Role of molecular imaging in the diagnosis of prosthetic aortic valve endocarditis by Bacillus licheniformis: a case report.

Background: Infective endocarditis is a challenging diagnosis that usually requires cardiovascular image confirmation as part of the approach. 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18F-FDG-PET/CT) is an imaging technique more sensible for the diagnosis of prosthetic valve endocarditis (PVE) when echocardiography is inconclusive. Case summary: We present the case of a 35-year-old man who had a previous Bentall-De Bono procedure 4 years prior that included biological, national institute of cardiology (INC)-type, locally manufactured aortic valve replacement and woven Dacron tube graft implantation in the ascending aorta. He was admitted because of dyspnoea, oedema, fever, and syncope. A complete auriculoventricular blockade was diagnosed, requiring cardiac pacing. Also, infective endocarditis (IE) was suspected. Blood cultures showed the isolation of Bacillus licheniformis. Transthoracic echocardiography, transoesophageal echocardiography, and CT angiography were inconclusive for IE. Treatment was initiated with intravenous (IV) antibiotic therapy, and an extensive protocol for IE, including molecular imaging modalities, was ordered. 99mTc-Ubiquicidin scintigraphy was acquired without abnormal findings. Images of 18F-FDG-PET/CT revealed abnormally intense heterogeneous uptake in the prosthetic aortic annulus in a classic pattern. Applying the modified 2015 Duke criteria for PET/CT, PVE was confirmed. Discussion: Although the other imaging modalities were negative, the high clinical suspicion made it mandatory to continue the study protocol, remarking on the utility of 18F-FDG-PET/CT on patients categorized as having 'possible' endocarditis, as in our patient.

13N-Ammonia myocardial blood flow quantitation in patient with aneurismal coronary artery disease.

Aneurysmal coronary artery disease includes coronary artery aneurysms and ectasia; this condition has been associated with poor long-term outcomes. Few studies have explored myocardial blood flow 13N-ammonia PET/CT MPI added value. We present a 45-year-old man who came to the emergency department with chest pain. After a physical examination and laboratory studies, he was diagnosed with very high-risk unstable angina and referred to the catheterization laboratory. Coronary angiography showed the culprit lesion in the LCx and was treated by angioplasty and stent. LAD was found with coronary artery ectasia (TIMI 2 flow grade) and the RCA with aneurysmal disease in the proximal and middle segments (TIMI 3 flow grade). Medical treatment was decided for these findings and the patient was discharged. Two weeks later, we performed a 13N-ammonia PET/CT MPI founding apical, inferior, and inferoseptal severe ischemia, and reduced hyperemic coronary blood flow and coronary flow reserve in the RCA territory. Flow was normal in the LAD territory. Although coronary angiography remains the gold standard for evaluating these coronary abnormalities, it does not show the physiological compromise. Therefore 13N-ammonia PET/CT MPI should be performed as a complementary noninvasive imaging approach.

Colchicine Is Safe Though Ineffective in the Treatment of Severe COVID-19: a Randomized Clinical Trial (COLCHIVID).

BACKGROUND: Colchicine is an available, safe, and effective anti-inflammatory drug and has been suggested as a COVID-19 treatment, but its usefulness in hospitalized severe COVID-19 patients has not been thoroughly demonstrated. OBJECTIVE: To address the safety and efficacy of colchicine in hospitalized patients with severe COVID-19. DESIGN: We conducted a triple-blind parallel non-stratified placebo-controlled clinical trial. PARTICIPANTS: We recruited 116 hospitalized patients with severe COVID-19 in Mexico. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomized to receive 1.5 mg of colchicine or placebo at the time of the recruitment in the study (baseline) and 0.5 mg BID PO to complete 10 days of treatment. MAIN MEASURES: The primary composite outcome was the progression to critical disease or death. Besides, we evaluated immunological features at baseline and after recovery or disease progression in 20 patients. KEY RESULTS: Fifty-six patients were allocated to colchicine and 60 patients received placebo. The study was suspended after the second interim analysis demonstrated colchicine had no effect on the primary outcome (OR 0.83, 95%CI 0.35-1.93, P = 0.67), nor in the days of ICU and hospital stays. Adverse events were similar between groups (OR 1.63, 95% CI 0.66-3.88, P = 0.37). After colchicine treatment, patients had higher BUN and lower serum levels of IL-8, IL-12p70, and IL-17A. CONCLUSIONS: Colchicine is safe but not effective in the treatment of severe COVID-19. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04367168.