Medical and cardio-vascular emergency department visits during the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020: is there a collateral damage? A retrospective routine data analysis.

BACKGROUND: In this retrospective routine data analysis, we investigate the number of emergency department (ED) consultations during the COVID-19 pandemic of 2020 in Germany compared to the previous year with a special focus on numbers of myocardial infarction and acute heart failure. METHODS: Aggregated case numbers for the two consecutive years 2019 and 2020 were obtained from 24 university hospitals and 9 non-university hospitals in Germany and assessed by age, gender, triage scores, disposition, care level and by ICD-10 codes including the tracer diagnoses myocardial infarction (I21) and heart failure (I50). RESULTS: A total of 2,216,627 ED consultations were analyzed, of which 1,178,470 occurred in 2019 and 1,038,157 in 2020. The median deviation in case numbers between 2019 and 2020 was - 14% [CI (- 11)-(- 16)]. After a marked drop in all cases in the first COVID-19 wave in spring 2020, case numbers normalized during the summer. Thereafter starting in calendar week 39 case numbers constantly declined until the end of the year 2020. The decline in case numbers predominantly concerned younger [- 16%; CI (- 13)-(- 19)], less urgent [- 18%; CI (- 12)-(- 22)] and non-admitted cases [- 17%; CI (- 13)-(- 20)] in particular during the second wave. During the entire observation period admissions for chest pain [- 13%; CI (- 21)-2], myocardial infarction [- 2%; CI (- 9)-11] and heart failure [- 2%; CI (- 10)-6] were less affected and remained comparable to the previous year. CONCLUSIONS: ED visits were noticeably reduced during both SARS-CoV-2 pandemic waves in Germany but cardiovascular diagnoses were less affected and no refractory increase was noted. However, long-term effects cannot be ruled out and need to be analysed in future studies.

Dispatcher Self-assessment and Attitude Toward Video Assistance as a New Tool in Simulated Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation.

INTRODUCTION: Video-assisted cardiopulmonary resuscitation (V-CPR) describes an advanced telephone-assisted CPR (T-CPR), in which emergency medical service (EMS) dispatchers view a live video steam of the resuscitation. Dispatchers ' general attitudes toward and self-assessment in V-CPR have not been previously investigated. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We conducted this quantitative analysis along with a pilot study on V-CPR. After conducting V-CPR with laypersons in a simulation, EMS dispatchers were given questionnaires with 21 items concerning their personal attitude toward V-CPR and their self-assessment in providing instructions. The actual CPR performance achieved was recorded and compared to the dispatchers' self-assessments. RESULTS: Dispatchers completed 49 questionnaires, and the data is presented descriptively. Over 80% strongly agreed that V-CPR was helpful in guiding and that their feedback improved CPR quality. Fifty-one percent agreed that video images supported them in making a diagnosis, while 44.9% disagreed. A vast majority (80-90% each) strongly agreed that V-CPR helped them recognize CPR issues such as compression point, compression rate, and deterioration. In contrast, data for improved compression depth and release were weaker. Thirty percent found V-CPR to be more stressful or exhausting than T-CPR. A majority stated they would prefer V-CPR as an addition to T-CPR in the future. There was a huge gap between dispatchers' own view of CPR effort and measured CPR quality. CONCLUSION: Dispatchers generally embrace V-CPR and praise the abilities it provides. Our results indicate that the use of V-CPR did not automatically result in an overall improvement in guideline-compliant CPR quality.

Impact of video quality when evaluating video-assisted cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a randomized, controlled simulation trial.

BACKGROUND: Although not routinely established during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), video-assisted CPR has been described as beneficial in the communication with emergency medical service (EMS) authorities in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest scenarios. Since the influence of video quality has not been investigated systematically and due to variation of quality of a live-stream video during video-assisted CPR, we investigated the influence of different video quality levels during the evaluation of CPR performance in video sequences. METHODS: Seven video sequences of CPR performance were recorded in high quality and artificially reduced to medium and low quality afterwards. Video sequences showed either correct CPR performance or one of six typical errors: too low and too high compression rate, superficial and increased compression depth, wrong hand position and incomplete release. Video sequences were randomly assigned to the different quality levels. During the randomised and double-blinded evaluation process, 46 paramedics and 47 emergency physicians evaluated seven video sequences of CPR performance in different quality levels (high, medium and low resolution). RESULTS: Of 650 video sequences, CPR performance was evaluable in 98.2%. CPR performance was correctly evaluated in 71.5% at low quality, in 76.8% at medium quality, and in 77.3% at high quality level, showing no significant differences depending on video quality (p = 0.306). In the subgroup analysis, correct classification of increased compression depth showed significant differences depending on video quality (p = 0.006). Further, there were significant differences in correct CPR classification depending on the presented error (p < 0.001). Allegedly errors, that were not shown in the video sequence, were classified in 28.3%, insignificantly depending on video quality. Correct evaluation did not show significant interprofessional differences (p = 0.468). CONCLUSION: Video quality has no significant impact on the evaluation of CPR in a video sequence. Even low video quality leads to an acceptable rate of correct evaluation of CPR performance. There is a significant difference in evaluation of CPR performance depending on the presented error in a video sequence. TRIAL REGISTRATION: German Clinical Trial Register (Registration number DRKS00015297 ) Registered on 2018-08-21.

Video-assisted cardiopulmonary resuscitation: Does the camera perspective matter? A randomized, controlled simulation trial.

BACKGROUND: Dispatcher assistance can help to save lives during layperson cardiopulmonary resuscitation during cardiac arrest. The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of different camera positions on the evaluation of cardiopulmonary resuscitation performance during video-assisted cardiopulmonary resuscitation. METHODS: For this randomized, controlled simulation trial, seven video sequences of cardiopulmonary resuscitation performance were recorded from three different camera positions: side, foot and head position. Video sequences showed either correct cardiopulmonary resuscitation performance or one of the six typical errors: low and high compression rate, superficial and increased compression depth, wrong hand position or incomplete release. Video sequences with different cardiopulmonary resuscitation performances and camera positions were randomly combined such that each evaluator was presented seven individual combinations of cardiopulmonary resuscitation and camera position and evaluated each cardiopulmonary resuscitation performance once. A total of 46 paramedics and 47 emergency physicians evaluated seven video sequences of cardiopulmonary resuscitation performance from different camera positions. The primary hypothesis was that there are differences in accuracy of correct assessment/error recognition depending on camera perspective. Generalized linear multi-level analyses assuming a binomial distribution and a logit link were employed to account for the dependency between each evaluator's seven ratings. RESULTS: Of 651 video sequences, cardiopulmonary resuscitation performance was evaluable in 96.8% and correctly evaluated in 74.5% over all camera positions. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation performance was classified correctly from a side perspective in 81.3%, from a foot perspective in 68.8% and from a head perspective in 73.6%, revealing a significant difference in error recognition depending on the camera perspective (p = .01). Correct cardiopulmonary resuscitation was mistakenly evaluated to be false in 46.2% over all perspectives. CONCLUSIONS: Participants were able to recognize significantly more mistakes when the camera was located on the opposite side of the cardiopulmonary resuscitation provider. Foot position should be avoided in order to enable the dispatcher the best possible view to evaluating cardiopulmonary resuscitation quality.

Verbal Motivation vs. Digital Real-Time Feedback during Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: Comparing Bystander CPR Quality in a Randomized and Controlled Manikin Study of Simulated Cardiac Arrest.

OBJECTIVE: The use of smartphone applications increases bystander CPR quality as well as the use of telephone CPR protocols. The present prospective, randomized, controlled manikin trial analyses the effects of a smartphone application (PocketCPR©) on CPR quality in a bystander CPR scenario compared to a dispatcher-assisted telephone CPR with the additional use of a metronome and verbal motivation. Methods: 150 laypersons were included to perform 8-minute CPR on a manikin. Volunteers were randomly assigned to one of three groups: (1) dispatcher-assisted telephone CPR (telephone-group), (2) dispatcher-assisted telephone CPR combined with the smartphone-application (telephone + app-group) and (3) dispatcher-assisted telephone CPR with additional verbal motivation ("push harder, release completely," every 20 seconds, starting after 60 seconds) and a metronome with 100 min-1 (telephone + motivation-group). Results: Median compression depth did not differ significantly between the study groups (p = 0.051). However, in the post hoc analysis median compression depth in the telephone + motivation-group was significantly elevated compared to the telephone + app-group (59 mm [IQR 47-67 mm] vs. 51 mm [IQR 46-57 mm]; p = 0.025). The median number of superficial compressions was significantly reduced in the telephone + motivation-group compared to the telephone + app-group (70 [IQR 3-362] vs. 349 [IQR 88-538]; p = 0.004), but not compared to the telephone-group (91 [IQR 4-449]; p = 0.707). In contrast to the other study groups, median compression depth of the telephone + motivation-group increased over time. Chest compressions with correct depth were found significantly more often in the telephone + app-group compared to the other study groups (p = 0.011). Median compression rate in the telephone + app-group was significantly elevated (108 min-1 [IQR 96-119 min-1]) compared to the telephone-group (78 min-1 [IQR 56-106 min-1]; p < 0.001) and the telephone + motivation-group (99 min-1 [IQR 91-101 min-1]; p < 0.001). Conclusions: The use of a smartphone application as well as verbal motivation by a dispatcher during telephone CPR leads to higher CPR quality levels compared to standard telephone CPR. Thereby, the use of the smartphone application mainly shows an increase in compression rate, while increased compression rate with simultaneously increased compression depth was only apparent in the telephone + motivation-group.

Hirudotherapy attenuates arthritic pain in patients with various chronic pain syndromes: A retrospective analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Osteoarthritis is a degenerative disease that affects synovial joints. Micro-injuries of articular structures initiate inflammatory processes, leading to persistent pain. Due to various risk factors, osteoarthritis is often diagnosed in multimorbid patients. This makes pain management one of the key challenges, with a consistent need for new therapeutic strategies. Hence, complementary and integrative methods such as hirudotherapy have become increasingly important, even though their mechanisms of action are not entirely understood. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the longitudinal effect of a single leech application on osteoarthritic joints in a heterogenic cohort of 24 cases with various chronic pain syndromes. We assessed articular pain intensity ratings and movability of the treated joint after one-time leeching for up to 12 months. We further investigated the effect of hirudotherapy on the systemic pain status and multimodal treatment strategies of the patients. RESULTS: There was a significant reduction in pain intensity ratings at the joint of leech application for up to 12 months after treatment. The improvements in pain intensities were independent of the form of osteoarthritis treated. In addition, we saw a considerable enhancement in local movability of the treated joint. Hirudotherapy did not seem to influence the systemic pain status as well as the previously established individualized multimodal treatment model of the patients. CONCLUSION: Leeching as an adjuvant therapy has a great potential especially in terms of safety and long-term outcome.

Plasma Disappearance Rate of Indocyanine Green for Determination of Liver Function in Three Different Models of Shock.

The measurement of the liver function via the plasma disappearance rate of indocyanine green (PDRICG) is a sensitive bed-side tool in critical care. Yet, recent evidence has questioned the value of this method for hyperdynamic conditions. To evaluate this technique in different hemodynamic settings, we analyzed the PDRICG and corresponding pharmacokinetic models after endotoxemia or hemorrhagic shock in rats. Male anesthetized Sprague-Dawley rats underwent hemorrhage (mean arterial pressure 35 ± 5 mmHg, 90 min) and 2 h of reperfusion, or lipopolysaccharide (LPS) induced moderate or severe (1.0 vs. 10 mg/kg) endotoxemia for 6 h (each n = 6). Afterwards, PDRICG was measured, and pharmacokinetic models were analyzed using nonlinear mixed effects modeling (NONMEM®). Hemorrhagic shock resulted in a significant decrease of PDRICG, compared with sham controls, and a corresponding attenuation of the calculated ICG clearance in 1- and 2-compartment models, with the same log-likelihood. The induction of severe, but not moderate endotoxemia, led to a significant reduction of PDRICG. The calculated ICG blood clearance was reduced in 1-compartment models for both septic conditions. 2-compartment models performed with a significantly better log likelihood, and the calculated clearance of ICG did not correspond well with PDRICG in both LPS groups. 3-compartment models did not improve the log likelihood in any experiment. These results demonstrate that PDRICG correlates well with ICG clearance in 1- and 2-compartment models after hemorrhage. In endotoxemia, best described by a 2-compartment model, PDRICG may not truly reflect the ICG clearance.

Using a smartphone application (PocketCPR) to determine CPR quality in a bystander CPR scenario - A manikin trial.

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: Feedback devices and dispatcher assistance increase CPR quality in bystander resuscitation. Yet, there is no data comparing both approaches with uninstructed CPR. The present prospective, randomized, controlled, manikin trial aims to determine the effects of the use of a smartphone application (PocketCPR) on CPR quality in a bystander CPR scenario compared to dispatcher-assisted telephone CPR and uninstructed CPR. METHODS: 100 laypersons were included to perform 8-min CPR on a manikin. Volunteers were randomly assigned to one of four groups: (1) uninstructed CPR (uninstructed group), (2) dispatcher-assisted telephone CPR (telephone-group), (3) guidance and feedback through a smartphone application (app-group) and (4) dispatcher-assisted telephone CPR combined with the smartphone-app (telephone + app-group). RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: There was no significant difference in the time to first compression between the uninstructed and the app-group (p = 0.052), likewise between the telephone- and the telephone + app-group (p = 0.193). The no-flow-time of the uninstructed group was significantly longer compared to all other groups (p < 0.001). Median compression rate was significantly higher and within the recommended range in the app- and the telephone + app-group. There was no significant difference regarding correct compression depth between the four groups. Correct hand position and complete thorax release was found significantly more frequently in groups with smartphone-app support. CONCLUSIONS: Feedback by a smartphone application can improve bystander CPR quality in terms of no-flow-time, compression rate, correct hand position, thorax release and does not delay CPR onset. However, the use of a smartphone application does not improve compression depth significantly.