Impact of low versus negative estrogen/progesterone receptor status on clinico-pathologic characteristics and survival outcomes in HER2-negative breast cancer.

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is classically defined by estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) immunohistochemistry expression <1% and absence of HER2 amplification/overexpression. HER2-negative breast cancer with low ER/PR expression (1-10%) has a gene expression profile similar to TNBC; however, real-world treatment patterns, chemotherapy response, endocrine therapy benefit, and survival outcomes for the Low-ER group are not well known. 516 patients with stage I-III HER2-negative breast cancer and ER/PR expression ≤10% who were enrolled in a multisite prospective registry between 2011 and 2019 were categorized on the basis of ER/PR expression. TNBC (ER and PR < 1%) and Low-ER (ER and/or PR 1-10%) groups comprised 87.4% (n = 451) and 12.6% (n = 65) of patients, respectively. Demographic, clinical, and treatment characteristics, including prevalence of germline BRCA1/2 mutation, racial and ethnic distribution, and chemotherapy use were not different between TNBC and Low-ER groups. No difference was observed in recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) between TNBC and Low-ER groups (3-year RFS 82.5% versus 82.4%, respectively, p = 0.728; 3-year OS 88.0% versus 83.4%, respectively, p = 0.632). Among 358 patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy, rates of pathologic complete response were similar for TNBC and Low-ER groups (49.2% vs 51.3%, respectively, p = 0.808). The HER2-negative Low-ER group is often excluded from TNBC clinical trials assessing novel treatments (immunotherapy and antibody-drug conjugates), thus limiting efficacy data for newer effective therapies in this group. Given that HER2-negative Low-ER disease displays clinical characteristics and outcomes similar to TNBC, inclusion of this group in TNBC clinical trials is encouraged.

Randomized Phase II Trial of Anthracycline-free and Anthracycline-containing Neoadjuvant Carboplatin Chemotherapy Regimens in Stage I-III Triple-negative Breast Cancer (NeoSTOP).

PURPOSE: Addition of carboplatin (Cb) to anthracycline chemotherapy improves pathologic complete response (pCR), and carboplatin plus taxane regimens also yield encouraging pCR rates in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). Aim of the NeoSTOP multisite randomized phase II trial was to assess efficacy of anthracycline-free and anthracycline-containing neoadjuvant carboplatin regimens. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients aged ≥18 years with stage I-III TNBC were randomized (1:1) to receive either paclitaxel (P) weekly × 12 plus carboplatin AUC6 every 21 days × 4 followed by doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide (AC) every 14 days × 4 (CbP → AC, arm A), or carboplatin AUC6 + docetaxel (D) every 21 days × 6 (CbD, arm B). Stromal tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (sTIL) were assessed. Primary endpoint was pCR in breast and axilla. Other endpoints included residual cancer burden (RCB), toxicity, cost, and event-free (EFS) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: One hundred patients were randomized; arm A (n = 48) or arm B (n = 52). pCR was 54% [95% confidence interval (CI), 40%-69%] in arm A and 54% (95% CI, 40%-68%) in arm B. RCB 0+I rate was 67% in both arms. Median sTIL density was numerically higher in those with pCR compared with those with residual disease (20% vs. 5%; P = 0.25). At median follow-up of 38 months, EFS and OS were similar in the two arms. Grade 3/4 adverse events were more common in arm A compared with arm B, with the most notable differences in neutropenia (60% vs. 8%; P < 0.001) and febrile neutropenia (19% vs. 0%; P < 0.001). There was one treatment-related death (arm A) due to acute leukemia. Mean treatment cost was lower for arm B compared with arm A (P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: The two-drug CbD regimen yielded pCR, RCB 0+I, and survival rates similar to the four-drug regimen of CbP → AC, but with a more favorable toxicity profile and lower treatment-associated cost.

Phase II trial of docetaxel/capecitabine in hormone-refractory prostate cancer.

BACKGROUND: Docetaxel is the most active single agent in the treatment of hormone-refractory prostate cancer (HRPC). Because of the preclinical and clinical evidence of synergy of capecitabine and docetaxel, it was hypothesized that this combination would be active and tolerable in HRPC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients received docetaxel 60 mg/m2 intravenously over 60 minutes on day 1 of each 21-day cycle and capecitabine 1000 mg/m2 administered orally twice daily on days 1-14 of each cycle for a maximum of 8 cycles or until disease progression or intolerable toxicity. Seventy-seven patients were enrolled at 43 US Oncology sites. The median age was 69.3 years (range, 48-86 years); 86% were white, and the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status scores of 0 and 1 were 49% and 51% respectively. Sixty-nine (90%) patients were evaluated for prostate-specific antigen response. RESULTS: Overall, 41% of patients had a decreased prostate specific antigen level > or = 50%. There were 4 complete responses (6%), 24 partial responses (35%), 29 incidences of stable disease (43%), and 11 incidences of progressive disease (16%). Nine patients has stable disease > or = 6 months and the clinical benefit rate was 54%. The median time to response was 1.5 months (range, 1-16.9 months). The estimated survival at 12 and 24 months (range, < 1-27 months). There were no treatment-related deaths. Grade 3/4 toxicities included neutropenia (50%), leukopenia (22%), hand-foot syndrome (17%), fatigue (11%), and nausea (11%). CONCLUSION: Docetaxel/capcitabine is an active and tolerable combination in HRPC. Toxicity was acceptable and anticipated. Response rate and survival are comparable with other docetaxel combinations.

Phase II trial of weekly docetaxel/ gemcitabine as first-line chemotherapy in patients with locally recurrent or metastatic breast cancer.

PURPOSE: A phase II study evaluated weekly docetaxel/gemcitabine as first-line chemotherapy for locally recurrent or metastatic breast cancer in a multicenter community oncology practice setting. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligible patients who had not received chemotherapy for metastatic disease received docetaxel 30 mg/m2 followed by gemcitabine 800 mg/m2, each administered weekly for 3 weeks (days 1, 8, and 15), followed by a 1-week rest period (28-day cycle). Patients also received oral dexamethasone to reduce the incidence/severity of fluid retention and hypersensitivity reactions. Of the 46 enrolled patients, 45 were treated as part of the intent-to-treat (ITT) population and were evaluable for safety. RESULTS: There were 3 complete responses and 12 partial responses among the 39 evaluable patients, for an objective response rate (ORR) of 39% (95% confidence interval [CI], 24%-54%). The ORR in the ITT population was 33% (95% CI, 18%-48%). Median time to response was 3.4 months, with a median response duration of 6.7 months. Median survival was 15.8 months, and median time to progression was 5.8 months. The most common grade 3/4 hematologic toxicity was neutropenia (13.3%); there was a low incidence of other grade 3/4 hematologic toxicities. Grade 3 fatigue (15.6%) was the most common grade 3/4 nonhematologic toxicity, and grade 2 alopecia occurred in 47% of patients. One patient who had been receiving chronic corticosteroid therapy died from treatment-related neutropenia and acute respiratory distress syndrome. CONCLUSION: These phase II results suggest that weekly docetaxel/gemcitabine is moderately active and well tolerated as first-line therapy for locally recurrent or metastatic breast cancer. No clear advantage for combined weekly docetaxel/gemcitabine was observed compared with published results on the efficacy of docetaxel and gemcitabine given as single agents.

Gemcitabine and cisplatin for patients with metastatic or recurrent esophageal carcinoma: a Southwest Oncology Group Study.

PURPOSE: Experimental data, both in vivo and in vitro, suggest that the combination of gemcitabine and cisplatin acts synergistically. Within the Southwest Oncology Group, we designed a Phase II trial to test this chemotherapy combination for patients with esophageal cancer. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Patients with metastatic or recurrent esophageal cancer were treated with gemcitabine 1000 mg/m(2) on days 1, 8, and 15, and cisplatin 100 mg/m(2) on day 15. Cycles were repeated every 28 days. The statistical endpoint was overall survival. RESULTS: Sixty-four eligible patients were accrued from 37 institutions. Twenty-six percent of patients had prior chemotherapy. The treatment was generally well-tolerated, with the most common toxicity being neutropenia in 31% of patients. All 64 patients have died. Survival at 3 months was 81%, and at 1 year was 20%. Median survival was 7.3 months. CONCLUSIONS: This regimen is tolerable palliative option for patients with metastatic esophageal cancer.