Revision surgery following CSF shunt insertion: how often could it be avoided?

BACKGROUND: Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) shunt revision surgery represents a huge social and economic burden. Few studies, however, have evaluated shunt revision surgeries in the context of their avoidability, and existing data are from paediatric populations. Using ratings from an expert panel, we classified avoidable and unavoidable shunt revisions in a mixed cohort of CSF-shunt patients. METHODS: In a retrospective review of a prospectively maintained, single-centre database, we identified all shunt systems implanted for the first time over a 10-year period (2007-2016) and all subsequent revision surgeries with a follow-up of at least 1 year. A panel of five expert shunt surgeons classified each revision surgery as avoidable or unavoidable. Rates of each were calculated and correlated with clinical data. RESULTS: Of 210 revision surgeries (314 patients, mean age, 49.9 years; mean follow-up, 4.2 years), the panel judged 114 as unavoidable (54.3%) and 96 (45.7%) as avoidable. Level of surgeon education correlated with these rates, but even in the most experienced hands, 12.5% of revisions were classified as avoidable. Avoidable revisions occurred significantly earlier than unavoidable interventions (mean; 112 and 448 days, respectively) after the index surgery. CONCLUSION: Rates of avoidable shunt revision surgery are alarmingly high, even in experienced hands. Avoidable revisions occur significantly earlier, predominantly within the first 3 months after the index surgery.

Different origins of hydrocephalus lead to different shunt revision rates.

INTRODUCTION: Hydrocephalus (HC) occurs due to multiple origins. Time course and dynamic of HC and its therapies differ between underlying pathologies. Different revision rates due to the type of HC are expected. Though hydrocephalus is known to be a life time condition, the lack of shunt malfunction years or decades after initial shunt insertion raises the hope of a superfluous shunt. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective survey of our OR-database during a 10 year period. All newly inserted shunt systems and subsequent shunt revisions are recorded according to quantity and time point. All patients were subdivided according their aetiology of HC. RESULTS: 260 patients were eligible with a follow-up of 4.5 years. Subgroups were: 90 patients with NPH, 76 patients with posthaemorrhagic and 16 patients had posttraumatic HC. 22 received a shunt as a consequence of a tumour, 41 were children and 15 for other causes. Overall revision rate was 39.5%. During the first 6 months 55.6%, 57.9% and 75% of patients with NPH, posthaemorrhagic and posttraumatic HC had revisions. In contrast only 38.1% of children and 20% of tumour cases required early revision. CONCLUSION: Two different patterns of revision are evident: mainly early revisions in morphologically stable diseases such as posthaemorrhagic, posttraumatic and NPH and predominantly late revisions in changing organisms such as children and tumour patients. The conception HC may be transient because of a lack of late revisions cannot be supported by this data.