Early Enteral Nutrition in Mechanically Ventilated Patients With COVID-19 Infection.

BACKGROUND: Nutrition therapy is essential in critically ill adults. Little is known about appropriate nutrition therapy in patients with severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection. METHODS: This was a retrospective, observational study in adult patients with confirmed COVID-19 infection receiving mechanical ventilation. Data regarding patient demographics and nutrition therapy were collected. Patients that received enteral nutrition within 24 hours of starting mechanical ventilation were compared with patients starting enteral nutrition later. The primary outcome was inpatient length of stay. Propensity score matching was conducted to control for baseline differences in patient groups. RESULTS: One hundred fifty-five patients were included in final analysis. Patients who received enteral nutrition within 24 hours received a significantly greater daily amount of calories (17.5 vs 15.2 kcal/kg, P = .015) and protein (1.04 vs 0.85 g/kg, P = .003). There was no difference in length of stay (18.5 vs 23.5 days, P = .37). The propensity score analysis included 100 patients. Following propensity scoring, significant differences in daily calorie (17.7 [4.6] vs 15.1 [5.1] kcal/kg/d, P = .009) and protein (1.03 [0.35] vs 0.86 [0.38] g/kg/d, P = .014) provision remained. No differences in length of stay or other outcomes were noted in the propensity score analysis. CONCLUSION: Initiation of enteral nutrition within 24 hours was not associated with improved outcomes in mechanically ventilated adults with COVID-19. No harm was detected either. Future research should seek to clarify optimal timing of enteral nutrition initiation in patients with COVID-19 who require mechanical ventilation.

Use of Integrated Clinical Decision Support Tools to Manage Parenteral Nutrition Ordering: Experience From an Academic Medical Center.

Parenteral nutrition (PN) is a complex therapy with numerous opportunities for error during the prescribing, preparation, and administration processes. Advances in technology, such as computerized provider order entry (CPOE), electronic health records (EHRs), and clinical decision support (CDS) have helped decrease the risks associated with PN therapy. These technologies can be utilized to guide prescribing, provide automated safety checks, and increase overall safety and accuracy in PN ordering, compounding, and administration. In recent years, increased awareness of the risks associated with PN therapy, in particular issues with ordering and transcription, have magnified the need for improved support of PN ordering within currently available systems. Additionally, drug shortages continue to impact key components of PN admixtures, further increasing the risks associated with this complex therapy. These concerns and risks present an opportunity for the development of new functionality, as well as improvements in and innovative utilization of available technology within systems supporting the PN use process. This discussion will highlight the risks associated with PN, examine the role of drug shortages on the safety of this therapy, describe the application of available technology to manage shortages, and report the experience of using commercially available CDS tools at one academic medical center. It will also include a discussion of the transition from paper orders to CPOE/EHR-based orders for PN and the transition from one commercially available electronic system to another at this particular institution.

Incidence of Rebound Hypertension after Discontinuation of Dexmedetomidine.

INTRODUCTION: To date, no studies have evaluated the incidence of rebound hypertension occurring with the discontinuation of long-term (> 72 hrs) dexmedetomidine infusions. Rebound hypertension has been documented in the literature with clonidine, a structurally and pharmacologically similar medication. OBJECTIVES: To compare the incidence of rebound hypertension associated with cessation of dexmedetomidine infusion with other sedative medications. METHODS: This retrospective, matched cohort study evaluated the incidence of rebound hypertension in intensive care unit patients receiving continuous infusions of at least 72 hours in duration of dexmedetomidine, propofol, or midazolam. RESULTS: The study population consisted of 216 patients: 54 treated with dexmedetomidine and 162 treated with propofol or midazolam. Rebound hypertension occurred significantly more often in patients with a history of hypertension (71.1%) than in patients with no prior hypertension (28.9%; p<0.001).There was no difference in incidence of rebound hypertension in the dexmedetomidine or propofol and midazolam arms (16.7% vs 17.9%, p=0.837). The titration timeframe for the dexmedetomidine infusion, defined as the time from peak infusion rate until discontinuation, was significantly shorter in patients with rebound hypertension (median duration, 4 hrs) compared with patients who did not have rebound hypertension (median duration, 17 hrs; p=0.011). CONCLUSION: There was no difference in the incidence of rebound hypertension observed with dexmedetomidine discontinuation compared with propofol or midazolam. Instead, history of hypertension and a shorter weaning duration appear to be associated with increased risk of rebound hypertension regardless of the sedative used.

Are Predictive Energy Expenditure Equations in Ventilated Surgery Patients Accurate?

BACKGROUND:: While indirect calorimetry (IC) is the gold standard used to calculate specific calorie needs in the critically ill, predictive equations are frequently utilized at many institutions for various reasons. Prior studies suggest these equations frequently misjudge actual resting energy expenditure (REE) in medical and mixed intensive care unit (ICU) patients; however, their utility for surgical ICU (SICU) patients has not been fully evaluated. Therefore, the objective of this study was to compare the REE measured by IC with REE calculated using specific calorie goals or predictive equations for nutritional support in ventilated adult SICU patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS:: A retrospective review of prospectively collected data was performed on all adults (n = 419, 18-91 years) mechanically ventilated for >24 hours, with an Fio2 ≤ 60%, who met IC screening criteria. Caloric needs were estimated using Harris-Benedict equations (HBEs), and 20, 25, and 30 kcal/kg/d with actual (ABW), adjusted (ADJ), and ideal body (IBW) weights. The REE was measured using IC. RESULTS:: The estimated REE was considered accurate when within ±10% of the measured REE by IC. The HBE, 20, 25, and 30 kcal/kg/d estimates of REE were found to be inaccurate regardless of age, gender, or weight. The HBE and 20 kcal/kg/d underestimated REE, while 25 and 30 kcal/kg/d overestimated REE. Of the methods studied, those found to most often accurately estimate REE were the HBE using ABW, which was accurate 35% of the time, and 25 kcal/kg/d ADJ, which was accurate 34% of the time. This difference was not statistically significant. CONCLUSION:: Using HBE, 20, 25, or 30 kcal/kg/d to estimate daily caloric requirements in critically ill surgical patients is inaccurate compared to REE measured by IC. In SICU patients with nutrition requirements essential to recovery, IC measurement should be performed to guide clinicians in determining goal caloric requirements.

Impact of an Intravenous Magnesium Shortage on Potassium Doses in Adult Surgical Patients Receiving Parenteral Nutrition.

BACKGROUND: Shortages of parenteral nutrition (PN) components have been common in recent years. Effects on patient management and outcomes have not been well documented. This study aimed to determine the effect of a parenteral magnesium shortage, and an institutional decision to omit magnesium from adult PN, on magnesium and potassium doses and serum concentrations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of adult surgical patients during two 6-month periods: prior to the magnesium shortage (2011) and during the shortage (2012). The relation between study period and electrolyte doses was evaluated by unadjusted and adjusted mixed models, while the relation between study period and hypokalemia and hypomagnesemia exposure was evaluated by Student's t tests and multiple linear regression. RESULTS: During the shortage, patients received more supplemental magnesium (0.11-0.12 mEq/kg/d, P < .0001) but received less total daily magnesium (0.08-0.09 mEq/kg/d, P < .0001) and had greater exposure to hypomagnesemia (9.6-14.2 h·mcg/dL/h, P < .05 for all comparisons except multivariate analysis in a matched subpopulation). Patients received similar amounts of potassium in PN (0.06-0.08 mEq/kg/d less, P < .05 for full cohort but P > .05 for matched cohort), in supplemental doses (0.01-0.05 mEq/kg/d less, P > .05), and in total (0.07-0.14 mEq/kg/d less, P > .05), and they had similar exposure to hypokalemia. CONCLUSION: Daily magnesium doses were lower and hypomagnesemia exposure was greater during the shortage, but the differences were numerically small and their clinical significance was questionable. Potassium doses and hypokalemia exposure were not higher during the shortage. This supports the strategy of omitting magnesium from PN of select patients and supplementing as clinically necessary.