Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 7 de 7
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Immunol Methods ; 530: 113698, 2024 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38823574

ABSTRACT

There is a critical need to understand the effectiveness of serum elicited by different SARS-CoV-2 vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 variants. We describe the generation of reference reagents comprised of post-vaccination sera from recipients of different primary vaccines with or without different vaccine booster regimens in order to allow standardized characterization of SARS-CoV-2 neutralization in vitro. We prepared and pooled serum obtained from donors who received a either primary vaccine series alone, or a vaccination strategy that included primary and boosted immunization using available SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines (BNT162b2, Pfizer and mRNA-1273, Moderna), replication-incompetent adenovirus type 26 vaccine (Ad26.COV2·S, Johnson and Johnson), or recombinant baculovirus-expressed spike protein in a nanoparticle vaccine plus Matrix-M adjuvant (NVX-CoV2373, Novavax). No subjects had a history of clinical SARS-CoV-2 infection, and sera were screened with confirmation that there were no nucleocapsid antibodies detected to suggest natural infection. Twice frozen sera were aliquoted, and serum antibodies were characterized for SARS-CoV-2 spike protein binding (estimated WHO antibody binding units/ml), spike protein competition for ACE-2 binding, and SARS-CoV-2 spike protein pseudotyped lentivirus transduction. These reagents are available for distribution to the research community (BEI Resources), and should allow the direct comparison of antibody neutralization results between different laboratories. Further, these sera are an important tool to evaluate the functional neutralization activity of vaccine-induced antibodies against emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern. IMPORTANCE: The explosion of COVID-19 demonstrated how novel coronaviruses can rapidly spread and evolve following introduction into human hosts. The extent of vaccine- and infection-induced protection against infection and disease severity is reduced over time due to the fall in concentration, and due to emerging variants that have altered antibody binding regions on the viral envelope spike protein. Here, we pooled sera obtained from individuals who were immunized with different SARS-CoV-2 vaccines and who did not have clinical or serologic evidence of prior infection. The sera pools were characterized for direct spike protein binding, blockade of virus-receptor binding, and neutralization of spike protein pseudotyped lentiviruses. These sera pools were aliquoted and are available to allow inter-laboratory comparison of results and to provide a tool to determine the effectiveness of prior vaccines in recognizing and neutralizing emerging variants of concern.


Subject(s)
2019-nCoV Vaccine mRNA-1273 , Antibodies, Neutralizing , Antibodies, Viral , BNT162 Vaccine , COVID-19 Vaccines , COVID-19 , Neutralization Tests , SARS-CoV-2 , Humans , SARS-CoV-2/immunology , Antibodies, Viral/blood , Antibodies, Viral/immunology , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19/immunology , COVID-19/virology , Antibodies, Neutralizing/blood , Antibodies, Neutralizing/immunology , COVID-19 Vaccines/immunology , COVID-19 Vaccines/administration & dosage , 2019-nCoV Vaccine mRNA-1273/immunology , BNT162 Vaccine/immunology , BNT162 Vaccine/administration & dosage , Spike Glycoprotein, Coronavirus/immunology , Reference Standards , Immunization, Secondary , Vaccination , Ad26COVS1/immunology
2.
PLoS One ; 17(9): e0273518, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36126055

ABSTRACT

The histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor vorinostat, used with gemcitabine and other therapies, has been effective in treatment of experimental models of pancreatic cancer. In this study, we demonstrated that M344, an HDAC inhibitor, is efficacious against pancreatic cancer in vitro and in vivo, alone or with gemcitabine. By 24 hours post-treatment, M344 augments the population of pancreatic cancer cells in G1, and at a later time point (48 hours) it increases apoptosis. M344 inhibits histone H3 deacetylation and slows pancreatic cancer cell proliferation better than vorinostat, and it does not decrease the viability of a non-malignant cell line more than vorinostat. M344 also elevates pancreatic cancer cell major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I molecule expression, potentially increasing the susceptibility of pancreatic cancer cells to T cell lysis. Taken together, our findings support further investigation of M344 as a pancreatic cancer treatment.


Subject(s)
Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors , Pancreatic Neoplasms , Cell Line, Tumor , Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors/pharmacology , Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Histone Deacetylases/metabolism , Histones/metabolism , Humans , Hydroxamic Acids/pharmacology , Hydroxamic Acids/therapeutic use , Pancreatic Neoplasms/drug therapy , Vorinostat/pharmacology , Pancreatic Neoplasms
3.
Cancers (Basel) ; 13(7)2021 Mar 26.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33810510

ABSTRACT

In the United States, pancreatic cancer is a major cause of cancer-related deaths. Although substantial efforts have been made to understand pancreatic cancer biology and improve therapeutic efficacy, patients still face a bleak chance of survival. A greater understanding of pancreatic cancer development and the identification of novel treatment targets are desperately needed. Our analysis of gene expression data from patient samples showed an increase in amyloid precursor-like protein 2 (APLP2) expression within primary tumor epithelium relative to pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PanIN) epithelial cells. Augmented expression of APLP2 in primary tumors compared to adjacent stroma was also observed. Genetically engineered mouse models of spontaneous pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma were used to investigate APLP2's role in cancer development. We found that APLP2 expression intensifies significantly during pancreatic cancer initiation and progression in the LSL-KrasG12D/+; LSL-Trp53R172H/+; Pdx-1-Cre (KPC) mouse model, as shown by immunohistochemistry analysis. In studies utilizing pancreas-specific heterozygous and homozygous knockout of APLP2 in the KPC mouse model background, we observed significantly prolonged survival and reduced metastatic progression of pancreatic cancer. These results demonstrate the importance of APLP2 in pancreatic cancer initiation and metastasis and indicate that APLP2 should be considered a potential therapeutic target for this disease.

4.
Cancer Metastasis Rev ; 40(2): 377-389, 2021 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33682030

ABSTRACT

The development of cancer stems from genetic instability and changes in genomic sequences, and hence, the heterogeneity exhibited by tumors is integral to the nature of cancer itself. Tumor heterogeneity can be further altered by factors that are not cancer cell intrinsic, i.e., by the microenvironment, including the patient's immune responses to tumors and administered therapies (immunotherapies, chemotherapies, and/or radiation therapies). The focus of this review is the impact of tumor heterogeneity on the interactions between immune cells and the tumor, taking into account that heterogeneity can exist at several levels. These levels include heterogeneity within an individual tumor, within an individual patient (particularly between the primary tumor and metastatic lesions), among the subtypes of a specific type of cancer, or within cancers that originate from different tissues. Because of the potential for immunity (either the natural immune system or via immunotherapeutics) to halt the progression of cancer, major clinical significance exists in understanding the impact of tumor heterogeneity on the associations between immune cells and tumor cells. Increased knowledge of why, whether, and how immune-tumor interactions occur provides the means to guide these interactions and improve outcomes for patients.


Subject(s)
Neoplasms/genetics , Neoplasms/immunology , Animals , Cytokines/immunology , Dendritic Cells/immunology , Dendritic Cells/pathology , Humans , Immunotherapy/methods , Neoplasms/pathology , Neoplasms/therapy , Neutrophils/immunology , Neutrophils/pathology , T-Lymphocytes/immunology , T-Lymphocytes/pathology
5.
J Control Release ; 327: 266-283, 2020 11 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32711026

ABSTRACT

Neuroblastoma is the most commonly diagnosed extracranial solid tumor in children. The patients with aggressive metastatic disease or refractory/relapsed neuroblastoma currently face a dismally low chance of survival. Thus, there is a great need for more effective therapies for this illness. In previous studies, we, as well as others, showed that the immune cell chemoattractant C-C motif chemokine ligand 21 (CCL21) is effective as an intratumoral therapy able to slow the growth of cancers. In this current study, we developed and tested an injectable, slow-release, uniform, and optimally loaded alginate nanoformulation of CCL21 as a means to provide prolonged intratumoral treatment. The alginate-nanoformulated CCL21, when injected intratumorally into mice bearing neuroblastoma lesions, significantly prolonged survival and decreased the tumor growth rate compared to CCL21 alone, empty nanoparticles, or buffer. Notably, we also observed complete tumor clearance and subsequent full protection against tumor rechallenge in 33% of nanoformulated CCL21-treated mice. Greater intratumoral presence of nanoformulated CCL21, compared to free CCL21, at days 1 and 2 after treatment ended was confirmed through fluorescent labeling and tracking. Nanoformulated CCL21-treated tumors exhibited a general pattern of prolonged increases in anti-tumor cytokines and relatively lower levels of pro-tumor cytokines in comparison to tumors treated with CCL21 alone or buffer only. Thus, this novel nanoformulation of CCL21 is an effective treatment for neuroblastoma, and may have potential for the delivery of CCL21 to other types of solid tumors in the future and as a slow-release delivery modality for other immunotherapies.


Subject(s)
Chemokine CCL21 , Neuroblastoma , Animals , Cell Line, Tumor , Chemokine CCL21/therapeutic use , Humans , Immunotherapy , Ligands , Mice , Neuroblastoma/drug therapy
6.
Cancer Biol Ther ; 20(6): 931-940, 2019.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30810435

ABSTRACT

Beta 2-microglobulin (ß2m) is a component of the major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I molecule, which presents tumor antigens to T lymphocytes to trigger cancer cell destruction. Notably, ß2m has been reported as persistently expressed, rather than down regulated, in some tumor types. For renal cell and oral squamous cell carcinomas, ß2m expression has been linked to increased migratory capabilities. The migratory ability of pancreatic cancer cells contributes to their metastatic tendencies and lethal nature. Therefore, in this study, we examined the impact of ß2m on pancreatic cancer cell migration. We found that ß2m protein is amply expressed in several human pancreatic cancer cell lines (S2-013, PANC-1, and MIA PaCa-2). Reducing ß2m expression by short interfering RNA (siRNA) transfection significantly slowed the migration of the PANC-1 and S2-013 cancer cell lines, but increased the migration of the MIA PaCa-2 cell line. The amyloid precursor-like protein 2 (APLP2) has been documented as contributing to pancreatic cancer cell migration, invasiveness, and metastasis. We have previously shown that ß2m/HLA class I/peptide complexes associate with APLP2 in S2-013 cells, and in this study we also detected their association in PANC-1 cells but not MIA PaCa-2 cells. In addition, siRNA down regulation of ß2m expression diminished the expression of APLP2 in S2-013 and PANC-1 but heightened the level of APLP2 in MIA PaCa-2 cells, consistent with our migration data and co-immunoprecipitation data. Thus, our findings indicate that ß2m regulates pancreatic cancer cell migration, and furthermore suggest that APLP2 is an intermediary in this process.


Subject(s)
Amyloid beta-Protein Precursor/genetics , Cell Movement/genetics , Nerve Tissue Proteins/genetics , Pancreatic Neoplasms/genetics , beta 2-Microglobulin/genetics , Cell Line, Tumor , Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic , Gene Knockdown Techniques , Histocompatibility Antigens Class I/genetics , Humans , beta 2-Microglobulin/metabolism
7.
Cancer Lett ; 417: 35-46, 2018 03 28.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29242097

ABSTRACT

Pancreatic cancer (PC) is the fourth leading cause of cancer-related deaths in the U.S., claiming approximately 43,000 lives every year. Much like other solid tumors, PC evades the host immune surveillance by manipulating immune cells to establish an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment (TME). Therefore, targeting and reinstating the patient's immune system could serve as a powerful therapeutic tool. Indeed, immunotherapy has emerged in recent years as a potential adjunct treatment for solid tumors including PC. Immunotherapy modulates the host's immune response to tumor-associated antigens (TAAs), eradicates cancer cells by reducing host tolerance to TAAs and provides both short- and long-term protection against the disease. Passive immunotherapies like monoclonal antibodies or engineered T-cell based therapies directly target tumor cells by recognizing TAAs. Active immunotherapies, like cancer vaccines, on the other hand elicit a long-lasting immune response via activation of the patient's immune cells against cancer cells. Several immunotherapy strategies have been tested for anti-tumor responses alone and in combination with standard care in multiple preclinical and clinical studies. In this review, we discuss various immunotherapy strategies used currently and their efficacy in abrogating self-antigen tolerance and immunosuppression, as well as their ability to eradicate PC.


Subject(s)
Antigens, Neoplasm/immunology , Immunotherapy/methods , Pancreatic Neoplasms/immunology , Pancreatic Neoplasms/therapy , Tumor Microenvironment/immunology , Animals , Antigens, Neoplasm/therapeutic use , Cancer Vaccines/immunology , Cancer Vaccines/therapeutic use , Humans , Immunotherapy/trends , Immunotherapy, Adoptive/methods , T-Lymphocytes/immunology , T-Lymphocytes/transplantation , Tumor Microenvironment/drug effects
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...