Acupuncture and Static Multipolar Magnets: An Emerging Attraction?

Objective: Magnetism has been known for >4,000 years. Recently static multipolar magnets have demonstrated analgesic clinical usefulness. Local application of magnets may be beneficial in reducing musculoskeletal pain, particularly when other modalities have failed. A recent series of clinical cases demonstrates how multipolar magnets may be incorporated as an effective adjunctive treatment in an acupuncture clinic. Materials and Methods: PubMed database was searched using the key words: magnets, medical magnets, magnets and pain management, therapeutic magnets, multipolar magnets, and history of magnet therapy. In addition, clinical cases were submitted by 4 different medical acupuncturists as examples of how the use of multipolar magnets is incorporated into an acupuncture clinic. Results: Over the past 20 years, 143 articles fulfilled the search criteria and unfortunately demonstrated considerable variability in research methodology. Magnetic tapes, needles, and beads of various magnetic strengths constituted the stimulating apparatus with durations ranging from minutes to years. This article highlights 10 cases, 9 of which reflected situations in which the use of 1 or more multipolar magnets provided an enhanced analgesic effect, often when traditional acupuncture had either failed to produce a satisfactory response or when the application of acupuncture needles needed to be limited. Conclusion: Despite the variability of the literature review, it appears that magnetism is related to pain reduction, and when properly employed, it can be an effective and safe modality as demonstrated by a recent series of cases submitted from the practices of 4 different medical acupuncturists. A clinical trial incorporating the latest technology of multipolar magnets with steep field gradients should be initiated for the more formal investigation of magnet-induced analgesia.

Precision Medicine-A Demand Signal for Genomics Education.

Pressed by the accumulating knowledge in genomics and the proven success of the translation of cancer genomics to clinical practice in oncology, the Obama administration unveiled a $215 million commitment for the Precision Medicine Initiative (PMI) in 2016, a pioneering research effort to improve health and treat disease using a new model of patient-powered research. The objectives of the initiative include more effective treatments for cancer and other diseases, creation of a voluntary national research cohort, adherence to privacy protections for maintaining data sharing and use, modernization of the regulatory framework, and forging public-private partnerships to facilitate these objectives. Specifically, the DoD Military Health System joined other agencies to execute a comprehensive effort for PMI. Of the many challenges to consider that may contribute to the implementation of genomics-lack of familiarity and understanding, poor access to genomic medicine expertise, needs for extensive informatics and infrastructure to integrate genomic results, privacy and security, and policy development to address the unique requirements of military medical practice-we will focus on the need to establish education in genomics appropriate to the provider's responsibilities. Our hypothesis is that there is a growing urgency for the development of educational experiences, formal and informal, to enable clinicians to acquire competency in genomics commensurate with their level of practice. Several educational approaches, both in practice and in development, are presented to inform decision-makers and empower military providers to pursue courses of action that respond to this need.

The Optimal Timing of Step 1 in Medical Education Following the Transition to Pass/Fail: A Unique Perspective from Post-clerkship Step 1 Schools.

The National Board of Medical Examiners' decision to change Step 1 of the United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) from a three-digit score to Pass/Fail (P/F) represents a disruptive change for students, faculty, and leaders in the academic community. In the context of this change, some schools may re-consider the optimal timing of Step 1 as they strive to align their assessment practices with sound educational principles. Currently, over 20 schools administer USMLE Step 1 after the core clerkships. In this commentary, we review the educational rationale for a post-clerkship Step 1, highlighting how adult learning theories support this placement. We discuss some short-term challenges post-clerkship Step 1 schools may encounter due to the proposed timing of the change in scoring, which creates three unique scenarios for learners that can introduce inequity in the system and provoke anxiety. We review outcomes of potentially heightened importance when Step 1 is P/F, including lower clinical subject exam scores in some clerkships, lower failure rates on Step 1 and stable Step 2 Clinical Knowledge scores with implications for the residency match. We outline the future potential for performance-based time-variable Step 1 study periods that are facilitated by post-clerkship placement of the exam. Finally, we discuss opportunities to achieve the goal of enhancing student well-being, which was a major rationale for eliminating the three-digit score.

Strategies From 11 U.S. Medical Schools for Integrating Basic Science Into Core Clerkships.

Calls for curricular reform in medical schools and enhanced integration of basic and clinical science have resulted in a shift toward preclerkship curricula that enhance the clinical relevance of foundational science instruction and provide students with earlier immersion in the clinical environment. These reforms have resulted in shortened preclerkship curricula, yet the promise of integrated basic science education into clerkships has not been sufficiently realized because of barriers such as the nature of clinical practice, time constraints, and limited faculty knowledge. As personalized medicine requires that physicians have a more nuanced understanding of basic science, this is cause for alarm. To address this problem, several schools have developed instructional and assessment strategies to better integrate basic science into the clinical curriculum. In this article, faculty and deans from 11 U.S. medical schools discuss the strategies they implemented and the lessons they learned to provide guidance to other schools seeking to enhance basic science education during clerkships. The strategies include program-level interventions (e.g., longitudinal sessions dedicated to basic science during clerkships, weeks of lessons dedicated to basic science interspersed in clerkships), clerkship-level interventions (e.g., case-based learning with online modules, multidisciplinary clerkship dedicated to applied science), bedside-level interventions (e.g., basic science teaching scripts, self-directed learning), and changes to formative and summative assessments (e.g., spaced repetition/leveraging test-enhanced learning, developing customized examinations). The authors discovered that: interventions were more successful when buy-in from faculty and students was considered, central oversight by curricular committees collaborating with faculty was key, and some integration efforts may require schools to provide significant resources. All schools administered the United States Medical Licensing Examination Step 1 exam to students after clerkship, with positive outcomes. The authors have demonstrated that it is feasible to incorporate basic science into clinical clerkships, but certain challenges remain.

Does Delaying the United States Medical Licensing Examination Step 1 to After Clerkships Affect Student Performance on Clerkship Subject Examinations?

Phenomenon: Schools are considering the optimal timing of Step 1 of the United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE). Two primary reasons for moving Step 1 after the core clerkships are to promote deeper, more integrated basic science learning in clinical contexts and to better prepare students for the increasingly clinical focus of Step 1. Positioning Step 1 after the core clerkships leverages a major national assessment to drive learning, encouraging students to deepen their basic science knowledge while in the clinical setting. Previous studies demonstrated small increases in Step 1 scores, reductions in failure rates, and similar Step 2 Clinical Knowledge scores when Step 1 was after the clerkships. Some schools that have moved Step 1 reported declines in clinical subject examination (CSE) performance. This may be due to shortened pre-clerkship curricula, the absence of the Step 1 study period for knowledge consolidation, or exposure to fewer National Board of Medical Examiners type questions prior to taking CSEs. This multi-institutional study aimed to determine whether student performance on CSEs was affected by moving Step 1 after the core clerkships. Approach: CSE scores for students from eight schools that moved Step 1 after core clerkships between 2012 and 2016 were analyzed in a pre-post format. Hierarchical linear modeling was used to quantify the effect of the curriculum on CSE performance. Additional analysis determined if clerkship order impacted clinical subject exam performance and whether the curriculum change resulted in more students scoring in the lowest percentiles (as defined as below the national fifth percentile) before and after the curricular change. Findings: After moving Step 1 to after the clerkships, collectively these eight schools demonstrated statistically significant lower performance on four CSEs (Medicine, Neurology, Pediatrics, and Surgery) but not Obstetrics/Gynecology or Psychiatry. Comparing performance within the three years pre and post Step 1 change, differences across all clerkships ranged from 0.3 to -2.0 points, with an average difference of -1.1. CSE performance in clerkships taken early in the sequence was more affected by the curricular change, and differences gradually disappeared with subsequent examinations. Medicine and Neurology showed the largest average differences between curricular-group when taken early in the clinical year. Finally, there was a slightly higher chance of scoring below the national fifth percentile in four of the clinical subject exams (Medicine, Neurology, Pediatrics, and Psychiatry) for the cohort with Step 1 after the clerkships. Insights: Moving Step 1 after core clerkships had a small impact on CSE scores overall, with decreased scores for exams early in the clerkship sequence and an increased number of students below the fifth percentile. Score differences have minor effects on clerkship grades, but overall the size of the effect is unlikely to be educationally meaningful. Schools can use a variety of mitigation strategies to address CSE performance and Step 1 preparation in the clerkship phase.

Curricular Change and Resiliency in the Era of Coronavirus (COVID-19): The Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences (USU) Experience.

INTRODUCTION: The Coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic has presented a myriad of organizational and institutional challenges. The Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, like many other front line hospitals and clinics, encountered a myriad of challenges in fostering and sustaining the education of students enrolled at the nation's only military medical school. Critical to the function of any academic medical institution, but particularly one devoted to the training of future physicians for the Military Health System, was the ability to rapidly adapt, modify, and create new means of keeping medical students engaged in their core curricula and progressing toward full and timely attainment of established educational goals and objectives. METHODS: This article highlights some of the particular challenges faced by faculty and students during the first 6 months of the COVID-19 pandemic and describes how they were managed and/or mitigated. RESULTS: Six key "lessons learned" were identified and summarized in this manuscript. These lessons may be applicable to other academic institutions both within and outside of the Military Health System. CONCLUSIONS: Recognizing and embracing these key tenets of academic change management can accelerate the generation of a cohesive, organizational response to the next pandemic or public health crisis.

Identifying and Supporting Students to Prevent USMLE Step 1 Failures When Testing Follows Clerkships: Insights From 9 Schools.

Several schools have moved the United States Medical Licensing Examination Step 1 exam after core clerkships, and others are considering this change. Delaying Step 1 may improve Step 1 performance and lower Step 1 failure rates. Schools considering moving Step 1 are particularly concerned about late identification of struggling students and late Step failures, which can be particularly problematic due to reduced time to remediate and accumulated debt if remediation is ultimately unsuccessful. In the literature published to date, little attention has been given to these students. In this article, authors from 9 medical schools with a postclerkship Step 1 exam share their experiences. The authors describe curricular policies, early warning and identification strategies, and interventions to enhance success for all students and struggling students in particular. Such learners can be identified by understanding challenges that place them "at risk" and by tracking performance outcomes, particularly on other standardized assessments. All learners can benefit from early coaching and advising, mechanisms to ensure early feedback on performance, commercial study tools, learning specialists or resources to enhance learning skills, and wellness programs. Some students may need intensive tutoring, neuropsychological testing and exam accommodations, board preparation courses, deceleration pathways, and options to postpone Step 1. In rare instances, a student may need a compassionate off-ramp from medical school. With the National Board of Medical Examiner's announcement that Step 1 scoring will change to pass/fail as early as January 2022, residency program directors might use failing Step 1 scores to screen out candidates. Institutions altering the timing of Step 1 can benefit from practical guidance by those who have made the change, to both prevent Step 1 failures and minimize adverse effects on those who fail.

Exploring the Predictors of Post-Clerkship USMLE Step 1 Scores.

Theory: We used two theoretical frameworks for this study: a) experiential learning, whereby learners construct new knowledge based on prior experience, and learning grows out of a continuous process of reconstructing experience, and b) deliberate practice, whereby the use of testing (test-enhanced learning) promotes learning and produces better long-term retention. Hypothesis: We hypothesized that moving the USMLE Step 1 exam to follow the clerkship year would provide students with a context for basic science learning that may enhance exam performance. We also hypothesized that examination performance variables, specifically National Board of Medical Examiners (NBME) Customized Basic Science Examinations and NBME subject examinations in clinical disciplines would account for a moderate to large amount of the variance in Step 1 scores. Thus we examined predictors of USMLE Step 1 scores when taken after the core clerkship year. Method: In 2011, we revised our medical school curriculum and moved the timing of Step 1 to follow the clerkship year. We performed descriptive statistics, an ANCOVA to compare Step 1 mean scores for three graduating classes of medical students before and after the curriculum changes, and stepwise linear regression to investigate the association between independent variables and the primary outcome measure after curriculum changes. Results: 993 students took the Step 1 exam, which included graduating classes before (2012-2014, N = 491) and after (2015-2017, N = 502) the curriculum change. Step 1 scores increased significantly following curricular revision (mean 218, SD 18.2, vs. 228, SD 16.7, p < 0.01) after controlling for MCAT and undergraduate GPA. Overall, 66.4% of the variance in Step 1 scores after the clerkship year was explained by: the mean score on fourteen pre-clerkship customized NBME exams (p < 0.01, 57.0% R2); performance on the surgery NBME subject exam (p < 0.01, 3.0% R2); the pediatrics NBME subject exam (p < 0.01, 2.0% R2); the Comprehensive Basic Science Self-Assessment (p < .01, 2.0% R2) ; the internal medicine NBME subject exam (p < 0.01, 0.03% R2), pre-clerkship Integrated Clinical Skills score (p < 0.01, 0.05% R2), and the pre-matriculation MCAT (p < 0.01, 0.01% R2). Conclusion: In our institution, nearly two-thirds of the variance in performance on Step 1 taken after the clerkship year was explained mainly by pre-clerkship variables, with a smaller contribution emanating from clerkship measures. Further study is needed to uncover the specific aspects of the clerkship experience that might contribute to success on high stakes licensing exam performance.

Effects of Moving the United States Medical Licensing Examination Step 1 After Core Clerkships on Step 2 Clinical Knowledge Performance.

PURPOSE: To investigate the effect of a change in the United States Medical Licensing Examination Step 1 timing on Step 2 Clinical Knowledge (CK) scores, the effect of lag time on Step 2 CK performance, and the relationship of incoming Medical College Admission Test (MCAT) score to Step 2 CK performance pre and post change. METHOD: Four schools that moved Step 1 after core clerkships between academic years 2008-2009 and 2017-2018 were analyzed. Standard t tests were used to examine the change in Step 2 CK scores pre and post change. Tests of differences in proportions were used to evaluate whether Step 2 CK failure rates differed between curricular change groups. Linear regressions were used to examine the relationships between Step 2 CK performance, lag time and incoming MCAT score, and curricular change group. RESULTS: Step 2 CK performance did not change significantly (P = .20). Failure rates remained highly consistent (pre change: 1.83%; post change: 1.79%). The regression indicated that lag time had a significant effect on Step 2 CK performance, with scores declining with increasing lag time, with small but significant interaction effects between MCAT and Step 2 CK scores. Students with lower incoming MCAT scores tended to perform better on Step 2 CK when Step 1 was after clerkships. CONCLUSIONS: Moving Step 1 after core clerkships appears to have had no significant impact on Step 2 CK scores or failure rates, supporting the argument that such a change is noninferior to the traditional model. Students with lower MCAT scores benefit most from the change.

Post-Carnegie II curricular reform: a north American survey of emerging trends & challenges.

BACKGROUND: In 2010, coincident with the 100th anniversary of Flexner's sentinel report, the Carnegie Foundation published an updated review of North American medical education and challenged medical schools to initiate further educational reforms. Specific recommendations pertained to a) ensuring standardized outcomes while allowing for individualized processes, b) integrating foundational knowledge with clinical experience, c) cultivating habits of inquiry and innovation and d) professional identity formation. As we approach the 10-year anniversary of this latest report, we sought to determine what type of curricular revisions have been emerging within the past decade and what types of challenges have been encountered along the way? METHODS: In 2018, an electronic survey was sent to all 166 Liaison Committee on Medical Education (LCME) accredited North American Medical Schools, using the points of contact (educational deans) that were listed in a publicly available, Association of American Medical Colleges database. Free text comments were grouped into themes using the constant-comparative technique. RESULTS: Sixty unique responses yielding a 36.14% response rate. The distribution of responses was proportionally representative of the distribution of public vs. private, old vs. new vs. established North American medical schools. Self-reported curricular changes aggregated into five main themes: Changes in curricular structure/organization, changes in curricular content, changes in curricular delivery, changes in assessment, and changes involving increased use of technology/informatics. Challenges were predominantly focused on overcoming faculty resistance, faculty development, securing adequate resourcing, change management, and competition for limited amounts of curricular time. CONCLUSIONS: Changes in curricular organization, content, delivery, assessment and the use of technology reflect reforms that are broad and deep. Empowering faculty to "let go" of familiar constructs/processes requires strong leadership, particularly when initiating particularly disruptive curricular changes, such as relocating the Step 1 examination or shifting to a competency-based curriculum. While North American medical schools are responding to the calls for action described in the second (2010) Carnegie Foundation report, the full vision has yet to be achieved.

Challenges Associated With Moving the United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) Step 1 to After the Core Clerkships and How to Approach Them.

An increasing number of medical schools have moved away from traditional 2 + 2 curricular structures toward curricula that intentionally integrate basic, clinical, and health systems science, with the goal of graduating physicians who consistently apply their foundational knowledge to clinical practice to improve the care of patients and populations. These curricular reforms often include a shortened preclerkship phase with earlier introduction of learners into clinical environments. This has led schools to reconsider the optimal timing of United States Medical Licensing Examination Step 1. A number of schools have shifted the exam to the period immediately after core clerkships. Although this shift can provide pedagogical advantages, there are potential challenges that must be anticipated and proactively addressed. As more institutions consider making this change, key educational leaders from five schools that repositioned the Step 1 exam after core clerkships share strategies for mitigating some of the potential challenges associated with this approach. The authors describe six possible challenges: lack of readiness without consolidation of basic science knowledge prior to clerkships; risk that weaker students will not be identified and provided academic support early; clerkship or clinical shelf exam performance weaknesses; extension of Step 1 study time; an increase in student anxiety about residency specialty choices; and/or a reduced time frame to take and pass board exams. These potential challenges may be addressed using three main strategies: effective communication with all stakeholders; curricular design and assessments that facilitate integration of basic and clinical sciences; and proactive student coaching and advising.

Moving the United States Medical Licensing Examination Step 1 After Core Clerkships: An Outcomes Analysis.

PURPOSE: Schools undergoing curricular reform are reconsidering the optimal timing of Step 1. This study provides a psychometric investigation of the impact on United States Medical Licensing Examination Step 1 scores of changing the timing of Step 1 from after completion of the basic science curricula to after core clerkships. METHOD: Data from four schools that recently moved the examination were analyzed in a pre-post format using examinee scores from three years before and after the change. The sample included scores from 2008 through 2016. Several confounders were addressed, including rising national scores and potential differences in cohort abilities using deviation scores and analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) controlling for Medical College Admission Test (MCAT) scores. A resampling procedure compared study schools' score changes versus similar schools' in the same time period. RESULTS: The ANCOVA indicated postchange Step 1 scores were higher compared with prechange (adjusted difference = 2.67; 95% confidence interval: 1.50-3.83, P < .001; effect size = 0.14) after adjusting for MCAT scores and rising national averages. The average score increase in study schools was larger than changes seen in similar schools. Failure rates also decreased from 2.87% (n = 48) pre change to 0.39% (n = 6) post change (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest moving Step 1 after core clerkships yielded a small increase in scores and a reduction in failure rates. Although these small increases are unlikely to represent meaningful knowledge gains, this demonstration of "noninferiority" may allow schools to implement significant curricular reforms.

Interprofessional Healthcare Student Training in the Care of Sexual Assault Patients Utilizing Standardized Patient Methodology.

BACKGROUND: The medical assessment of sexual assault (SA) is challenging because SA patients are often hesitant to disclose their medical needs, which puts them at further physical and psychological risk, and because of provider unease in conducting SA examinations. This challenge is compounded by a lack of provider training. OBJECTIVES: The study goals were to develop an interprofessional simulation event that would foster SA interview skills, foster effective communication with SA patients, and increase learner confidence in assessing SA patients. METHODS: Participants were senior-year school of medicine (n = 165) and advanced practice registered nursing (n = 30) students (N = 195) who were enrolled in a mandatory Military Sexual Assault Assessment and Treatment course, along with data provided by trained standardized patients (SPs, n = 16) who participated in the simulation event and in assessments of learners. Measures included the Sexual Assault Interview Skills Checklist, the Essential Elements of Communication, and the Confidence in SA Assessment scale. Data were analyzed using analysis of variance and t tests at the P < 0.05 threshold. RESULTS: Postsimulation Sexual Assault Interview Skills Checklist and Essential Elements of Communication scores demonstrated an acceptable level of competence according to both students and SPs. Confidence in SA assessment rose significantly from presimulation to postsimulation. Before simulation, medical students were significantly lower than nursing students, but the simulation event closed the confidence in SA assessment gap. CONCLUSIONS: This interprofessional simulation event resulted in SA interview competence, communication skills competence, and improved confidence scores. Combined, these findings support the efficacy of simulation to train emerging healthcare providers to properly assess SA.

Building Capacity for Complementary and Integrative Medicine Through a Large, Cross-Agency, Acupuncture Training Program: Lessons Learned from a Military Health System and Veterans Health Administration Joint Initiative Project.

Introduction: Complementary and integrative medicine (CIM) use in the USA continues to expand, including within the Military Health System (MHS) and Veterans Health Administration (VHA). To mitigate the opioid crisis and provide additional non-pharmacological pain management options, a large cross-agency collaborative project sought to develop and implement a systems-wide curriculum, entitled Acupuncture Training Across Clinical Settings (ATACS). Materials and Methods: ATACS curriculum content and structure were created and refined over the course of the project in response to consultations with Subject Matter Experts and provider feedback. Course content was developed to be applicable to the MHS and VHA environments and training was open to many types of providers. Training included a 4-hr didactic and "hands on" clinical training program focused on a single auricular acupuncture protocol, Battlefield Acupuncture. Trainee learning and skills proficiency were evaluated by trainer-observation and written examination. Immediately following training, providers completed an evaluation survey on their ATACS experience. One month later, they were asked to complete another survey regarding their auricular acupuncture use and barriers to use. The present evaluation describes the ATACS curriculum, faculty and trainee characteristics, as well as trainee and program developer perspectives. Results: Over the course of a 19-mo period, 2,712 providers completed the in-person, 4-hr didactic and hands-on clinical training session. Due to the increasing requests for training, additional ATACS faculty were trained. Overall, 113 providers were approved to be training faculty. Responses from the trainee surveys indicated high satisfaction with the ATACS training program and illuminated several challenges to using auricular acupuncture with patients. The most common reported barrier to using auricular acupuncture was the lack of obtaining privileges to administer auricular acupuncture within clinical practice. Conclusion: The ATACS program provided a foundational template to increase CIM across the MHS and VHA. The lessons learned in the program's implementation will aid future CIM training programs and improve program evaluations. Future work is needed to determine the most efficient means of improving CIM credentialing and privileging procedures, standardizing and adopting uniform CIM EHR codes and documentation, and examining the effectiveness of CIM techniques in real-world settings.