Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg ; 28(11): 1641-1644, 2022 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36282157

ABSTRACT

The authors present the case of a 9-year-old boy who sustained a gunshot injury to the pericardium by an air gun. The penetrative wound to the pericardium was, according to the performed pre-operative diagnostic methods, initially believed to be a penetrative wound into the cardiophrenic angle of the left pleural cavity. The stabilized patient was indicated for an extraction of the projectile through a left anterior minithoracotomy, during which the projectile was found and successfully removed from the pericardium. The limits of pre-operative assessment, optimal treatment procedures, and surgical approaches in pediatric patients with gunshot injuries to the chest and heart are discussed.


Subject(s)
Foreign Bodies , Thoracic Injuries , Wounds, Gunshot , Male , Humans , Child , Wounds, Gunshot/diagnostic imaging , Wounds, Gunshot/surgery , Thoracic Injuries/surgery , Pericardium/diagnostic imaging , Pericardium/surgery , Foreign Bodies/surgery
2.
Surg Endosc ; 36(11): 8255-8260, 2022 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35474390

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The use of the magnetic sphincter augmentation (MSA) in patients with de novo or persistent gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) after sleeve gastrectomy has not been thoroughly investigated. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of MSA device placement in improving GERD symptoms and reducing anti-reflux medication usage in patients with persistent or de novo GERD after sleeve gastrectomy. METHODS: This is a retrospective analysis of patients who underwent laparoscopic MSA device placement between January 2018 and July 2020 after sleeve gastrectomy. RESULTS: A total of twenty-two patients met inclusion criteria. Twenty patients were female (91%) and two patients were male (9%). All patients were taking anti-reflux medications daily to control GERD symptoms prior to MSA device placement. There was a significant improvement in the mean GERD-HRQL survey scores when comparing scores prior to (43.8) and after (16.7) MSA device placement (p < 0.0001). Majority of the patients did well without any post-operative complications (77%). Nearly 82% of patients were no longer taking any anti-acid medications after MSA device placement (p < 0.0485). There were no patients that required MSA device removals. There were no adverse events such as MSA device erosions or device-related mortalities. CONCLUSIONS: MSA device placement in patients with medically refractory GERD after sleeve gastrectomy is a safe and viable alternative to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass without conferring additional risks. We show an improvement in reflux symptoms after MSA device placement as evidenced by decreased post-operative GERD-HRQL scores, decreased anti-acid medication usage, and overall patient satisfaction with the procedure. Further prospective and comparative studies with longer term follow-up are needed to validate the use of MSA in patients who have undergone sleeve gastrectomy.


Subject(s)
Gastroesophageal Reflux , Laparoscopy , Obesity, Morbid , Male , Female , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Quality of Life , Gastroesophageal Reflux/etiology , Gastroesophageal Reflux/surgery , Gastrectomy/adverse effects , Gastrectomy/methods , Laparoscopy/adverse effects , Magnetic Phenomena , Treatment Outcome , Obesity, Morbid/surgery
3.
Biomedicines ; 9(2)2021 Jan 21.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33494257

ABSTRACT

Anastomotic leakage is a dreadful complication in colorectal surgery. It has a negative impact on postoperative mortality, long term life quality and oncological results. Nanofibrous polycaprolactone materials have shown pro-healing properties in various applications before. Our team developed several versions of these for healing support of colorectal anastomoses with promising results in previous years. In this study, we developed highly porous biocompatible polycaprolactone nanofibrous patches. We constructed a defective anastomosis on the large intestine of 16 pigs, covered the anastomoses with the patch in 8 animals (Experimental group) and left the rest uncovered (Control group). After 21 days of observation we evaluated postoperative changes, signs of leakage and other complications. The samples were assessed histologically according to standardized protocols. The material was easy to work with. All animals survived with no major complication. There were no differences in intestinal wall integrity between the groups and there were no signs of anastomotic leakage in any animal. The levels of collagen were significantly higher in the Experimental group, which we consider to be an indirect sign of higher mechanical strength. The material shall be further perfected in the future and possibly combined with active molecules to specifically influence the healing process.

4.
In Vivo ; 34(5): 2675-2685, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32871799

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND/AIM: The aim of the study was to evaluate the influence of primary tumour location and clinical risk factors for long-term results of surgery for colorectal liver metastases (CLMs). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were evaluated in 636 patients. Patients were divided by tumour location (right-/left-sided colorectal cancer: RCRC/LCRC; rectal cancer), and age, gender, number and size of CLMs, type of liver surgery and interval from primary operation were evaluated. RESULTS: One-, 3- and 5-year OS and RFS were independent of primary tumour location (p<0.59). CLM diameter was negatively associated with OS for the whole cohort (p<0.002), and RCRC (p<0.03) and LCRC (p<0.04) groups, as well as for RFS of those with LCRC (p<0.04). CLM number was negatively associated with RFS for the whole cohort (p<0.0001), RCRC (p<0.02), LCRC (p<0.0001) and RC (p<0.02). Radiofrequency ablation and combined procedures led to worse OS for the whole cohort (p<0.03), and to worse RFS for the whole cohort (p<0.0003) and for those with LCRC (p<0.03). A shorter interval between primary colorectal cancer surgery and CLMs procedure was risky for poor OS and RFS of patients with CLMs from RCRC (p<0.05), LCRC (p<0.05) and RC (p<0.02). CONCLUSION: Primary tumour location together with clinical risk factors are important for long-term results of surgery CLMs.


Subject(s)
Colorectal Neoplasms , Liver Neoplasms , Rectal Neoplasms , Colorectal Neoplasms/surgery , Hepatectomy , Humans , Liver Neoplasms/surgery , Risk Factors , Survival Rate
5.
Burns Trauma ; 6: 25, 2018.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30221175

ABSTRACT

The USA is currently going through an opioid crisis, associated with tremendous economic and societal impacts. In response to this crisis, healthcare professionals are looking for alternative pain management methods, and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are a sensible choice because of their effectiveness after surgical procedures. However, before surgeons start prescribing NSAIDs in place of opioids, it is crucial to first understand their potential post-surgical complications. The goal of this review is to summarize the data obtained through both animal and human studies, which suggest how a dramatic increase in NSAID use may affect these post-surgical complications. We first provide a short review outlining the mechanisms of action of NSAIDs, followed by a summary of animal studies, which show a trend towards the negative effects of NSAIDs on wound healing and an association between NSAID use and wound infections. Lastly, we present evidence from human studies on the association of NSAIDs with the following complications: anastomotic leaks, necrotizing soft tissue infections, bleeding complications, orthopedic injuries, wound healing, and cancer care. The human studies are much more variable in their conclusions as to whether NSAIDs are beneficial or not, with the only strong evidence showing that NSAIDs inhibit bone healing. This may partially be explained by male and female differences in response to NSAIDs as many animal studies showing the inhibitory effects of NSAIDs were performed on females, while all the human studies were performed with both sexes. We conclude that strong caution should be used in the prescription of NSAIDs, especially in female patients, but larger scale studies are warranted before solid recommendations can be made.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...