ABSTRACT
This population-based study aimed to describe the effects of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NC) on survival in breast cancer (BC) patients in daily practice. BC patients treated with NC followed by surgery and radiotherapy, were retrospectively selected from 1982 to 2005 using the Côte d'Or BC registry. These patients were matched for the baseline AJCC (American Joint Committee on Cancer) stage, age at diagnosis, date of diagnosis and oestrogens receptors status to those who had undergone surgery followed by adjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy. The prognostic effect of NC on survival in BC patients was assessed with relative survival (RS) analyses. From 1982 to 2005, 210 patients with BC diagnosed in Côte d'Or were treated with NC followed by surgery and radiotherapy. For these patients, mean age at diagnosis was 50 (SD = 11). The main tumour characteristics were clinical AJCC stage 3 (46%) and an advanced Scarff Bloom and Richardson (SBR) stage (80%). Breast conserving surgery was performed in 84 patients (40%), 151 patients (72%) were treated with anthracyclines as the NC and the 5-year RS rate was 71%. Among these patients, 92 (37%) were matched. In this population, multivariate analyses showed that the use of NC did not independently influence RS: relative excess risk = 0.93 (0.50, 1.71).
Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy , Adult , Aged , Breast Neoplasms/mortality , Breast Neoplasms, Male/drug therapy , Breast Neoplasms, Male/mortality , Case-Control Studies , Chemotherapy, Adjuvant/mortality , Female , France/epidemiology , Humans , Male , Mastectomy, Segmental/mortality , Mastectomy, Segmental/statistics & numerical data , Middle Aged , Neoadjuvant Therapy/mortality , Retrospective Studies , Survival Analysis , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
Breast cancer in men is rare, and clinical trials are thus not feasible. This study aimed to describe the epidemiological characteristics, treatment and prognostic factors of breast cancer in men. A population-based study was performed using data from the Cote d'Or breast and gynaecological cancer registry. Data on male breast cancer diagnosed from 1982 to 2008 were provided. Relative survival rates were estimated at 5 years according to the characteristics of the patient and tumour, and treatment. Prognostic factors of survival in men with breast cancer were identified using a generalised linear model. Seventy-five men with invasive breast cancer were registered. Mean age at diagnosis was 66 years. The use of adjuvant chemotherapy (P= 0.013) and hormone therapy (P < 0.0001) increased over time. Relative survival rate at 5 years was 69% for the whole population. Analysis of relative survival according to the treatment showed that survival was longer for patients treated with surgery + radiotherapy + hormone therapy: 89% at 5 years. Scarff, Bloom and Richardson grade was independent prognostic factor of survival. Male breast cancer is a rare disease with a poor prognosis, and diagnosis is often made at an advanced stage. Early diagnosis and better knowledge of the disease would certainly lead to improvements in the prognosis.
Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms, Male/mortality , Aged , Breast Neoplasms, Male/therapy , France/epidemiology , Humans , Male , Neoplasm Staging , Prognosis , Registries , Retrospective Studies , Rural Health , Survival Analysis , Treatment Outcome , Urban HealthABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Few population-based studies have reported jointly analyses of relative survival according to the following prognostic factors: tumour-node-metastasis (TNM) stage, age, number of examined and positive nodes, hormonal status, histological Scarff, Bloom and Richardson (SBR) grade, tumour extension, hormone receptor status and tumour multifocal status. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data on female invasive breast cancer were provided by the Cote d'Or breast cancer registry. The Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test were used to estimate and compare the survival probability at 1, 5, 10 and 15 years. The effect of prognostic factors on survival was assessed with crude and relative multivariate survival analyses. RESULTS: Crude survival seemed to be worse in patients aged >60 years compared with those aged 45-60 (P > 0.0001), whereas relative survival did not differ. TNM stage, histological SBR grade, progesterone receptor status, tumour multifocal status, locoregional extension and the period of diagnosis were independent prognostic factors of crude and relative survival. CONCLUSION: Breast cancer is influenced by many factors. Despite the absence of any association between the number of examined nodes and overall survival in this study, the number of nodes removed, in conjunction with other prognostic factors, may be useful in selecting node-negative patients for systemic therapy.
