Cannabis use as an indicator of risk for mental health problems in adolescents: a population-based study at secondary schools.

BACKGROUND: Although the association between cannabis use and a wide range of psychiatric symptoms is fairly well established, it is not clear whether cannabis use is also a risk factor for general mental health problems at secondary school. Method A total of 10 324 secondary school children aged 11-16 years, participating in an ongoing Public Health Service School Survey, gave information on demographics, substance use, school factors and stressful life events and completed the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ). RESULTS: Cannabis use in the past month was associated with a clinically relevant score on the SDQ [unadjusted odds ratio (OR) 4.46, 95% confidence interval (CI) 3.46-5.76]. Other risk factors associated with poor psychosocial functioning were: a low level of education, alcohol use, cigarette smoking, hard drug use, frequent truancy, an unfavourable school evaluation, feeling unsafe at school, being victimized, frequent absence due to illness, a mentally ill parent, molestation by a parent, financial problems and feeling distressed by an adverse event. In a full model adjusting for these risk factors, cannabis was not significantly associated with mental health problems, although an association at trend level was apparent. Of these risk factors, regular alcohol use, cigarette smoking, hard drug use, frequent truancy, an unfavourable school evaluation and frequent absence due to illness were also associated with cannabis use. CONCLUSIONS: The association between cannabis use and poor psychosocial functioning in adolescence is due, at least in part, to confounding by other risk factors. Thus, cannabis use can best be viewed as an indicator of risk for mental health problems in adolescence.

Persistent impaired emotional functioning in survivors of a myocardial infarction?

The quality of life (QoL) of survivors of a myocardial infarction (MI) remains lower than that of their peers long after the acute event. Previous research on this subject has indicated, however, that this difference might lessen somewhat over time for the dimension 'emotional functioning' (as measured by the sickness impact profile (SIP): a generic instrument for QoL). The present study explores this phenomenon further using two instruments that specifically measure emotional functioning i.e. the hospital anxiety and depression scale (HAD) and the heart patients psychological questionnaire (HPPQ). Ninety-nine participants of a large population-based cohort (the Rotterdam study), who had been admitted to the hospital because of an MI in the previous 6-60 months, and 101 reference subjects, without a history of infarction of heart or brain, from the same age and gender-groups, were interviewed twice (at 1- to 3-year time intervals). The results of the present study confirm earlier findings that the emotional functioning (in terms of 'anxiety', 'depression', 'well-being', 'feeling disabled', and 'displeasure') of MI survivors is impaired when compared to their unaffected peers. Moreover, they did not show any improvement in 'anxiety', 'depression', 'well-being' and 'displeasure' over time in the MI survivors. The results did, however, show that the difference between MI survivors and referents became less in time in the dimension 'feeling disabled'. This decrease was partly because MI survivors improved and partly because referents felt more disabled over time. One explanation for this might be that referents (51% aged 70 years and over) had difficulties in adapting emotionally to decreasing levels of physical functioning with increasing age, while the MI survivors tended to adjust to and accept the impairments they had contracted several years earlier.