Lipoprotein(a) and Low-Molecular-Weight Apo(a) Phenotype as Determinants of New Cardiovascular Events in Patients with Premature Coronary Heart Disease.

BACKGROUND: Lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) is a genetic risk factor of atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases (ASCVDs). Proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) is related to vascular inflammation and detected in atherosclerotic plaques. A temporary increase in the circulating concentration of PCSK9 and Lp(a) was shown in patients with myocardial infarction (MI). The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of the apo(a) phenotype and the Lp(a) concentration as well as its complex with PCSK9 in the development of cardiac events and MI in patients with a premature manifestation of coronary heart disease (CHD). METHODS: In a prospective study with retrospective data collection, we included 116 patients with premature CHD who were followed for a median of 14 years. The medical history and information on cardiovascular events after an initial exam as well as data on the levels of lipids, Lp(a), PCSK9, PCSK9-Lp(a) complex, and apo(a) phenotype were obtained. RESULTS: The patients were divided into two groups depending on the presence of a low- (LMW, n = 52) or high-molecular weight (HMW, n = 64) apo(a) phenotype. LMW apo(a) phenotype (odds ratio 2.3 (1.1 to 4.8), p = 0.03), but not elevated Lp(a) (1.9 (0.8-4.6), p = 0.13), was an independent predictor for the development of MI after adjustment for sex, age of CHD debut, initial lipids levels, and lipid-lowering treatment. The apo(a) phenotype also determined the relationship between Lp(a) and PCSK9 concentrations. The level of the PCSK9-Lp(a) complex was higher in LMW apo(a) patients. CONCLUSION: The LMW apo(a) phenotype is a risk factor for non-fatal MI in a long-term prospective follow-up of patients with premature CHD, and this link could be mediated via PCSK9.

Low Molecular Weight Apolipoprotein(a) Phenotype Rather Than Lipoprotein(a) Is Associated With Coronary Atherosclerosis and Myocardial Infarction.

Background and Aims: Current evidence suggests that lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] level above 50 mg/dL is associated with increased cardiovascular risk. Our study aim was to determine the relationship of apolipoprotein(a) [apo(a)] phenotypes and Lp(a) concentration below and above 50 mg/dL with coronary atherosclerosis severity and myocardial infarction (MI). Material and Methods: The study population consisted of 540 patients (mean age 54.0 ± 8.8 years, 82% men) who passed through coronary angiography. The number of diseased major coronary arteries assessed atherosclerosis severity. Lipids, glucose, Lp(a) levels and apo(a) phenotypes were determined in all patients. All patients were divided into four groups: with Lp(a) <50 mg/dL [ "normal" Lp(a)] or ≥50 mg/dL [hyperLp(a)], and with low-molecular (LMW) or high-molecular weight (HMW) apo(a) phenotypes. Results: Baseline clinical and biochemical characteristics were similar between the groups. In groups with LMW apo(a) phenotypes, the odds ratio (OR; 95% confidence interval) of multivessel disease was higher [10.1; 3.1-33.5, p < 0.005 for hyperLp(a) and 2.2; 1.0-4.9, p = 0.056 for normal Lp(a)], but not in the group with HMW apo(a) and hyperLp(a) [1.1; 0.3-3.3, p = 0.92] compared with the reference group with HMW apo(a) and normal Lp(a). Similarly, MI was observed more often in patients with LMW apo(a) phenotype and hyperLp(a) and normal Lp(a) than in groups with HMW apo(a) phenotype. Conclusion: The LMW apo(a) phenotype is associated with the severity of coronary atherosclerosis and MI even when Lp(a) level is below 50 mg/dL. The combination of Lp(a) level above 50 mg/dL and LMW apo(a) phenotype increases the risk of severe coronary atherosclerosis, regardless of other risk factors.

Elevated Lipoprotein(a) Level Influences Familial Hypercholesterolemia Diagnosis.

Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) and elevated lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] level are the most common inherited disorders of lipid metabolism. This study evaluated the impact of high Lp(a) level on accuracy Dutch Lipid Clinic Network (DLCN) criteria of heterozygous FH diagnosis. A group of 206 individuals not receiving lipid-lowering medication with low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) >4.9 mmol/L was chosen from the Russian FH Registry. LDL-C corrected for Lp(a)-cholesterol was calculated as LDL-C − 0.3 × Lp(a). DLCN criteria were applied before and after adjusting LDL-C concentration. Of the 206 patients with potential FH, a total of 34 subjects (17%) were reclassified to less severe FH diagnosis, 13 subjects of them (6%) were reclassified to "unlike" FH. In accordance with Receiver Operating Characteristic curve, Lp(a) level ≥40 mg/dL was associated with FH re-diagnosing with sensitivity of 63% and specificity of 78% (area under curve = 0.7, 95% CI 0.7−0.8, p < 0.001). The reclassification was mainly observed in FH patients with Lp(a) level above 40 mg/dL, i.e., 33 (51%) with reclassified DLCN criteria points and 22 (34%) with reclassified diagnosis, compared with 21 (15%) and 15 (11%), respectively, in patients with Lp(a) level less than 40 mg/dL. Thus, LDL-C corrected for Lp(a)-cholesterol should be considered in all FH patients with Lp(a) level above 40 mg/dL for recalculating points in accordance with DLCN criteria.

Lipoprotein(a), Immune Cells and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients with Premature Coronary Heart Disease.

The detection of lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] in the artery wall at the stage of lipid-bands formation may indicate that it participates in the atherosclerosis local nonspecific inflammatory process. Innate immune cells are involved in atherogenesis, with monocytes playing a major role in the initiation of atherosclerosis, while neutrophils can contribute to plaque destabilization. This work studies the relationship between Lp(a), immune blood cells and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in patients with the early manifestation of coronary heart disease (CHD). The study included 200 patients with chronic CHD, manifested up to the age of 55 in men and 60 in women. An increased Lp(a) concentration [hyperLp(a)] was shown to predict cardiovascular events in patients with premature CHD with long-term follow-up. According to the logistic regression analysis results, an increase in the monocyte count with OR = 4.58 (95% CI 1.04-20.06) or lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio with OR = 0.82 (0.68-0.99), (p < 0.05 for both) was associated with MACE in patients with early CHD, regardless of gender, age, classical risk factors, atherogenic lipoproteins concentration and statin intake. The combination of an increased monocyte count and hyperLp(a) significantly increased the proportion of patients with early CHD with subsequent development of MACE (p = 0.02, ptrend = 0.003). The odds of cardiovascular events in patients with early CHD manifestation were highest in patients with an elevated lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio and an elevated Lp(a) level. A higher neutrophil blood count and an elevated neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio determined the faster development of MACE in patients with a high Lp(a) concentration. The data obtained in this study suggest that the high atherothrombogenicity of Lp(a) is associated with the "inflammatory" component and the innate immune cells involvement in this process. Thus, the easily calculated immunological ratios of blood cells and Lp(a) concentrations can be considered simple predictors of future cardiovascular events.

The Association of Lipoprotein(a) and Circulating Monocyte Subsets with Severe Coronary Atherosclerosis.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Chronic inflammation associated with the uncontrolled activation of innate and acquired immunity plays a fundamental role in all stages of atherogenesis. Monocytes are a heterogeneous population and each subset contributes differently to the inflammatory process. A high level of lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) is a proven cardiovascular risk factor. The aim of the study was to investigate the association between the increased concentration of Lp(a) and monocyte subpopulations in patients with a different severity of coronary atherosclerosis. METHODS: 150 patients (124 males) with a median age of 60 years undergoing a coronary angiography were enrolled. Lipids, Lp(a), autoantibodies, blood cell counts and monocyte subpopulations (classical, intermediate, non-classical) were analyzed. RESULTS: The patients were divided into two groups depending on the Lp(a) concentration: normal Lp(a) < 30 mg/dL (n = 82) and hyperLp(a) ≥ 30 mg/dL (n = 68). Patients of both groups were comparable by risk factors, autoantibody levels and blood cell counts. In patients with hyperlipoproteinemia(a) the content (absolute and relative) of non-classical monocytes was higher (71.0 (56.6; 105.7) vs. 62.2 (45.7; 82.4) 103/mL and 17.7 (13.0; 23.3) vs. 15.1 (11.4; 19.4) %, respectively, p < 0.05). The association of the relative content of non-classical monocytes with the Lp(a) concentration retained a statistical significance when adjusted for gender and age (r = 0.18, p = 0.03). The severity of coronary atherosclerosis was associated with the Lp(a) concentration as well as the relative and absolute (p < 0.05) content of classical monocytes. The high content of non-classical monocytes (OR = 3.5, 95% CI 1.2-10.8) as well as intermediate monocytes (OR = 8.7, 2.5-30.6) in patients with hyperlipoproteinemia(a) were associated with triple-vessel coronary disease compared with patients with a normal Lp(a) level and a low content of monocytes. CONCLUSION: Hyperlipoproteinemia(a) and a decreased quantity of classical monocytes were associated with the severity of coronary atherosclerosis. The expansion of CD16+ monocytes (intermediate and non-classical) in the presence of hyperlipoproteinemia(a) significantly increased the risk of triple-vessel coronary disease.

Lipoprotein(a) and Cardiovascular Outcomes after Revascularization of Carotid and Lower Limbs Arteries.

BACKGROUND: Despite high-intensity lipid-lowering therapy, there is a residual risk of cardiovascular events that could be associated with lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)). It has been shown that there is an association between elevated Lp(a) level and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with coronary heart disease. Data about the role of Lp(a) in the development of cardiovascular events after peripheral revascularization are scarce. PURPOSE: To evaluate the relationship of Lp(a) level with cardiovascular outcomes after revascularization of carotid and lower limbs arteries. METHODS: The study included 258 patients (209 men, mean age 67 years) with severe carotid and/or lower extremity artery disease, who underwent successful elective peripheral revascularization. The primary endpoint was the composite of nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, or cardiovascular death. The secondary endpoint was the composite of primary endpoint and repeated revascularization. RESULTS: For 36-month follow-up, 29 (11%) primary and 128 (50%) secondary endpoints were registered. There was a greater risk of primary (21 (8%) vs. 8 (3%); hazard ratio (HR), 3.0; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.5-6.3; p < 0.01) and secondary endpoints (83 (32%) vs. 45 (17%), HR, 2.8; 95% CI 2.0-4.0; p < 0.01) in patients with elevated Lp(a) level (≥30 mg/dL) compared to patients with Lp(a) < 30 mg/dL. Multivariable-adjusted Cox regression analysis revealed that Lp(a) was independently associated with the incidence of cardiovascular outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with peripheral artery diseases have a high risk of cardiovascular events. Lp(a) level above 30 mg/dL is significantly and independently associated with cardiovascular events during 3-year follow-up after revascularization of carotid and lower limbs arteries.

Lipoprotein(a), Immunity, and Inflammation in Polyvascular Atherosclerotic Disease.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) is a genetically determined risk factor for coronary artery disease and its complications, although data on the association with other vascular beds and the severity of atherosclerosis is limited. The aim of this study was to evaluate the association of atherosclerosis of various vascular beds with Lp(a), as well as its autoantibodies and generalized inflammatory markers. MATERIAL AND METHODS: this study included 1288 adult patients with clinical and imaging examination of three vascular beds (coronary, carotid, and lower limb arteries). Patients were categorized according to the number of affected vascular beds (with at least one atherosclerotic stenosis ≥50%): 0 (n = 339), 1 (n = 470), 2 (n = 315), 3 (n = 164). We assessed blood cell count, lipid profile, C-reactive protein, circulating immune complexes, Lp(a), and its autoantibodies. RESULTS: the number of affected vascular beds was associated with an increasing level of Lp(a) and a lower level of IgM autoantibodies to Lp(a). Hyperlipoproteinemia(a) (Lp(a) ≥ 30 mg/dL) was detected more frequently in patients with atherosclerosis. In logistic regression analysis adjusted for age, sex, hypertension, type 2 diabetes, and smoking, an elevated Lp(a) level was independently associated with stenotic atherosclerosis and lesion severity. There was a positive association of the number of affected vascular beds with C-reactive protein (r = 0.21, p < 0.01) and a negative association with circulating immune complexes (r = -0.29, p < 0.01). The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio was significantly higher and the lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio was significantly lower in patients with atherosclerosis compared to the controls (p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Lp(a), C-reactive protein, circulating immune complexes, and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio are associated with the stenotic atherosclerosis of different vascular beds. Lp(a) levels increase and IgM autoantibodies to Lp(a) decrease with the number of affected vascular beds.

Effect of Evolocumab on Lipoprotein(a) and PCSK9 in Healthy Individuals with Elevated Lipoprotein(a) Level.

Background and aims: The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of a single injection of Evolocumab on the dynamics of Lp(a), fractions of apoB100-containing lipoproteins, PCSK9, and their complexes in healthy individuals with elevated Lp(a) levels. Methods: This open-label, 4-week clinical study involved 10 statin-naive volunteers with Lp(a) >30 mg/dL, LDL-C < 4.9 mmol/L, and a moderate risk of cardiovascular events. The concentrations of Lp(a), lipids, PCSK9, circulating immune complexes (CIC), and plasma complexes of PCSK9 with apoB100-containing lipoproteins (Lp(a)-PCSK9 and LDL-PCSK9) were measured before and each week after Evolocumab (MABs) administration. Results: After a single dose injection of 140 mg of MABs, the median concentration of PCSK9 in serum increased from 496 to 3944 ng/mL; however, the entire pool of circulating PCSK9 remained bound with MABs for 2-3 weeks. LDL-C level decreased significantly from 3.36 mmol/L to 2.27 mmol/L during the first two weeks after the injection. Lp(a) concentrations demonstrated multidirectional changes in different patients with the maximal decrease on the second week. There were no positive correlations between the changes in levels of Lp(a), LDL-C, and TC. The change in the amount of circulating complex of PCSK9-Lp(a) was significantly less than of PCSK9-apoB100 (-5% and -47% after 1 week, respectively). Conclusions: A single administration of monoclonal antibodies against PCSK9 (Evolocumab) in healthy individuals with hyperlipoproteinemia(a) resulted in a decrease of Lp(a) of 14%, a 5% decrease in PCSK9-Lp(a), a 36% reduction of LDL-C, a 47% decrease in PCSK9-apoB100 and a tenfold increase in total serum PCSK9 concentration.

Therapeutic Apheresis for Management of Lp(a) Hyperlipoproteinemia.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: High lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) level is an independent cardiovascular risk factor with higher prevalence among patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). The actual problem is that most currently available lipid-lowering drugs are unable to abolish Lp(a) pathogenicity. Lipoprotein apheresis (LA) is an effective method for elimination of atherogenic lipoproteins, but it is approved only in some countries for treatment of elevated Lp(a) level in the presence of progressive ASCVD. In recent years, new studies on LA were published and the purpose of this review is to present the information on optimal management of Lp(a) hyperlipoproteinemia by LA in the modern era. RECENT FINDINGS: Most clinical studies designed to treat Lp(a) hyperlipoproteinemia with different LA systems are small in size but demonstrate that the elimination of Lp(a) from bloodstream leads to reduction of inflammatory and prothrombotic process in a few months and to atherosclerotic plaques regression in 1.5 years. Treatment with LA for 2 to 5 years in terms of clinical trials and in real-world setting provides further evidence that Lp(a) reduction by 60-80% is associated with proportional decreasing of rate and risk of cardiovascular events. Specific Lp(a) apheresis is the only possible method that solely targets Lp(a). In most countries, non-specific LA is used for treatment Lp(a) hyperlipoproteinemia in very high-risk subjects with progressive ASCVD. PCSK9 inhibitors have only modest effect on significantly elevated Lp(a), whereas large population-based studies requested sustained and prolonged reduction of Lp(a) levels by 50-100 mg/dL to gain proportional decreasing of major adverse cardiovascular events.

Matrix Metalloproteinase 9 as a Predictor of Coronary Atherosclerotic Plaque Instability in Stable Coronary Heart Disease Patients with Elevated Lipoprotein(a) Levels.

We sought to investigate whether levels of matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) and their inhibitors predict coronary atherosclerotic plaque instability, as assessed by intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) virtual histology during coronary angiography. Blood samples were collected before angiography in 32 subjects (mean age 56 ± 8 years) with stable coronary heart disease (CHD) and elevated lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a), 94 ± 35 mg/dL). Levels of high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP), apolipoprotein B100 (apoB100), MMP-7, MMP-9, tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases (TIMP)-1, and TIMP-2 were determined using commercially available enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kits. Results. The morphology of a total of sixty coronary lesions was assessed by virtual histology IVUS imaging. Eleven (18%) plaques in nine (28%) patients were classified as plaques with an unstable phenotype or a thin-cap fibroatheroma. Age, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, apoB100, MMP-7, and MMP-9 levels were positively associated with necrotic core volume. Conversely, there was a negative relationship between MMP-7 and -9 levels and fibrous and fibro-fatty tissue volume. Multivariate regression analysis revealed that MMP-9 is a strong independent predictor of atherosclerotic plaque instability in stable CHD patients. In stable CHD patients with elevated Lp(a), MMP-9 levels are positively associated with the size of the necrotic core of coronary atherosclerotic plaques.

Apolipoprotein(a) phenotype determines the correlations of lipoprotein(a) and proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 levels in patients with potential familial hypercholesterolemia.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The aim of this study is to investigate the relation between lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] and proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) concentrations, and their complex, in patients with potential familial hypercholesterolemia (FH), depending on apo(a) phenotype. METHODS: The study included 205 patients with total cholesterol (TC) > 7.5 mmol/L and/or low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C)>4.9 mmol/L, 32 (15%) patients suffered from ischemic heart disease (IHD), 64 were taking statins. The diagnosis of FH was estimated according to the Dutch Lipid Clinics Network criteria. Lipid parameters, apoB-containing lipoprotein subfractions, Lp(a), PCSK9, Lp(a)-PCSK9 complex levels and apo(a) phenotype were determined. Depending on the apo(a) phenotype, all patients were divided into 2 groups: with high molecular weight (HMW) (n = 145) and low molecular weight (LMW) (n = 60) apo(a) phenotype. RESULTS: The groups were comparable by all major clinical characteristics and biochemical parameters. In the whole group, PCSK9 concentration correlated with age, statins intake, Lp(a), TC and TG levels. Correlation between Lp(a) and PCSK9 levels was found only in the LMW apo(a) phenotype group independently of statins intake (r = 0.46, p < 0.001). Associations between Lp(a)-PCSK9 complex and large subfractions of intermediate (r = 0.30) and low-density lipoproteins (r = 0.30, p < 0.05 for both) were observed, with more significance in group 2 (r = 0.59, p < 0.005 and r = 0.40, p < 0.05, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with potential familial hypercholesterolemia, positive correlations between concentrations of Lp(a) and PCSK9, as well as of Lp(a)-PCSK9 plasma complex with large subfractions of intermediate and low-density lipoproteins (IDL-1 and LDL-C), were determined by the LMW apo(a) phenotype.

Association of lipoprotein(a) level with short- and long-term outcomes after CABG: The role of lipoprotein apheresis.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the association of lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] level with short- and long-term outcomes after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and to assess the effect of a 12 month course of weekly lipoprotein apheresis on vein graft patency and coronary atherosclerosis course in post-CABG patients with hyperlipidemia. METHODS: This study was performed in patients after successful CABG and consisted of three parts: a) a retrospective part with computed tomography assessment of vein graft patency in patients with first-year recurrence of chest pain after CABG (n = 102); b) a prospective trial with evaluation of cardiovascular outcomes during follow up time up to 15 years in relation to baseline Lp(a) levels (n = 356); c) an 12-months interventional controlled study in 50 patients with low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels >2.6 mmol/L prior to the operation despite statin treatment that allocated into 2 groups: active (n = 25, weekly apheresis by cascade plasma filtration (CPF) plus atorvastatin), and control (n = 25, atorvastatin alone). RESULTS: Patients subjected to computed tomography were divided in two groups: 66 (65%) with at least one vein graft occlusion and 36 (35%) without occlusions. Lp(a) levels were significantly higher in patients with occluded grafts with a median (95% confidence intervals (CI)) of 24 (17-42) mg/dL vs. 12 (6-24) mg/dL in patients with patent grafts, p < 0.01. Over a mean of 8.5 ± 3.5 years (range 0.9-15.0 years), the primary and secondary endpoints were registered in 46 (13%) and 107 (30%) patients, respectively. Patients with Lp(a) ≥30 mg/dL were at significantly greater risk for the primary endpoint (hazard ratio (HR) 2.98, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.76-5.03, p < 0.001) and secondary endpoint (HR 3.47, 95%CI 2.48-4.85, p < 0.001) than patients with Lp(a) values <30 mg/dL. During the CPF procedure LDL-C levels decreased by 59 ± 14%, Lp(a) levels by 49 ± 15. The frequency of vein graft occlusions at study end was 14.3% (11 of 77) in the apheresis group and 27.4% (23 of 84) in the control group, p < 0.05. Progression of atherosclerosis was obtained in 26 (14.2%) segments of native coronary arteries in the apheresis group and in 50 (25.0%) segments of the control group. Regression signs were found in 30 (16.4%) and 19 (9.5%) segments, stabilization in 127 (69.4%) and 131 (65.5%) segments, respectively (χ2 = 9.37, p < 0.01). A Lp(a) level higher than 30 mg/dL was associated with a three-fold increased risk of vein grafts occlusion during first year after CABG, p < 0.001. CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that elevated Lp(a) is associated with a significantly increasing rate of one-year vein graft occlusions and adverse long-term cardiovascular outcomes whereas the use of lipoprotein apheresis improves vein graft patency during the first year after CABG.

Lipoprotein(a) apheresis.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Currently, different methods for extracorporeal elimination of atherogenic apolipoprotein B100 containing lipoprotein particles are used in clinical practice. Most of them effectively remove both lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] and LDL. The aim of this review is to highlight research describing the clinical advantages of specific Lp(a) immunosorption compared with other lipoprotein apheresis systems. RECENT FINDINGS: Data on the utility of lipoprotein apheresis in patients with elevated Lp(a) level are limited. However, several longitudinal studies demonstrated improvement in cardiovascular outcomes when both Lp(a) and LDL cholesterol levels were decreased with different apheresis systems. The main limitation of these trials is the absence of a control group. First developed in 1991, studies on apheresis with a specific immunosorbent to Lp(a) were small and noncontrolled before 2000s. The only prospective controlled clinical trial utilising Lp(a) apheresis (Clinicaltrials.gov NCT02133807), demonstrated regression of coronary and carotid atherosclerosis when Lp(a) was removed weekly for 18 months. SUMMARY: Lipoprotein apheresis usually affects multiple lipoproteins, and there are minimal data regarding the effect of specific removal of Lp(a) alone. There is a need for randomized controlled trial with specific Lp(a) apheresis to investigate its effect on cardiovascular outcomes.

Dramatic fate of a young coronary heart disease patient rescued with specific lipoprotein(a) apheresis.

Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is acknowledged to be an independent atherothrombotic risk factor. Although genetic studies have highlighted the causal relationship between coronary disease and Lp(a), it is uncertain which strategies maximize the therapeutic benefit of patients with high Lp(a) levels. We report the challenging case of a young coronary heart disease (CHD) patient who underwent 10 percutaneous coronary interventions due to repeated acute coronary syndromes (2006-2009) despite an optimally controlled, traditional risk-factor profile. For the first time, we performed specific Lp(a) immunoadsorption in the presence of very low levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) while the patient was on a high-dose statin regimen. There have been no previous reports of patients with high Lp(a) levels who achieved LDL-C goals when treated with an isolated Lp(a)-lowering method. Despite the very high risk of cardiovascular death, targeting Lp(a) resulted in dramatic improvement of the patient's clinical condition. Thus, we suggest that specific Lp(a) apheresis should be considered an effective new treatment strategy for patients with progressive CHD who have reached LDL-C goals but harbor elevated Lp(a) levels.

Lipoprotein(a) level and apolipoprotein(a) phenotype as predictors of long-term cardiovascular outcomes after coronary artery bypass grafting.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the relationships of lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) concentration and apolipoprotein(a) (apo(a)) phenotype to major adverse cardiovascular events after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in long-term follow-up. METHODS: This single-center study included 356 patients with stable coronary heart disease (CHD) who underwent successful CABG. At baseline, we assessed the patient's risk factor profile for atherosclerosis, Lp(a) concentration and apo(a) phenotype. The primary endpoint was the composite of cardiovascular death and non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI). The secondary endpoint also included hospitalization for recurrent or unstable angina and repeat revascularization. RESULTS: Over a mean of 8.5 ± 3.5 years (range 0.9-15.0 years), the primary and secondary endpoints were registered in 46 (13%) and 107 (30%) patients, respectively. Patients with Lp(a) ≥30 mg/dL were at significantly greater risk for the primary endpoint (hazard ratio (HR) 2.98, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.76-5.03, p < 0.001) and secondary endpoint (HR 3.47, 95% CI 2.48-4.85, p < 0.001) than patients with Lp(a) values <30 mg/dL. The low molecular-weight apo(a) phenotype was also associated with higher risk of both primary and secondary endpoints (3.57 (1.87-6.82) and 3.05 (2.00-4.62), respectively; p < 0.001 for both), regardless of conventional risk factors and statins use. CONCLUSION: In stable CHD patients Lp(a) concentration and low molecular-weight apo(a) phenotype are independently associated with three-fold increase in risk of major adverse cardiovascular events within 15 years after CABG. Lp(a) levels may provide an additional information for postoperative cardiovascular risk assessment.

Effect of specific lipoprotein(a) apheresis on coronary atherosclerosis regression assessed by quantitative coronary angiography.

AIM: To evaluate the effect of specific lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] apheresis on coronary atherosclerosis progression in coronary heart disease (CHD) patients with elevated Lp(a) levels. METHODS: A total of 30 subjects (mean age 53.5 ± 8.3 years, 70% male) with CHD verified by angiography, Lp(a) > 50 mg/dL, and low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) ≤ 2.5 mmol/L on chronic statin treatment were prospectively evaluated for 18 months. Patients were allocated to receive specific Lp(a) apheresis, which was carried out weekly with Lp(a) Lipopak(®) columns (POCARD Ltd., Russia) (n = 15), or atorvastatin only (n = 15). Blinded quantitative coronary angiography analyses of percent diameter stenosis and minimal lumen diameter (MLD) were performed at baseline and after the 18-month treatment period. RESULTS: By the single specific Lp(a) apheresis procedure, Lp(a) level decreased by an average of 73 ± 12% to a mean of 29 ± 16 mg/dL, and mean Lp(a)-corrected LDL-C decreased by 7% to a mean of 1.4 mmol/L. Median percent diameter stenosis was reduced by -2.0 (95% confidence interval [CI], -5.0-0.0) with apheresis (p < 0.01 in comparison with baseline), and increased by 3.5 (0.0-6.9) with atorvastatin (p < 0.001 between the groups). The effect on MLD was more favorable with apheresis than with atorvastatin: 0.20 ± 0.39 mm, as compared with 0.01 ± 0.34 mm, p = 0.04. Lp(a) apheresis had greater efficacy regarding the amount of regressed/stabilized coronary segments than atorvastatin alone in the majority of patients (chi-square test 13.61, p < 0.005). CONCLUSION: Specific Lp(a) apheresis for 18 months produced coronary atherosclerosis regression in stable CHD patients with high Lp(a) levels and reached LDL-C goals.

Cascade plasma filtration during the first year after CABG in patients with hyperlipidemia refractory to statins.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of a 12-month course of weekly lipid apheresis on vein graft patency after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in patients with hyperlipidemia refractory to statins. METHODS: In a 12-month prospective controlled clinical trial we enrolled 34 male patients (mean age 57 ± 8 years) who passed through successful CABG and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) level >2.6 mmol/L prior to the operation despite statin treatment. Patients were allocated into 2 groups: active (n = 17, weekly apheresis by cascade plasma filtration (CPF) plus atorvastatin), and control (n = 17, atorvastatin alone). Graft patency was evaluated by multislice computed tomography at 3 months and by angiography at 12 months after an operation. RESULTS: Both groups were comparable in clinical and biochemical characteristics. During each CPF procedure, LDL-C level decreased by 64 ± 9%, apoB - by 65 ± 8%, Lp(a) - by 52 ± 15%,; these changes were significant compared to baseline and the control group. Mean net difference in LDL-C level between apheresis and control groups was 1.1 ± 0.3 mmol/L. Vein graft patency at study end was 88.2% (45 of 51) in the apheresis group versus 72.7% (40 of 55) in the control group (p = 0.05). Use of apheresis was associated with decreased vein graft occlusions by 46%: relative risk 0.54; 95% confidence interval 0.27 to 1.02; p = 0.05. CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that the use of lipoprotein apheresis with CPF results in a better vein graft patency during the first year after CABG in patients with hyperlipidemia refractory to statins.

Association of lipoprotein(a) excess with early vein graft occlusions in middle-aged men undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the relationship of lipoprotein(a) to early vein graft occlusions in patients after coronary artery bypass grafting. METHODS: We studied 102 male patients (mean age 52.3 +/- 8.6 years) with chest pain occurrence during the first year (mean time 5.3 +/- 3.0 months) after surgical myocardial revascularization. Graft patency was examined by electron-beam computed tomography (n = 102) and quantitative coronary angiography (n = 31). RESULTS: Patients were divided into 2 groups according to graft patency data: 66 (65%) with occlusions and 36 (35%) without occlusions at follow-up. No significant differences were found between the groups concerning age, smoking, family history of coronary heart disease, previous myocardial infarction, hypertension, serum lipids, and apolipoprotein B. Lipoprotein(a) level was significantly higher in patients with occluded grafts with a median (95% confidence intervals) of 24 mg/dL (17-42 mg/dL) versus 12 mg/dL (6-24 mg/dL) in patients with patent grafts, P <.01. More patients with nonoccluded grafts were taking statins postoperatively: 42% versus 18% of patients with occluded grafts, P <.05. The sensitivity and specificity of electron-beam computed tomography in revealing vein graft occlusion was close to 100%. CONCLUSION: There is an association between high lipoprotein(a) level and vein graft occlusions in middle-aged men during the first year after coronary artery bypass grafting. Use of statins is associated with a lower rate of vein graft occlusion. Electron-beam tomography could be useful for assessing graft occlusions.