Antibiotic Use in Acute Upper Respiratory Tract Infections.

Upper respiratory tract infections are responsible for millions of physician visits in the United States annually. Although viruses cause most acute upper respiratory tract infections, studies show that many infections are unnecessarily treated with antibiotics. Because inappropriate antibiotic use results in adverse events, contributes to antibiotic resistance, and adds unnecessary costs, family physicians must take an evidence-based, judicious approach to the use of antibiotics in patients with upper respiratory tract infections. Antibiotics should not be used for the common cold, influenza, COVID-19, or laryngitis. Evidence supports antibiotic use in most cases of acute otitis media, group A beta-hemolytic streptococcal pharyngitis, and epiglottitis and in a limited percentage of acute rhinosinusitis cases. Several evidence-based strategies have been identified to improve the appropriateness of antibiotic prescribing for acute upper respiratory tract infections.

Chronic Nonallergic Rhinitis.

Chronic nonallergic rhinitis encompasses a group of rhinitis subtypes without allergic or infectious etiologies. Although chronic nonallergic rhinitis represents about one-fourth of rhinitis cases and impacts 20 to 30 million patients in the United States, its pathophysiology is unclear and diagnostic testing is not available. Characteristics such as no evidence of allergy or defined triggers help define clinical subtypes. There are eight subtypes with overlapping presentations, including nonallergic rhinopathy, nonallergic rhinitis with nasal eosinophilia syndrome, atrophic rhinitis, senile or geriatric rhinitis, gustatory rhinitis, drug-induced rhinitis, hormonal rhinitis, and occupational rhinitis. Treatment is symptom-driven and similar to that of allergic rhinitis. Patients should avoid known triggers when possible. First-line therapies include intranasal corticosteroids, intranasal antihistamines, and intranasal ipratropium. Combination therapy with decongestants and first-generation antihistamines can be considered if monotherapy does not adequately control symptoms. Nasal irrigation and intranasal capsaicin may be helpful but need further investigation.

Competency-based Standard Setting for a High-stakes Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE): Validity Evidence.

This article was migrated. The article was marked as recommended. Introduction Medical educators need to demonstrate that their trainees meet expected competency levels when progressing through medical education. This study aimed to develop competency-based pass/fail cut-scores for a graduation required Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE), and examine validity evidence for new standards. Methods Six clinicians used the modified Angoff method to determine the cut-scores for an 8-station OSCE. The clinicians estimated the percentage of minimally competent students who would answer each checklist item correctly. Inter-rater reliability, differences in other academic achievements between pass/fail groups, educational impact, and response process were examined. Results One hundred seventy-four rising 4th-year medical students participated in the OSCE. The cut-scores determined for the OSCE resulted in a substantially lower failure rate (5% vs. 29% of the previous year). The inter-rater reliability across domains and cases was .98 (95% CI = .97 - .99). The pass/fail groups significantly differed in six of the eight measures of academic achievements included in the study. Discussion The impact of the standards setting was substantial as it significantly reduced the failure rate and burdens of remediation for both students and faculty. The very high inter-rater reliability indicates that the modified Angoff method produced reliable cut-scores. The significant differences between the pass/fail groups in other measures support external validity of the standards and ensure no false passes. The study also supports response process validity by including discussion among judges and check of previous student performances, as well as recruiting and training multiple clinician educators experienced in medical student teaching. Conclusion Findings of the study provide strong evidence supporting validity of the new cut-scores from a wide spectrum of validity metrics, including response process, internal structure, relations to other variables, and consequences. The study also added to the literature the value of the modified Angoff method in determining competency-based standards for OSCEs.

Treatment of Allergic Rhinitis.

Allergic rhinitis is a common and chronic immunoglobulin E-mediated respiratory illness that can affect quality of life and productivity, as well as exacerbate other conditions such as asthma. Treatment should be based on the patient's age and severity of symptoms. Patients should be educated about their condition and advised to avoid known allergens. Intranasal corticosteroids are the most effective treatment and should be first-line therapy for persistent symptoms affecting quality of life. More severe disease that does not respond to intranasal corticosteroids should be treated with second-line therapies, including antihistamines, decongestants, cromolyn, leukotriene receptor antagonists, and nonpharmacologic therapies such as nasal irrigation. Subcutaneous or sublingual immunotherapy should be considered if usual treatments do not adequately control symptoms and in patients with allergic asthma. Evidence does not support the use of mite-proof impermeable mattresses and pillow covers, breastfeeding, air filtration systems, or delayed exposure to solid foods in infancy or to pets in childhood.