ABSTRACT
AIM: Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) is associated with frequent cardiovascular ischemic events. We followed the survival of PAD patients and tested whether PAD remains an adverse prognostic indicator in spite of treatment according to the current European guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention. METHODS: Eight hundred eleven patients with PAD and 778 control subjects, aged 65 (SD 9) years at inclusion, with a male/female ratio of 3/2 were treated according to the European guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention and evaluated yearly for occurrence of death, non-fatal acute coronary syndrome, stroke or critical limb ischemia (major events) and revascularization procedures (minor events). At baseline, classical risk factors were significantly more prevalent in the PAD group and protective cardiovascular medication was prescribed to patients with PAD more frequently than to control subjects. RESULTS: In the PAD group, the 2-year Kaplan-Meier survival estimate was 96.7% (CI 95.4-97.9) vs. 98.2% (CI 97.2-99.1) in the control group, P=0.059. The groups differed in the 2-year major event-free survival: 93.5% (CI 92.7-95.3) in PAD vs. 97.1% (CI 95.9-98.4) in controls, P<0.017, as well as in event-free survival: 79.9% (CI 77.1-82.9) in PAD vs.96.4% (CI 95.0-97.9) in controls, P<0.001. CONCLUSION: Patients with PAD had a borderline higher risk of all-cause death and a significantly higher risk of major and minor non-fatal cardiovascular events compared to control subjects. However, treatment according to the European guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention resulted in encouragingly low absolute mortality and morbidity. (ClinicalTrials.gov number NCT00761969.).
Subject(s)
Cardiovascular Diseases/prevention & control , Ischemia/prevention & control , Lower Extremity/blood supply , Peripheral Arterial Disease/therapy , Aged , Cardiovascular Diseases/etiology , Cardiovascular Diseases/mortality , Chi-Square Distribution , Disease Progression , Disease-Free Survival , Female , Guideline Adherence , Humans , Ischemia/etiology , Ischemia/mortality , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Male , Middle Aged , Peripheral Arterial Disease/complications , Peripheral Arterial Disease/diagnosis , Peripheral Arterial Disease/mortality , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Prospective Studies , Research Design , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Severity of Illness Index , Slovenia , Time Factors , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The outcome of percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) of peripheral arterial lesions is influenced by several factors, including the haemodynamic conditions. Our study tested: (a) whether infrapopliteal run-off after completed PTA influenced the time course of restenosis/reocclusion of the femoropopliteal arterial segment, and (b) whether worsening of infrapopliteal run-off influenced the long-term femoropopliteal patency after PTA. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Among 245 patients treated by femoropopliteal PTA we enrolled 176 patients who consented to regular follow-up. Concomitant infrapopliteal PTA was performed whenever feasible. The technical success of PTA and the patency of calf arteries were assessed by angiography. Infrapopliteal run-off was scored by a modification of the Society for Vascular Surgery criteria. The treated patients' limbs were divided into a group with good infrapopliteal run-off and a group with compromised run-off. Follow-up examination of the femoropopliteal arterial segment was performed by vascular ultrasonography (US) 1, 6 and 12 months after PTA, and an adverse outcome was defined by a > or = 50 % stenosis, i.e., at least doubling of the maximal systolic velocity, or occlusion - evidenced by the absence of flow. The patency of calf arteries was re-assessed by US 12 months after PTA. RESULTS: One month after femoropopliteal PTA 19 / 83 (23 %) of patients with compromised run-off developed the combined end-point of restenosis or reocclusion in comparison to 10 / 93 (11 %) with good run-off (p = 0.03). After 6 months the incidence of restenosis/reocclusion had increased in both groups at an approximately equal rate, but the differences were no longer significant: 39 / 80 (49 %) in the compromised run-off group vs. 36 / 83 (43 %) in the good run-off group after 6 months, p = 0.49, and 42 / 73 (57 %) vs. 38 / 73 (52 %) after 12 months, p = 0.51. However, in patients' limbs with good periprocedural run-off that deteriorated into compromised run-off in the year after PTA, femoropopliteal restenosis/reocclusion occurred more often than in limbs which retained good run-off: 10 / 14 (71 %) vs. 18 / 51 (35 %), p = 0.02. CONCLUSIONS: Compromised postprocedural infrapopliteal run-off predisposes to early restenosis/reocclusion after femoropopliteal PTA. Deterioration of infrapopliteal run-off in the year after femoropopliteal PTA is accompanied by worsening of long-term femoropopliteal patency.
