Single crown vs. composite for glass fiber post-retained restorations: An 8-year randomized clinical trial.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to compare the success and survival rates of metal-ceramic crowns and composite resin restorations applied in root filled teeth that received a glass fiber post. METHODS: A prospective, randomized controlled trial, with equivalent parallel groups was designed. Eighty-two teeth were randomly allocated to the metal-ceramic or composite resin groups. Multivariate Cox regression analysis with shared frailty for patients and Kaplan-Meier curves were performed using success and survival rates (p<0.05). RESULTS: Seventy-five post-retained restorations (34 metal-ceramic crowns and 41 composite restorations) in 62 patients were analyzed. The median follow-up was 8.1 years [IQR 4.0-9.9]. Twenty-seven failures were observed. Twenty-two failures (81.5 %) were observed in the composite resin group, of which six (27.3 %) were not repairable. Five failures (18.5 %) were observed in the metal-ceramic crown group, of which three (66.6 %) were non-repairable. The cumulative success rate at 8 years was 85.0 % for crowns (AFR=1.31 %) and 43.2 % for composite resins (AFR=6.58 %), while the survival rate was 93.8 % for crowns (AFR=0.52 %) and 97.6 % for composite resins (AFR=0.20 %). Considering the success rates, adjusted multivariate Cox regression showed that composite resin had a Hazard Ratio of 5.07 (95 %CI, 1.99-12.89) greater than the metal-ceramic crown. No significant difference in the failure risk was observed when the survival rates were considered (HR=0.38, 95 %CI (0.10 - 1.44), p = 0.156). Co-variables did not affect the success and survival rates (p>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Metal-ceramic crowns showed a higher success rate than composite restorations. The survival rates were similar, but composite restorations presented a higher need for repairs. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Post-retained composite restorations may need more reinterventions during the lifecycle, although more preservation of sound tooth structure is expected with a large restoration of resin post-and-core. These aspects have to be discussed with the patient for decision-making planning.

Is the effect of COVID-19 on periodontal treatment similar to that in general dental care and primary medical care? an observational study in Brazil.

The present study aimed to analyze the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on the rates of periodontal procedures, and provide a comparison with general dental care and primary medical care procedures carried out in the Brazilian Public Health System. The study had an ecological, retrospective design with data from 5,564 Brazilian municipalities (99.9%). A multilevel mixed-effects linear regression was used to analyze the longitudinal associations between the COVID-19 pandemic and the rate of procedures. There was a significant reduction in the number of periodontal procedures (Coef. -428.6 [95%CI -774.3/-82.9]) during the COVID-19 pandemic, although this reduction was no greater than that of medical and general dental procedures. Medical procedures witnessed the sharpest drop in procedures (Coef. -2831.5 [95%CI -3964.1/-1699.0]). A lower rate of general dental procedures was also identified during the pandemic (Coef. -2,110.6 [95%CI -3,400.8/-820.4]). The COVID-19 pandemic has had a negative effect on the rate of periodontal procedures carried out in the Brazilian Public Health System. The highest recutions were observed in general dental and medical procedures.

Short vs standard implants associated with sinus floor elevation: a randomized controlled trial / Implantes curtos versus implantes convencionais associados à elevação do seixo maxilar: um ensaio clínico randomizado

Objective: the present equivalence two-arm parallel randomized controlled trial aimed to compare survival and marginal bone loss (MBL) of short implants (≤6 mm) and standard implants (≥8.5 mm) associated with sinus floor elevation (SFE). Methods: adult patients with partial edentulism with occlusal stability in the sinus area and intermediate bone height were selected in this double-blind trial (patient and outcome assessment). Patients were randomly allocated into two groups: standard length implants with SFE (control) or short implants (test). Clinical and radiographic assessments were made at the time of implant placement, 6 months, and annually thereafter up to 2 years after loading. The inter-examiner agreement was analyzed using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). One-way ANOVA, Kaplan-Meier, and Log-rank tests were used to compare implant survival (primary outcome) and MBL (secondary outcome) (P<0.05). Results: eight short implants and six standard implants were placed (mean age of patients was 47 ±12.5 years). The implant survival rates were 87.5% for short (one 5 mm implant failed at 7 months) and 100% for standard implants with no statistically significant difference between groups (P=0.4). The mean MBL after 1 year was 0.30 ±0.62 mm for short and 0.21 ±0.36 mm for standard implants (P=0.123). The inter-examiner agreement was set in 0.831. Conclusion: survival of short implants and standard implants associated with SFE was similar after two years of clinical service. Trial registration: Registered on 27-03-2018 at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03479333). Funding: This study was partially funded by Capes Finance Code 001 and #88881.187933/2018-01. TPC is partially funded by National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq - Brazil). The funders had no role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish or preparation of the manuscript.(AU)

Objetivo: o presente ensaio clínico randomizado de dois braços de equivalência comparou a taxa de sobrevivência e a perda óssea marginal de implantes curtos (≤ 6 mm) e implantes convencionais (≥ 8.5 mm) associados à elevação do seio maxilar. Métodos: edêntulos parciais adultos, com estabilidade oclusal e altura óssea intermediária na região do seio maxilar, foram selecionados neste estudo duplo-cego e alocados randomicamente em dois grupos: implante de comprimento convencional associado à elevação do seio maxilar (controle) ou implante curto (teste). Avaliações clínicas e radiográficas foram realizadas logo após a instalação do implante, seis meses e anualmente por até dois anos. A concordância interexaminador foi avaliada através do coeficiente de correlação intraclasse. Os testes ANOVA de uma via, Kaplan-Meier e Log-rank foram utilizados para comparar a sobrevivência do implante e a perda óssea marginal (P<0.05). Resultados: oito implantes curtos e seis implantes de comprimento convencional foram instalados em onze pacientes (média de idade dos pacientes: 47 ± 12.5 anos). As taxas de sobrevivência dos implantes foram de 87,5% para implantes curtos (um implante de 5 mm falhou aos sete meses), e 100% para implantes convencionais, sem diferença estatisticamente significativa entre os grupos (P=0.4). A perda óssea marginal média após um ano foi de 0.30 ±0.62 mm para implantes curtos e 0.21 ±0.36 mm para implantes convencionais (P=0.123). A concordância interexaminador foi de 0.831. Conclusão: a taxa de sobrevivência de implantes curtos e convencionais associados ao seio maxilar foi semelhante após dois anos de acompanhamento. Registro do estudo: Registrado em 27-03-2018 no ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03479333).(AU)

Randomized controlled trial comparing glass fiber posts and cast metal posts.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess the survival and success of glass fiber posts compared to cast metal posts in teeth without ferrule. MATERIAL AND METHODS: An equivalency, prospective, double-blind (patient and outcome evaluator) randomized controlled trial (RCT) with parallel groups was designed to compare the clinical performance of cast metal and glass fiber posts cemented in endodontically treated teeth without ferrule (NCT01461239). Teeth were randomly allocated to the glass fiber or cast-metal post groups. All teeth were restored with single metal-ceramic crowns. Kaplan-Meier analysis with the log-rank test was used to test the success and survival between glass fiber and cast metal posts considering a cut-off value of P = 0.05. The annual failure rates were calculated considering the survival data for all restorations and separated by type of post after five years. RESULTS: A hundred and nineteen patients and 183 posts (72 cast metal posts and 111 glass fiber posts) were analyzed. The median follow-up was 62 months (IQR 37-81). The log-rank test for success (P = 0.26) and survival (P = 0.63) analyses did not present statistically significant differences. The AFR of both posts after 5 years was 1.5%. Considering the posts separately and after 5 years, cast metal posts presented AFR of 1.2% and glass fiber posts AFR of 1.7%. Most failures were in posterior teeth (16/23), 10 failures were classified as root fractures and 5 as post debonding. The follow-up rate was 95.3%. CONCLUSIONS: Glass fiber and cast metal posts showed good and similar clinical performance. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Results of this randomized controlled trial can help dentists to answer how the best technique to rehabilitate endodontically treated teeth with no remaining coronal wall.

CONSORT endorsement improves the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials in dentistry.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to assess if the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) endorsement by journals is associated with improved completeness of reporting of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) in dentistry. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: We searched for RCTs in dentistry indexed/published on PubMed in 2017. Study selection was undertaken by two reviewers independently. Data related to the general characteristics, reports of methodological characteristics, and whether the trial report was published in a journal that endorses the CONSORT Statement were extracted by two reviewers. Descriptive statistics were used to present the data surrounding the general and methodological characteristics of the included studies. We explored differences in the reporting of 12 methodological items between journals that endorsed CONSORT and those that did not. RESULTS: Five hundred and thirty three reports were included. The main area was implant dentistry with 101 articles (18.9%). Most studies had a parallel design (75.8%), performed at a single center (89.3%) and presenting two groups of comparison (75.6%). The median number of sample size was 50 (interquartile range: 31-90). Six of the 12 methodologic items were reported more often for RCTs published in journals that endorsed CONSORT than in journals that did not. CONCLUSION: CONSORT endorsement by journals is linked to improvement in the quality of RCT reports in dentistry.

Failure of miniscrews installed in maxilla and mandible: a systematic review and meta-analysis / Falha de mini-implantes instalados em maxila e mandíbula: uma revisão sistemática e meta-análise

Objective: The aim of this systematic review was to compare the clinical failure rate of orthodontic miniscrews in maxilla and mandible. Material and Methods: Randomized controlled trials of patients in orthodontic treatment, which required miniscrews for orthodontic intervention reporting the failure rate of miniscrews in the maxilla and mandible were searched in Pubmed database. Two authors independently reviewed all identified titles and abstracts for eligibility. Comparison between failures in maxilla and mandible were estimated using pairwise meta-analysis to calculate the relative risk (RR) of failure and the 95% confidence intervals using a random-effect model. The reports of randomized trials were assessed for bias using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. Results: Four studies fulfilled the eligibility criteria. 299 patients with a total of 628 miniscrews installed were included in the analysis. The analysis showed a 0.55 RR (95% CI 0.23­1.29) and I2 = 85%. All studies had an unclear risk of bias regarding to the two following items: allocation concealment, blinding of participants and personnel. All studies had a low risk of bias with regard to incomplete outcome data and selective reporting. The results did not demonstrate statistical difference between risk of failure of miniscrew between maxilla and mandible. Conclusion: The results of the meta-analysis showed that miniscrews installed in maxilla presents reduced risk of failure. A tendency of higher number of failures in mandible was also demonstrated. However, results should be interpreted with caution because of the very low quality of included studies and the differences among methodologies. (AU)

Objetivo: A presente revisão sistemática objetivou comparar a taxa de falha clínica de mini-implantes ortodônticos instalados em maxila e mandíbula. Materiais e Métodos: Ensaios clínicos controlados e randomizados que reportaram a taxa de falha de mini-implantes instalados em maxila e mandíbula de pacientes necessitando tratamento ortodôntico foram pesquisados na base de dados do Pubmed. Dois autores revisaram independentemente os títulos e resumos identificados com base nos critérios de elegibilidade. Comparações entre as falhas na maxila e mandíbula foram estimadas utilizando meta-análise pareada para cálculo do risco relativo (RR) de falha e dos intervalos de confiança de 95%, usando um modelo de efeito aleatório. Os reportes dos estudos incluídos foram avaliados quanto ao risco de viés seguindo os critérios da Cochrane para ensaios clínicos randomizados. Resultados: Quatro estudos preencheram os critérios de elegibilidade. No total, 299 pacientes e 628 mini-implantes instalados foram incluídos na análise. A análise apresentou um RR 0,55 (IC 95% 0,23-1,29) e I2 = 85%. Todos os estudos apresentaram um risco claro de viés em relação aos dois itens seguintes: ocultação de alocação, cegamento dos participantes e profissionais. Todos os estudos apresentaram um baixo risco de viés no que diz respeito a dados de desfecho incompletos e reporte seletivo. Não foi demonstrada diferença estatisticamente significativa entre mini-implantes instalados em maxila e mandíbula. Conclusão: Os resultados da meta-análise demonstraram um menor risco de falhas em mini-implantes instalados na maxila e uma tendência para maior número de falhas na mandíbula. Contudo, os resultados devem ser interpretados com cautela, dadas a baixa qualidade dos estudos incluídos e as diferenças entre suas metodologias (AU)

Influence of Implant Inclination and Prosthetic Abutment Type on the Biomechanics of Implant-Supported Fixed Partial Dentures.

Obtaining parallelism during implant placement is often difficult, leading to inclination of implants. The present study evaluated the stress distribution in 3-unit fixed partial dentures supported by 2 implants with different inclinations and prosthetic abutments. Universal castable long abutments (UCLAs) or tapered abutments were used considering 17° of implant angulation in different directions (mesial, distal, buccal, or lingual). To do so, 3-dimensional finite element models were built and exported to specific analysis software. Forces were applied to the functional cusps. Data were obtained with regard to the maximum principal and von Mises stresses (in MPa). No relevant differences were observed in the stress values in the cortical and cancellous bone nor in the prosthesis with UCLA or tapered abutments. However, a relevant stress reduction in the prosthetic screws of the tilted implant was observed when using UCLA abutments. According to the obtained results, it is possible to suggest that both UCLA or tapered abutments can be used for 3-unit fixed partial dentures when 1 of the implants is tilted. UCLA abutment might lead to less biomechanical problems related to screw loosening or fracture.

Impact of temporomandibular disorders on oral health-related quality of life of institutionalized elderly people / Impacto da disfunção temporomandibular na qualidade de vida relacionada à saúde bucal em idosos institucionalizados

Objective: to assess the characteristics associated withtemporomandibular disorders (TMD) and their impacton oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) of institutionalizedelderly people. Subjects and method: itwas a cross-sectional study performed in 30 private institutionsfor the elderly. The data collected included theTMD questionnaire and clinical evaluation assessed bythe Research Diagnostic Criteria/TemporomandibularDisorders (RDC/TMD), as well as the OHIP-49 questionnairefor OHRQoL. Results: twenty-four institutionsaccepted to participate in the study (n = 375 with 133fit for answering both questionnaires). Considering thecharacteristics, tinnitus was the most frequent symptomreported, while 98.5% of the research participants didnot present myofascial pain. Disc displacement wasobserved in 26.3%, while 93% of individuals did notpresent chronic pain. Severe depression was found in23.3% of the elderly with 24.1% presenting moderatelevels of non-specific physical symptoms, includingpain. Poisson regression analysis showed that the characteristicsreported were associated with a negativeimpact on OHRQoL. Conclusion: the domain-specificanalysis showed that all domains were affected negativelyby TMD characteristics and higher levels of depressionare associated with a negative impact on OHRQoL. (AU)

Objetivo: avaliar as características associadas às disfunções temporomandibulares (DTM) e seu impacto na qualidade de vida relacionada a saúde bucal (OHRQoL) em idosos institucionalizados. Sujeitos e método: este foi um estudo transversal, realizado em trinta instituições privadas de idosos. Os dados coletados incluíram um questionário e uma avaliação clínica de DTM por meio do instrumento Research Diagnostic Criteria/ Temporomandibular Disorders (RDC/TMD) e do questionário OHIP 49 para OHRQoL. Resultados: vinte e quatro instituições autorizaram a realização do estudo, (n = 375 com 133 idosos aptos a responder ambos os questionários). Dentre as características, o agravo mais frequentemente relatado foi a ocorrência de zumbido no ouvido, enquanto 98,5% dos participantes da pesquisa não apresentaram dor miofascial. Deslocamento de disco foi observado em 26,3%, enquanto 93% dos indivíduos não apresentaram dor crônica. Depressão severa foi encontrada em 23,3% dos idosos avaliados, com 24,1% apresentando grau moderado de sintomas físicos não específicos, incluindo dor. Análise da regressão de Poisson apresentou que as características relatadas estiveram associadas a impacto negativo na qualidade de vida relacionada à saúde bucal. Conclusão: realizando a análise por domínios, todos os domínios foram negativamente afetados pelas características da DTM, e os níveis maiores de depressão estão associados a um impacto negativo na OHRQoL. (AU)

Impact of the CONSORT Statement endorsement in the completeness of reporting of randomized clinical trials in restorative dentistry.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess if journal endorsement of the CONSORT Statement is associated with improved completeness of reporting of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in restorative dentistry. MATERIALS AND METHODS: RCTs in restorative dentistry published in two journals that have (Journal of Dentistry and Clinical Oral Investigations) and have not (Operative Dentistry and Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry) endorsed the CONSORT Statement were selected. We compared the completeness of reporting between comparison groups (endorsers versus non-endorsers, before versus after endorsement) using a risk ratio (RR) with a 99% confidence interval for each outcome of CONSORT 2010. Also, the risk of bias of each study was evaluated. RESULTS: The electronic search retrieved a total of 3701 records. After the title and abstract evaluation, 169 full texts were screened and 79 RCTs identified. Considering CONSORT-endorsing journals before and after CONSORT endorsement, six items had effect estimates indicating a relatively higher proportion of completely reported RCTs published after CONSORT endorsement. Considering CONSORT-endorsing journals compared to non-endorsing journals, twelve items indicated a relatively higher proportion of completely reported RCTs published in CONSORT-endorsing journals. In both analyses the overall evidence did not present statistical significance. CONCLUSION: Although CONSORT endorsement has been linked with some improvement in the completeness of RCTs reports in the biomedical literature, this was not reflected in the present analysis confined to restorative dentistry. More innovative and involved approaches to enhancing reported may therefore be required. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Inadequate reporting of randomized controlled trials can produce important consequences for all stakeholders including waste of resources and implication on healthcare decisions. A broad understandment of the use of reporting guidelines is necessary to lead to better results.

Influence of maternal psychological traits on sleep bruxism in children.

BACKGROUND: Sleep bruxism (SB) is a sleep disorder with high incidence in toddlers and may perpetuate to adulthood. The multifactorial etiology of bruxism includes pathophysiologic and psychological factors. AIM: To investigate the relationship between depression, stressful events, and the presence of symptoms of anxiety and depression with SB in children of adolescent mothers. DESIGN: This cross-sectional study nested in a cohort evaluated a sample of 536 mothers and their children aged 24-36 months. Interviews were conducted with mothers. Maternal report of SB was collected. Mother's major depressive disorder was assessed using the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI Plus); Life Events Scale assessed the stressful events; Beck Depression Inventory and Beck Anxiety Inventory investigated the symptoms of depression and anxiety. Poisson regression analysis was applied to assess the association of maternal psychological disorders and stressful events with SB on children. RESULTS: Prevalence of SB was 25.93% (95% CI 22.2-29.7). After adjustments, maternal major depression disorder [PR 1.43 (95% CI 1.06-1.92)] and the presence of stressful events mainly environmental changes [PR 1.47 (95% CI 1.08-2.00)] showed significant association with bruxism in children. CONCLUSION: This study showed a positive association between mother's psychological traits and SB development in their toddlers.

Randomized clinical trial of the influence of impression technique on the fabrication of cast metal posts.

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Direct and indirect techniques are used for intracanal impression and fabrication of cast metal posts. However, whether those techniques affect the accuracy of cast metal posts is unknown. PURPOSE: The purpose of this randomized clinical trial was to evaluate the accuracy of cast metal posts depending on tooth position and impression technique. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Endodontically treated teeth (anterior or posterior) planned to receive cast metal posts and complete crowns were randomized according to impression technique (direct or indirect). Impressions were made by 2 operators, and time for the impression was recorded. All impressions and cast metal posts were photographed to assess any possible differences between techniques in length of the cast metal post. RESULTS: All cast metal posts were shorter than the impressions. The mean reduction for the metal posts was 2.3% for direct in anterior teeth, 5.7% for direct in posterior teeth, 6.3% for indirect in anterior teeth, and 7.2% for indirect in posterior teeth (all P<.05). Statistically significant differences were found between time of technique and tooth position (P=.031), with the direct technique more time consuming than the indirect technique (P<.001) for both tooth positions. For the indirect technique, the impression times for both tooth groups were similar (P=.459). CONCLUSIONS: Both of the intracanal impression techniques resulted in cast posts that were shorter than the impressed post space. The discrepancy was greatest for the indirect technique. Nevertheless, all posts were considered clinically acceptable and were cemented.