Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther ; 21(10): 675-692, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37772751

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Coronary Artery Disease (CAD) is a prevalent condition characterized by the presence of atherosclerotic plaques in the coronary arteries of the heart. The global burden of CAD has increased significantly over the years, resulting in millions of deaths annually and making it the leading health-care expenditure and cause of mortality in developed countries. The lack of cost-effective strategies for monitoring the prognosis of CAD warrants a pressing need for accurate and efficient markers to assess disease severity and progression for both reducing health-care costs and improving patient outcomes. AREA COVERED: To effectively monitor CAD, prognostic biomarkers and imaging techniques play a vital role in risk-stratified patients during acute treatment and over time. However, with over 1,000 potential markers of interest, it is crucial to identify the key markers with substantial utility in monitoring CAD progression and evaluating therapeutic interventions. This review focuses on identifying and highlighting the most relevant markers for monitoring CAD prognosis and disease severity. We searched for relevant literature using PubMed and Google Scholar. EXPERT OPINION: By utilizing the markers discussed, health-care providers can improve patient care, optimize treatment plans, and ultimately reduce health-care costs associated with CAD management.


Coronary artery disease is a narrowing or blockage of coronary arteries due to the formation of plaque. The main risk factors are inflammation, aging, high cholesterol, shear stress, obesity, and smoking. Narrowing of the arteries results in decreased blood supply (nutrient and oxygen) to the tissue precipitating ischemia presented as angina or myocardial infarction. During ischemic events, there occurs a change in the expression of various molecular and cellular components and increased expressions of many of these factors have been used as biomarkers to diagnose the pathology. Myoglobin, fatty acid-binding proteins, and glycogen phosphorylase isoenzyme BB are early biomarkers, troponin-T and troponin-I are late biomarkers, while creatine kinase-myocardial band is a biomarker in the first 10­12 h for the diagnosis of AMI. However, there is a need for a panel of biomarkers that can help in the prediction, prognosis, and diagnosis of disease progression (atherosclerosis), pre-ischemic and ischemic events, and post-MI periods to design the treatment strategies in a specific and sensitive manner. There is a need for cost-effective sensitive biomarkers that can prevent progression, risk stratify, predict, diagnose, and prevent MI in a timely manner. In this comprehensive review, we discuss the key markers of substantial utility for monitoring coronary artery disease progression and the efficacy of therapeutic intervention among various markers of interest.


Subject(s)
Coronary Artery Disease , Myocardial Infarction , Humans , Coronary Artery Disease/diagnosis , Coronary Artery Disease/therapy , Coronary Artery Disease/complications , Myocardial Infarction/etiology , Prognosis , Biomarkers , Treatment Outcome , Patient Acuity
2.
Nat Commun ; 12(1): 4864, 2021 08 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34381030

ABSTRACT

Successful therapeutics and vaccines for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) have harnessed the immune response to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Evidence that SARS-CoV-2 exists as locally evolving variants suggests that immunological differences may impact the effectiveness of antibody-based treatments such as convalescent plasma and vaccines. Considering that near-sourced convalescent plasma likely reflects the antigenic composition of local viral strains, we hypothesize that convalescent plasma has a higher efficacy, as defined by death within 30 days of transfusion, when the convalescent plasma donor and treated patient were in close geographic proximity. Results of a series of modeling techniques applied to approximately 28,000 patients from the Expanded Access to Convalescent Plasma program (ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT04338360) support this hypothesis. This work has implications for the interpretation of clinical studies, the ability to develop effective COVID-19 treatments, and, potentially, for the effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines as additional locally-evolving variants continue to emerge.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/therapy , Plasma/immunology , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Antibodies, Viral/immunology , Antibody Specificity , Antigenic Variation , Blood Donors , COVID-19/mortality , Female , Humans , Immunization, Passive/mortality , Male , Middle Aged , SARS-CoV-2/genetics , SARS-CoV-2/immunology , Treatment Outcome , United States/epidemiology , Young Adult , COVID-19 Serotherapy
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...