ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: The aim of the present study was to use real-world data from Swedish primary-care and national registries to understand clinical outcomes in patients with Type 2 diabetes (T2D) treated with liraglutide in clinical practice, and to compare with data from those treated with sitagliptin. METHODS: This was a non-interventional, retrospective study conducted between February 2014 and September 2014 using T2D patient data from Swedish primary-care centers and national healthcare registries. The primary objective was to assess the effectiveness of liraglutide in control of glycemia and body weight in clinical practice (stage 1). The secondary objective was to compare the clinical effectiveness of liraglutide with sitagliptin on glycemic control and body weight in clinical practice in a propensity-score-matched population (stage 2). RESULTS: In stage 1 (n = 402), 39.4% of patients treated with liraglutide achieved ≥1.0% (10.9 mmol/mol) reduction in glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) after 180 days of treatment and 54.9% achieved the target HbA1c of <7.0% (53.0 mmol/mol). Moreover, compared with baseline, 22.5% of patients treated with liraglutide achieved both ≥1.0% reduction in HbA1c and ≥3.0% reduction in body weight. In stage 2, a significantly greater proportion of patients receiving liraglutide (n = 180) than sitagliptin (n = 208) achieved ≥1.0% reduction in HbA1c [52.9% vs 33.5%, respectively (P = 0.0002)]. Mean body-weight loss was also significantly greater in patients receiving liraglutide vs sitagliptin [-3.5 vs -1.3 kg, respectively (P < 0.0001)]. CONCLUSION: This study provides real-world evidence from Sweden corroborating previous clinical trials that demonstrate greater efficacy of liraglutide over sitagliptin on glycemic control and body-weight reduction in patients with T2D. FUNDING: Novo Nordisk A/S. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT02077946.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Long-acting insulin treatments with varying clinical benefits are currently available for patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). The current evidence base demonstrates the efficacy of treatments, but it is critical also to understand patient preferences regarding treatments and how they are determined. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to measure the willingness to pay (WTP) of individuals with diabetes in the United Kingdom for different attributes of long-acting insulin therapy. METHODS: A survey based on discrete choice experiment methodology was developed to elicit the preferences and values of adults with T1DM or insulin-dependent T2DM regarding different aspects of their therapy. Participants were presented with a series of 27 paired choices and asked which they preferred. WTP values were calculated for relevant attribute levels. RESULTS: A total of 252 participants completed the questionnaire (52% response rate); 143 had T1DM and 109 had insulin-treated T2DM. The highest WTP values in participants with T1DM were avoiding 2-kg or 4-kg weight gain (£29 and £58, respectively), avoiding major difficulties with the injection device (£49), increasing the number of days per week when blood glucose levels are in the target range from 2 to 6 (£40), reducing the number of daily injections from 3 to 1 (£39), and avoiding nighttime hypoglycemia (£33). In participants with T2DM, similar factors had the highest WTP. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to assess WTP for long-acting insulin therapy and could have implications for future guidelines on diabetes management, however some limitations, notably in sample selection, could affect generalizability of the results. In both T1DM and T2DM, the highest WTP values were for avoidance of weight gain, and reduction in the number of injections and hypoglycemia.
