutic use , Consensus , Drug Therapy, Combination , Female , Glucosamine/therapeutic use , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Orthopedics/standards , Osteoarthritis/drug therapy , Osteoarthritis, Knee/therapy , Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine/standards , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Rheumatology/standards , Severity of Illness Index , Treatment Outcome
6.
Acta Ortop Bras ; 27(2): 95-99, 2019.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30988654

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the epidemiological profile of patients with osteoporotic fractures compared to patients with osteoarthritis (OA) and identify factors that diminish adherence to secondary prevention. METHODS: A total of 108 patients with osteoporotic fractures (OF) were compared to 86 patients with OA. RESULTS: Patients in the OF group were older (p < 0.001); had a lower body mass index (p < 0.001); were less literate (p = 0.012); were more frequently Caucasian (p = 0.003); were less frequently married (p < 0.001); experienced more falls, cognitive deficiency, previous fractures, old fracture, falls in the last year, and fall fractures; needed more help and took more medicine for osteoporosis (p < 0.05); and showed less pathology in the feet, muscle weakness, less vitamin D intake, and lower Katz & Lawton scores (p < 0.001). Factors that increased the chance of nonadherence included older age (p = 0.020), falls (p = 0.035), cognitive deficiency (p = 0.044), and presence of depression/apathy/confusion (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Patient age, ethnicity, marital status, previous falls, foot pathologies, muscle weakness, previous fractures, use of vitamin D, use of osteoporosis drugs, and lower Katz & Lawton scale score defined the OF group. Factors that increased the chance of nonadherence included older age, sedative use, cognitive disorders, and symptoms of depression/apathy/confusion. Level of Evidence III, Case-control.


OBJETIVO: Avaliar o perfil epidemiológico de pacientes com fraturas osteoporóticas, comparando com pacientes com osteoartrite (OA) e identificar fatores que diminuam aderência à prevenção secundária. MÉTODOS: 108 pacientes com FO foram comparados a 86 pacientes com OA. RESULTADOS: Grupo FO era mais velho (p< 0,001), com menor IMC (p<0,001), menos alfabetizado (p = 0,012), com maior frequência de brancos (p = 0,003), menor frequência de casados (p< 0,001). Apresentaram mais quedas, deficiência cognitiva, fraturas prévias, fratura antiga, queda no último ano, fraturas por queda. Necessitam de mais auxílio e tomam mais medicamento para osteoporose (p< 0,05); apresentaram menos patologia nos pés, fraqueza muscular. Tomam menos vitamina D e menor Katz & Lawton (p<0,001). Tem aumento da chance de não aderência: maior idade (p = 0,020), sedativo (p = 0,020), quedas (p = 0,035), deficiência cognitiva (p = 0,044) e presença de depressão/apatia/confusão (p< 0,001). CONCLUSÃO: Idade do paciente, etnia, estado civil, quedas prévias, patologias nos pés, fraqueza muscular, fraturas prévias, uso de vitamina D, uso de medicamentos para osteoporose e a escala Katz & Lawton definem o grupo FO. Aumentam a chance de não aderência: maior idade, sedativos, distúrbios cognitivos e sintomas de depressão/apatia/confusão. Nível de Evidência III, Estudo de caso controle.

7.
Acta ortop. bras ; 27(2): 95-99, Mar.-Apr. 2019. tab
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-989202

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT Objective: To evaluate the epidemiological profile of patients with osteoporotic fractures compared to patients with osteoarthritis (OA) and identify factors that diminish adherence to secondary prevention. Methods: A total of 108 patients with osteoporotic fractures (OF) were compared to 86 patients with OA. Results: Patients in the OF group were older (p < 0.001); had a lower body mass index (p < 0.001); were less literate (p = 0.012); were more frequently Caucasian (p = 0.003); were less frequently married (p < 0.001); experienced more falls, cognitive deficiency, previous fractures, old fracture, falls in the last year, and fall fractures; needed more help and took more medicine for osteoporosis (p < 0.05); and showed less pathology in the feet, muscle weakness, less vitamin D intake, and lower Katz & Lawton scores (p < 0.001). Factors that increased the chance of nonadherence included older age (p = 0.020), falls (p = 0.035), cognitive deficiency (p = 0.044), and presence of depression/apathy/confusion (p < 0.001). Conclusion: Patient age, ethnicity, marital status, previous falls, foot pathologies, muscle weakness, previous fractures, use of vitamin D, use of osteoporosis drugs, and lower Katz & Lawton scale score defined the OF group. Factors that increased the chance of nonadherence included older age, sedative use, cognitive disorders, and symptoms of depression/apathy/confusion. Level of Evidence III, Case-control.


RESUMO Objetivo: Avaliar o perfil epidemiológico de pacientes com fraturas osteoporóticas, comparando com pacientes com osteoartrite (OA) e identificar fatores que diminuam aderência à prevenção secundária. Métodos: 108 pacientes com FO foram comparados a 86 pacientes com OA. Resultados: Grupo FO era mais velho (p< 0,001), com menor IMC (p<0,001), menos alfabetizado (p = 0,012), com maior frequência de brancos (p = 0,003), menor frequência de casados (p< 0,001). Apresentaram mais quedas, deficiência cognitiva, fraturas prévias, fratura antiga, queda no último ano, fraturas por queda. Necessitam de mais auxílio e tomam mais medicamento para osteoporose (p< 0,05); apresentaram menos patologia nos pés, fraqueza muscular. Tomam menos vitamina D e menor Katz & Lawton (p<0,001). Tem aumento da chance de não aderência: maior idade (p = 0,020), sedativo (p = 0,020), quedas (p = 0,035), deficiência cognitiva (p = 0,044) e presença de depressão/apatia/confusão (p< 0,001). Conclusão: Idade do paciente, etnia, estado civil, quedas prévias, patologias nos pés, fraqueza muscular, fraturas prévias, uso de vitamina D, uso de medicamentos para osteoporose e a escala Katz & Lawton definem o grupo FO. Aumentam a chance de não aderência: maior idade, sedativos, distúrbios cognitivos e sintomas de depressão/apatia/confusão. Nível de Evidência III, Estudo de caso controle.

8.
Clinics ; 74: e722, 2019. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-1001822

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to provide evidence for understanding how to treat osteoarthritis (OA) in our country. Therefore, it was necessary to match information and investigations related to the treatment of the disease from the three main types of specialists involved: physiatrists, orthopedists and rheumatologists. METHODS: The authors acted as a scientific advisory committee. From the initial discussions, a structured questionnaire was developed for use with a group of specialists on OA using the Delphi technique. The questionnaire was sent to 21 experts appointed by the authors, and the results obtained were critically analyzed and validated. RESULTS: The prevalence of OA was 33% in Brazil, corresponding to one-third of the individuals in the reference population, which included individuals over 25 years of age. Another significant finding was that most patients did not receive any form of treatment in the early stages of OA. CONCLUSION: The committee pointed to the need for early intervention and that the available medicinal resources can fulfil this important role, as is the case with SYSADOA treatments. Glucosamine-based medicinal products with or without chondroitin could also fulfill this need for early treatment. The other generated evidence and included investigations were then grouped together and are the subject of this publication.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adult , Middle Aged , Osteoarthritis/therapy , Delphi Technique , Clinical Competence/standards , Evidence-Based Medicine/standards , Orthopedics/standards , Osteoarthritis/drug therapy , Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine/standards , Severity of Illness Index , Brazil , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/administration & dosage , Chondroitin Sulfates/therapeutic use , Treatment Outcome , Osteoarthritis, Knee/therapy , Consensus , Drug Therapy, Combination , Glucosamine/therapeutic use
9.
Drug Des Devel Ther ; 10: 1987-93, 2016.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27382251

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are the most common type of medication used in the treatment of acute pain. Ketorolac trometamol (KT) is a nonnarcotic, peripherally acting nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug with analgesic effects comparable to certain opioids. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of KT and naproxen (NA) in the treatment of acute low back pain (LBP) of moderate-to-severe intensity. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this 10-day, Phase III, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, noninferiority trial, participants with acute LBP of moderate-to-severe intensity as determined through a visual analog scale (VAS) were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive sublingual KT 10 mg three times daily or oral NA 250 mg three times daily. From the second to the fifth day of treatment, if patient had VAS >40 mm, increased dosage to four times per day was allowed. The primary end point was the reduction in LBP as measured by VAS. We also performed a post hoc superiority analysis. RESULTS: KT was not inferior to NA for the reduction in LBP over 5 days of use as measured by VAS scores (P=0.608 for equality of variance; P=0.321 for equality of means) and by the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (P=0.180 for equality of variance test; P=0.446 for equality of means) using 95% confidence intervals. The percentage of participants with improved pain relief 60 minutes after receiving the first dose was higher in the KT group (24.2%) than in the NA group (6.5%; P=0.049). The most common adverse effects were heartburn, nausea, and vomiting. CONCLUSION: KT is not inferior in efficacy and delivers faster pain relief than NA.


Subject(s)
Ketorolac/administration & dosage , Low Back Pain/drug therapy , Naproxen/administration & dosage , Tromethamine/administration & dosage , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/administration & dosage , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/chemistry , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/metabolism , Double-Blind Method , Humans , Ketorolac/chemistry , Ketorolac/metabolism , Naproxen/chemistry , Naproxen/metabolism , Tromethamine/chemistry , Tromethamine/metabolism
10.
Acta fisiátrica ; 22(2): 83-86, jun. 2015.
Article in English, Portuguese | LILACS | ID: lil-771286

ABSTRACT

A osteoartrite é a doença articular mais comum causando dores em seus portadores. Diversos tratamentos podem ser usados, dentre eles o de ondas de choque. Objetivo: Observar a influência do tratamento por ondas de choque na intensidade da dor em mulheres idosas com AO de joelho. Método: Participaram do estudo, 40 idosas (69,57 ± 6,42 anos) submetidos a tratamento semanalmente por ondas de choque com 2000 impulsos à de 2,5 a 4,0 bar, na frequência de 8Hz, no local mais doloroso à palpação da interlinha articular medial do joelho, durante três semanas consecutivas. O efeito da aplicação sobre a dor foi avaliado pela escala visual analógica antes e depois do tratamento. Resultados: Houve diminuição significante (p < 0,0001) da intensidade da dor das voluntárias, passando de 7,86 ± 1,07 cm para 5,32 ± 2,26 cm. Conclusão: A aplicação de ondas de choque mostrou-se benéfica para redução da dor em idosas portadoras de osteoatrite


Osteoarthritis is the most common articular disease that causes pain to its sufferers. Shockwave therapy is among the many treatments that can be used. Objective: The objective of this study was to observe the influence of shockwave therapy on the intensity of pain in elderly women with knee OA. Method: In this study, 40 elderly females (69.57 ± 6.42 years) were submitted to weekly shockwave therapy with 2000 impulses at 2.5 to 4.0 bar, at a frequency of 8Hz, at the location most painful to touch in the knee, the medial articular interline, for three consecutive weeks. The effect of its application on the pain was evaluated by the visual analogue scale before and after the treatment. Results: There was a significant reduction (p < 0.0001) of pain intensity in the volunteers, going from 7.86 ± 1.07 cm to 5.32 ± 2.26 cm. Conclusion: The application of shockwave therapy has been shown to reduce pain in elderly females with osteoarthritis


Subject(s)
Humans , Female , Middle Aged , Aged , Pain Measurement , Health of the Elderly , Osteoarthritis, Knee/therapy , Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy/instrumentation
11.
Gait Posture ; 38(2): 321-5, 2013 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23340044

ABSTRACT

The incidence of osteoporosis has been increasing, as have fractures resulting from falls. Postural balance was evaluated in postmenopausal women with and without lumbar osteoporosis. One hundred and twenty-six postmenopausal women aged 55-65 years were evaluated and separated into two groups according to the bone mineral density values of their lumbar spine: the osteoporosis group and the control group, paired by age (P = 0.219) and physical activity (P = 0.611). There was no difference between the groups (P = 0.139) regarding falls reported in the previous 12 months. Functional mobility was evaluated through the Timed Up and Go Test. Postural balance was evaluated using a portable force platform in standard standing position, with eyes open and closed, for 60s. Muscle strength was evaluated through an isokinetic dynamometer. This study shows that there is no difference in knee muscle strength and functional mobility (P = 0.121), postural balance with eyes open [mediolateral displacement (P = 0.286) and mean velocity of the center of pressure (COP) (P = 0.173)] and with eyes closed [mediolateral displacement (P = 0.163), and the mean velocity of displacement of the COP (P = 0.09)] in both groups. Subjects reporting falls had greater mediolateral displacement (P = 0.028) in both groups. Postmenopausal women aged between 55 and 65 years do not present changes in postural balance irrespective of lumbar osteoporosis. Greater COP mediolateral displacement is related to the occurrence of falls in postmenopausal women in the previous year.


Subject(s)
Accidental Falls/statistics & numerical data , Knee Joint/physiopathology , Lumbar Vertebrae , Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal/physiopathology , Postural Balance/physiology , Aged , Case-Control Studies , Female , Humans , Knee Joint/physiology , Middle Aged , Muscle Strength/physiology , Muscle Strength Dynamometer , Risk Factors
12.
Arq Bras Endocrinol Metabol ; 53(1): 107-12, 2009 Feb.
Article in Portuguese | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19347193

ABSTRACT

With the evolution of bone densitometry, differences in technologies, acquisition techniques, reference databases, reporting methods, diagnostic criteria and terminology have developed and the International Society for Clinical Densitometry (ISCD) periodically holds Position Development Conferences, the latest in 2007. The Brazilian Society for Clinical Densitometry (SBDens), with support from many Brazilian societies interested in bone health, gathered numerous specialists to discuss the ISCD proposals and to evaluate the validity of the extension of those norms to Brazilian population. The SBDens reunion of consensus made a very useful document to help the understanding and interpretation of bone densitometry and other methods of bone assessment.


Subject(s)
Bone Density , Densitometry/methods , Adolescent , Adult , Brazil , Child , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Societies, Medical , Young Adult
13.
Arq. bras. endocrinol. metab ; 53(1): 107-112, fev. 2009.
Article in Portuguese | LILACS | ID: lil-509873

ABSTRACT

A evolução dos métodos de avaliação da massa óssea trouxe diferentes tecnologias, modos de aquisição de imagens, bancos de dados de referência, terminologias, critérios diagnósticos fez com que a International Society for Bone Densitometry (ISCD) tomasse a iniciativa de promover reuniões periódicas de consenso, a última em 2007. A Sociedade Brasileira de Densitometria Clínica (SBDens), com apoio de várias sociedades brasileiras ligadas ao estudo da saúde óssea, reuniu diversos especialistas para discutir as propostas da ISCD e validar a aplicação destas normas à população brasileira. A reunião de Posições Oficiais da SBDens produziu um documento extremamente útil para a compreensão e interpretação da densitometria e de outros métodos de avaliação da massa óssea.


With the evolution of bone densitometry, differences in technologies, acquisition techniques, reference databases, reporting methods, diagnostic criteria and terminology have developed and the International Society for Clinical Densitometry (ISCD) periodically holds Position Development Conferences, the latest in 2007. The Brazilian Society for Clinical Densitometry (SBDens), with support from many Brazilian societies interested in bone health, gathered numerous specialists to discuss the ISCD proposals and to evaluate the validity of the extension of those norms to Brazilian population. The SBDens reunion of consensus made a very utile document to help the understanding and interpretation of bone densitometry and other methods of bone assessment.


Subject(s)
Adolescent , Adult , Child , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Young Adult , Bone Density , Densitometry/methods , Brazil , Societies, Medical , Young Adult
14.
Rev. bras. ortop ; 36(8): 317-21, ago. 2001. tab
Article in Portuguese | LILACS | ID: lil-296234

ABSTRACT

A tendinite patelar é freqüente em indivíduos que fazem atividade esportiva. Ainda näo está completamente esclarecida a causa dessa doença. Estudos histológicos vêm sendo realizados para melhor conhecimento do tendäo patelar. O objetivo deste trabalho foi o de estudar quantitativamente as ondulaçöes da fibra colágena do tendäo patelar humano, em adultos e crianças, dividindo-o em três regiöes: terço proximal, médio e distal. Compararam-se as três regiöes do tendäo entre si e o grupo de adultos com o grupo de crianças. Para tanto, estudou-se o tendäo de cadáveres de nove adultos e oito crianças. As lâminas foram coradas com Picro-Sirius e analisadas sob microscopia óptica e com luz polarizada. Verificou-se haver menor número de ondulaçöes no terço proximal do tendäo patelar de adultos quando comparados com os terços médio e distal. Näo existe diferença entre o número de ondulaçöes nas três regiöes do tendäo patelar em crianças. O número de ondulaçöes no terço proximal e medial do tendäo patelar em crianças é maior do que em adultos.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Infant, Newborn , Infant , Adult , Middle Aged , Collagen/ultrastructure , Patellar Ligament , Data Interpretation, Statistical , Tendinopathy
15.
Rev. Hosp. Clin. Fac. Med. Univ. Säo Paulo ; 52(3): 163-70, maio-jun. 1997.
Article in Portuguese | LILACS | ID: lil-205896

ABSTRACT

Osteoporose e a alteracao metabolica mais frequente acometendo ossos e e uma das doencas mais comuns em mulheres apos a menopausa. Pode ser definida como uma condicao clinica, na qual existe uma perda ossea significativa, com uma reducao da massa ossea alem da considerada normal para pacientes da mesma idade e sexo, comprometendo a integridade do arcabouco osseo, diminuindo sua resistencia e propiciando fraturas dos ossos acometidos, mesmo aos minimos esforcos. E considerada como uma doenca silenciosa ate que surgem as primeiras fraturas. A prevencao e fundamental, assim como o tratamento de reabilitacao, associado ao tratamento medicamentoso. Os exercicios fisicos sao importantes nao so na prevencao da propria osteoporose, assim como na prevencao de quedas que podem levar a fraturas


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Exercise , Osteoporosis/rehabilitation , Physical Therapy Specialty , Bone Remodeling , Osteoporosis , Osteoporosis/complications , Osteoporosis/therapy
17.
Rev. Hosp. Clin. Fac. Med. Univ. Säo Paulo ; 47(4): 185-9, jul.-ago. 1992.
Article in Portuguese | LILACS | ID: lil-125174

ABSTRACT

A osteoartrose e uma doenca de alta incidencia na populacao em geral, atingindo preferencialmente alguns grupos, como mulheres pos menopausa. A doenca se caracteriza por alguns aspectos clinicos que levam a niveis variados de incapacidade funcional. A incapacidade pode ser causada pelo processo doloroso ou por alteracoes articulares e peri-articulares secundarias a propria dor ou decorrentes da evolucao da doenca. Este artigo traz uma revisao sobre a fisiopatologia e abordagem terapeutica fisiatrica da dor, com indicacoes e limitacoes dos metodos.


Subject(s)
Humans , Osteoarthritis/rehabilitation , Physical Therapy Specialty , Analgesia , Osteoarthritis/physiopathology , Pain/therapy
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...