Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
1.
Infect Dis Now ; 54(1): 104832, 2024 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37952582

ABSTRACT

In march 2020, the International Working Group on the Diabetic Foot (IWGDF) published an update of the 2015 guidelines on the diagnosis and management of diabetic foot infection (DFI). While we (the French ID society, SPILF) endorsed some of these recommendations, we wanted to update our own 2006 guidelines and specifically provide informative elements on modalities of microbiological diagnosis and antibiotic treatment (especially first- and second-line regiments, oral switch and duration). The recommendations put forward in the present guidelines are addressed to healthcare professionals managing patients with DFI and more specifically focused on infectious disease management of this type of infection, which clearly needs a multidisciplinary approach. Staging of the severity of the infection is mandatory using the classification drawn up by the IWGDF. Microbiological samples should be taken only in the event of clinical signs suggesting infection in accordance with a strict preliminarily established protocol. Empirical antibiotic therapy should be chosen according to the IWGDF grade of infection and duration of the wound, but must always cover methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus. Early reevaluation of the patient is a fundamental step, and duration of antibiotic therapy can be shortened in many situations. When osteomyelitis is suspected, standard foot radiograph is the first-line imagery examination and a bone biopsy should be performed for microbiological documentation. Histological analysis of the bone sample is no longer recommended. High dosages of antibiotics are recommended in cases of confirmed osteomyelitis.


Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus , Diabetic Foot , Osteomyelitis , Humans , Diabetic Foot/diagnosis , Diabetic Foot/drug therapy , Osteomyelitis/diagnosis , Osteomyelitis/drug therapy , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Staphylococcus aureus , Disease Management , Diabetes Mellitus/drug therapy
2.
Infect Dis Now ; 53(8): 104775, 2023 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37634659

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Infectious disease (ID) advice is a major part of antimicrobial stewardship programs. The objective of this study was to assess general practitioners' (GPs)' opinions and compliance with advice given by ID hotlines. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This multicenter survey was based on the 7-day assessment of initial advice requested by GPs to a hotline set up by volunteer hospital ID teams to record advice for 3 years. The primary endpoint was the GPs' satisfaction with the advice given by ID specialists. RESULTS: Ten ID teams participated in the study and recorded 4138 requests for advice, of which 1325 requests included a proposal for antibiotic therapy and justified a follow-up call at seven days. Only 398 follow-up calls (30%) were carried out because many GPs were not reachable. GPs were very satisfied with ID hotlines: 58% considered them indispensable and 38% very useful. The recommendations provided by ID specialists were followed by GPs in more than 80% of cases. The two main motivations for GPs to call the hotline were to get quick advice (86%) and to receive help in managing a patient (76%). CONCLUSIONS: The ID telephone consultations and advice systems for GPs are highly appreciated and are effective in terms of following the recommendations.


Subject(s)
Communicable Diseases , General Practitioners , Humans , Hotlines , Communicable Diseases/drug therapy , Surveys and Questionnaires , Primary Health Care
5.
Int J Obstet Anesth ; 41: 22-28, 2020 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31402310

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Most pregnant women who self-report penicillin allergy are not truly penicillin-allergic and this misunderstanding often leads to administration of inappropriate antibiotic therapy. Decision algorithms have been developed to guide antibiotic selection but major discrepancies have been reported between guidelines and clinical practice. We aimed to optimize the prescription of antibiotics for pregnant women who self-reported penicillin allergy, using an educational intervention about the classification of penicillin allergies that targeted gynecologists, anesthesiologists and midwives. METHODS: This quasi-experimental study assessed the effect of an educational intervention about the classification of penicillin allergy. For six months, a combination of two strategies was used, namely dissemination of printed educational materials and group education. The principal study endpoint was the appropriateness of the antibiotic therapy, defined in advance for each level of allergic risk. RESULTS: The pre-intervention phase included 903 women; one year after its conclusion, the post-intervention phase began and included 892 women. The prevalence of self-reported penicillin allergy was stable over the two periods (6.8% before vs 5.4% after, P=0.24). The clinical classification of penicillin allergies was more often used after the educational intervention (68% vs 100%, P<0.001). The appropriateness of the antibiotic therapy prescribed to self-reported penicillin allergic-women increased significantly between the two periods, from 5/29 (17.2%) to 18/27 (66.7%, P<0.001). CONCLUSION: An educational intervention about penicillin allergy classification was associated with an improvement in the choice of appropriate antibiotic therapy among women who had reported penicillin allergy.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/adverse effects , Drug Hypersensitivity/classification , Patient Education as Topic , Penicillins/adverse effects , Female , Humans , Pregnancy , Pregnant Women
6.
Med Mal Infect ; 46(4): 215-9, 2016 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27210283

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Infections caused by extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (ESBL-E) have become a major public health issue worldwide. Cefoxitin is a second-generation cephalosporin and is associated with a strong in vitro activity against ESBL. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a prospective monocentric cohort study from 2012 to 2015 to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of cefoxitin in 15 patients treated for urinary tract infection (UTI) caused by ESBL-E, without any severity criteria. RESULTS: We included 15 patients; 11 were male patients with defined risk factors for ESBL-E. Ten patients presented with male UTI, three with pyelonephritis, and two with cystitis. Escherichia coli was the predominant pathogen. All patients had a positive outcome with a good tolerance (a skin rash without any sign of severity was observed in one patient). Microbiological cure was obtained in 9 patients out of 10 at the end of treatment. CONCLUSION: Cefoxitin is an alternative treatment to carbapenems for urinary tract infections caused by ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Cefoxitin/therapeutic use , Escherichia coli Infections/drug therapy , Urinary Tract Infections/drug therapy , beta-Lactam Resistance , Anti-Bacterial Agents/adverse effects , Bacterial Proteins/metabolism , Cefoxitin/adverse effects , Drug Eruptions/etiology , Female , Humans , Klebsiella Infections/drug therapy , Klebsiella pneumoniae/drug effects , Klebsiella pneumoniae/enzymology , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Treatment Outcome , Uropathogenic Escherichia coli/drug effects , Uropathogenic Escherichia coli/enzymology , beta-Lactamases/metabolism
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...