Intraoperative complications in kidney tumor surgery: critical grading for the European Association of Urology intraoperative adverse incident classification.

INTRODUCTION: The European Association of Urology committee in 2020 suggested a new classification, intraoperative adverse incident classification (EAUiaiC), to grade intraoperative adverse events (IAE) in urology. AIMS: We applied and validated EAUiaiC, for kidney tumor surgery. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective multicenter study was conducted based on chart review. The study group comprised 749 radical nephrectomies (RN) and 531 partial nephrectomies (PN) performed in 12 hospitals in Finland during 2016-2017. All IAEs were centrally graded for EAUiaiC. The classification was adapted to kidney tumor surgery by the inclusion of global bleeding as a transfusion of ≥3 units of blood (Grade 2) or as ≥5 units (Grade 3), and also by the exclusion of preemptive conversions. RESULTS: A total of 110 IAEs were recorded in 13.8% of patients undergoing RN, and 40 IAEs in 6.4% of patients with PN. Overall, bleeding injuries in major vessels, unspecified origin and parenchymal organs accounted for 29.3, 24.0, and 16.0% of all IEAs, respectively. Bowel (n = 10) and ureter (n = 3) injuries were rare. There was no intraoperative mortality. IAEs were associated with increased tumor size, tumor extent, age, comorbidity scores, surgical approach and indication, postoperative Clavien-Dindo (CD) complications and longer stay in hospital. 48% of conversions were reactive with more CD-complications after reactive than preemptive conversion (43 vs. 25%). CONCLUSIONS: The associations between IAEs and preoperative variables and postoperative outcome indicate good construct validity for EAUiaiC. Bleeding is the most important IAE in kidney tumor surgery and the inclusion of transfusions could provide increased objectivity.

Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Does Not Increase the Morbidity of Radical Cystectomy: A 10-year Retrospective Nationwide Study.

BACKGROUND: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is underutilized in the treatment of bladder cancer (BC). OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of NAC on the risk of surgical complications for radical cystectomy (RC) in a population-based setting. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: All radical cystectomies performed in Finland during 2005-2014 were included in the study. Data were collected retrospectively using a web-based data collection platform. Complications were recorded for 90 d using the Clavien classification. Patients treated with NAC were compared to patients receiving RC alone using three cohorts and approaches: the entire cohort, a neoadjuvant period cohort, and a matched cohort. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: For all three cohorts, odds ratios (ORs) were estimated using simple binary logistic regression. In addition, a multivariable stratified logistic model with propensity score was used. For the matched cohort analysis, both univariate and adjusted analyses were carried out. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: During 2005-2014, 1427 RCs were performed in Finland, of which 1385 were included in the analyses. NAC was introduced in 2008, and 231 patients (16%) were assigned to NAC and 214 (15%) received two or more cycles of chemotherapy. Within 90 d, 61% of patients experienced complications and mortality was 4% (1.9% in the NAC group, and 4.4% in the RC-alone group). In simple binary logistic regression, NAC patients had significantly fewer complications, but this was not observed in multivariable or propensity score analyses. In the matched cohort analyses, no differences in complication rates could be observed. None of the analyses demonstrated higher complication rates in the NAC group. CONCLUSIONS: Our retrospective study reports on nationwide use of NAC for BC and demonstrates that NAC does not increase RC morbidity. PATIENT SUMMARY: Chemotherapy given before radical surgery does not increase severe postoperative complications in the treatment of bladder cancer.

Estimate of Opportunistic Prostate Specific Antigen Testing in the Finnish Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer.

PURPOSE: Screening for prostate cancer remains controversial, although ERSPC (European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer) showed a 21% relative reduction in prostate cancer mortality. The Finnish Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer, which is the largest component of ERSPC, demonstrated a statistically nonsignificant 16% mortality benefit in a separate analysis. The purpose of this study was to estimate the degree of contamination in the control arm of the Finnish trial. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Altogether 48,295 and 31,872 men were randomized to the control and screening arms, respectively. The screening period was 1996 to 2007. The extent of prostate specific antigen testing was analyzed retrospectively using laboratory databases. The incidence of T1c prostate cancer (impalpable prostate cancer detected by elevated prostate specific antigen) was determined from the national Finnish Cancer Registry. RESULTS: Approximately 1.4% of men had undergone prostate specific antigen testing 1 to 3 years before randomization. By the first 4, 8 and 12 years of followup 18.1%, 47.7% and 62.7% of men in the control arm had undergone prostate specific antigen testing at least once and in the screening arm the proportions were 69.8%, 81.1% and 85.2%, respectively. The cumulative incidence of T1c prostate cancer was 6.1% in the screening arm and 4.5% in the control arm (RR 1.21, 95% CI 1.13-1.30). CONCLUSIONS: A large proportion of men in the control arm had undergone a prostate specific antigen test during the 15-year followup. Contamination is likely to dilute differences in prostate cancer mortality between the arms in the Finnish screening trial.

Prostate cancer screening: a survey of attitudes and practices among Finnish physicians in 1999 and 2007.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the attitudes and practices related to prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening for prostate cancer (PC) among Finnish physicians in 1999 and 2007. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The first questionnaire survey was conducted in 1999 with a mailing to 102 urologists, 679 community physicians and 684 occupational health physicians identified from the membership files of three medical associations. The area of residence was divided into the study area of the Finnish PC screening trial and the rest of Finland. The second survey was carried out in 2007 targeting 168 urologists, 1039 community physicians and 938 occupational health physicians. RESULTS: The response proportion was 48% in 1999 and 50% in 2007. In both rounds, urologists regarded PC as a more important public health issue than other physicians. On the other hand, the non-urologists considered early diagnosis and screening more important than the urologists. PC was rated by all physicians as a less important public health problem in 2007 than in 1999. A smaller proportion of urologists found routine PSA testing indicated for asymptomatic men, compared with other physicians (40% versus 74-60% in 1999, P < 0.001 and 35% versus 44-37% in 2007, P = 0.005). The proportion of physicians reporting regular PSA screening in asymptomatic men was reduced from 1999 to 2007 (from 18% to 9%, P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Based on reported practices of Finnish urologists, community physicians and occupational health physicians, popularity of PSA testing declined between 1999 and 2007. Urologists found PSA testing among asymptomatic men justified less frequently than the other physicians.