Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 20
Filter
2.
CMAJ ; 189(11): E445, 2017 03 20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28385720
5.
Am J Public Health ; 104(8): e106-11, 2014 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24922150

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: We evaluated the effect of North American public bicycle share programs (PBSPs), which typically do not offer helmets with rentals, on the occurrence of bicycle-related head injuries. METHODS: We analyzed trauma center data for bicycle-related injuries from 5 cities with PBSPs and 5 comparison cities. We used logistic regression models to compare the odds that admission for a bicycle-related injury would involve a head injury 24 months before PBSP implementation and 12 months afterward. RESULTS: In PBSP cities, the proportion of head injuries among bicycle-related injuries increased from 42.3% before PBSP implementation to 50.1% after (P < .01). This proportion in comparison cities remained similar before (38.2%) and after (35.9%) implementation (P = .23). Odds ratios for head injury were 1.30 (95% confidence interval = 1.13, 1.67) in PBSP cities and 0.94 (95% confidence interval = 0.79, 1.11) in control cities (adjusted for age and city) when we compared the period after implementation to the period before. CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest that steps should be taken to make helmets available with PBSPs. Helmet availability should be incorporated into PBSP planning and funding, not considered an afterthought following implementation.


Subject(s)
Bicycling/injuries , Craniocerebral Trauma/epidemiology , Adolescent , Adult , Bicycling/statistics & numerical data , Canada/epidemiology , Cities/statistics & numerical data , Craniocerebral Trauma/etiology , Humans , Middle Aged , United States/epidemiology , Young Adult
7.
8.
BMC Pediatr ; 11: 26, 2011 Apr 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21477307

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: How youth perceive marketing messages in sports is poorly understood. We evaluated whether youth perceive that the imagery of a specific sports marketing advertisement contained smoking-related messages. METHODS: Twenty grade 7 to 11 classes (397 students) from two high schools in Montréal, Canada were recruited to participate in a cluster randomised single-blind controlled trial. Classes were randomly allocated to either a NIKE advertisement containing the phrase 'LIGHT IT UP' (n = 205) or to a neutral advertisement with smoking imagery reduced and the phrase replaced by 'GO FOR IT' (n = 192). The NIKE logo was removed from both advertisements. Students responded in class to a questionnaire asking open-ended questions about their perception of the messages in the ad. Reports relating to the appearance and text of the ad, and the product being promoted were evaluated. RESULTS: Relative to the neutral ad, more students reported that the phrase 'LIGHT IT UP' was smoking-related (37.6% vs. 0.5%) and that other parts of the ad resembled smoking-related products (50.7% vs. 10.4%). The relative risk of students reporting that the NIKE ad promoted cigarettes was 4.41 (95% confidence interval: 2.64-7.36; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The unbranded imagery of an advertisement in a specific campaign aimed at promoting NIKE hockey products appears to have contained smoking-related messages. This particular marketing campaign may have promoted smoking. This suggests that the regulation of marketing to youth may need to be more tightly controlled.


Subject(s)
Child Behavior/psychology , Smoking/epidemiology , Social Perception , Students/psychology , Adolescent , Advertising , Canada/epidemiology , Child , Cluster Analysis , Female , Humans , Male , Marketing , Mass Media , Sports , Visual Perception
9.
Inj Prev ; 17(3): 195-200, 2011 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21441161

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Many injury studies use samples of hospital patients. If a study requires further contact, consent is usually required but the sample may be biased if many fail to consent. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether wording requiring 'active' consent resulted in more refusals than wording that was 'passive'--that is, where consent is implied in the absence of direct refusal. METHODS: Subjects were injured children seen in the emergency departments in five hospitals where the Canadian Hospital Injury Reporting and Prevention Program (CHIRPP) operates. For CHIRPP, parents or older children complete a one-page questionnaire to describe the injury; one question seeks consent to follow-up for research. Three of the hospitals use passive wording for this question and two use active wording. All cases where CHIRPP coordinators completed forms using the medical record were treated as refusals. It was hypothesised that there would be a significant association between the form of wording (active or passive) and the rate of consent, and that this association would be affected by socio-demographic and clinical variables. RESULTS: On average, 64.5% of parents gave consent for follow-up at hospitals using passive consent wording versus 42% where active consent wording was used. Passive wording consistently yielded a higher percentage of consents for all variables. The differences were greater than 5% for families living in census tracts with low median household incomes and greater than 10% for those age 15-19 years. For parent completed forms the adjusted OR for active wording was 0.48 (95% CI 0.43 to 0.54). CONCLUSION: Caution is needed when interpreting results from studies using hospital samples, especially when wording of consent for follow-up requires direct affirmation.


Subject(s)
Emergency Service, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Informed Consent/statistics & numerical data , Wounds and Injuries/epidemiology , Bias , Canada/epidemiology , Consent Forms , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Informed Consent/psychology , Male , Patient Participation/statistics & numerical data , Refusal to Participate/statistics & numerical data , Surveys and Questionnaires
10.
Paediatr Child Health ; 15(1): 30, 2010 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21197167
16.
Paediatr Child Health ; 9(5): 299-300, 2004 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19657509
18.
Can J Public Health ; 94(6): 458-62, 2003.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14700247

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Reports from the U.S. suggest increases in the proportion and rate of head and neck injuries in skiers and snowboarders. It is important to determine if the same is true in Canada. METHODS: Skiers and snowboarders (< 18 years) presenting to 16 selected emergency departments from 1991 to 1999 were assigned one body region of injury in the following order: i) brain and spine-spinal cord, ii) head and neck, iii) face, iv) other body region (i.e., controls). Crude and adjusted (age, gender, helmet use and hospital admission) odds ratios indicating the proportion of head, brain, face, and neck injury relative to controls by calendar year were estimated. Injury rates were examined for 12 to 17 year olds over the last 4 years of the study. RESULTS: Compared with 1997-1999, there was a lower proportion of skier head injuries from 1991-93 (adjusted odds ratio (AOR) = 0.16; 95% Confidence Interval (CI) = 0.09-0.30) and from 1995-97 (AOR = 0.71; 95% CI = 0.49-1.04). The proportion of skier brain injuries was lower from 1993-95 (AOR = 0.69; 95% CI = 0.44-1.07) and from 1995-97 (AOR = 0.56; 95% CI: 0.35-0.91). In snowboarders, however, compared with 1997-99, there was evidence that although the proportion of head injuries was lower from 1991-93 (AOR = 0.19; 95% CI = 0.05-0.80), the opposite was true for facial injuries. For 12 to 17 year olds, skier brain and snowboarder head and neck injury rates increased from 1995-99. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that head and brain injuries in skiers and head and neck injuries in snowboarders may be increasing, particularly in adolescents.


Subject(s)
Craniocerebral Trauma/epidemiology , Emergency Service, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Neck Injuries/epidemiology , Skiing/injuries , Adolescent , Canada/epidemiology , Confidence Intervals , Craniocerebral Trauma/classification , Craniocerebral Trauma/etiology , Female , Humans , Incidence , Male , Neck Injuries/classification , Neck Injuries/etiology
19.
BMJ ; 325(7371): 979-80, 2002 Nov 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12411330
20.
CMAJ ; 167(7): 767-8, 2002 Oct 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12389840
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...