Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 36
Filter
1.
Med Intensiva ; 47(3): 131-139, 2023 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36855737

ABSTRACT

Objective: Few studies have reported the implications and adverse events of performing endotracheal intubation for critically ill COVID-19 patients admitted to intensive care units. The aim of the present study was to determine the adverse events related to tracheal intubation in COVID-19 patients, defined as the onset of hemodynamic instability, severe hypoxemia, and cardiac arrest. Setting: Tertiary care medical hospitals, dual-centre study performed in Northern Italy from November 2020 to May 2021. Patients: Adult patients with positive SARS-CoV-2 PCR test, admitted for respiratory failure and need of advanced invasive airways management. Interventions: Endotracheal Intubation Adverse Events. Main variables of interests: The primary endpoint was to determine the occurrence of at least 1 of the following events within 30 minutes from the start of the intubation procedure and to describe the types of major adverse peri-intubation events: severe hypoxemia defined as an oxygen saturation as measured by pulse-oximetry <80%; hemodynamic instability defined as a SBP 65 mmHg recoded at least once or SBP < 90 mmHg for 30 minutes, a new requirement or increase of vasopressors, fluid bolus >15 mL/kg to maintain the target blood pressure; cardiac arrest. Results: Among 142 patients, 73.94% experienced at least one major adverse peri-intubation event. The predominant event was cardiovascular instability, observed in 65.49% of all patients undergoing emergency intubation, followed by severe hypoxemia (43.54%). 2.82% of the patients had a cardiac arrest. Conclusion: In this study of intubation practices in critically ill patients with COVID-19, major adverse peri-intubation events were frequent. Clinical Trial registration: www.clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT04909476.


Objetivo: Pocos estudios han informado las implicaciones y los eventos adversos de realizar una intubación endotraqueal para pacientes críticos con COVID-19 ingresados ​​en unidades de cuidados intensivos. El objetivo del presente estudio fue determinar los eventos adversos relacionados con la intubación traqueal en pacientes con COVID-19, definidos como la aparición de inestabilidad hemodinámica, hipoxemia severa y paro cardíaco. Ámbito: Hospitales médicos de atención terciaria, estudio de doble centro realizado en el norte de Italia desde noviembre de 2020 hasta mayo de 2021. Pacientes: Pacientes adultos con prueba PCR SARS-CoV-2 positiva, ingresados por insuficiencia respiratoria y necesidad de manejo avanzado de vías aéreas invasivas. Intervenciones: Eventos adversos de la intubación endotraqueal. Principales variables de interés: El punto final primario fue determinar la ocurrencia de al menos 1 de los siguientes eventos dentro de los 30 minutos posteriores al inicio del procedimiento de intubación y describir los tipos de eventos adversos periintubación mayores. : hipoxemia severa definida como una saturación de oxígeno medida por pulsioximetría <80%; inestabilidad hemodinámica definida como PAS 65 mmHg registrada al menos una vez o PAS < 90 mmHg durante 30 minutos, nuevo requerimiento o aumento de vasopresores, bolo de líquidos > 15 mL/kg para mantener la presión arterial objetivo; paro cardiaco. Resultados: Entre 142 pacientes, el 73,94% experimentó al menos un evento periintubación adverso importante. El evento predominante fue la inestabilidad cardiovascular, observada en el 65,49% de todos los pacientes sometidos a intubación de urgencia, seguido de la hipoxemia severa (43,54%). El 2,82% de los pacientes tuvo un paro cardíaco. Conclusión: En este estudio de prácticas de intubación en pacientes críticos con COVID-19, los eventos adversos periintubación mayores fueron frecuentes. Registro de ensayos clínicos: www.clinicaltrials.gov identificador: NCT04909476.

2.
Med. intensiva (Madr., Ed. impr.) ; 47(3): 131-139, mar. 2023. tab, ilus
Article in English | IBECS | ID: ibc-216668

ABSTRACT

Objective Few studies have reported the implications and adverse events of performing endotracheal intubation for critically ill COVID-19 patients admitted to intensive care units. The aim of the present study was to determine the adverse events related to tracheal intubation in COVID-19 patients, defined as the onset of hemodynamic instability, severe hypoxemia, and cardiac arrest. Setting Tertiary care medical hospitals, dual-centre study performed in Northern Italy from November 2020 to May 2021. Patients Adult patients with positive SARS-CoV-2 PCR test, admitted for respiratory failure and need of advanced invasive airways management. Interventions Endotracheal Intubation Adverse Events. Main variables of interests The primary endpoint was to determine the occurrence of at least 1 of the following events within 30 minutes from the start of the intubation procedure and to describe the types of major adverse peri-intubation events: severe hypoxemia defined as an oxygen saturation as measured by pulse-oximetry <80%; hemodynamic instability defined as a SBP 65 mmHg recoded at least once or SBP < 90 mmHg for 30 minutes, a new requirement or increase of vasopressors, fluid bolus >15 mL/kg to maintain the target blood pressure; cardiac arrest. Results Among 142 patients, 73.94% experienced at least one major adverse peri-intubation event. The predominant event was cardiovascular instability, observed in 65.49% of all patients undergoing emergency intubation, followed by severe hypoxemia (43.54%). 2.82% of the patients had a cardiac arrest. Conclusion In this study of intubation practices in critically ill patients with COVID-19, major adverse peri-intubation events were frequent (AU)


Objetivo Pocos estudios han informado las implicaciones y los eventos adversos de realizar una intubación endotraqueal para pacientes críticos con COVID-19 ingresados ​​en unidades de cuidados intensivos. El objetivo del presente estudio fue determinar los eventos adversos relacionados con la intubación traqueal en pacientes con COVID-19, definidos como la aparición de inestabilidad hemodinámica, hipoxemia severa y paro cardíaco. Ámbito Hospitales médicos de atención terciaria, estudio de doble centro realizado en el norte de Italia desde noviembre de 2020 hasta mayo de 2021. Pacientes Pacientes adultos con prueba PCR SARS-CoV-2 positiva, ingresados por insuficiencia respiratoria y necesidad de manejo avanzado de vías aéreas invasivas. Intervenciones Eventos adversos de la intubación endotraqueal. Principales variables de interés El punto final primario fue determinar la ocurrencia de al menos 1 de los siguientes eventos dentro de los 30 minutos posteriores al inicio del procedimiento de intubación y describir los tipos de eventos adversos periintubación mayores. : hipoxemia severa definida como una saturación de oxígeno medida por pulsioximetría <80%; inestabilidad hemodinámica definida como PAS 65 mmHg registrada al menos una vez o PAS < 90 mmHg durante 30 minutos, nuevo requerimiento o aumento de vasopresores, bolo de líquidos > 15 mL/kg para mantener la presión arterial objetivo; paro cardiaco. Resultados Entre 142 pacientes, el 73,94% experimentó al menos un evento periintubación adverso importante. El evento predominante fue la inestabilidad cardiovascular, observada en el 65,49% de todos los pacientes sometidos a intubación de urgencia, seguido de la hipoxemia severa (43,54%). El 2,82% de los pacientes tuvo un paro cardíaco. Conclusión En este estudio de prácticas de intubación en pacientes críticos con COVID-19, los eventos adversos periintubación mayores fueron frecuentes (AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Aged , Coronavirus Infections/therapy , Pneumonia, Viral/therapy , Pandemics , Respiratory Insufficiency/therapy , Respiratory Insufficiency/virology , Intubation, Intratracheal/adverse effects , Prospective Studies , Risk Factors
3.
Med Intensiva (Engl Ed) ; 47(3): 131-139, 2023 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36155747

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Few studies have reported the implications and adverse events of performing endotracheal intubation for critically ill COVID-19 patients admitted to intensive care units. The aim of the present study was to determine the adverse events related to tracheal intubation in COVID-19 patients, defined as the onset of hemodynamic instability, severe hypoxemia, and cardiac arrest. SETTING: Tertiary care medical hospitals, dual-centre study performed in Northern Italy from November 2020 to May 2021. PATIENTS: Adult patients with positive SARS-CoV-2 PCR test, admitted for respiratory failure and need of advanced invasive airways management. INTERVENTIONS: Endotracheal Intubation Adverse Events. MAIN VARIABLES OF INTERESTS: The primary endpoint was to determine the occurrence of at least 1 of the following events within 30 minutes from the start of the intubation procedure and to describe the types of major adverse peri-intubation events: severe hypoxemia defined as an oxygen saturation as measured by pulse-oximetry <80%; hemodynamic instability defined as a SBP 65 mmHg recoded at least once or SBP < 90 mmHg for 30 minutes, a new requirement or increase of vasopressors, fluid bolus >15 mL/kg to maintain the target blood pressure; cardiac arrest. RESULTS: Among 142 patients, 73.94% experienced at least one major adverse peri-intubation event. The predominant event was cardiovascular instability, observed in 65.49% of all patients undergoing emergency intubation, followed by severe hypoxemia (43.54%). 2.82% of the patients had a cardiac arrest. CONCLUSION: In this study of intubation practices in critically ill patients with COVID-19, major adverse peri-intubation events were frequent. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov identifier: NCT04909476.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Heart Arrest , Respiratory Distress Syndrome , Respiratory Insufficiency , Adult , Humans , SARS-CoV-2 , Critical Illness , Hypoxia
4.
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci ; 26(10): 3664-3676, 2022 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35647848

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Chronic pain is currently considered a disease state with biopsychosocial consequences and a negative impact on patients' quality of life (QoL). Pain from postherpetic neuralgia (PHN) can persist for months or years and is a prototypical example of chronic pain. We analyzed PHN as a model of chronic pain, including its effects on QoL and clinical aspects. We explored treatment options, focusing on the topical treatment with lidocaine 700 mg medicated plaster (LMP) and how this impacts PHN management. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This article is a narrative review of published studies. Preclinical and clinical studies were retrieved from literature through a search performed in PubMed/MEDLINE. RESULTS: To choose the appropriate treatment for chronic pains, such as PHN, not only efficacy but also tolerability, manageability, practicality, and compliance are important factors, especially in the long term. It is also important to set treatment expectations with the patients as total suppression of pain may be unrealistic, and a balance needs to be found between pain control and the minimization of adverse events. In this respect, LMP may be the best currently available treatment: it is easy to use, has low systemic absorption and thus a low risk for pharmacological interactions. Therefore, treatments can be personalized, and concomitant medications can be added, if needed. Recent data from a real-world study support this view by showing that LMP has superior effectiveness in reducing pain and improving the QoL compared to other commonly used systemic treatments and confirming its good tolerability profile that is mainly characterized by localized skin reactions. CONCLUSIONS: LMP is one of the best currently available treatment options for PHN patients balancing good efficacy with an excellent tolerability profile and can therefore be considered for use as a first-line treatment for PHN.


Subject(s)
Chronic Pain , Neuralgia, Postherpetic , Anesthetics, Local , Chronic Pain/drug therapy , Humans , Lidocaine/therapeutic use , Neuralgia, Postherpetic/drug therapy , Quality of Life
5.
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci ; 24(22): 11891-11899, 2020 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33275260

ABSTRACT

The control of post-operative pain in Italy and other western countries is still suboptimal. In recent years, the Sufentanil Sublingual Tablet System (SSTS; Zalviso; AcelRx Pharmaceuticals, Redwood City, CA, USA), which is designed for patient-controlled analgesia (PCA), has entered clinical practice. SSTS enables patients to manage moderate-to-severe acute pain during the first 72 postoperative hours directly in the hospital setting. However, the role of SSTS within the current framework of options for the management of post-operative pain needs to be better established. This paper presents the position on the use of SSTS of a multidisciplinary group of Italian Experts and provides protocols for the use of this device.


Subject(s)
Analgesia, Patient-Controlled/instrumentation , Analgesics, Opioid/therapeutic use , Pain Management/instrumentation , Pain, Postoperative/drug therapy , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Sufentanil/therapeutic use , Acute Pain/drug therapy , Administration, Sublingual , Analgesics, Opioid/administration & dosage , Humans , Sufentanil/administration & dosage , Tablets
6.
Neurol Sci ; 40(7): 1425-1431, 2019 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30941628

ABSTRACT

To improve patient care and help clinical research, the Neuropathic Pain Special Interest Group of the Italian Neurological Society appointed a task force to elaborate a consensus statement on pharmacoresistant neuropathic pain. The task force included 19 experts in neuropathic pain. These experts participated in a Delphi survey consisting of three consecutive rounds of questions and a face-to-face meeting, designed to achieve a consensus definition of pharmacoresistant neuropathic pain. In the three rounds of questions, the participants identified and described the main distinguishing features of pharmacoresistance. In the face-to-face meeting the participants discussed the clinical features determining pharmacoresistance. They finally agreed that neuropathic pain is pharmacoresistant when "the patient does not reach the 50% reduction of pain or an improvement of at least 2 points in the Patient Global Impression of Change, having used all drug classes indicated as first, second, or third line in the most recent and widely agreed international guidelines, for at least 1 month after titration to the highest tolerable dose." Our consensus statement might be useful for identifying eligible patients for invasive treatments, and selecting patients in pharmacological trials, thus improving patient care and helping clinical research.


Subject(s)
Neuralgia/classification , Pain, Intractable/classification , Delphi Technique , Drug Resistance , Humans , Neuralgia/diagnosis , Neuralgia/therapy , Pain, Intractable/diagnosis , Pain, Intractable/therapy
7.
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis ; 34(2): 357-65, 2015 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25217227

ABSTRACT

Invasive fungal infections (IFIs) are an increasing problem in intensive care units (ICUs), and conventional diagnostic methods are not always reliable or timely enough to deliver appropriate antimicrobial therapy. The dosage of fungal antigens in serum is a promising diagnostic technique, but several confounding factors, such as treatment with immunoglobulins (Ig), albumin, or antifungals, could interfere with the correct interpretation of the (1,3)-beta-D-glucan (BG) assay. This study assessed the reliability of the BG assay and the influence of timing and dosage of major confounding factors on circulating levels of IFI biomarkers. 267 ICU patients who underwent a BG assay were retrospectively studied. The timing and dosage of albumin, use of azole treatment, and infusions of intravenous IgG, red blood cells, concentrated platelets, and frozen plasma were analyzed to find possible correlations with the BG results. The sensitivity and specificity of the BG assay were calculated. The BG test in serum showed high sensitivity (82.9 %) but low specificity (56.7 %). The optimal cut-off for the test was 95.9 pg/mL. The mean BG level in proven invasive candidiasis was around 400 pg/mL. The only factor that was found to significantly confound (p < 0.05) the diagnostic performance of the BG assay was the administration of more than 30 g of albumin within 2 days prior to BG testing. The BG assay remains a useful diagnostic test in ICU patients and the levels of BG are useful in evaluating the positive predictive value of this biomarker. The only confounding factor in our study was the use of albumin.


Subject(s)
Antigens, Fungal/blood , Candida/immunology , Candidiasis, Invasive/diagnosis , beta-Glucans/blood , Aged , Antifungal Agents/blood , Candida/isolation & purification , Candidiasis, Invasive/microbiology , Female , Humans , Immunoglobulins/blood , Intensive Care Units , Male , Middle Aged , Predictive Value of Tests , Proteoglycans , Reproducibility of Results , Retrospective Studies , Sensitivity and Specificity , Serum Albumin
8.
Minerva Med ; 105(3): 177-95, 2014 Jun.
Article in Italian | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24988084

ABSTRACT

Localized neuropathic pain (LNP) is a type of neuropathic pain characterized by consistent and circumscribed area(s) of maximum pain, which are associated with negative or positive sensory signs and/or spontaneous symptoms typical of neuropathic pain. This description outlines the clinical features of a group of pathologies, in which a LNP can be diagnosed and for whom topical targeted treatment with 5% Lidocaine medicated plaster can be suggested. Indeed both American as well as European guidelines already suggest 5% Lidocaine medicated plaster as a first line treatment in post herpetic neuralgia and in general in the treatment of conditions such as diabetic painful polyneuropathy and post surgical pain where a LNP can be ascertain. In a daily practice of a Pain Unit however the usual case mix encompasses also other causes of LNP, most of them with a scanty pain control in spite of a ongoing polytherapy. Aims of this paper were to focus on 5% Lidocaine medicated plaster as a first line treatment in LNP and to add new insight on its possible use as add-on therapy reporting our data on a consecutive series of 42 patients affected by LNP under unsatisfactory polytherapy in which 5% Lidocaine medicated plaster was able to achieve a satisfactory pain control.


Subject(s)
Anesthetics, Local/administration & dosage , Lidocaine/administration & dosage , Neuralgia/diagnosis , Neuralgia/drug therapy , Pain Management/methods , Transdermal Patch , Adult , Aged , Algorithms , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neuralgia/etiology , Neuralgia/physiopathology , Pain Measurement
10.
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci ; 15(12): 1461-72, 2011 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22288307

ABSTRACT

NSAIDs are generally considered to be safe and well tolerated, but, even with the advent of selective COX-2 inhibitors, nephrotoxicity remains a concern. An impaired renal perfusion caused by the inhibition of prostaglandin synthesis is claimed like the more frequent cause of an acute renal failure due to NSAIDs, while a chronic interstitial nephritis or an analgesic nephropathy are believed the causes of a chronic renal failure. The real incidence of renal side effects of NSAIDs is still unclear and it differs between the age of the patients and the reports present in the literature. The occurrence of renal side effects following prenatal exposure to NSAIDs seems to be rare considering the large number of pregnant woman treated with indomethacin or other prostaglandin inhibitors. NSAID-related nephrotoxicity remains an important clinical problem in the newborns, in whom the functionally immature kidney may exert a significant effect on the disposition of the drugs. Instead, nephrotoxicity is a rare event in children and the risk is lower than adults. In healthy adult patients the incidence of renal adverse effects is very low, less than 1%. The risk increased with age. The elderly are at higher risk, and it is correlated at the presence of pretreatment renal disease, hypovolemia due to use of diuretics, diabetes, congestive heart failure or alteration of NSAID pharmacokinetics.


Subject(s)
Acute Kidney Injury/chemically induced , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/adverse effects , Indomethacin/adverse effects , Acute Kidney Injury/epidemiology , Acute Kidney Injury/pathology , Adult , Age Factors , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/administration & dosage , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/pharmacokinetics , Child , Female , Humans , Indomethacin/administration & dosage , Indomethacin/pharmacokinetics , Infant, Newborn , Pregnancy , Prenatal Exposure Delayed Effects , Risk Factors
11.
Transplant Proc ; 40(4): 1200-4, 2008 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18555148

ABSTRACT

Pancreatic carcinoma, an important leading cause of cancer death, has increased steadily in incidence and still has a poor prognosis. Pain is one of the most frequent symptoms, affecting more than 75% of patients. It is often present in the early stages of disease and may be severe and difficult to treat. Abdominal viscera, including pancreas, liver, gallbladder, adrenal, kidney, and the gastrointestinal tract from the level of the gastroesophageal junction to the splenic flexure of the colon are innervated, at least in part, via the celiac plexus. Thus, painful tumors in these viscera may have pain relieved through the use of a neurolytic celiac plexus block (NCPB). Although some investigators questioned the role and the efficacy of NCPB in the treatment of upper abdominal cancer pain, most of them have suggested that it may represent the optimal treatment, especially for pancreatic cancer pain. In this report we have reviewed the techniques, results, and complications of NCPB for the treatment of pancreatic cancer pain.


Subject(s)
Autonomic Nerve Block/methods , Celiac Plexus , Pain, Intractable/drug therapy , Pancreatic Neoplasms/physiopathology , Anesthetics, Local/administration & dosage , Anesthetics, Local/therapeutic use , Atropine/therapeutic use , Bupivacaine/administration & dosage , Bupivacaine/therapeutic use , Humans , Premedication
14.
Pain Pract ; 2(3): 261-4, 2002 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17147741
15.
J Electrocardiol ; 34(4): 309-17, 2001 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11590558

ABSTRACT

Unilateral percutaneous cervical cordotomy, performed in humans to relieve intractable cancer pain, elicits signs of ipsilateral sympathetic block. In patients undergoing right or left percutaneous cervical cordotomy (9 per group), changes in sympathovagal balance were evaluated by spectral analysis of heart rate to confirm the sympatholytic effect of this surgical procedure and to investigate the lateralization of sympathetic cardiac control. For these purposes, heart rate variability was recorded 1 hour before cordotomy and 24 hours later. Cordotomy significantly depressed the low frequency peak (LF) of heart rate variability and increased the high frequency component (HF), when measured as a percentage of total power. As a consequence, the LF/HF ratio decreased significantly (P =.001), particularly during standing. The effects of right or left cordotomies were not significantly different. In conclusion, in humans unilateral percutaneous cervical cordotomy depresses some sympathetic indexes (LF/total power ratio and LF/HF ratio) derived from heart rate variability, irrespective of side.


Subject(s)
Cordotomy/adverse effects , Heart Rate , Sympathetic Nervous System/physiopathology , Sympathetic Nervous System/surgery , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Blood Pressure , Cordotomy/methods , Electrocardiography , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasms/surgery , Pain, Intractable/surgery , Respiration
16.
J Physiol ; 531(Pt 1): 235-44, 2001 Feb 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11179406

ABSTRACT

1. Parameters derived from frequency-domain analysis of heart period and blood pressure variability are gaining increasing importance in clinical practice. However, the underlying physiological mechanisms in human subjects are not fully understood. Here we address the question as to whether the low frequency variability (approximately 0.1 Hz) of the heart period may depend on a baroreflex-mediated response to blood pressure oscillations, induced by the alpha-sympathetic drive on the peripheral resistance. 2. Heart period (ECG), finger arterial pressure (Finapres) and respiratory airflow were recorded in eight healthy volunteers in the supine position with metronome respiration at 0.25 Hz. We inhibited the vascular response to the sympathetic vasomotor activity with a peripheral alpha-blocker (urapidil) and maintained mean blood pressure at control levels with angiotensin II. 3. We performed spectral and cross-spectral analysis of heart period (RR) and systolic pressure to quantify the power of low- and high-frequency oscillations, phase shift, coherence and transfer function gain. 4. In control conditions, spectral analysis yielded typical results. In the low-frequency range, cross-spectral analysis showed high coherence (> 0.5) and a negative phase shift (-65.1 +/- 18 deg) between RR and systolic pressure, which indicates a 1-2 s lag in heart period changes in relation to pressure. In the high-frequency region, the phase shift was close to zero, indicating simultaneous fluctuations of RR and systolic pressure. During urapidil + angiotensin II infusion the low-frequency oscillations of both blood pressure and heart period were abolished in five cases. In the remaining three cases they were substantially reduced and lost their typical cross-spectral characteristics. 5. We conclude that in supine rest conditions, the oscillation of RR at low frequency is almost entirely accounted for by a baroreflex mechanism, since it is not produced in the absence of a 0.1 Hz pressure oscillation. 6. The results provide physiological support for the use of non-invasive estimates of the closed-loop baroreflex gain from cross-spectral analysis of blood pressure and heart period variability in the 0.1 Hz range.


Subject(s)
Adrenergic alpha-Antagonists/pharmacology , Baroreflex/physiology , Heart Rate/physiology , Adult , Baroreflex/drug effects , Blood Pressure/drug effects , Blood Pressure/physiology , Electrocardiography , Female , Heart Rate/drug effects , Humans , Male , Respiratory Mechanics/drug effects , Respiratory Mechanics/physiology , Supine Position/physiology
17.
Curr Rev Pain ; 4(2): 127-33, 2000.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10998724

ABSTRACT

Neurolytic celiac plexus block (NCPB) is commonly performed to relieve pancreatic cancer pain. Since Kappis described the percutaneous NCPB, a number of variations of this technique have been proposed to improve analgesic results and minimize complications. In this article, we review and discuss techniques, results, and complications of NCPB.


Subject(s)
Celiac Plexus/drug effects , Nerve Block/methods , Pain/drug therapy , Pain/etiology , Pancreatic Neoplasms/complications , Humans , Nerve Block/adverse effects , Splanchnic Nerves/drug effects
18.
Chir Ital ; 52(3): 307-11, 2000.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10932378

ABSTRACT

Recently an increasing percentage of patients is receiving care and surgical procedures in Day Surgery (DS), undergoing local or loco-regional anesthesia techniques, to which many patients appear to be rather reluctant and show fear and anxiety. The anesthesiologist can resolve this problem administering i.v. hypnotic and analgesic drugs and adjusting their level to patient's needs and type of surgery. They increase the patient's compliance to DS care and contribute to its diffusion. Nowadays, commonly used drugs permit quick changes of anesthesia depth with a fast and safe recovery but these require an appropriate monitoring in order to prevent and rapidly detect the onset of complications. In this study we analyze the peculiarity of Monitored Anesthesia Care and the appropriate intraoperative monitoring especially regarding the use of pulse oximetry.


Subject(s)
Ambulatory Surgical Procedures , Anesthesia , Monitoring, Intraoperative , Humans
19.
Br J Anaesth ; 84(2): 169-73, 2000 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10743448

ABSTRACT

We have assessed if recovery times after morphine or fentanyl, given before terminating remifentanil anaesthesia with isoflurane or propofol, are compromised. We studied patients undergoing elective, major abdominal surgery, allocated randomly to receive remifentanil and isoflurane (n = 277) or remifentanil and propofol (n = 274) anaesthesia. Twenty-five minutes before the end of surgery, patients received fentanyl 0.15 mg or morphine 15 mg in a randomized, double-blind manner followed by a second dose (fentanyl 0.05 mg, morphine 7 mg) for moderate or severe pain in recovery. Recovery was rapid and at an Aldrete score > or = 9 (median 12-15 min), 42-51% of patients reported none or mild pain. However, 26-35% of patients reported severe pain and > 90% required a second dose of opioid within 21-27 min after anaesthesia.


Subject(s)
Analgesics, Opioid , Anesthetics, General , Pain, Postoperative/prevention & control , Piperidines , Abdomen/surgery , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Anesthesia Recovery Period , Anesthetics, Inhalation , Anesthetics, Intravenous , Double-Blind Method , Female , Fentanyl/therapeutic use , Humans , Isoflurane , Male , Middle Aged , Morphine/therapeutic use , Propofol , Remifentanil
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...