Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Publication year range
1.
Rev Esp Enferm Dig ; 99(3): 128-31, 2007 Mar.
Article in Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17516824

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To determine the need to perform ultrasound scans to all patients after liver biopsy or fine-needle aspiration (FNA) in order to detect complications with or without symptoms. MATERIAL AND METHODS: After liver biopsy or FNA using a regular protocol the patient is observed for 24 hours at the hospital, and all patients undergo an abdominal sonography at that time even in the absence of evident complications. RESULTS: 298 liver biopsies and 98 FNAs were performed. There were complications in 37 patients (9.34%): 36 (9.09%) were minor complications such as pain, vasovagal episodes, or small bleeding, and 1 (0.25%) was a major complication with severe hemorrhage. Only 1 out of all 396 procedures had a complication detected by ultrasounds (intrahepatic hematoma) while the patient was asymptomatic. CONCLUSIONS: The low incidence of complications occurring without symptoms, and their favorable course suggest that routine ultrasonography is not necessary after these techniques, and that it should be only performed when a complication is suspected.


Subject(s)
Biopsy, Fine-Needle , Liver Diseases/diagnostic imaging , Liver Diseases/pathology , Liver/diagnostic imaging , Liver/pathology , Biopsy, Fine-Needle/adverse effects , Hematoma/diagnostic imaging , Hematoma/etiology , Hemorrhage/etiology , Humans , Pain/etiology , Prospective Studies , Syncope, Vasovagal/etiology , Ultrasonography
2.
Rev. esp. enferm. dig ; 99(3): 128-131, mar. 2007. tab
Article in Es | IBECS | ID: ibc-056490

ABSTRACT

Objetivo: establecer si es necesario realizar una ecografía de control a todos los pacientes sometidos a una biopsia hepática o una punción aspiración con aguja fina, para detectar posibles complicaciones con o sin repercusión clínica. Material y métodos: tras la realización de una biopsia hepática o una punción aspiración con aguja fina según el protocolo habitual, se mantiene al paciente en observación durante 24 horas, realizándose en ese momento una ecografía a todos los pacientes aunque no presenten datos clínicos de complicación. Resultados: se llevaron a cabo 298 biopsias hepáticas y 98 punciones mediante aguja fina. Presentaron complicaciones un total de 37 pacientes (9,34%), de las cuales 36 (9,09%) fueron complicaciones menores en forma de dolor, síncope vasovagal o hemorragia leve y 1 (0,25%) complicación mayor en forma de hemorragia grave. De las 396 exploraciones tan sólo uno de los casos presentó una complicación detectada en la ecografía (hematoma intraparenquimatoso) encontrándose asintomático. Conclusiones: la baja incidencia de complicaciones, que cursan de forma asintomática, y la buena evolución de las mismas hacen poco rentable la realización de ecografía de control tras la realización de dichas técnicas diagnósticas, siendo necesaria tan sólo en el caso de sospecha clínica de complicación


Objective: to determine the need to perform ultrasound scans to all patients after liver biopsy or fine-needle aspiration (FNA) in order to detect complications with or without symptoms. Material and methods: after liver biopsy or FNA using a regular protocol the patient is observed for 24 hours at the hospital, and all patients undergo an abdominal sonography at that time even in the absence of evident complications. Results: 298 liver biopsies and 98 FNAs were performed. There were complications in 37 patients (9.34%): 36 (9.09%) were minor complications such as pain, vasovagal episodes, or small bleeding, and 1 (0.25%) was a major complication with severe hemorrhage. Only 1 out of all 396 procedures had a complication detected by ultrasounds (intrahepatic hematoma) while the patient was asymptomatic. Conclusions: the low incidence of complications occurring without symptoms, and their favorable course suggest that routine ultrasonography is not necessary after these techniques, and that it should be only performed when a complication is suspected


Subject(s)
Humans , Biopsy, Needle/methods , Biopsy, Fine-Needle/methods , Ultrasonography , Prospective Studies , Hematoma , Punctures/adverse effects , Liver Neoplasms/pathology
3.
Transplant Proc ; 37(9): 3887-8, 2005 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16386573

ABSTRACT

Model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score is a good parameter to establish the patient survival before liver transplantation and give priority to the sickest patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate the variability and potential regression of MELD score during the months before liver transplant. From the 350 patients waitlisted for transplantation, we evaluated the 124 patients who had enough blood tests during 12 months before the final event (transplantation, death, removal from list due to improvement or worsening). We considered month 12 as the final event and blood tests from 0, 3, 6, and 12 months were analyzed. MELD score was calculated and compared using ANOVA for repeated measures test. To determine variability of MELD and its components, intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was calculated for 0, 3, and 6 months. The degree of constancy was defined by proximity of ICC to 1. Two groups by initial MELD (< or =17 or >17) were considered. Patient data are: mean age, 53 +/- 9 years; sex: 70% men, etiology, 28% hepatitis C, 11% alcohol and hepatitis C, 16% alcohol, 28% hepatocellular carcinoma, 6% hepatitis B, 11% others; Initial Child-score, 8.5 +/- 2.0; Initial MELD score, 15.2 +/- 4.9; mean time on waiting list, 8.1 +/- 5.7 months. MELD score from 6 and 12 months was significantly higher than the initial one. The most constant parameter was creatinine (ICC:0.89); bilirubin (ICC:0.58) and INR (ICC:0.59) were the most variable ones. MELD score ICC was 0.79. In only one patient did MELD score decrease 5 points below the initial one. For initial MELD < or = 17 and >17, variability was lower in the former. In conclusion, MELD became significantly higher 6 months after the basal determination. This score is reliable as it does not tend to decrease in time. In high MELD scores (>17), 3-month survival was lower and variability greater so that more careful follow-up and prioritizing are needed.


Subject(s)
Liver Failure/surgery , Liver Transplantation/methods , Waiting Lists , Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Treatment Outcome
4.
Transplant Proc ; 35(5): 1911-2, 2003 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12962845

ABSTRACT

Liver biopsy is frequently necessary for candidate evaluation or histologic follow-up of transplanted livers. Although generally considered to be safe, it carries a risk of complications in up to 0.5% of cases; hemorrhage being the most important. It can present as an asymptomatic intra- or perihepatic hematoma or result in overt hemorrhage of variable intensity. Patients with deranged hemostasis or on antiaggregant therapy are at high-risk for hemorrhagic complications. Percutaneous liver biopsy may be contraindicated if hemostasis is profoundly disordered. Safety values are not well defined: arbitrary limits are 60% prothrombin activity and 60,000 platelets per mm3. Patients with more altered values are candidates for alternative techniques, such as transjugular biopsy. Another option is the so-called plugged percutaneous liver biopsy, which uses direct injection of a plugging material into the biopsy tract. Different materials have been used: Tissucol, absorbable gelatin sponge, or hemostasis coils. We communicate our experience with Tissucol (fibrin glue) plugging in 30 percutaneous liver biopsies on 16 patients after liver transplantation with prothrombin activity <60%, platelet count <60,000 per mm3, or both. Only two complications were observed. Plugged liver biopsy is an efficient and relatively safe procedure in patients with impaired hemostasis; it can be performed even when transjugular biopsy is not available.


Subject(s)
Biopsy/methods , Fibrin Tissue Adhesive/therapeutic use , Liver Transplantation , Liver/pathology , Hemostasis , Humans , Patient Selection , Prothrombin Time , Safety , Tissue Adhesives , Waiting Lists
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...