PET Evaluation of Late Cerebral Effect in Advanced Radiation Therapy Techniques for Cranial Base Tumors.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Even though the benefits of radiation therapy are well established, it is important to recognize the broad spectrum of radiation-induced changes, particularly in the central nervous system. The possible damage to the brain parenchyma may have clinical consequences and in particular cognitive impairment might be one of the major complications of radiotherapy. To date, no studies have investigated the effects of focal radiation therapy on brain structure and function together with the assessment of their clinical outcomes at a long follow-up. METHODS: In this prospective study, we evaluated in six patients the possible brain late effects after radiation therapy, using a standardized neuropsychological battery, MRI and 18F-FDG PET using SPM and semi-quantitative methods, in patients affected by cranial base tumors who underwent gamma knife or tomotherapy. RESULTS: Neuropsychological examinations showed no cognitive impairment after the treatment. In all patients, both MRI assessment and 18F-FDG-PET did not reveal any local or distant anatomical and metabolic late effects. CONCLUSION: The present study support the safety of advanced radiation therapy techniques. 18F-FDGPET, using SPM and semi-quantitative methods, might be a valuable tool to evaluate the cerebral radiotoxicity in patients treated for brain neoplasms.

Semantic feature degradation and naming performance. Evidence from neurodegenerative disorders.

The failure to name an object in Alzheimer's disease (AD) and in the semantic variant of the primary progressive aphasia (sv-PPA) has been generally attributed to semantic memory loss, with a progressive degradation of semantic features. Not all features, however, may have the same relevance in picture naming. We analyzed the relationship between picture naming performance and the loss of semantic features in patients with AD with or without naming impairment, with sv-PPA and in matched controls, assessing the role of distinctiveness, semantic relevance and feature type (sensorial versus non-sensorial) with a sentence verification task. The results showed that distinctive features with high values of semantic relevance were lost only in all patients with naming impairment. The performance on the sensorial distinctive features with high relevance was the best predictor of naming performance only in sv-PPA, while no difference between sensorial and non-sensorial features was found in AD patients.

Abstract and concrete categories? Evidences from neurodegenerative diseases.

We assessed the performance of patients with a diagnosis of Alzheimer׳s disease (AD) and of the semantic variant of primary progressive aphasia (sv-PPA) in a series of tasks involving both abstract and concrete stimuli, which were controlled for most of the variables that have been shown to affect performance on lexical-semantic tasks. Our aims were to compare the patients׳ performance on abstract and concrete stimuli and to assess category-effects within the abstract and concrete domains. The results showed: (i) a better performance on abstract than concrete concepts in sv-PPA patients. (ii) Category-related effects in the abstract domain, with emotion concepts being preserved in AD and social relations being selectively impaired in sv-PPA. In addition, a living-non living dissociation may be (infrequently) observed in individual AD patients after controlling for an extensive set of potential confounds. Thus, differences between and within the concrete or abstract domain may be present in patients with semantic memory disorders, mirroring the different brain regions involved by the different pathologies.

An Italian battery for the assessment of semantic memory disorders.

We report the construction and standardization of a new comprehensive battery of tests for the assessment of semantic memory disorders. The battery is constructed on a common set of 48 stimuli, belonging to both living and non-living categories, rigidly controlled for several confounding variables, and is based on an empirically derived corpus of semantic features. It includes six tasks, in order to assess semantic memory through different modalities of input and output: two naming tasks, one with colored pictures and the other in response to an oral description, a word-picture matching task, a picture sorting task, a free generation of features task and a sentence verification task. Normative data on 106 Italian subjects pooled across homogenous subgroups for age, sex and education are reported. The new battery allows an in-depth investigation of category-specific disorders and of progressive semantic memory deficits at features level, overcoming some of the limitations of existing tests.