ABSTRACT
Supported self-care interventions are a low-intensity treatment for depression that has received little research attention in the cancer population. This is a phase II intervention only study to test the feasibility, acceptability and preliminary effectiveness of a depression self-care intervention for cancer patients who have completed their primary treatment and have moderate depressive symptoms. The self-care intervention was adapted from a successful model for people with chronic physical conditions, following focus groups with cancer care professionals and patients. The support was delivered by telephone by a trained lay coach who provided up to 8 weekly coaching contacts. A variety of recruitment methods were tested; those with the highest yield of eligible subjects per research staff time were electronic mailings to community support group members and social media posting. Sixty-eight people were contacted about the study over an 11-month period, of whom 34 (49%) were eligible; 32 were enrolled (94% recruitment rate); and 25 completed 2-month follow-up (78% retention). The mean severity of PHQ-9 depression decreased significantly from screening to 2 months (12.8 to 7.0, p < .0001). The intervention is a promising treatment option for cancer survivors, demonstrating sufficient effectiveness and feasibility to proceed with a phase III clinical trial.
Subject(s)
Cancer Survivors/psychology , Cognitive Behavioral Therapy/methods , Depression/therapy , Patient Education as Topic/methods , Self Care/methods , Adult , Depression/psychology , Feasibility Studies , Female , Focus Groups , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Patient Acceptance of Health Care , Patient Health Questionnaire , Program Development , Telephone , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
The aim of this study was to assess the incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) of two brief cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT)-based interventions and a pharmacological treatment, compared with usual care, initiated in the emergency department (ED) for individuals with panic disorder (PD) with a chief complaint of noncardiac chest pain. A total of 69 patients were followed up to 6 months. The primary outcome variables were direct and indirect costs of treatment and PD severity. Panic management (PM) had an ICER of $124.05, per the Anxiety Disorders Interview Schedule for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, severity score change (95% confidence interval [CI], $54.63-$314.57), compared with pharmacotherapy (paroxetine), with an ICER of $213.90 (95% CI, $133.51-$394.94), and brief CBT, with an ICER of $309.31 (95% CI, $151.27-$548.28). The pharmacological and CBT interventions were associated with a greater clinical improvement compared with usual care at posttest. PM presented a superior ICER, suggesting that it may be a promising treatment option to implement in EDs.
Subject(s)
Antidepressive Agents, Second-Generation/economics , Antidepressive Agents, Second-Generation/therapeutic use , Chest Pain/economics , Chest Pain/therapy , Cognitive Behavioral Therapy/economics , Panic Disorder/economics , Panic Disorder/therapy , Paroxetine/economics , Paroxetine/therapeutic use , Psychotherapy, Brief/economics , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Chest Pain/psychology , Cohort Studies , Cost-Benefit Analysis/economics , Drug Costs/statistics & numerical data , Emergency Service, Hospital/economics , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Panic Disorder/psychology , Quebec , Young AdultABSTRACT
The present study compared the efficacy of virtual reality (VR) in virtuo exposure and in vivo exposure in the treatment of spider phobia. Two treatment conditions were compared to a waiting-list condition. A 3-month follow-up evaluation was conducted in order to assess the durability of the treatment effects. Participants were randomly assigned to the treatment groups. A total of 16 participants received the in virtuo treatment, and 16 received the in vivo treatment. The waiting-list condition included 11 participants. Participants received eight 1.5-hour treatment sessions. Efficacy was measured with the Fear of Spiders Questionnaire, the Spider Beliefs Questionnaire (SBQ-F), and a Behavioral Avoidance Test (BAT). In addition, a clinician administered the Structured Interview for DSM-IV to assess DSM-IV's criteria for specific phobia and severity. Clinical and statistically significant improvements were found for both groups. Differences in treatment groups were found on one of five measures of fear: greater improvement on the SBQ-F beliefs subscale was associated with in vivo exposure.
Subject(s)
Computer Simulation , Implosive Therapy/methods , Phobic Disorders/therapy , User-Computer Interface , Adolescent , Adult , Analysis of Variance , Animals , Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Intention to Treat Analysis , Interview, Psychological , Male , Middle Aged , Phobic Disorders/diagnosis , Severity of Illness Index , Spiders , Surveys and Questionnaires , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
This article reviews the literature on economic studies of evidence-based cognitive-behavioral treatment and pharmacotherapy for anxiety disorders. Articles were identified through electronic search of medical and psychological databases between 1980 and 2008. Seven studies were identified and included panic disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, specific phobia and social phobia. Results show that evidence-based cognitive-behavior therapy and pharmacotherapy are cost-effective, usually more than usual care. Although the evidence base needs to be strengthened, it appears beneficial in increasing access to evidence-based treatments for anxiety disorders from a societal perspective.
