Subject(s)
Albumins , Endothelin Receptor Antagonists , Glomerular Filtration Rate/physiology , Gluconates , Ischemia/prevention & control , Kidney Transplantation/physiology , Organ Preservation Solutions , Animals , Glomerular Filtration Rate/drug effects , Kidney/blood supply , Rats , Rats, Inbred LewABSTRACT
The purpose of the study was two-fold: 1) to determine whether endothelin (ET) levels could be detected in the ureteral effluent during hypothermic perfusion preservation (HPP) and; 2) to determine whether preretrieval warm ischemic (WI) injury is associated with increased ureteral excretion of ET. In situ pre-WI injury was induced in Lewis rats (n=10) by a 30-min extrinsic occlusion of the suprarenal aorta. The left kidney underwent 16 hr of HPP, and ureteral effluent (UE) from ischemic and control kidneys (n=10) was collected over 16 hr of HPP. The UE ET concentration and total ET excretion over 16 hr of HPP were significantly higher in kidneys subjected to pre-WI injury compared with nonischemic controls. Kidneys subjected to pre-WI injury can be distinguished from nonischemic control kidneys during HPP by a significantly higher concentration of ET in the UE and a higher overall excretion of ET during HPP.
Subject(s)
Endothelins/urine , Ischemia , Kidney , Organ Preservation/methods , Tissue and Organ Harvesting/methods , Animals , Kidney/blood supply , Kidney/physiology , Male , Rats , Rats, Inbred Lew , Temperature , Ureter/physiologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Historically, ex vivo physiological evaluation of cadaveric renal allografts has been limited to assessing perfusate flow (PF) during hypothermic perfusion preservation (HPP). Using a small animal model, we have previously described a method for continuous monitoring of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) during HPP. Our study was undertaken to determine if monitoring GFR and PF during HPP distinguished kidneys subjected to preretrieval warm ischemic (WI) injury more reliably than PF alone. METHODS: In situ WI was induced in Lewis rats (n=10) by extrinsic occlusion of the suprarenal aorta for 30 min. After in situ cold perfusion and retrieval, the left kidney underwent 16 hr of HPP. Nonischemic (NI) control kidneys (n=10) were retrieved in the absence of suprarenal aortic occlusion. Longitudinal changes in PF, GFR, and filtration fraction (FF) during HPP were compared in WI versus NI kidneys (FF=GFR/PF x 100%). RESULTS: PF remained the same in both cohorts throughout HPP. GFR, however, increased to a significantly greater degree in WI versus NI kidneys during the first 4 hr of HPP (713+/-401 vs. 26+/-23%, respectively) (P<0.05). The increase in FF at 4 hr was 1203+/-696% in the WI kidneys versus 83+/-46% in the NI controls (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In contrast to PF alone, measurement of both PF and GFR distinguished kidneys subjected to pre-WI from NI controls. The data provide a means to determine if monitoring of both GFR and PF during HPP will predict short- and long-term renal allograft function more reliably than PF alone.
