Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 7 de 7
Filter
1.
Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil ; 4(3): e1179-e1184, 2022 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35747642

ABSTRACT

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate case volume and variability of hip arthroscopy exposure among graduating orthopaedic residents. Methods: The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) surgical case log data from 2016 to 2020 for graduating United States orthopaedic surgery residents were assessed. Arthroscopy procedures of the pelvis/hip were identified. The average number of cases performed per resident was compared from 2016 to 2020 to determine the percent change in case volume. The 10th, 30th, 50th, and 90th percentiles of case volumes from 2016 to 2020 were presented to demonstrate case volume variability. Results: There was no change in the number of hip arthroscopy procedures between 2016 and 2020 [average: 8.4 ± 10 (range: 0 to 87) vs. 9.8 ± 12 (range: 0 to 101)] (P = .995). There was a wide variability in case volume among residents. The 90th percentile of residents performed 24 cases in 2020, compared to 2 cases in the 30th percentile and 0 cases amongst the 10th percentile of residents. Conclusions: Despite the growing popularity of hip arthroscopy, resident exposure to this highly technical procedure remains limited, with about one-third of residents performing 2 or less cases by graduation. Clinical Relevance: Understanding case volume and variability is important for orthopaedic surgery programs to ensure that graduating residents are gaining adequate exposure.

2.
J Shoulder Elbow Surg ; 31(2): 437-444, 2022 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34358667

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Despite the growing popularity of certain shoulder and elbow procedures (eg, shoulder arthroplasty), resident exposure to these surgeries remains unclear. This study sought to evaluate trends in graduating orthopedic resident case volumes of commonly performed shoulder and elbow procedures. METHODS: The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) surgical case log data from 2016 to 2020 for graduating US orthopedic surgery residents was assessed. Procedures of the shoulder and humerus/elbow were categorized into predefined ACGME categories: repair/revision/reconstruction, fracture/dislocation, and arthroscopy. The average number of cases performed per resident in each of these categories was directly compared from 2016 to 2020. The 10th and 90th percentiles of case volumes within each category of procedures was compared from 2016 and 2020. RESULTS: There was a 31% increase in the number of shoulder repair/revision/reconstruction cases between 2016 and 2020 (average: 27.5 to 36.1; P < .001), followed by a 23% increase for elbow fracture/dislocation (24.4 to 30; P < .001), 21% increase for elbow repair/revision/reconstruction (10.6 to 12.8; P < .001), and 16% increase for shoulder arthroscopy (69 to 79.7; P < .001). No significant changes were found for shoulder fracture/dislocation and elbow arthroscopy. There was a wide case volume variability for each procedure, particularly for shoulder repair/revision/reconstruction, where there was a nearly 5-fold difference in the number of cases performed between the 10th and 90th percentiles of residents in 2020 (13 vs. 62 cases, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The case category shoulder repair/revision/reconstruction has seen the largest relative increase in the shoulder and elbow case volume of graduating orthopedic surgery residents, most likely reflecting the national rising trends of shoulder arthroplasty. However, our study shows that there is wide variability in resident exposure to these cases. Implementation of shoulder arthroplasty case minimum requirements might help reduce case variability and discrepancies in resident education.


Subject(s)
Internship and Residency , Shoulder Fractures , Arthroscopy , Clinical Competence , Education, Medical, Graduate , Elbow , Humans , Shoulder
3.
Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil ; 3(6): e1769-e1773, 2021 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34977632

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate orthopaedic surgery resident case volume and variability for adult and pediatric knee arthroscopy from 2016 to 2020. METHODS: The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education surgical case log data from 2016 to 2020 for graduating United States orthopaedic surgery residents were analyzed. The average number of total (adult and pediatric), adult, and pediatric knee arthroscopy cases were compared from 2016 to 2020. The 10th and 90th percentiles of case volumes for adult and pediatric knee arthroscopy procedures were compared from 2016 to 2020 to determine caseload variability. RESULTS: There was an 18% increase in pediatric knee arthroscopy cases between 2016 and 2020 (average: 13.9 ± 10 to 16.4 ± 13; P < .005), a 5.4% decrease in adult knee arthroscopy cases (100 ± 45 to 94.6 ± 47; P < .027), and a 2.6% decrease in total knee arthroscopy (113.9 ± 47 to 111 ± 51; P = .264) cases. There was an 11-fold difference in the number of pediatric knee arthroscopy cases performed between the 10th and 90th percentile of residents in 2020 (3 vs 33 cases, respectively), a 3.28-fold difference for adult knee arthroscopy (47 vs 154, respectively), and a 2.98-fold difference for total knee arthroscopy (59 vs 176, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Pediatric knee arthroscopy comprises a small yet growing percentage of total knee arthroscopy case volume of graduating orthopaedic surgery residents. However, wide variability in resident exposure is present and likely masked by the abundance of adult cases performed each year. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The findings presented in this study may assist in optimizing arthroscopy resident education. Existing ACL reconstruction and knee arthroscopy case minimum requirements could be updated to include a set number of pediatric cases. These changes might help reduce case volume variability and discrepancies in resident education.

4.
Ophthalmology ; 116(12): 2286-93, 2009 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19815286

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To investigate the impact of an intervention program to improve adherence with topical, once daily therapy for glaucoma. DESIGN: Randomized controlled clinical trial. PARTICIPANTS: Sixty-six patients with glaucoma being treated with a prostaglandin analog in 1 or both eyes at the Scheie Eye Institute or Wilmer Eye Institute between November 2006 and June 2007. METHODS: In an observational study, participants who took 75% or fewer doses (as measured using the travoprost Dosing Aid [DA]) during an initial 3-month period were randomized into 2 groups. The intervention group watched an educational video, reviewed current barriers to drop-taking and possible solutions with a study coordinator, received regular phone call reminders, and had audible and visible reminders activated on their DA devices. The control group was told to take drops as prescribed and received no additional intervention. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Change in drop use adherence as determined by the DA device. RESULTS: In the 3-month observation period before randomization, intervention group patients had used a mean of 54+/-17% of scheduled doses, and this increased to 73+/-22% during the following 3-month period (P<0.001, n = 35). The control mean adherence rate of 46+/-23% at baseline was statistically unchanged during the follow-up observation period (51+/-30%, P = 0.16, n = 31). In a multivariate analysis, intervention, baseline compliance rate of <50%, and white ethnicity were predictors of improved adherence during the 3 months of intervention. The intraocular pressure (IOP) of the intervention and control groups did not change between months 3 and 6 after intervention (P = 0.96, 0.34, respectively), and there was no correlation of IOP change with adherence rate change between both groups (Pearson correlation r = 0.06, P = 0.51). CONCLUSIONS: A multifaceted intervention significantly increased adherence with glaucoma medications. Those with improved adherence were in the intervention group, had very low adherence rates at baseline, and were white. IOP did not correlate with adherence. Further research is needed to determine which components of this intervention were most effective.


Subject(s)
Antihypertensive Agents/administration & dosage , Cloprostenol/analogs & derivatives , Drug Monitoring/instrumentation , Glaucoma/drug therapy , Medication Adherence , Patient Compliance , Patient Education as Topic/methods , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cloprostenol/administration & dosage , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Intraocular Pressure/drug effects , Male , Middle Aged , Ophthalmic Solutions/administration & dosage , Prospective Studies , Travoprost , Video Recording
5.
Ophthalmology ; 116(6): 1097-105, 2009 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19376591

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To identify risk factors for poor adherence to topical once daily therapy for glaucoma. DESIGN: Prospective, observational cohort study. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 196 patients with glaucoma who were being treated with a prostaglandin analog in 1 or more eyes at the Scheie or Wilmer Eye Institutes between August 2006 and June 2007. METHODS: Demographics, ocular history, and responses to interview questions about glaucoma knowledge, health beliefs, and drop-taking behaviors were obtained from each patient. All patients used the Travatan Dosing Aid (DA; Alcon Laboratories Inc., Fort Worth, TX) to administer travoprost as prescribed. Devices were collected at 3 months, and the data of drop use were downloaded using software provided with the DA. Patients taking 75% of doses. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Risk factors for poor adherence. RESULTS: Eighty-seven patients (44.4% of the 196 subjects with evaluable data at 3 months) used the DA on 75% or less of the monitored days. In univariate analysis, poorer adherers were more likely to be <50 or >or=80 years of age, to be African American, to report less than excellent health, to report higher amounts of depression, to have lower income, and to be treated at the Scheie Eye Institute. Multivariate analysis (adjusting for education and income) found that age, race/ethnicity, and less than excellent health were associated with poor adherence. CONCLUSIONS: Those who failed to take more than 75% of eyedrop doses were more likely to be African American and to report poor health. Those in the youngest and oldest age groups were less adherent, although this finding was not always statistically significant. Further research into the factors driving these associations and into developing predictive models to assist in screening for low adherence are warranted. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found after the references.


Subject(s)
Antihypertensive Agents/administration & dosage , Cloprostenol/analogs & derivatives , Glaucoma/drug therapy , Medication Adherence/statistics & numerical data , Ophthalmic Solutions/administration & dosage , Age Factors , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cloprostenol/administration & dosage , Drug Monitoring/instrumentation , Ethnicity , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Glaucoma/ethnology , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Humans , Intraocular Pressure/drug effects , Male , Middle Aged , Ocular Hypertension/drug therapy , Ocular Hypertension/ethnology , Prospective Studies , Risk Factors , Surveys and Questionnaires , Travoprost
6.
J Glaucoma ; 18(3): 173-9, 2009 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19295366

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To estimate the change in iris cross-sectional (CS) area with pupil dilation using anterior segment optical coherence tomography comparing eyes with angle closure (AC) to open angle glaucoma (OAG). METHODS: Sixty-five patients from the Wilmer Glaucoma service, 36 with definite or suspected OAG and 29 with definite or suspected AC, underwent anterior segment optical coherence tomography imaging under 3 conditions (pupil constriction to light, physiologic dilation in the dark, and after pharmacologic dilation). The nasal and temporal iris CS areas were measured with custom software, 3 times in each of 4 meridians. The principal outcome variables were iris CS area and change in iris CS area/mm pupil diameter change. The relation of these parameters to potential variables that would influence iris area was estimated by multivariate regression. RESULTS: CS area was smaller in eyes with larger pupil diameter, those that had undergone trabeculectomy, and those of European-derived persons (P<0.05 for all in a univariate analysis). In a multivariate model with CS area as the dependent variable, larger pupil diameter (with a 0.19 mm decrease in CS area for each 1 mm of pupil enlargement, P=0.0002), and trabeculectomy remained significant factors. In a second multivariate model, AC irides had less change in CS area/mm pupil enlargement than OAG or OAG suspects (P=0.01). Change in iris CS area was essentially complete in 5 seconds (n=10 eyes). CONCLUSIONS: The iris loses nearly half its volume from a pupil diameter of 3 to 7 mm, probably by eliminating extracellular fluid. Smaller iris CS area change with physiologic pupil dilation is a potential risk factor for AC. Dynamic iris CS area change deserves testing as a prospective indicator of AC.


Subject(s)
Glaucoma, Angle-Closure/physiopathology , Iris/physiopathology , Pupil/physiology , Female , Glaucoma, Open-Angle/physiopathology , Gonioscopy , Humans , Intraocular Pressure , Light , Male , Middle Aged , Mydriatics/administration & dosage , Ocular Hypertension/physiopathology , Pupil/drug effects , Pupil/radiation effects , Risk Factors , Tomography, Optical Coherence , Tonometry, Ocular
7.
Ophthalmology ; 116(2): 191-9, 2009 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19084273

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To assess patient adherence and behaviors with topical once-daily therapy for glaucoma. DESIGN: Prospective, observational cohort study. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred ninety-six patients with glaucoma who were being treated with a prostaglandin analog in 1 or both eyes at the Scheie or Wilmer Eye Institutes between August 2006 and June 2007. METHODS: Detailed medical history was obtained from each patient. All subjects used the Travatan Dosing Aid (DA; Alcon, Fort Worth, TX) to administer travoprost as prescribed. Devices were collected at 3 months and the data of drop usage was downloaded using software provided with the dosing aid. Data were analyzed for the 8-week period starting 2 weeks after the enrollment visit and ending 2 weeks before the 3-month visit. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Assessment of adherence and patterns of drop usage as indicated by the DA. RESULTS: A total of 282 subjects consented to be in the study and 86 (30%) withdrew before study completion or had device errors, leaving 196 subjects (70%) with evaluable data at 3 months. The overall mean (+/-standard deviation) adherence rate was 0.71 (+/-0.24), ranging from 0.02 to 0.97. One hundred nine of these patients (55.6%) took greater than 75% of the expected doses. Those with adherence of less than 50% of expected doses showed substantially increased dose taking immediately after the office visit and just before the return visit at 3 months (P = 0.03). The mean adherence rate estimates of the physician and patient self-report were 0.77 and 0.95, respectively. The agreement between the physician assessment and DA-recorded adherence rate showed poor correlation for individual cases (intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.09; 95% confidence interval, 0.00-0.19). CONCLUSIONS: Nearly 45% of patients using an electronic monitoring device who knew they were being monitored and were provided free medication used their drops less than 75% of the time. Patients reported far higher medication use than their actual behavior. The ability of the physician to identify which persons are poorly adherent from their self-report or from other subjective clues is poor. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found after the references.


Subject(s)
Antihypertensive Agents/administration & dosage , Cloprostenol/analogs & derivatives , Glaucoma, Angle-Closure/drug therapy , Glaucoma, Open-Angle/drug therapy , Patient Compliance/statistics & numerical data , Administration, Topical , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Attitude to Health , Cloprostenol/administration & dosage , Cohort Studies , Drug Monitoring/instrumentation , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Intraocular Pressure/drug effects , Male , Middle Aged , Ocular Hypertension/drug therapy , Ophthalmic Solutions/administration & dosage , Prospective Studies , Surveys and Questionnaires , Travoprost
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...