Clinical outcomes of external beam radiotherapy in patients with localized prostate cancer: Does dose escalation matter?

BACKGROUND: To report outcomes of localized prostate cancer treated with radical external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) in our institution over a 14-year period, and to determine the impact of dose escalation of prostate cancer outcomes. METHODS: Patients with T1-T4 N0 M0 prostate cancer who received radical EBRT between January 2002 and December 2015 were reviewed retrospectively. Clinical data were obtained via the institutional electronic medical records. The primary endpoint was 5-year overall survival (OS). The secondary endpoints were 5-year freedom from biochemical failure (FFBF) and treatment toxicities. RESULTS: A total of 200 eligible patients were identified. Median follow-up duration was 48 months. 13%, 36% and 51% of patients had low-, intermediate- and high-risk disease. Median dose was 79.2 Gy. The 5-year OS were 90%, 87% and 78% and FFBF were 94%, 100% and 81% for low-, intermediate- and high-risk patients, respectively. Multivariable analysis showed that Eastern Cooperate Oncology Group performance status 2 and Gleason grade group 5 were independent predictors of worse OS. The incidence of grade ≥2 proctitis was 24.5%. Dose escalation was significantly associated with increased incidence of grade ≥2 proctitis (odd ratio, 4.42; 95% confidence interval, 1.95-10.08; P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Men with localized prostate cancer treated with EBRT in our population had excellent 5-year OS and biochemical outcomes. Dose escalation did not significantly improve these outcomes but was associated with significantly increased risk of grade ≥2 proctitis in our population. Future studies should be performed to identify patients who will benefit the most from dose-escalated EBRT.

Systematic Review of the Volume-Outcome Relationship for Radical Prostatectomy.

CONTEXT: Radical prostatectomy (RP) is one of the most complex urological procedures performed. Higher surgical volume has been found previously to be associated with better patient outcomes and reduced costs to the health care system. This has resulted in some regionalization of care toward high-volume facilities and providers; however, the preponderance of RPs is still performed at low-volume institutions. OBJECTIVE: To provide an updated systematic review of the association of hospital and surgeon volume on patient and system outcomes after RP, including robot-assisted RP. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: A systematic review of literature was undertaken, searching PubMed (1959-2016) for original articles. Selection criteria included RP, hospital and/or surgeon volumes as predictor variables, categorization of hospital and/or surgeon volumes, and measurable end points. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Overall 49 publications fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Most of the studies demonstrated that higher-volume surgeries are associated with better outcomes including reduced mortality, morbidity, postoperative complications, length of stay, readmission, and cost-associated factors. The volume-outcome relationship is maintained in robotic surgery. Eleven studies assessed hospital and surgeon volume simultaneously, and findings reflect that neither is an independent predictor variable affecting outcomes. The studies varied in how volume cutoffs were categorized as well as how the volume-outcome relationship was methodologically evaluated. CONCLUSIONS: Contemporary evidence continues to support the relationship between high-volume surgeries with improved RP outcomes. Recent studies demonstrate that the volume-outcome relationship applies to robot-assisted RP and may be applied for potential cost savings in health care. An increase in the number of international studies suggests reproducibility of the association. Although regionalization of surgical care remains a contentious issue, there is an increasing body of evidence that short-term outcomes are improved at high-volume centers for RP. PATIENT SUMMARY: This systematic review of the latest literature found that higher surgical volume was associated with improved outcomes for radical prostatectomy.

MRI Fusion-Targeted Transrectal Prostate Biopsy and the Role of Prostate-Specific Antigen Density and Prostate Health Index for the Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in Southeast Asian Men.

OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that targeted biopsy has a higher detection rate for clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) than systematic biopsy. We defined csPCa as any Gleason sum ≥7 cancer. In patients with Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) 3 lesions, to determine if factors, such as prostate-specific antigen density (PSAD) and prostate health index (PHI), can predict csPCa and help select patients for biopsy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We report the first series of targeted biopsies in Southeast Asian men, with comparison against systematic biopsy. Consecutive patients were registered into a prospective institutional review board-approved database in our institution. We reviewed patients who underwent biopsy from May 2016 to June 2017. Inclusion criteria for our study were patients with at least one PI-RADS ≥3, and who underwent both targeted and systematic biopsies in the same sitting. RESULTS: There were 115 patients in the study, of whom 74 (64.3%) had a previous negative systematic biopsy. Targeted biopsies detected significantly less Gleason 6 cancers than systematic biopsies (p < 0.01), and demonstrated significantly higher sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value (NPV) for the detection of csPCa. For patients with PI-RADS 3 lesions, PHI and PSAD were found to be the best predictors for csPCa. PSAD <0.10 ng/mL/mL had an NPV of 93% and sensitivity of 92%, while allowing 20% of patients to avoid biopsy. PHI cutoff of <27 would allow 34% of patients to avoid biopsy, with both sensitivity and NPV of 100%. CONCLUSIONS: Targeted prostate biopsies were found to be significantly superior to systematic biopsies for the detection of csPCa, while detecting less Gleason 6 cancer. Usage of PSAD and PHI cutoff levels in patients with PI-RADS 3 lesions may enable a number of patients to avoid unnecessary biopsy.

Outcomes of Robotic versus Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy: an Updated Meta-Analysis of 4,919 Patients.

PURPOSE: We evaluated the current literature comparing outcomes of robotic vs laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a literature search according to Cochrane guidelines up to December 2015 including studies comparing robotic and laparoscopic partial nephrectomy, and we compared baseline patient and tumor characteristics. We performed a meta-analysis to evaluate safety, effectiveness and functional outcomes of robotic vs laparoscopic partial nephrectomy using weighted mean difference and inverse variance pooled risk ratios, respectively. RESULTS: A total of 4,919 patients were included from 25 studies (robotic partial nephrectomy 2,681, laparoscopic partial nephrectomy 2,238). There were no significant differences between the 2 groups in terms of age, gender, laterality and final malignant pathology. Patients treated with robotic partial nephrectomy had larger tumors (WMD 0.17 cm, p=0.001) and higher mean R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry scores (WMD 0.59, p=0.002), and were associated with a decreased likelihood of conversion to laparoscopic/open surgery compared to laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (RR 0.36, p <0.001), any (Clavien 1 or greater) (RR 0.84, p=0.007) and major (Clavien 3 or greater) (RR 0.71, p=0.023) complications, positive margins (RR 0.53, p <0.001) and shorter warm ischemia time by 4.3 minutes (p <0.001). Both approaches had similar operative times (WMD -12.2 minutes, p=0.34), estimated blood loss (WMD -24.6 ml, p=0.15) and postoperative change in estimated glomerular filtration rate. CONCLUSIONS: This updated meta-analysis of retrospective cohort studies demonstrated that robotic partial nephrectomy confers a superior morbidity profile compared to laparoscopic partial nephrectomy in most of the examined perioperative outcomes. Despite being the strongest available evidence (Level 2b) for outcomes of robotic vs laparoscopic partial nephrectomy thus far, there have been no completed or ongoing randomized trials to lend Level 1 support for either approach.

Developing technical expertise in robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy in a moderate-volume center through a proctor-based team approach.

Our aim is to report our preliminary experience of a proctor-based team approach in robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP) for the treatment of localized prostate cancer. Data was collected between December 2008 and February 2012. RALP was performed on 100 consecutive patients with prostate cancer by a team of five urologists proctored by two fellowship-trained surgeons from a single hospital. Clinical and pathological data of these patients were reviewed. The mean age of the patients was 66 years (range 48-76). Clinical stages were 82 % cT1c, 3 % cT1b, 13 % cT2a and 2 % cT3a disease. Preoperative mean prostate-specific antigen level was 11.33 ng/ml (SD 10.47). Mean operative time was 342 min and mean blood loss was 717 ml (SD 988). Mean hospital stay and duration of the indwelling catheter were 3.2 days (SD 1.8) and 12.6 days (SD 8.5), respectively. Pathological staging showed 65 patients with pT2a (65 %) disease and 33 patients with pT3a (33 %) disease. Thirty-five patients (35 %) had positive surgical margins. Eighteen patients underwent adjuvant radiotherapy. Overall postoperative complication rate was 14 %. There were six Clavien grade 1 complications, seven Clavien grade 2 complications and one Clavien grade 3 complication. At mean follow-up of 36 months, 100 % of patients remained free of biochemical recurrence with continence at 70 %. Our proctor-based team approach will continue to improve each surgeon's technical competency. He or she will continue to improve and gradually move on to achieving his or her outcomes learning curve.

The role of R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score in the era of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy.

PURPOSE: We studied the role of the R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score (NS) in predicting surgical outcomes in a series of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Of 99 cases of minimally invasive partial nephrectomy performed by a single surgeon from 2003 to 2011, 83 were performed with robotic assistance. A trained physician investigator applied the NS to these 83 cases using the preoperative CT scans. Forty-two of these were reviewed by a urology resident to eliminate interobserver variation. Tumors were categorized into noncomplex (NS 4-6) or complex (NS 7-12) tumors, and perioperative outcomes were compared. Outcomes were also compared by each component of the NS. Perioperative outcomes were analyzed using chi-square tests and Mann-Whitney/Kruskal-Wallis tests. Univariate regression was used to analyze trends between nephrometry and outcomes. RESULTS: Strong correlation was found between the two sets of NS (Spearman correlational coefficient 0.814, P<0.001). Comparing between noncomplex and complex tumors, statistical differences were found in operative time (181 min vs 215 min, P=0.028) and ischemia time (21 min vs 24 min, P=0.006). Complication rates, blood loss, conversion rate, and decrease in glomerular filtration rate were similar in both groups. On univariate regression analysis, only warm ischemia time showed a significant trend with the overall NS (P=0.007) and the location score (P=0.031). CONCLUSIONS: A high NS was not associated with clinically worse outcomes during RAPN. Such renal tumors can still be excised safely with robotic assistance without adverse long-term effects.

Comparison of donor, and early and late recipient outcomes following hand assisted and laparoscopic donor nephrectomy.

PURPOSE: While laparoscopic donor nephrectomy has encouraged living kidney donation, debate exists about the safest laparoscopic technique. We compared purely laparoscopic and hand assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomies in terms of donor outcome, early graft function and long-term graft outcome. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed the records of consecutive laparoscopic and hand assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomies performed by a single surgeon from 2002 to 2011. Donor operative time and perioperative morbidity were compared. Early graft function for kidneys procured by each technique was evaluated by rates of delayed graft function, need for dialysis and recipient discharge creatinine. Long-term outcomes were evaluated by graft function. RESULTS: A total of 152 laparoscopic donor nephrectomies were compared with 116 hand assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomies. Hand assisted procedures were more often done for the right kidney (41.1% vs 17.1%, p <0.001) and in older donors (age 41.4 vs 37.5 years, p = 0.011). Warm ischemia time was shorter for hand assisted than for purely laparoscopic nephrectomy (120 seconds, IQR 50 vs 145, IQR 64, p <0.001). Median operative time was slightly shorter for the hand assisted than for the purely laparoscopic procedure (155 vs 165 minutes, p = 0.038). In each group 2 intraoperative complications required intervention (open conversion in 1 case each). Postoperatively complications developed after 5 purely laparoscopic and 5 hand assisted operations (1 Clavien 3b in each). Median length of stay was 2 days for each surgery. Postoperatively recipient outcomes were also similar. Delayed function occurred after 0% hand assisted vs 0.9% purely laparoscopic nephrectomies, dialysis was required in 0.9% vs 1.7% and rejection episodes developed in 9.7% vs 18.4% (p >0.05). At last followup the organ was nonfunctioning in 6.1% of hand assisted and 7.7% of purely laparoscopic cases (p >0.05). The recipient glomerular filtration rate at discharge home was similar in the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS: Hand assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy had shorter warm ischemia time but perioperative donor morbidity and graft outcome were comparable. The choice of technique should be based on patient and surgeon preference.

Technique of pelvic lymphadenectomy after robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy for prostate cancer.

Pelvic lymphadenectomy for prostate cancer is an important tool in the prognostication of the disease in selected patients who are at risk of occult lymph node metastases. This procedure, usually performed in conjunction with radical prostatectomy, had progressed successfully from an open approach to the current robot-assisted approach. The following article and accompanying video describe the surgical technique of robot-assisted pelvic lymphadenectomy for prostate cancer. We also discuss the indications, patient selection, preparation, complications, and tips to avoid the major pitfalls in the procedure.

Current status of robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy.

With increased incidence of diagnosis of small renal masses, partial nephrectomy has been preferred over radical nephrectomy as the surgical treatment of choice. The transition from open to laparoscopic partial nephrectomy had been challenging for many urologists. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy(RLPN) is increasingly used to facilitate this transition . In this review, we examine the recent technical advances and clinical outcomes in RLPN. Many series had successfully reported the feasibility of using the da Vinci Surgical (Intuitive Surgical Inc, Sunnyvale, CA) System in laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. Recent advances had focused on reducing risk of renal damage by shortening the warm ischaemia time. These techniques included unclamped excision, selective arterial clamping and improved renorrhaphy methods. Operative times and warm ischaemia times have also improved once the learning curve are overcome, which is less steep than conventional laparoscopy. With longer follow-up and more widespread experience, the outcome of RLPN could be favourable compared to conventional laparoscopy. Improving techniques had made this surgery a safe and efficacious treatment option for small renal masses.

Lap-band causing left gastric artery erosion presenting with torrential hemorrhage.

A 61-year-old lady presented 2 years after lap-band surgery with hemetemesis. She was stable on admission and band erosion was diagnosed on gastroscopy. Laparotomy was performed to remove the lap band. Upon division of the lap band, torrential hemorrhage from the eroded left gastric artery was encountered. An anterior gastrostomy was done to expose the artery. Intraoperative gastroscopy was also performed to define the cardioesophageal junction. The artery was ligated and the perforation and gastrostomy were repaired. The patient was discharged after 9 days in hospital. This case highlighted the potential injury to the left gastric artery in patients with band erosion presenting with hemetemesis. Torrential bleeding may be encountered upon division of the lap band, and this should be anticipated during laparotomy.

Prognostic factors for upper tract transitional cell carcinoma: a retrospective review of 66 patients.

OBJECTIVE: We assessed the prognostic factors on recurrence and disease-specific survival of patients treated for upper tract transitional cell carcinoma (TCC). METHODS: Data on 66 patients who were treated for upper tract TCC in a single centre over a 13-year period were analysed. Mean follow-up time was 49.2 months. Fifty-five out of 66 (83.3%) underwent nephroureterectomy with excision of a bladder cuff. Four (6.1%) patients had nephrectomy alone while three (4.5%) had renal-sparing surgery. Four patients did not receive surgery due to advanced age and other comorbidities. Age, sex, tumour location, stage and grade were analysed as prognostic factors for disease recurrence and disease-specific survival using log rank univariate analysis. RESULTS: Disease recurrence occurred in 45 (68.2%) patients at a median time of 11.0 months. Recurrences were found in the bladder in 27.3%, the contralateral renal pelvis in 4.5%, local retroperitoneum in 19.7%, distant sites in 13.6%, with simultaneous local and distant metastases occurring in 3.0%. Tumour stage was the only significant prognostic factor for recurrence. Presence of extraurothelial recurrence, stage and grade were significant prognostic factors for disease-specific survival. CONCLUSION: Tumour stage was the most consistent predictor of both disease recurrence and survival. These findings would guide the need for any adjuvant chemoradiotherapy.